Connect with us

ASIA

Stockholm Syndrome: Japan’s Liberal Democratic Party

Published

on

The 79th anniversary of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima was commemorated at a time of heightened fears of nuclear war. Around 150,000 people were killed on 6 August 1945 when the United States mercilessly dropped the bomb with a nuclear warhead called “Little Boy”.

On that painful day, which is remembered as a day of catastrophe for Japan and the whole world, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida refrained from naming the perpetrator. In his speech, Kishida said that nuclear threats from Russia had created an ‘increasingly serious’ environment for nuclear disarmament.

In another statement, Kishida, of the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), expressed his commitment to nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation, while relying on the US extended deterrence, known as the nuclear umbrella, to allay concerns and deter the growing nuclear capabilities of China, North Korea and Russia.

So why is the ‘murderer’ protected?

The LDP is a party that emerged after the American post-war occupation of Japan. After the left-wing parties merged into a single Socialist Party of Japan in 1955, Japanese conservatives, backed by the US CIA, decided to merge the two main conservative parties, the Liberal Party and the Democratic Party of Japan. The new LDP gained the upper hand and oversaw Japan’s economic miracle. It also benefited from an electoral system that favoured rural areas, where the party’s influence was strong. Factions within the party’s big tent competed as regime change came from within. This LDP dominance, known as the “1955 system”, ended in 1993 when a group of powerful LDP figures left the party and formed an alternative coalition government with opposition parties. This unruly coalition dissolved the following year, but not before electoral reform had paved the way for the emergence of the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ), whose victory over the LDP in 2009 was seen as a harbinger of a period of genuine intra-party competition.

The main figure in the aforementioned “1955 system” was Kishi Nobusuke, who was listed as a Class A war criminal after World War II, but whom the US government did not indict or even prosecute, but chose as the best man to lead Japan in a pro-American direction. The Kishi family would now become a name that would shape Japanese politics with the support of the US. Shinzo Abe, who would shape Japanese politics for years to come, followed in his own grandfather Kishi’s footsteps and maintained strong ties with the US. However, in a Japan that could not break free of its traditionalist structure, Abe was the leader of the Japanese people who, as stated in Article 9 of the Constitution, ‘The Japanese people, sincerely desiring international peace based on justice and order, permanently renounce war as a sovereign right of the nation and the threat or use of force to settle international disputes. Accordingly, no army, navy, air force or other armed force shall be maintained. No right of war is recognised for the State”, and he died as a result of an assassination attempt.

1 July 1957 Nobusuke Kishi with his two grandsons Hironobu Abe (in Indian dress) and Shinzo Abe (on his lap)

The US-led policy in Japan sought to change the pacifist defence strategy and legitimise an aggressive policy with constitutional support. After all these attempts were blocked, the eyes were interpreted as a sign that the Japanese “deep state” structure was acting against the US leadership.

Shinzo Abe was one of the strongest proponents of the Indo-Pacific concept. As early as 2007, in a speech to the Indian parliament, he had stressed the importance of the ‘Indo-Pacific’, speaking of the region’s future geopolitical rise and pushing for closer quadrilateral cooperation with the US, Australia and India. In August 2016, in his keynote speech at TICAD VI in Kenya, Prime Minister Abe announced to the world for the first time the concept of a ‘Free and Open Indo-Pacific’. This plan has been interpreted in the region as a geostrategic planning programme entirely in the interests of US ideals. The development that will make this interpretation realistic was confirmed by the “Free and Open Indo-Pacific Strategy” to be announced by US Secretary of State Antony Blinken in 2021. In this statement, the US pointed to the common problem in the region by stating that “a free and open Indo-Pacific means stronger ties within and beyond the region, allowing us to work together as a regional community to solve our common challenges.

Undoubtedly, the People’s Republic of China is the countervailing power to this alliance, which the US calls a ‘common problem’ and of which Japan is the flag bearer. China, which is growing stronger not only in the region but also globally, is seen as a power that will shake US hegemony. At this point, the US is trying to implement the ‘containment of China’ strategy by pursuing joint policies with the governments in the region under its leadership.

Today, Fumio Kishida’s hiding the name of the murderer is actually a strategy to maintain a tradition and policy of his party. The deep function of the US on the states of the region shows us an effect more frightening than the nuclear bomb.

ASIA

Syria will not follow Afghanistan’s Taliban model of governance

Published

on

In an astonishing statement, Ahmed Shará, also known as Abu Mohamad Jolani, the leader of the Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) said that he will allow the girls to go to schools and will not turn Syria like Afghanistan under the rule of the Taliban.

Jolani, the de facto ruler of Syria, said that he will distance himself from the Taliban’s strict policies on women’s rights, and said that Syria will not follow the Taliban’s mode of governance.  

Jolani, who brought down the government of Bashar al-Assad and also widely welcomed by the Taliban, said that he believes in the education of women and girls and will not make Syria like Afghanistan.

“Syria is a diverse society with various ideas, unlike Afghanistan, which is more tribal. The Afghan model cannot be applied here,” Jolani told a BBC reporter.

Jolani says that Syria is a diverse society with various ideas, unlike Afghanistan, which is more tribal.

Jolani’s comment came when the Taliban congratulated the HTS-led victory by Jolani over Assad’s regime after years of fighting. The Afghan Foreign Ministry celebrated Jolani’s victory through a statement and hoped Jolani can bring peace and stability in the country.

“It is hoped that the power transition process is advanced in a manner that lays the foundation of a sovereign and serve-oriented Islamic government in the line with the aspiration of the Syrian people; that unifies the entire population without discrimination and retribution through adoption of a general assembly; and a positive foreign policy with world countries the safeguard Syria from a threat of negative rivalries of foreign actors and creates conditions for the return of millions of refugees,” the statement by Taliban Foreign Ministry.

However, Jolan’s position on the rights of women and girls is in great contrast with the current view of the Taliban leadership. Women and girls have been banned from education and work since the return of the Taliban in August 2021, following the collapse of the Republic System and withdrawal of the US troops from Afghanistan. Girls and women are even banned from medical institutions and visiting public spaces.

Jolani says he has a plan to create a government based institution and a council chosen by the people. 

The situation got worse when the Taliban’s Ministry for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice called women’s voices “immodest” compounding their exclusion from public life. This year, it has been marked as three years since girls were banned from pursuing education over sixth grade. Besides that, on December 20, 2022, the Taliban’s Ministry of Higher Education announced that women would be barred from attending public and private universities.    

In an interview with CNN, Jolani said that he has a plan to create a government based on institutions and a “council chosen by the people.”

“When we talk about objectives, the goal of the revolution remains the overthrow of this regime. It is our right to use all available means to achieve that goal,” said Jolani.

“The seeds of the regime’s defeat have always been within it… the Iranians attempted to revive the regime, buying it time, and later the Russians also tried to prop it up. But the truth remains: this regime is dead.”

Moreover, he also said the Syrian people are the “rightful owners” of the country after the ouster of Assad, and declared a “new history” has been written for the entire Middle East.

Continue Reading

ASIA

Yoon summoned again for questioning on treason charges

Published

on

A joint law enforcement team investigating South Korea’s martial law case announced on Friday that it has issued a second summons to ousted President Yoon Suk Yeol, requesting his presence for questioning next week. The inquiry concerns his alleged involvement in the failed implementation of martial law.

The team has scheduled the questioning for 10:00 a.m. next Wednesday at the Corruption Investigation Office for Senior Officials (CIO) headquarters in Gwacheon, located just south of Seoul. This marks the second summons after Yoon refused to cooperate with the initial notice earlier this week.

The decision to hold the questioning on a public holiday appears to be a strategic move by the CIO, likely aimed at addressing security concerns. The office confirmed that the summonses were delivered via express mail and electronically to both Yoon’s residence and the presidential office in Yongsan. Notably, after Yoon’s team refused to accept the first subpoena, the CIO opted against delivering the documents in person for this round.

The investigation focuses on Yoon’s role in the December 3 martial law declaration, which he revoked following a vote in the National Assembly. If Yoon continues to disregard the summons without valid justification, the CIO may seek a court order to detain him for up to 48 hours.

Yoon faces allegations of sedition and abuse of office, charges that have gained traction since his dismissal by parliament last Saturday. His suspension from office remains in effect pending a decision by the Constitutional Court, which will determine whether he is permanently removed or reinstated.

Continue Reading

ASIA

Xi Jinping champions economic diversification during Macau visit

Published

on

During a three-day visit to Macau commemorating the 25th anniversary of its return to Chinese sovereignty from Portugal, President Xi Jinping emphasized the importance of economic diversification and maintaining the “one country, two systems” framework.

Speaking at the swearing-in ceremony for Macau’s new Chief Executive Officer, Sam Hou-fai, Xi urged the administration to make economic diversification the city’s primary focus. Sam, the fourth leader since the 1999 handover and the first mainland-born Chinese official to hold the position, is expected to align closely with Beijing’s objectives to reduce Macau’s reliance on gambling. The gambling industry, which accounts for approximately 80% of Macau’s tax revenue, has been the cornerstone of its rapid economic growth in recent years.

“Macau should prioritize proper economic diversification,” Xi stated, calling for enhanced policy support and investment in emerging sectors. He also reiterated the significance of the “one country, two systems” principle, stressing its role in ensuring the city’s “prosperity and stability” for the long term.

Xi’s visit included stops at the Macau University of Science and Technology, where he explored laboratories focusing on traditional Chinese medicine and planetary science. He also attended a cultural performance at the Macau Dome and met with local stakeholders, according to Chinese state media. His trip marked a shift in tone, with Anthony Lawrence, founder of Intelligence Macau, noting that it was the first time Xi publicly praised Macau for its progress rather than delivering critiques or instructions.

Since the liberalization of Macau’s gaming monopoly in 2002, the city has attracted significant foreign investment, including from prominent US casino operators such as Las Vegas Sands, MGM, and Wynn Resorts. However, the economy struggled during the COVID-19 pandemic due to travel restrictions, and recovery has only recently begun.

On Friday, Macau’s casinos were bustling with visitors, while non-gaming initiatives like a stamp exhibition co-organized by MGM China and Beijing’s Palace Museum showcased the city’s efforts to diversify its offerings.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey