Connect with us

ASIA

Stockholm Syndrome: Japan’s Liberal Democratic Party

Published

on

The 79th anniversary of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima was commemorated at a time of heightened fears of nuclear war. Around 150,000 people were killed on 6 August 1945 when the United States mercilessly dropped the bomb with a nuclear warhead called “Little Boy”.

On that painful day, which is remembered as a day of catastrophe for Japan and the whole world, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida refrained from naming the perpetrator. In his speech, Kishida said that nuclear threats from Russia had created an ‘increasingly serious’ environment for nuclear disarmament.

In another statement, Kishida, of the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), expressed his commitment to nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation, while relying on the US extended deterrence, known as the nuclear umbrella, to allay concerns and deter the growing nuclear capabilities of China, North Korea and Russia.

So why is the ‘murderer’ protected?

The LDP is a party that emerged after the American post-war occupation of Japan. After the left-wing parties merged into a single Socialist Party of Japan in 1955, Japanese conservatives, backed by the US CIA, decided to merge the two main conservative parties, the Liberal Party and the Democratic Party of Japan. The new LDP gained the upper hand and oversaw Japan’s economic miracle. It also benefited from an electoral system that favoured rural areas, where the party’s influence was strong. Factions within the party’s big tent competed as regime change came from within. This LDP dominance, known as the “1955 system”, ended in 1993 when a group of powerful LDP figures left the party and formed an alternative coalition government with opposition parties. This unruly coalition dissolved the following year, but not before electoral reform had paved the way for the emergence of the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ), whose victory over the LDP in 2009 was seen as a harbinger of a period of genuine intra-party competition.

The main figure in the aforementioned “1955 system” was Kishi Nobusuke, who was listed as a Class A war criminal after World War II, but whom the US government did not indict or even prosecute, but chose as the best man to lead Japan in a pro-American direction. The Kishi family would now become a name that would shape Japanese politics with the support of the US. Shinzo Abe, who would shape Japanese politics for years to come, followed in his own grandfather Kishi’s footsteps and maintained strong ties with the US. However, in a Japan that could not break free of its traditionalist structure, Abe was the leader of the Japanese people who, as stated in Article 9 of the Constitution, ‘The Japanese people, sincerely desiring international peace based on justice and order, permanently renounce war as a sovereign right of the nation and the threat or use of force to settle international disputes. Accordingly, no army, navy, air force or other armed force shall be maintained. No right of war is recognised for the State”, and he died as a result of an assassination attempt.

1 July 1957 Nobusuke Kishi with his two grandsons Hironobu Abe (in Indian dress) and Shinzo Abe (on his lap)

The US-led policy in Japan sought to change the pacifist defence strategy and legitimise an aggressive policy with constitutional support. After all these attempts were blocked, the eyes were interpreted as a sign that the Japanese “deep state” structure was acting against the US leadership.

Shinzo Abe was one of the strongest proponents of the Indo-Pacific concept. As early as 2007, in a speech to the Indian parliament, he had stressed the importance of the ‘Indo-Pacific’, speaking of the region’s future geopolitical rise and pushing for closer quadrilateral cooperation with the US, Australia and India. In August 2016, in his keynote speech at TICAD VI in Kenya, Prime Minister Abe announced to the world for the first time the concept of a ‘Free and Open Indo-Pacific’. This plan has been interpreted in the region as a geostrategic planning programme entirely in the interests of US ideals. The development that will make this interpretation realistic was confirmed by the “Free and Open Indo-Pacific Strategy” to be announced by US Secretary of State Antony Blinken in 2021. In this statement, the US pointed to the common problem in the region by stating that “a free and open Indo-Pacific means stronger ties within and beyond the region, allowing us to work together as a regional community to solve our common challenges.

Undoubtedly, the People’s Republic of China is the countervailing power to this alliance, which the US calls a ‘common problem’ and of which Japan is the flag bearer. China, which is growing stronger not only in the region but also globally, is seen as a power that will shake US hegemony. At this point, the US is trying to implement the ‘containment of China’ strategy by pursuing joint policies with the governments in the region under its leadership.

Today, Fumio Kishida’s hiding the name of the murderer is actually a strategy to maintain a tradition and policy of his party. The deep function of the US on the states of the region shows us an effect more frightening than the nuclear bomb.

ASIA

Taliban denies Pakistan claims Jaffar Express “terrorists” were in contact with leaders in Afghanistan

Published

on

The recent attack on the Jafar Express passenger train in the Pakistani province of Balochistan by the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA) has sparked a number of reactions, including strong condemnation from the National Resistance Front and some Afghan jihadi organizations. Many people asked for designation of the BLA as a terrorist group.

Pakistan Foreign Ministry spokesman Shafqat Ali Khan said that “India has been involved in terrorism. In the particular attack on Jaffar Express, the terrorists had been in contact with their handlers and ring leaders in Afghanistan.” The statement came a day after the rescue operation for the Jaffar Express attack was completed and all the 33 BLA fighters, who hijacked the Jaffar Express which was carrying over 400 passengers, were killed.

The Pakistani military said that 21 passengers have been killed and the remaining hostages have been freed. And also, four Pakistani security forces killed during the rescue operation in the Mushqaf area of the Bolan district.

Shafqat Ali Khan added that “the terrorists have safe havens in Afghanistan, and Pakistan has repeatedly urged the Afghan interim government to prevent groups like the BLA from using its soil for terrorism.”

Pakistani Director General Inter-Services Public Relations Lieutenant General Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry said that the Jaffar Express incident changed the rules of the game.

“Whoever did this will be hunted down and brought to justice,” he said, adding that the terrorists had nothing to do with Islam, Pakistan and Balochistan. In a statement, the ISPR said that intelligence reports have unequivocally confirmed that the attack was orchestrated and directed by terrorist ring leaders operating from Afghanistan, who were in direct communication with the terrorists throughout the incident.

Taliban urges Pakistan to restrain from irresponsible statement rather resolve their own security issues.

The Taliban Foreign Ministry Spokesman, Abdul Qahar Balki asked Pakistan to refrain from giving irresponsible remarks and instead focus on the security situation and internal issues of the country.

“We categorically reject baseless allegations by a Pakistani army spokesman linking the attack on a passenger train in Balochistan province with Afghanistan, and urge the Pakistani side to focus on resolving their own security and internal problems instead of such irresponsible remarks,” Balkhi added.

Balkhi furthered that “no members of Balouch opposition have presence in Afghanistan, nor have they ever had or have any links with the Islamic Emirate.”

He expressed his saddened by the loss of life of innocents in the incident, lamenting that “sacrificing civilians for political objectives is unjustifiable”.

Baloch struggle against injustices.

The incident came despite the fact that the Baloch struggle against injustices by the Pakistani military began in 1948. These struggles are in response to systematic discrimination, political marginalization, the “kill and dump” policy, and the unjust exploitation of Balochistan’s natural resources.

Given these facts, a fundamental question arises: What is the difference between the oppression of the Pakistani military against the Baloch and the oppression of the same military’s proxy forces in the form of the Taliban against the people of Afghanistan?

“What difference should there be between the BLA and those who have condemned it, to call one a terrorist group and consider themselves legitimate fighters, while both groups have resorted to armed resistance in response to injustice and oppression,” Rahmatullah Nabil former Afghan spy head said.

It seems that condemning the Baloch freedom movement indicates a double policy that can add to the distrust of the narrative of the struggle of these movements. “I think it is essential to address such issues by paying attention to the historical and social roots of the conflicts and responding to them with a fair and impartial approach.”

 

Continue Reading

ASIA

Premier Li calls for accelerated efforts to meet China’s economic goals

Published

on

Chinese Premier Li Qiang has urged officials to do their utmost in the race to achieve key targets, such as maintaining an economic growth rate of around 5%, as set out in the “two sessions” held last week.

“We must improve measures and accelerate their implementation, race against time amidst various uncertainties, and work quickly and proactively,” Li said on Wednesday at a State Council meeting, one day after the conclusion of the annual meetings of China’s top legislative and advisory bodies.

As Beijing outlined a series of policies to boost growth in the face of economic headwinds, Li called on all state institutions to “take the initiative to fulfill their responsibilities and take more positive steps to complete their tasks.”

Although Chinese leaders emphasized their confidence in the future of the world’s second-largest economy, they also highlighted ongoing challenges such as weak domestic demand and intensifying trade frictions with the US during the two sessions.

According to a summary of Wednesday’s meeting reported by Xinhua, Li asked officials to “closely monitor changes in the situation and make good policy preparations to ensure they can be launched in a timely manner and deliver results as soon as possible.”

In his work report last week, Li emphasized that China’s growth target of around 5% for 2025 underscored the leadership’s determination to tackle challenges and achieve results.

While China announced further fiscal stimulus measures during the two sessions, following a package in the last quarter of 2024, it faces uncertainties not only domestically but also externally, particularly due to the trade war with US President Donald Trump.

At Wednesday’s State Council meeting, a work plan was discussed and adopted that clarified the division of key tasks for this year among different departments and emphasized inter-departmental coordination.

According to a separate meeting held by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology on the same day, these tasks include expanding the scale of 5G telecom technology applications and accelerating the development of 6G.

Li Lecheng, the Party Secretary of the Ministry, pledged to continue efforts to upgrade traditional industries, accelerate the digitalization and green transformation of the manufacturing sector, and accelerate the application of artificial intelligence, especially in areas such as electric vehicles, the low-altitude economy, and biomanufacturing.

According to data from the Ministry of Commerce, 1.664 million electric bicycles were sold and replaced nationwide from January 1 to Tuesday, accounting for 120.4% of the total number in 2024.

Meanwhile, the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, a leading state-owned bank, pledged on Wednesday to provide at least 6 trillion yuan (829.2 billion US dollars) in financing to private enterprises over the next three years, Xinhua reported.

Bank Chairman Liao Lin said at an event in Beijing that the aim was to “support businesses to stick to their core businesses” and “help the economy continue to recover and improve.”

Continue Reading

ASIA

Zhao Leji misses key political meetings, citing respiratory infection

Published

on

For the first time in recent history, the head of China’s top legislature was absent from the closing of the parliamentary meeting known as the “two sessions” on Tuesday.

Zhao Leji, 68, the third-ranking official and chairman of the National People’s Congress (NPC), was unable to attend due to a “respiratory infection,” according to his deputy, Li Hongzhong, who presided over the closing ceremony.

Zhao last appeared in public on Saturday at the first meeting of the NPC presidium.

For the first time in decades, not all members of the Politburo Standing Committee attended the closing meeting of the NPC.

However, Zhao’s name was mentioned when Li announced the voting results of the NPC’s annual work report.

“The deputies of the NPC listened to and reviewed the work report presented by Chairman Zhao Leji on behalf of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress. The session fully approved the work of the Standing Committee over the past year, agreed with the tasks proposed in the report for the coming year, and decided to approve the report,” Li said.

According to Li, the work report was approved by an overwhelming majority.

Chinese President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Qiang both appeared relieved as they left the stage after the ceremony concluded.

For the first time since the pandemic, Covid-19 tests were not required to attend the two sessions.

Zhao was also absent from the closing of the annual session of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC) on Monday, which was attended by the other six members of the Politburo Standing Committee, including President Xi.

Since the 1980s, it has become a political norm for all top leaders of the ruling party to attend the opening and closing ceremonies of the annual NPC and CPPCC sessions as a political endorsement of the national legislative and political advisory sessions.

The annual event also serves as a platform for party and government leaders to hear the views of non-party Chinese elites on China’s most pressing issues.

In addition to missing the closing of the CPPCC, Zhao also did not attend two meetings of the NPC’s presidium on Monday, which are usually overseen by the NPC chairman. Instead, state news agency Xinhua said that NPC Vice Chairman Li Hongzhong was “entrusted by Zhao Leji” to preside over the two meetings.

At the meeting where Zhao last appeared in public on March 8 at the NPC presidium, it was decided to submit the draft decision on the amendment of the Deputies Law and the draft revisions to the government work report and the central and local government budgets to the NPC for consideration.

Zhao, who was promoted to the Politburo Standing Committee in 2017, served as secretary of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection, the party’s top anti-corruption and political discipline body, until 2022, succeeding Wang Qishan.

At the 20th Party Congress in 2022, he was reappointed to the Politburo Standing Committee, becoming the third-ranking member. In March 2023, he was appointed chairman of the NPC Standing Committee, succeeding Li Zhanshu.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey