Connect with us

Asia

Tensions between Pakistan and Iran

Published

on

Iran and Pakistan are the two neighboring countries that share more than 900 kilometers of border. The two countries have many mutual geopolitical, cultural, and religious interests, but at the same time going through difficulties.

Issues related to the human trafficking, narcotics, fight against terrorism and relations with China and sectarian problems are among the commonalities in relations between Tehran and Islamabad.

From a security perspective, the two sides have found themselves in an uncomfortable and unenviable position, and have been facing intricacy on the bordering areas. Militant groups are still regarded as a big threat to both the countries, and both capitals have consensus on the fight against terrorist groups, but yet to be succeeded in this regard.

Both countries have always complained about border insecurity and it has deteriorated in the last few months. Several border incidents happened, highlighting the need for both sides to take steps towards common ground to accelerate their security cooperation.

Iran and Pakistan also engage in trade activities and both are doing business through three border crossings. The two countries’ central banks signed a banking and payment agreement in 2017 and expanded their financial cooperation. Iran and Pakistan are also looking toward increasing its bilateral trade to five billion dollars by the end of this year 2023.

Challenges and border insecurity

Changing geopolitical dynamics are not new to the South West Asia region, and relations between Iran and Pakistan have also shifted in recent years, especially after some border incidents. Illegal immigration and risk of sectarian fault lines also continue to be main points of contention between the duo.

In a recent incident, four Pakistani soldiers were killed after their convoy came under attack from rebels across the border with Iran in the restive Balochistan province on Wednesday. This is the latest incident of cross-border clashes.

Four Pakistani security personnel were killed when rebels launched an attack from “Iranian soil”, the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) said.

According to the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), the Pakistan Army’s media wing, these security forces were killed during a “terrorist activity” from across the Pakistan-Iran border in Balochistan’s Panjgur district.

The statement said that the firing took place in the Chukab sector near the border where the soldiers were patrolling along the border.

“Militants used Iranian soil to target a convoy of security forces patrolling along the border,” Pakistan army said, calling on its neighbor Iran to hunt down the terrorists on their side.

In the past, the border at Taftan and Panjgur was closed after clashes between protesters and security forces. Similarly, two incidents took place in 2021 as well.

There has been no claim of responsibility for Wednesday’s attack so far.

Officials meeting

The officials of the two sides have made high-profile visits several times but failed to address the core issues. Indeed, Iran is a little careful with its relations with Pakistan due to its ties with the US and Saudi Arabia, the two countries where Tehran has many difficulties.

In August last year, a Pakistani Air Force delegation and Pakistan Air and Naval attaché at Tehran were reportedly subjected to harassment and intimidation. Based on several reports, when the Pakistani attaché protested, his phone was also seized by the Iranian officials.

Another point of contention is that Iran is accusing Pakistan of sponsoring terrorist organizations like Jaish al Adl, which has been engaged in anti-Iran activities. Repeated incursions on the border sides and Pakistan’s engagement in fencing the border with Iranian territory have remained a sour point in the ties between the two countries.

Last year, Iran’s Interior Ministry Ahmad Vahidi arrived in Pakistan’s capital city Islamabad for a one day official meeting and publically the two sides called the meeting positive and productive. But at the same time many news came out in which Pakistani sides warned Iran and accused Tehran for letting the Balch insurgent to its soil against Pakistan and warned them to take decisive action against them. Balochistan is Pakistan’s largest province that borders both Iran and Afghanistan, and is regularly targeted by Islamist militants, sectarian groups and nationalist separatists.

But they are good neighbors

Pakistan and Iran indeed have bilateral relations rooted in historical linkages and based on religious, linguistic, and cultural linkages. The relation between them has remained very positive and Iran was the first country to recognize Pakistan after its independence. After the 1979 Islamic Revolution of Iran, Pakistan was also one of the first countries to recognize the new dispensation.

The two sides have also supported each other in different times and Tehran and Islamabad also seemed interested in growing positivity and desire to work together and engage in different projects, especially in energy and gas.

Former Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan visited Iran for a two-day official visit during his tenure in 2019, and it was deemed fruitful to enhance mutual understanding on a range of issues in political, economic and security areas.

The visit helped in setting a clear policy direction for durable, mutually-beneficial relations with Iran, but the new Prime Minister is yet to visit Iran.

Meanwhile, the two countries are working together at expert level to improve road and rail connectivity as well as upgradation of 700 kilometer Quetta-Taftan highway. The Pakistan-Iran border has been named “Border of Peace, Friendship and Love” by the leadership of both countries in an attempt  to improve the ties.

Asia

South Korea emerges as major beneficiary of shifts in global arms market

Published

on

Uncertainty in the global arms market, driven by the United States reassessing its relationships with allies and a broad rearmament drive across many countries, is creating major commercial opportunities for South Korea. According to an analysis published by Politico, Seoul has become the world’s fastest-growing supplier of military equipment.

The report said that large-scale conflicts around the world have created urgent demand for weapons as countries seek both to support allies and strengthen their own defenses against potential future confrontations. At the same time, changes in the US role within the global arms market have opened new opportunities for South Korean manufacturers. Statements and policy decisions by US President Donald Trump regarding NATO have led allies to question Washington’s reliability in times of crisis, increasing uncertainty across the global market. In addition, the diversion of a large share of US weapons supplies to the Middle East because of ongoing conflicts has placed further strain on already overstretched supply chains.

European countries increase purchases from South Korea

Faced with what Politico described as the Trump administration’s more distant approach toward allies, European countries in particular have accelerated arms purchases from South Korea. The publication noted that Seoul’s growing influence as a supplier has been driven largely by major defense contracts signed with Poland.

Following the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine, several Eastern European capitals, including Warsaw, transferred portions of their military inventories to Kyiv, relying on German support to replenish their arsenals. However, Berlin’s slow pace in replacing allied stockpiles generated frustration across the region.

South Korea emerged as an alternative supplier during this period and became a reliable source of military equipment for Eastern European countries. Poland became Seoul’s largest customer through a $13.7 billion agreement covering the purchase of tanks, rocket launchers, self-propelled howitzers and other military equipment.

“We were originally preparing against North Korea, but now we are ready to provide these solutions to customers around the world,” said Choo Hyung-kim, head of the Security Management Institute, a defense analysis organization affiliated with South Korea’s National Assembly.

Lack of political baggage gives Seoul an advantage

Politico reported that one of the greatest advantages enjoyed by South Korean defense companies is the absence of the “political baggage” associated with major arms exporters such as the United States, China, Russia and Israel.

According to the figures cited, the combined projected revenue of South Korea’s largest defense companies, including Hanwha Group, Hyundai Rotem, LIG Nex1 and Korea Aerospace Industries, is expected to reach approximately $37 billion in 2026. That would represent a fourfold increase from their combined revenues in 2021.

Meanwhile, an official from the office of former South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol told the Yonhap news agency in 2024 that the scale of any weapons shipments to Ukraine would depend on Russia’s approach to its relationship with North Korea. Seoul later clarified that it had no plans to provide ammunition directly to Ukraine.

Continue Reading

Asia

DeepSeek raises $7.4 billion in funding round, surpasses $50 billion valuation

Published

on

Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek has raised more than 50 billion yuan ($7.4 billion) in its first funding round. According to Reuters, citing The Information, the company’s valuation has surpassed $50 billion.

The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported that the capital will be used to support the costly development of advanced artificial intelligence technologies.

According to the newspaper, citing sources familiar with the matter, investors valued the company at more than $50 billion. The valuation makes DeepSeek the most valuable AI startup in China.

DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng reportedly owned about 90% of the company before the funding round. Liang is said to have contributed roughly $3 billion during the fundraising process, making him the largest participant in the round.

According to Reuters, the transaction was structured in an unusual way that allows Liang to retain control of the company.

Rather than investing directly in DeepSeek, investors were required to invest through a limited partnership managed by a senior executive of the startup. Under the arrangement, investors were not granted voting rights. The report also said restrictions were placed on the use of invested funds for a period of five years.

The sole exception was the China National Artificial Intelligence Industry Investment Fund. The fund reportedly invested approximately $150 million directly in DeepSeek, allowing it to retain both voting rights and full discretion over its stake.

Other major investors in the funding round included Tencent, which invested approximately $1.5 billion, and Contemporary Amperex Technology, which invested about $740 million.

Bloomberg previously described the transaction as one of the largest fundraising rounds undertaken by a Chinese startup. According to the agency, the investment marks a new stage in the efforts of leading Chinese AI companies to compete with their US rivals.

DeepSeek told prospective investors that it would prioritize foundational and transformative AI research over short-term commercialization.

Based in the Chinese city of Hangzhou, DeepSeek emerged as one of Beijing’s most prominent AI companies after unveiling a more powerful and lower-cost model more than a year ago. The WSJ reported that interest surrounding the company has accelerated AI adoption in China and increased investor appetite for domestic startups.

Liang Wenfeng has previously said he intends to continue developing open-source AI models and ultimately aims to achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI). According to Bloomberg, the strategy continues an approach that has contributed to the spread of open models and influenced companies across China’s AI market, including Alibaba’s Qwen platform.

Bloomberg added that while global rivals such as OpenAI and Anthropic are exploring public offerings and revenue-generation strategies, DeepSeek has maintained its “research first” approach.

Continue Reading

Asia

China issues white paper on global governance reform, urging support for UN-centered international system

Published

on

China’s State Council Information Office on Wednesday released a white paper titled “A More Just and Equitable Global Governance: China’s Principles, Proposals and Actions.”

The white paper was issued to introduce China’s principles, proposals, and actions regarding global governance, to foster a broader consensus within the international community, to enable more effective responses to global challenges, and to build a more just and equitable global governance system.

The document states that global governance is a common endeavor concerning the well-being of all humanity, and that building a just and equitable global governance system is a shared vision long pursued by people around the world. It also emphasizes that China has always been an active participant, contributor, and builder of global governance.

According to the white paper, in the new era, Chinese President Xi Jinping has put forward the vision of building a community with a shared future for mankind. Advancing a global governance system shaped on the basis of extensive consultation, joint contribution, and shared benefits, Xi has called for true multilateralism to promote an equal and orderly multipolar world and an economic globalization that is inclusive and beneficial for all.

In 2025, Xi proposed the Global Governance Initiative (GGI). This initiative was designed to offer China’s solutions to two urgent questions of the era: What kind of global governance system should be established, and how should global governance be reformed and improved?

The white paper notes that shortly after its introduction, the GGI received support from approximately 160 countries and international organizations, with more than 60 countries joining the Group of Friends of the Global Governance Initiative. It states that the international community is of the view that the GGI sends a clear message: to defend multilateralism, join forces, and strive for a just future.

According to the white paper, the GGI aligns with the growing trend toward greater democracy in international relations and strengthens international confidence in the practice of multilateralism. The initiative provides a clear and actionable roadmap for the improvement of global governance, injecting valuable stability and positive energy into a turbulent world.

The white paper emphasizes that China proposed the GGI to accelerate the construction of a more just and equitable global governance system. The document states that firmly defending the authority and status of the United Nations is of fundamental importance for the effective implementation of this initiative.

According to the white paper, success will also depend on major countries acting with a sense of responsibility and all nations working together in unity to bridge deficits in peace and development. It states that rather than attempting to reinvent the wheel, all countries must firmly defend the international system with the UN at its core, maintain the international order based on international law, and uphold the fundamental norms of international relations based on the purposes and principles of the UN Charter.

In addition to the preface and conclusion, the white paper consists of five chapters: “Today’s World Faces Severe and Complex Challenges,” “The Global Governance Initiative Responds to the Challenges of Our Era,” “China’s Contribution to the Development of Global Governance,” “Directing the Course of Change Toward a Bright Future,” and “Advancing Hand in Hand at a Critical Juncture in History.”

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey