Connect with us

Asia

Surge in violence against journalists; Will this change in 2024

Published

on

Afghanistan has been considered as one of the most dangerous countries in the world for journalists. In its latest report, the Reporters Without Borders has assessed Afghanistan, Vietnam, and Russia as the most dangerous countries to be a journalist.

In Afghanistan, where once freedom of expression was considered as the most valuable achievement of the past 20 years, has now been under immense suppression as the current Taliban government has restricted their movements.

It has been said that even the Taliban check the headline of news bulletins of local tv stations before they start their broadcast.

A reporter speaking to Harici from Kabul, said that he has been working in a local tv station for five years and recently he tweeted about poverty in Afghanistan. “After the tweet, I received a call from a Taliban official and ordered me to remove the tweet,” he said.

Speaking on condition of anonymity, he said that the Taliban had established a committee to observe the local media outlets and other Afghan journalists active in YouTube.

The media watchdog also reported that free media in Afghanistan have faced severe suppression and the Taliban continue arresting journalists on charges of espionage.

The Reporters Without Borders also documented at least 21 cases of journalist arrests in Afghanistan in 2023, stating that three journalists are still under the captivity of the Taliban.

Three journalists are still under the captivity of Taliban

The report said that countries like Vietnam, Russia and Afghanistan are at the top of the list of the countries that are dangerous for journalists due to their strict environments such as intolerance toward freedom of expression and insecurity as well as unacceptance of revealing critical content.

At least 779 journalists have been detained for at least a short period of time, according to the report, in which among them 547 journalists are still in prison in various countries worldwide.

The Afghanistan Journalists Center (AJC) had also stated in its annual report on the situation of Afghan journalists in 2023, stating that they have recorded 168 cases of violations of journalist’s rights in the country.

One reporter was killed and 19 journalists were wounded, according to the AJC report, while it also recorded 78 cases of threats and 61 cases of arrest of journalists in 2023.

Meanwhile, AJC said that the record cases of violation of the rights of journalists shows a decrease compared to 260 events recorded in 2022.

A Kabul-based journalist, Rasul Khalili said that journalists should lodge a complaint through commission of media violation and inform the authority in case there is any serious issue. He also called on the Taliban leadership to investigate all cases of violence against journalists and urged them to provide a safe environment to carry their jobs.

Journalists are not a target

“Journalists are civilians. We are ordinary people. Journalists’ work is to connect people to the government and convey people’s problems to the government. We are just servants of society. We help the government to get to know what is happening in the society,” he said.

He also called on the Taliban to increase access to information and urged the leadership to help improve the economic situation of the media organizations.

Meanwhile, the Taliban rejected AJC’s report and said that detention of the journalists has not been due to their media related activities.

Taliban spokesman Zabiullah Mujahid said that no media has been restricted or come under any sort of pressure and claimed that all media outlets are operating actively and freely in Afghanistan.

He said that some cases happened in 2023 and that was due to violations. “There was some arrest of journalists for some criminal activities or legal cases. These detentions were temporary and it has never been permanently,” he added.

At least 220 media organizations were closed since the return of the Taliban to power on 15 August 2021. At the same time around 86 TV channels, 257 radio stations and 46 printing media organizations are currently active in Afghanistan.

Taliban institutions, including the Intelligence Directorate and the Ministry of Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice, execute restrictive orders. The establishment of a commission to address complaints and violations by the media has not yielded tangible success and, in some instances, contributed to violations of journalists’ and media rights, , according to the AJC report.

Media watchdog asks cancellation of extralegal media guidelines

The AJC called on the Taliban to cease serious violations of journalists and media rights in the country. They urge the cancellation of extralegal media guidelines, the enforcement of media laws, and the previous government’s access to information law.

This report comes at a time when the Taliban, since their takeover, has imposed significant restrictions on the work of journalists and media, leading to the detention, beating, and imprisonment of journalists. In the latest incident, the group sentenced Sultan-Ali Jawadi, the editor-in-chief of Radio Nasim in Daikundi, to one year in prison on charges of “propagating against the system and working for foreign media.

Asia

South Korea emerges as major beneficiary of shifts in global arms market

Published

on

Uncertainty in the global arms market, driven by the United States reassessing its relationships with allies and a broad rearmament drive across many countries, is creating major commercial opportunities for South Korea. According to an analysis published by Politico, Seoul has become the world’s fastest-growing supplier of military equipment.

The report said that large-scale conflicts around the world have created urgent demand for weapons as countries seek both to support allies and strengthen their own defenses against potential future confrontations. At the same time, changes in the US role within the global arms market have opened new opportunities for South Korean manufacturers. Statements and policy decisions by US President Donald Trump regarding NATO have led allies to question Washington’s reliability in times of crisis, increasing uncertainty across the global market. In addition, the diversion of a large share of US weapons supplies to the Middle East because of ongoing conflicts has placed further strain on already overstretched supply chains.

European countries increase purchases from South Korea

Faced with what Politico described as the Trump administration’s more distant approach toward allies, European countries in particular have accelerated arms purchases from South Korea. The publication noted that Seoul’s growing influence as a supplier has been driven largely by major defense contracts signed with Poland.

Following the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine, several Eastern European capitals, including Warsaw, transferred portions of their military inventories to Kyiv, relying on German support to replenish their arsenals. However, Berlin’s slow pace in replacing allied stockpiles generated frustration across the region.

South Korea emerged as an alternative supplier during this period and became a reliable source of military equipment for Eastern European countries. Poland became Seoul’s largest customer through a $13.7 billion agreement covering the purchase of tanks, rocket launchers, self-propelled howitzers and other military equipment.

“We were originally preparing against North Korea, but now we are ready to provide these solutions to customers around the world,” said Choo Hyung-kim, head of the Security Management Institute, a defense analysis organization affiliated with South Korea’s National Assembly.

Lack of political baggage gives Seoul an advantage

Politico reported that one of the greatest advantages enjoyed by South Korean defense companies is the absence of the “political baggage” associated with major arms exporters such as the United States, China, Russia and Israel.

According to the figures cited, the combined projected revenue of South Korea’s largest defense companies, including Hanwha Group, Hyundai Rotem, LIG Nex1 and Korea Aerospace Industries, is expected to reach approximately $37 billion in 2026. That would represent a fourfold increase from their combined revenues in 2021.

Meanwhile, an official from the office of former South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol told the Yonhap news agency in 2024 that the scale of any weapons shipments to Ukraine would depend on Russia’s approach to its relationship with North Korea. Seoul later clarified that it had no plans to provide ammunition directly to Ukraine.

Continue Reading

Asia

DeepSeek raises $7.4 billion in funding round, surpasses $50 billion valuation

Published

on

Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek has raised more than 50 billion yuan ($7.4 billion) in its first funding round. According to Reuters, citing The Information, the company’s valuation has surpassed $50 billion.

The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported that the capital will be used to support the costly development of advanced artificial intelligence technologies.

According to the newspaper, citing sources familiar with the matter, investors valued the company at more than $50 billion. The valuation makes DeepSeek the most valuable AI startup in China.

DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng reportedly owned about 90% of the company before the funding round. Liang is said to have contributed roughly $3 billion during the fundraising process, making him the largest participant in the round.

According to Reuters, the transaction was structured in an unusual way that allows Liang to retain control of the company.

Rather than investing directly in DeepSeek, investors were required to invest through a limited partnership managed by a senior executive of the startup. Under the arrangement, investors were not granted voting rights. The report also said restrictions were placed on the use of invested funds for a period of five years.

The sole exception was the China National Artificial Intelligence Industry Investment Fund. The fund reportedly invested approximately $150 million directly in DeepSeek, allowing it to retain both voting rights and full discretion over its stake.

Other major investors in the funding round included Tencent, which invested approximately $1.5 billion, and Contemporary Amperex Technology, which invested about $740 million.

Bloomberg previously described the transaction as one of the largest fundraising rounds undertaken by a Chinese startup. According to the agency, the investment marks a new stage in the efforts of leading Chinese AI companies to compete with their US rivals.

DeepSeek told prospective investors that it would prioritize foundational and transformative AI research over short-term commercialization.

Based in the Chinese city of Hangzhou, DeepSeek emerged as one of Beijing’s most prominent AI companies after unveiling a more powerful and lower-cost model more than a year ago. The WSJ reported that interest surrounding the company has accelerated AI adoption in China and increased investor appetite for domestic startups.

Liang Wenfeng has previously said he intends to continue developing open-source AI models and ultimately aims to achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI). According to Bloomberg, the strategy continues an approach that has contributed to the spread of open models and influenced companies across China’s AI market, including Alibaba’s Qwen platform.

Bloomberg added that while global rivals such as OpenAI and Anthropic are exploring public offerings and revenue-generation strategies, DeepSeek has maintained its “research first” approach.

Continue Reading

Asia

China issues white paper on global governance reform, urging support for UN-centered international system

Published

on

China’s State Council Information Office on Wednesday released a white paper titled “A More Just and Equitable Global Governance: China’s Principles, Proposals and Actions.”

The white paper was issued to introduce China’s principles, proposals, and actions regarding global governance, to foster a broader consensus within the international community, to enable more effective responses to global challenges, and to build a more just and equitable global governance system.

The document states that global governance is a common endeavor concerning the well-being of all humanity, and that building a just and equitable global governance system is a shared vision long pursued by people around the world. It also emphasizes that China has always been an active participant, contributor, and builder of global governance.

According to the white paper, in the new era, Chinese President Xi Jinping has put forward the vision of building a community with a shared future for mankind. Advancing a global governance system shaped on the basis of extensive consultation, joint contribution, and shared benefits, Xi has called for true multilateralism to promote an equal and orderly multipolar world and an economic globalization that is inclusive and beneficial for all.

In 2025, Xi proposed the Global Governance Initiative (GGI). This initiative was designed to offer China’s solutions to two urgent questions of the era: What kind of global governance system should be established, and how should global governance be reformed and improved?

The white paper notes that shortly after its introduction, the GGI received support from approximately 160 countries and international organizations, with more than 60 countries joining the Group of Friends of the Global Governance Initiative. It states that the international community is of the view that the GGI sends a clear message: to defend multilateralism, join forces, and strive for a just future.

According to the white paper, the GGI aligns with the growing trend toward greater democracy in international relations and strengthens international confidence in the practice of multilateralism. The initiative provides a clear and actionable roadmap for the improvement of global governance, injecting valuable stability and positive energy into a turbulent world.

The white paper emphasizes that China proposed the GGI to accelerate the construction of a more just and equitable global governance system. The document states that firmly defending the authority and status of the United Nations is of fundamental importance for the effective implementation of this initiative.

According to the white paper, success will also depend on major countries acting with a sense of responsibility and all nations working together in unity to bridge deficits in peace and development. It states that rather than attempting to reinvent the wheel, all countries must firmly defend the international system with the UN at its core, maintain the international order based on international law, and uphold the fundamental norms of international relations based on the purposes and principles of the UN Charter.

In addition to the preface and conclusion, the white paper consists of five chapters: “Today’s World Faces Severe and Complex Challenges,” “The Global Governance Initiative Responds to the Challenges of Our Era,” “China’s Contribution to the Development of Global Governance,” “Directing the Course of Change Toward a Bright Future,” and “Advancing Hand in Hand at a Critical Juncture in History.”

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey