Connect with us

Diplomacy

UK halts intelligence sharing with US over lethal anti-drug operations

Published

on

The United Kingdom’s intelligence agencies and military have stopped sharing intelligence with the US regarding vessels suspected of drug trafficking in the Caribbean.

The claim was reported by the British newspaper The Times. The Trump administration is conducting lethal attacks against drug traffickers in international waters. In an unprecedented move, intelligence gathered from British sources in the region is no longer being passed to the Americans, as Britain seeks to avoid complicity in US attacks.

The Royal Navy conducts operations against suspected traffickers, but a military source said, “We only target the vessels and do not kill people. We detain them.”

Military officials are concerned about the legality of Donald Trump’s decision to “blow up” drug cartels after defining them as terrorists.

In September of last year, a Royal Navy warship intercepted a “narco-submarine” for the first time, seizing cocaine worth £160 million being trafficked in the Caribbean Sea.

HMS Trent worked with the US Coast Guard and a US naval patrol aircraft to seize the semi-submersible vessel 190 nautical miles south of the Dominican Republic, and eleven suspects were arrested.

A Royal Navy source said at the time that the use of submarines by criminal gangs was a growing phenomenon as criminal organizations find more innovative ways to make money from drugs.

The US began attacks against boats in September, and 76 people have been killed so far.

According to CNN, Britain became concerned that the US could use intelligence provided by the British to select targets and suspended intelligence sharing more than a month ago.

The US is Britain’s closest intelligence-sharing partner, and London relies heavily on information collected by the Americans.

Both countries are part of the “Five Eyes” intelligence-sharing partnership, along with Canada, Australia, and New Zealand.

A government spokesperson said, “It is our long-standing policy not to comment on intelligence matters. The US is our closest ally on security and intelligence. We continue to work together to protect global peace and security, defend freedom of navigation, and respond to emerging threats.”

It is unclear whether the US has retaliated by restricting the information it shares with the British.

The United Kingdom controls a number of territories in the Caribbean that host various intelligence assets. Information gathered by agencies such as the country’s listening agency, GCHQ, is then passed to the US to be used for interdicting these criminals. The UK is willing to provide intelligence to the US for the purpose of prosecuting traffickers as criminals.

The source added that the intelligence provided by the UK includes the locations of drug trafficking vessels and the number of people on board.

When the Royal Navy conducts missions itself, it boards the vessels, detains the crew, and seizes the drugs.

Last month, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk said these attacks violate international law. Britain is thought to share this view.

The Trump administration argues that the traffickers can be killed because they pose an imminent threat to Americans and are “enemy combatants.”

On Monday, it was revealed that US forces had attacked two more boats in the eastern Pacific, allegedly operated by drug cartels.

According to Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, six people were killed. Hegseth said, “These vessels were known by our intelligence to be linked to illicit drugs and trafficking, carrying drugs, and sailing along a known drug trafficking transit route in the eastern Pacific.”

Diplomacy

Greece’s Marinakis says paying Hormuz transit fees beats enduring Red Sea shipping crisis detour

Published

on

Evangelos Marinakis, one of Greece’s leading shipowners, has announced that he is prepared to pay up to $200,000 per transit to keep the Strait of Hormuz open to civilian maritime traffic.

Speaking to the Financial Times, Marinakis stated that paying a transit fee would be a far better option for him than having the strait closed to navigation.

As the chairman of Capital Maritime Group, which controls a fleet of 185 vessels including approximately 35 tankers, Marinakis emphasized that shipowners have been forced to use alternative routes around the Cape of Good Hope for years due to attacks launched by the Houthis in the Red Sea, a detour that has generated substantial additional costs.

The Greek shipowner indicated that paying a transit fee of $100,000 or $200,000, depending on the size of the cargo or the vessel, is far more reasonable than enduring the current logistical challenges. He added that such payments could offset all the losses experienced so far.

Following US strikes on Iran and the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, the Tehran administration had introduced transit fees of up to $2 million for certain vessels transiting the waterway.

In May, Iran announced the establishment of a state agency tasked with managing the Strait of Hormuz. It was stated that the institution in question would provide real-time updates regarding maritime activities in the waterway.

Ebrahim Azizi, the chairman of the Iranian Parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, had noted that only commercial vessels and countries cooperating with Iran would be able to benefit from the facilities provided under this “professional mechanism.”

US President Donald Trump has explicitly opposed the imposition of transit fees in the Strait of Hormuz. In a statement on the matter, Trump said, “We want the strait to be open. We do not want any transit fees to be charged. This is an international waterway.”

On the other hand, the draft text of a planned 60-day ceasefire extension agreement between the parties stipulates that the Strait of Hormuz will remain open without any transit fees being demanded.

According to the draft details reviewed by Axios, the US in return commits to lifting the blockade it has imposed on Iranian ports. The Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, however, announced that the management of the Strait of Hormuz has been excluded from the scope of the agreement with the US, asserting that the issue will be addressed solely by littoral states.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Pashinyan promises aid to farmers hit by Russian import restrictions

Published

on

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has pledged compensation for Armenian farmers affected by restrictions on exports to Russia.

According to Sputnik Armenia, Pashinyan made the announcement during an election campaign meeting in the Gegharkunik region.

Speaking at the event, Pashinyan said the subsidies would be designed to offset losses incurred by producers.

The prime minister also acknowledged that some Armenian products had failed to meet required quality standards, adding that such companies would receive support aimed at improving product quality.

Addressing alternative markets for Armenian exports, Pashinyan said several Armenian business delegations were already engaged in negotiations abroad.

He added that Armenia had received offers for the purchase of roses as well as fresh fruits and vegetables.

Pashinyan argued that Armenia’s agricultural output was not particularly large, describing this as an advantage under current circumstances. According to the prime minister, “a respected supermarket chain in Europe” would be capable of selling the entire volume of these products on its own.

Russia’s Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance (Rosselkhoznadzor) imposed temporary restrictions on imports of stone fruits and grapes from Armenia effective July 2.

The ban covers cherries, sour cherries, apricots, plums, peaches and nectarines, among other products.

On the same day, a temporary suspension was also introduced on certification procedures for live fish shipments from Armenia. Russian authorities had previously restricted the entry of flower products originating from Armenia into the Russian market.

In addition, Russia’s Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing (Rospotrebnadzor) halted the import of all consignments of Jermuk mineral water from Armenia.

In a statement, the agency said levels of bicarbonate, chloride and sulfate ions in the mineral water exceeded established limits and could mislead consumers regarding the product’s medicinal properties.

The Russian regulator argued that the growing number of violations stemmed from the abolition of Armenia’s Agriculture Ministry and the transfer of its responsibilities to the Economy Ministry.

Rosselkhoznadzor further stated that Armenia’s Economy Ministry was experiencing structural problems and was unable to adequately perform the supervisory functions assigned to it.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Zelenskyy urges US to grant Ukraine license to produce Patriot missiles

Published

on

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he has asked the United States to grant Ukraine a license to manufacture missiles for the Patriot air defence system.

In a post on social media platform X, Zelenskyy argued that current US production of missile defence interceptors is insufficient and could contribute to crises in different parts of the world.

“Producing 60-65 missiles a month is nothing compared with the challenges we face today. This is no secret, and Russia knows it as well,” Zelenskyy wrote. “We need to expand production. As I requested from the previous US administration, I am asking the current administration to grant Ukraine a license to produce Patriot missiles.”

Zelenskyy said US companies possess advanced technologies that are not available in Ukraine, while Kyiv could contribute its extensive battlefield experience in return.

He also argued that granting such a license would benefit not only Ukraine, but also the Middle East and any country Washington chooses to support.

Washington pledges to maintain defence support

Zelenskyy’s remarks came a day after US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on May 30 that Washington would continue supporting Ukraine’s defence capabilities and ensure military shipments to Kyiv continue.

“We want them to be able to defend themselves, and we will find a way to help them do that,” Hegseth said.

Several days earlier, Yuriy Ihnat, spokesperson for the Ukrainian Air Force, warned that the country’s air defence forces were experiencing a shortage of missiles.

“Due to certain supply problems, we are practically at starvation levels when it comes to missiles today,” Ihnat said.

Concerns persist over air defence missile stocks

In April, Zelenskyy warned that Ukraine’s stockpile of air defence missiles could be exhausted at any moment.

He said that under current conditions, air defence missiles were more critical for Ukraine than the air defence systems themselves.

Highlighting what he described as a critical shortage of Patriot missiles, Zelenskyy said: “We are facing a deficit now that could hardly be worse.”

Concerns that Ukraine could face a severe shortage of US-made air defence missiles had previously been reported by Reuters.

The situation was expected to worsen as the United States and its allies depleted significant portions of their arsenals during tensions with Iran, a point Zelenskyy also underscored.

In a separate statement in January, Zelenskyy said Ukraine lacked sufficient missiles for both US- and European-made air defence systems.

The Ukrainian leader said he had been forced to personally secure every package of missiles from European countries and the United States.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey