Connect with us

Asia

The neglected plight of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

Published

on

It is a bitter reality that the supreme power in the Kingdom of Godfather Pakistan is monopolized solely by the military establishment, which has subjugated all state institutions. Among its victims, the media stands atop the list.

Although Pakistan is officially hailed as a federation, where all its constituent units enjoy equal rights and powers, this equality remains confined to mere words. In practice, it is far from the truth.

Whenever Punjab faces challenging times or crises, little attention has been paid to the other provinces. Punjab not only holds the majority population in Pakistan but also dominates the ranks and positions within the Pakistan Army.

This demographic reality has led to the military establishment prioritizing the interests and rights of Punjabis. This thought has been on my mind since April 2022 when the relations between former Prime Minister Imran Khan and the military establishment turned sour.

Since then, security incidents in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) have either been completely ignored or treated with secondary importance. The ongoing power struggle between Imran Khan and the military establishment has entered a decisive phase, resulting in the dismissal of his loyalists for making trivial statements in press conferences. Ironically, during this period of time, loyalists of the Pakistan-backed Taliban in Afghanistan have made their presence felt, resulting in increased terrorism and violence in the northern districts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.

How did the militants of Pakistan’s extremist organization, Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan, manage to return from Afghanistan? Pakistani General Retired Faiz Hameed and his close associate Barrister Muhammad Ali Saif might shed light on this matter. Nevertheless, the powerful circles responsible for this will have to be held accountable, either now or in the near future.

Continued attacks in KP

Unfortunately, major acts of terrorism have occurred throughout Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. These include a suicide blast in Peshawar’s Police Lines Jama Masjid during Zuhr prayers, attacks on anti-terror police stations in Bannu and Swat, and terrorist incidents in Dera Ismail Khan and Hangu, targeting a foreign company’s plant. In areas such as Lucky Marwat, North and South Waziristan, and others, hundreds of people, including police officers and polio workers, have fallen victim to ambushes and bombings.

Recently, Teri Mangal, a highly sensitive area near the Afghanistan border in Kurram district, witnessed a horrific incident of terror and bloodshed. Eight individuals, including five teachers, were brutally murdered. While locals classify it as a purely terrorist incident, some quarters attribute it to a property or land dispute. However, leaders from Shia and Sunni schools of thought in Kurram district are united in their demand for an impartial investigation into these incidents.

Major terrorism incidents went unnoticed in KP

It is disconcerting to note that since 2004 neither judicial inquiries nor reports from any other institution have shed light on the major terrorism incidents in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and across the country. Despite protests in Kurram district and Peshawar regarding the incident in Teri Mangal, there is a lack of awareness among those who hold real power, as well as the media, who seem focused on perpetuating political crises.

Among the victims of this tragedy were highly educated teachers. Ironically, while those responsible for upholding the law follow the orders of powerful circles, political parties and leaders remain preoccupied with their future prospects. Regrettably, the province finds itself burdened with a governor, Ghulam Ali, who has turned the governor’s house into a center for personal gain. Similarly, despite being in the position of caretaker Chief Minister, Azam Khan has failed to ensure the protection of lives and property.

Ousted primer Khan is also from KP

Cricketer-turned politician Imran Khan is originally from KP and the general view is that since he is not a Punjab politician, he is more under attack

Now the army accused Khan’s supporters of damaging military properties and attempting to forcibly enter the Army’s General Headquarters (GHQ) in protest against Khan’s arrest.

Indeed, torching military buildings or attacking GHQ is not a common practice in Pakistan as people are afraid of the army. The army has been the protagonist in power politics for decades but after the arrest of dozens of Khan’s supporters and consideration to dissolve Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party, once again the army showed its power. The May 9 chaos in return gives the army more power against Khan, with the majority of the PTI’s leaders either leaving the party or politics. There would soon be a scene where Khan would be proverbially seen alone, like a leader without followers.

Khan had repeatedly said that he was unaware of May 9 events, and he is right because he was in jail during the chaos and was not even allowed to carry cellophane. He was behind bars almost disarmed. After his release, Khan said his party was not involved in creating chaos, but the army is using the old tactic by showing the scenes of people barging into a lieutenant general’s house in Lahore and the Army’s GHQ, to further isolate Khan and eventually force him to quit the party or leave the country. If Khan persists, the army will not leave any stone unturned to put him behind bars for some years.

Everyone knows who Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto was – he was the founder of Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) and was a populist like Khan and had the ability to enthrall the people. But of course, when Bhutto was put in jail and sentenced to death, his party workers and supporters did not attack military establishment.

Asia

South Korea emerges as major beneficiary of shifts in global arms market

Published

on

Uncertainty in the global arms market, driven by the United States reassessing its relationships with allies and a broad rearmament drive across many countries, is creating major commercial opportunities for South Korea. According to an analysis published by Politico, Seoul has become the world’s fastest-growing supplier of military equipment.

The report said that large-scale conflicts around the world have created urgent demand for weapons as countries seek both to support allies and strengthen their own defenses against potential future confrontations. At the same time, changes in the US role within the global arms market have opened new opportunities for South Korean manufacturers. Statements and policy decisions by US President Donald Trump regarding NATO have led allies to question Washington’s reliability in times of crisis, increasing uncertainty across the global market. In addition, the diversion of a large share of US weapons supplies to the Middle East because of ongoing conflicts has placed further strain on already overstretched supply chains.

European countries increase purchases from South Korea

Faced with what Politico described as the Trump administration’s more distant approach toward allies, European countries in particular have accelerated arms purchases from South Korea. The publication noted that Seoul’s growing influence as a supplier has been driven largely by major defense contracts signed with Poland.

Following the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine, several Eastern European capitals, including Warsaw, transferred portions of their military inventories to Kyiv, relying on German support to replenish their arsenals. However, Berlin’s slow pace in replacing allied stockpiles generated frustration across the region.

South Korea emerged as an alternative supplier during this period and became a reliable source of military equipment for Eastern European countries. Poland became Seoul’s largest customer through a $13.7 billion agreement covering the purchase of tanks, rocket launchers, self-propelled howitzers and other military equipment.

“We were originally preparing against North Korea, but now we are ready to provide these solutions to customers around the world,” said Choo Hyung-kim, head of the Security Management Institute, a defense analysis organization affiliated with South Korea’s National Assembly.

Lack of political baggage gives Seoul an advantage

Politico reported that one of the greatest advantages enjoyed by South Korean defense companies is the absence of the “political baggage” associated with major arms exporters such as the United States, China, Russia and Israel.

According to the figures cited, the combined projected revenue of South Korea’s largest defense companies, including Hanwha Group, Hyundai Rotem, LIG Nex1 and Korea Aerospace Industries, is expected to reach approximately $37 billion in 2026. That would represent a fourfold increase from their combined revenues in 2021.

Meanwhile, an official from the office of former South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol told the Yonhap news agency in 2024 that the scale of any weapons shipments to Ukraine would depend on Russia’s approach to its relationship with North Korea. Seoul later clarified that it had no plans to provide ammunition directly to Ukraine.

Continue Reading

Asia

DeepSeek raises $7.4 billion in funding round, surpasses $50 billion valuation

Published

on

Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek has raised more than 50 billion yuan ($7.4 billion) in its first funding round. According to Reuters, citing The Information, the company’s valuation has surpassed $50 billion.

The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported that the capital will be used to support the costly development of advanced artificial intelligence technologies.

According to the newspaper, citing sources familiar with the matter, investors valued the company at more than $50 billion. The valuation makes DeepSeek the most valuable AI startup in China.

DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng reportedly owned about 90% of the company before the funding round. Liang is said to have contributed roughly $3 billion during the fundraising process, making him the largest participant in the round.

According to Reuters, the transaction was structured in an unusual way that allows Liang to retain control of the company.

Rather than investing directly in DeepSeek, investors were required to invest through a limited partnership managed by a senior executive of the startup. Under the arrangement, investors were not granted voting rights. The report also said restrictions were placed on the use of invested funds for a period of five years.

The sole exception was the China National Artificial Intelligence Industry Investment Fund. The fund reportedly invested approximately $150 million directly in DeepSeek, allowing it to retain both voting rights and full discretion over its stake.

Other major investors in the funding round included Tencent, which invested approximately $1.5 billion, and Contemporary Amperex Technology, which invested about $740 million.

Bloomberg previously described the transaction as one of the largest fundraising rounds undertaken by a Chinese startup. According to the agency, the investment marks a new stage in the efforts of leading Chinese AI companies to compete with their US rivals.

DeepSeek told prospective investors that it would prioritize foundational and transformative AI research over short-term commercialization.

Based in the Chinese city of Hangzhou, DeepSeek emerged as one of Beijing’s most prominent AI companies after unveiling a more powerful and lower-cost model more than a year ago. The WSJ reported that interest surrounding the company has accelerated AI adoption in China and increased investor appetite for domestic startups.

Liang Wenfeng has previously said he intends to continue developing open-source AI models and ultimately aims to achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI). According to Bloomberg, the strategy continues an approach that has contributed to the spread of open models and influenced companies across China’s AI market, including Alibaba’s Qwen platform.

Bloomberg added that while global rivals such as OpenAI and Anthropic are exploring public offerings and revenue-generation strategies, DeepSeek has maintained its “research first” approach.

Continue Reading

Asia

China issues white paper on global governance reform, urging support for UN-centered international system

Published

on

China’s State Council Information Office on Wednesday released a white paper titled “A More Just and Equitable Global Governance: China’s Principles, Proposals and Actions.”

The white paper was issued to introduce China’s principles, proposals, and actions regarding global governance, to foster a broader consensus within the international community, to enable more effective responses to global challenges, and to build a more just and equitable global governance system.

The document states that global governance is a common endeavor concerning the well-being of all humanity, and that building a just and equitable global governance system is a shared vision long pursued by people around the world. It also emphasizes that China has always been an active participant, contributor, and builder of global governance.

According to the white paper, in the new era, Chinese President Xi Jinping has put forward the vision of building a community with a shared future for mankind. Advancing a global governance system shaped on the basis of extensive consultation, joint contribution, and shared benefits, Xi has called for true multilateralism to promote an equal and orderly multipolar world and an economic globalization that is inclusive and beneficial for all.

In 2025, Xi proposed the Global Governance Initiative (GGI). This initiative was designed to offer China’s solutions to two urgent questions of the era: What kind of global governance system should be established, and how should global governance be reformed and improved?

The white paper notes that shortly after its introduction, the GGI received support from approximately 160 countries and international organizations, with more than 60 countries joining the Group of Friends of the Global Governance Initiative. It states that the international community is of the view that the GGI sends a clear message: to defend multilateralism, join forces, and strive for a just future.

According to the white paper, the GGI aligns with the growing trend toward greater democracy in international relations and strengthens international confidence in the practice of multilateralism. The initiative provides a clear and actionable roadmap for the improvement of global governance, injecting valuable stability and positive energy into a turbulent world.

The white paper emphasizes that China proposed the GGI to accelerate the construction of a more just and equitable global governance system. The document states that firmly defending the authority and status of the United Nations is of fundamental importance for the effective implementation of this initiative.

According to the white paper, success will also depend on major countries acting with a sense of responsibility and all nations working together in unity to bridge deficits in peace and development. It states that rather than attempting to reinvent the wheel, all countries must firmly defend the international system with the UN at its core, maintain the international order based on international law, and uphold the fundamental norms of international relations based on the purposes and principles of the UN Charter.

In addition to the preface and conclusion, the white paper consists of five chapters: “Today’s World Faces Severe and Complex Challenges,” “The Global Governance Initiative Responds to the Challenges of Our Era,” “China’s Contribution to the Development of Global Governance,” “Directing the Course of Change Toward a Bright Future,” and “Advancing Hand in Hand at a Critical Juncture in History.”

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey