Middle East
Syrian government forces withdraw from Suwayda amid Israeli airstrikes
Following Israeli airstrikes on Damascus, Syrian government forces have begun to withdraw from Suwayda.
The Syrian government announced that it has started to withdraw army units from the city of Suwayda and has agreed to completely halt its military operations there. However, some Druze leaders have opposed this agreement, while Israel has stated it will continue to “protect the Druze.”
The announcement came after US Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated that the parties involved in the sectarian clashes in Suwayda, ongoing since the weekend, had “agreed on concrete steps” for a ceasefire.
In a statement on Wednesday, Rubio said, “The parties in Suwayda have agreed on concrete steps that will end this terrible and disturbing situation tonight. All parties must fulfill the commitments they have made, and we expect them to do so.”
Rubio had previously claimed that the clashes between the Israeli and Syrian governments stemmed from a “misunderstanding.”
According to the new ceasefire agreement published by the Syrian Ministry of Interior, “all military operations will be immediately and completely halted,” and a committee composed of government officials and Druze religious leaders will oversee the implementation of the agreement.
The Syrian Ministry of Defense reported that it “has begun to withdraw from the city of Suwayda to implement the terms of the agreement, following the end of the sweeping operation against illegal groups in the city.”
The statement did not include any information about the withdrawal of other security forces stationed in the city.
He appeared before the cameras for the first time
Syria’s interim President, Ahmed al-Shara, appeared before the cameras for the first time since the Israeli attacks, stating that security responsibility in Suwayda would be transferred to religious leaders and some local groups in line with “supreme national interests.”
Al-Shara said, “The perpetrators of violations and attacks against our Druze people will be brought to justice. The Druze are under the protection and responsibility of the state.”
Before the government intervention, Druze areas were largely controlled by the community’s own fighters. Addressing the Druze people, al-Shara stated, “You are a fundamental part of this nation… Protecting your rights and freedom is one of our priorities.”
Al-Shara said that diplomatic initiatives by the US, Arab countries, and Türkiye prevented the conflict from escalating: “Without American, Arab, and Turkish mediation, the region could have been dragged into an unknown disaster.” It was not specified which Arab countries acted as mediators.
10-point ceasefire
In a video broadcast by Syrian state television, Sheikh Yusuf al-Jarbu, one of the country’s three main Druze spiritual leaders, read the 10-point text of the ceasefire. This text also included the “full integration of the Suwayda province into the Syrian state.”
According to the ceasefire text, civilians and their property will not be harmed. This clause is particularly significant following testimonies and reports of violations such as alleged executions and looting carried out by government forces and their allies in recent days.
It also states that a joint committee of Druze and regime officials will investigate “crimes and legal violations” in the region. The text also includes the release of everyone detained during the events.
Some Druze groups oppose the agreement
However, shortly after the ceasefire announcement, Druze leader Sheikh Hikmat al-Hijri rejected the ceasefire. In a statement, al-Hijri said: “There can be no agreement or negotiation with these armed groups that call themselves a government.”
Al-Hijri called on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, US President Donald Trump, and “everyone influential” to “save Suwayda.”
The “Men of Dignity Movement,” one of the two largest Druze armed groups in the region, also stated, “Any agreement that does not include the full withdrawal of the occupying forces is unacceptable.” A post on Facebook included the following statement: “We will continue to fight until the occupiers withdraw from all the villages and towns they have defiled.”
Death toll in Suwayda exceeds 350
The Israeli army announced that it is continuing its airstrikes against Syrian government forces in the Suwayda region and released footage of the attacks. The army announced that the targets of the attacks included armored vehicles, pickup trucks equipped with machine guns, army positions, weapons depots, and other military targets.
The UK-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR) reported this morning that the death toll has exceeded 350. According to AFP, citing SOHR, 79 Druze fighters and 55 civilians have been killed so far in the clashes that erupted on Sunday. Of these civilians, 27 were killed in “extrajudicial executions” by elements of the Syrian Ministry of Defense and Ministry of Interior. Additionally, 189 defense and interior personnel and 18 Bedouin fighters were killed in the clashes.
It was announced that a press worker named Hassan al-Zaabi was also among those killed in Suwayda.
The UK-based organization also reported that 15 defense and interior ministry personnel were killed in Israeli airstrikes in southern Syria.
In footage shared on social media, pro-government militants were seen forcibly shaving the mustaches of Druze sheikhs and trampling on Druze flags and photos of religious leaders. In other footage, Druze fighters were recorded beating captured regime soldiers and posing over their bodies. AP reporters saw burned and looted houses in the area.
Israel continued attacks during ceasefire talks
Meanwhile, despite the ceasefire talks, Israel continued its attacks on Syrian government forces and reiterated that it would defend the Druze.
Israeli Chief of General Staff, General Eyal Zamir, visited the Syrian border on Wednesday evening and, in an assessment with soldiers, made the following statement: “We are acting with determination to prevent the establishment of enemy elements across the border, to protect Israeli citizens, and to prevent harm to the Druze.”
‘We will not remain silent in the face of attacks’
Speaking at a memorial ceremony for Zionist leader Theodor Herzl, Israeli President Isaac Herzog stated that Israel cannot remain indifferent to a jihadist threat across its border, saying: “Israel will not remain silent when there is a possibility of a jihadist threat across the border. Israel will also not remain silent when the Druze community, which it considers its own and a part of itself, is under attack and facing the danger of a massacre.”
Middle East
Israel military weighs legal steps against Gaza documentary makers
Israel’s Chief of General Staff, Eyal Zamir, has instructed officials to examine criminal and legal steps against the production team of the documentary “NAZA”, which focuses on testimonies from soldiers and intelligence personnel who served in Gaza operations.
While Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu targeted the production, describing it as “unacceptable”, more than 200 Israeli filmmakers published a joint statement backing the directors.
Maintaining that the documentary slandered the military, Chief of General Staff Zamir asserted that the work had no intention of uncovering the truth.
“In light of the available data, this production is not a work that constructively criticises the military,” Zamir said. “On the contrary, it relies on blood libels, a deliberate distortion of the reality on the ground, and baseless accusations directed at our soldiers and commanders.”
Zamir further claimed that the military was presented as an entity acting unlawfully and that the arguments of anti-Israel circles were adapted for the film.
The Israeli military is establishing a new multidisciplinary, inter-agency working group involving domestic and international experts to counter such allegations.
Meanwhile, the military’s most senior legal official, Itai Ofir, is reviewing the legal procedures that could be initiated against the documentary’s producers.
The military leadership contends that the testimonies lack credibility because the identities, ranks, and operational details of the personnel interviewed in the film were concealed.
Rejecting the assertion that targets were selected by artificial intelligence, military officials stated that all strikes and target approvals were decided by human hands within the framework of military directives.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reacted to the production in a video message shared on Telegram.
“This situation is appalling,” Netanyahu said, voicing his reaction. “While resisting antisemitic incitement conducted globally, it is unacceptable for a similar approach to arise from within ourselves. Two Israeli directors presenting the Israeli military as war criminals are being applauded at the Venice Film Festival.”
The 80-minute production was awarded the Special Jury Prize at the 83rd Venice International Film Festival and received a 25-minute standing ovation in the auditorium at the end of the screening.
In reactions emerging from the cabinet, Minister of Culture and Sports Miki Zohar accused directors Yuval Abraham and Rachel Szor of “high treason”.
“The self-hatred displayed by these producers, who risk harming their own country to win the praise of antisemitic circles worldwide, is beyond comprehension,” Zohar said. Announcing that he would launch an initiative to revoke the directors’ citizenship, Zohar stated that direct accusations of treason could be brought against the individuals.
Far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir also addressed the directors, stating: “You are a source of shame for the entire people of Israel. Get out of here.” Under current Israeli legislation, the culture minister does not have the authority to unilaterally revoke citizenship; decisions in this direction can be made only as a result of legal processes involving the Ministry of Interior and judicial bodies.
Following the mounting backlash, more than 200 Israeli filmmakers, including Ari Folman, Shlomi Elkabetz, Ran Tal, and Michal Aviad, signed a joint declaration of solidarity. The text emphasised that “the primary duty of art and the profession of journalism is to hold up a mirror to the society from which it arises.”
Produced in partnership with The Guardian and JW Films, “NAZA” conveys testimonies from 24 military and intelligence personnel whose identities were kept concealed and who took part in surveillance, targeting, and air strike decisions in Gaza.
Deriving its name from a Hebrew military acronym that designates the number of civilians expected to lose their lives during an operation and corresponds to the concept of “collateral damage”, the film documents that targets were determined using artificial intelligence and mass surveillance networks.
Describing high-tech weaponry and AI-assisted targeting mechanisms, one interviewed soldier made the comparison: “Because everything runs on remote control, the process resembles a video game.”
Another soldier described the deaths on the ground as “unbelievably fun”.
Director Yuval Abraham said: “The intelligence personnel we interviewed stated that the mass deaths were not an accident, but on the contrary rested upon a designed and systematic choice.”
Abraham and Szor stated that the production did not scrutinise individual soldier violations, but directly examined the institutional chain of command and operational doctrines.
The two directors had previously made the Oscar-winning documentary “No Other Land”, which addressed the displacement of Palestinians and settler violence in the occupied West Bank, alongside Palestinian filmmakers Basel Adra and Hamdan Ballal.
While the Ministry of Health in Gaza announced that the number of Palestinians who have lost their lives in the attacks exceeded 73,700, the actual death toll is projected to be far above this figure due to destroyed healthcare infrastructure and casualties lost beneath the rubble.
Middle East
Saudi Arabia asks UK for military aid to counter Houthis in Yemen
British Prime Minister Andy Burnham is considering responding to requests for military assistance directed at Yemen from the Saudi Arabian government.
According to sources speaking to Bloomberg, the prime minister has received various requests for diplomatic and military support from Saudi Arabia.
The sources stated that Saudi Arabia’s requests include providing operational support to its military to repel the advance of Ansarullah (the Houthis) along Yemen’s Red Sea coast towards the strategically vital Bab el-Mandeb Strait, as well as assistance in defending against attacks on oil infrastructure.
Under pressure to take action because of the economic difficulties generated by the war with Iran, Burnham is also concerned about creating the impression that he supports Donald Trump’s war against Iran, given that the UK public overwhelmingly opposes the war.
Reports had emerged that Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman asked Donald Trump to conduct air strikes against the Yemeni resistance.
At present, the UK has approved the deployment of only British military advisers to Saudi Arabia.
This comes despite Saudi Arabia’s request for operational support to halt operations carried out by Yemeni forces along the coastline.
Former UK prime ministers Rishi Sunak and Keir Starmer had provided more comprehensive support to Saudi Arabia against the Yemeni resistance.
The prime minister was also warned by UK officials that the Bab el-Mandeb Strait is of vital importance to global maritime transport and the economy, and that the capture of this strait by the Houthis must be prevented.
Earlier on Monday, Bloomberg reported that Saudi Arabia was seeking to increase the volume of oil shipments transiting the Strait of Hormuz after shutting down its East-West crude pipeline.
Middle East
Saudi exportable crude stocks risk depletion within a week
Saudi Arabia risks exhausting its exportable crude stockpiles if the East-West pipeline to the Red Sea fails to resume operations, according to reports.
Citing companies purchasing Saudi crude as well as market traders, the Reuters news agency reported that such an outcome could trigger a severe contraction in global oil supply.
Oil flows through the pipeline were halted following drone strikes. The government in Riyadh has not yet issued an official statement regarding the extent of the damage or the expected duration of repair works.
Sources familiar with the matter have offered differing estimates regarding the repair timetable.
One source speaking to Reuters noted that works could take five to six weeks, while another source stated that the damage could be repaired more quickly and that partial oil flows could be restored before repairs are entirely completed.
Stocks at Yanbu port reach critical threshold
Traversing the Arabian Peninsula to the Red Sea port of Yanbu, the pipeline carries approximately 4 million barrels of oil per day. This volume represents roughly 4% of global oil supply.
The line previously provided Saudi Arabia with an alternative export route, bypassing the Strait of Hormuz where maritime traffic has faced disruptions due to regional conflict in the Middle East.
Three sources closely tracking shipment schedules indicated that, following the stoppage, oil reserves at Yanbu port would suffice to sustain exports for only five to seven days.
A fourth source stated that additional reserves held in Egypt at the Red Sea port of Ain Sokhna and the Mediterranean terminal of Sidi Kerir afford buyers shipments for several more days.
Storage capacities stand at approximately 35 million barrels at Yanbu, 18 million barrels at Ain Sokhna, and 20 million barrels at Sidi Kerir.
However, sources stressed that these facilities are not currently filled to maximum capacity and warned that these inventories will be entirely depleted if the pipeline is not brought back online.
Output at lowest level in 30 years
According to International Energy Agency data, disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz and Red Sea transit corridors pushed Saudi oil supply in August to its lowest level in 30 years.
Data submitted by the Riyadh government to OPEC show that the kingdom’s crude production fell from 10.9 million barrels per day in February to 6.2 million barrels per day in August.
In July, the Houthis in Yemen announced the launch of a naval blockade against Saudi Arabia. On 8 September, the Saudi Ministry of Energy announced that operations had been suspended at several energy facilities in the southern part of the country.
On the same day, the Saudi Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued an official statement condemning Houthi strikes targeting facilities in the cities of Abha, Khamis Mushait, Jizan, and Najran.
Riyadh authorities reported that 73 civilians, including women and children, were injured in the attacks. US President Donald Trump stated that Iran might be behind this attack on Saudi Arabia.
In oil markets, Brent crude futures recorded their sharpest single-day gain since late July on Thursday, 10 September.
The price of November Brent crude contracts rose by 6.3% to reach $107.6 per barrel. Prices retreated below the $105 mark the following day.
-
Europe2 weeks agoGermany’s CDU drafts tougher citizenship rules to counter AfD
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoGeoffrey Roberts sees Ukraine war concluding within coming months
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoPope Francis accused Opus Dei of mafia tactics over Spanish shrine
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoUS expands military footprint in Somalia with new Bosaso base
-
America2 weeks agoMilei hardens Falklands stance with oil sanctions and defence push
-
Middle East2 weeks agoBen Gvir reveals plan to expel majority of Gaza population
-
Asia2 weeks agoChina leads $54bn capital injection into state banks and insurers
-
America2 weeks agoPentagon launches mass polygraph inquiry over munitions leaks
