Asia
Unprecedented tension between Taliban and Pakistan
Tensions between the Afghan Taliban and Pakistani officials have heightened after the recent attack in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) province that left 23 Pakistani soldiers dead. The attack involved suicide bombings from Afghanistan, targeted Pakistani forces in Dera Ismail Khan neighborhood of PK.
Soon after the attack, the Tehreek-e-Jihad Pakistan, TJP, a group reportedly known as prominent branch of Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) had claimed responsibility for the attack, a statement caused anger among the Pakistani officials and called on the Afghan Taliban to stop harboring these groups inside their country.
Though, the Taliban has often claimed that they will not let any group to use Afghanistan soil against any other countries, but this narrative flattens when Qari Shakir, a resident of the Musa Qala district of Helmand province and member of the Afghan Taliban carried out suicide bombing. The bomber Shakir also appeared in a video clip, openly admitting to do suicide bombing.
This was when the Pakistani foreign ministry didn’t bear this open statement by an Afghan Taliban bomber and immediately summoned the Taliban ambassador in Islamabad. In the behind the door meeting, Pakistani authorities asked the ambassador to take action against the TTP group in Afghanistan and arrested their leaders.

A Pakistani soldier at the bombing site that killed his 23 comrades in the bombing. (AP)
In response, the Taliban have said they detained 13 members of the TTP. However, the arrest exposed the lie of the Taliban about TTP members that are not inside Afghanistan. If the TTP fighters are not in Afghanistan, who are the 13 TTP members? Pakistan asked Talian to hand these militants to them and also asked Taliban to strongly condemn the incident and launch a thorough investigation in the bombing.
Pakistan should stop blaming others for its own failure
Khawaja Muhammad Asif, Pakistan’s former defense minister had called Afghanistan as the origin of the terrorism. Asif said in response to the Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid, who said that “attributing every issue to another country is not a solution.” Mujahid had directly said that Pakistan should look after its internal affairs and don’t blame other countries for their own failure.
Meanwhile, John Achakzai, minister of information of Balochistan State, also labeled Afghanistan a “terrorism place” and suggested Washington carry drone attacks to target Islamic State (IS) militants and al-Qaeda members inside Afghanistan.
This was while General Asim Munir, the Chief of Staff of the Pakistan Army had visited the US and held talks with Lloyd Austin, US Defense Minister, and US officials.
Taliban not taking Pakistan seriously
A very simple question is why the Taliban is not paying heed to Pakistan’s request to start a crackdown against TTP. The first thing that we get is maybe the Taliban wants something in return. What that could be. Anything special. The critical issue for the Taliban is their recognition. So far, no country, including Pakistan which is very close to the Taliban, did not recognize their regime. This could be the first thing that the Taliban are up to.
Taliban somehow wants Pakistan to officially recognize their government and then the Taliban will launch an operation against TTP. This could be one scenario that the Taliban are not willing to take any action against the TTP. Honestly, the Taliban are right in their wish. Islamabad has been a prominent Taliban supporter and now Islamabad is not recognizing them. This is really hurtful to have such a dual policy from a friend.
Pakistan yet to recognize Taliban government while it did in 1996
It is a logical question from the Taliban side as to why Pakistan is not recognizing their government while Islamabad had recognized their Emirate between 1996-2001, followed by two other countries, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. Why this time Pakistan is not willing for a unilateral recognition of the Taliban. Though a number of its officials in international platforms are lobbying for the Taliban, that is not enough.
Taliban is smart and has been playing games with Pakistan by using the TTP as a tool. Taliban knows that if Pakistan officially recognized their government, it would make the way easy for other countries to follow Islamabad’s footstep.
Taliban not happy over Pakistan-US ties
Meanwhile, the Taliban has a lot of observations over Pakistan and US ties. The Taliban believes that Pakistan will help US anything Washington wants and even if it’s against the Taliban current government. It has been alleged that Pakistan has provided its airspace to the US. The allegation was turned right when a US drone strike killed Ayman al-Zawahiri, the leader of al-Qaeda in downtown Kabul, the Afghan capital city. The Taliban Defense Minister, Mullah Yaqoob Mujahid had said that US drones are violating Afghanistan’s airspace through Pakistan. He also called the airstrike a clear violation of Doha agreement between Taliban and US. Another Taliban official, Sher Mohammad Abbas Stanikzai, Taliban Political Deputy of Foreign Affairs also accused Pakistan of receiving millions of dollars in exchange for the US using its airspace.
Taliban rage over expulsion of Afghan refugees from Pakistan
Pakistani authorities have unexpectedly decided to deport millions of Afghan refugees, including those who were born in Pakistan and lived there for decades. The Taliban had repeatedly called on Islamabad to stop the process of deportation, but it fell down to the deaf ears. The mass deportation caused the Taliban to further support the TTP instead of working Islamabad against the group.

Refugees arrive in trucks at the Pakistan-Afghanistan crossing point.
This was out of expectation for Islamabad and that’s why its interim Prime Minister had said that Pakatan’s interest is first and said that deportation of Afghan refugees will be continued.
Islamabad has been trying to use refugees as a tool against the Taliban while Taliban using TTP, but between them the poor Afghan refugees are the victims.
Apparently, Pakistan has only one serious issue with the Taliban – the harboring of the TTP leadership and fighters. Pakistan has never opposed the Taliban Emirate, even when the Talian stop girls from schools and women from workplaces. Islamabad called this restriction as an internal matter of Afghanistan and said they will not interfere in this regard. When the entered Kabul in 15 August 2021, following the withdrawal of US troops, Pakistan ex-spy chief visited Kabul and was very happy.
Pakistan’s chief of army’s flop US trip
Frustrating from the Taliban, the Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir visited US in order to explain the situation and encourage Washington to convince the Taliban to arrested TTP leaders. Munir will also call for a military campaign against TTP members and also try to justify the deportation of Afghan refugees. The Pakistani general knows that the Taliban still receives financial support from the US and Washington could play an important role in this area.
But this is not an easy decision because the Taliban will oppose them, and the US is also very careful with the Taliban. The regional countries have been maintaining good ties with the Taliban and the US doesn’t want to spoil its relation with Kabul at any condition. Seemingly, Munir’s visit to the US would be a big flop.
Asia
Pentagon plans covert spy ring for economic war on China, report says
The US Department of War (Pentagon) is reportedly planning to establish an extensive network of deep-cover agents to wage economic warfare against China and other adversaries of the US.
According to a report by The Washington Post citing six sources familiar with the initiative, the plan has not yet been put into effect. The newspaper reported that the initiative remains at the planning stage. The Pentagon, however, denies that any such initiative exists.
The report said the operatives would pose as entrepreneurs or private sector employees while concealing their ties to the US government. The network’s mission would be to gather economic intelligence and counter China.
The programme is led by Tom Rakusa, who spent 39 years at the CIA. Rakusa serves as a senior adviser to Deputy Secretary of Defence Steve Feinberg.
The proposed spy network is seen as part of a broader policy by the Donald Trump administration to sharpen economic competition with other countries.
The US is already resorting to tariffs, export controls, and investment in strategic sectors, alongside expanding its economic intelligence gathering.
According to The Washington Post, the new initiative demonstrates the Pentagon’s growing influence under the Trump administration. The department is currently seeking a record budget of $1.5 trillion.
Trade war flares up again with Trump’s return to the White House
The trade friction between the US and China flared up again following Donald Trump’s return to the White House. In April 2025, Washington raised tariffs on Chinese goods to as much as 145%, and Beijing retaliated with tariffs of up to 125%.
In May, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio described China as the primary geopolitical challenge facing Washington. Rubio said that to avoid war, the two sides needed to manage their conflict of interests.
In July, Chinese expert Zheng Yongnian did not simply warn that underestimating the US could prove to be a “fatal mistake”; he stated it explicitly.
According to Zheng’s assessment, the US maintains its primacy through the role of the dollar, its military superiority, and its technological advantages.
Even so, the two sides agreed in June to declare a truce and lower tariffs. In autumn 2026, the US and China extended their trade truce until 10 January 2027.
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the extension would give the parties more time to discuss economic issues.
Trade deals do not eliminate the strategic contradictions between the two countries. Financial Times columnist Rana Foroohar likened the race between the two nations for commercial, technological, and geopolitical influence to the 19th-century “Great Game” between the Russian and British empires.
Foroohar cited China’s standing in shipbuilding and commercial maritime transport, as well as its expanding footprint in overseas ports, among its key advantages.
Asia
Japan plans curbs on short-term home sales to cool urban prices
Japan’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) plans to restrict short-term property trading to rein in surging home prices in major urban centres, particularly Tokyo.
Led by Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, the party aims to make support for working households a core priority ahead of local elections scheduled for April next year.
The LDP’s research commission on housing and land policy met on Wednesday to discuss the issue.
According to a report by the Nikkei Asia newspaper, Commission Chair and LDP lawmaker Midori Matsushima said at the opening of the meeting: “Prices of newly built condominiums across Tokyo’s 23 wards have doubled over the past decade. We must work on measures ensuring that people who wish to live in these homes can actually afford to buy them.”
Homeownership in the capital has become virtually unattainable for broad segments of the population. According to data from the Real Estate Economic Institute, the average sale price of a newly built condominium in Tokyo’s 23 wards rose %18.5 in fiscal 2025 compared with the previous year, reaching 137.84 million yen (around $872,000).
Meanwhile, statistics from the Ministry of Labour show that the average annual income of a full-time worker in the capital remained at 6.78 million yen in fiscal 2025. This widening gap between incomes and residential property prices is directly shaping political priorities.
During its campaign for the House of Representatives election in February, the LDP pledged to curb speculative transactions across metropolitan Tokyo and other regions. Earlier this month, a party project team focused on policies concerning foreign nationals also submitted a recommendation urging the government to introduce immediate tax measures against rising home prices.
Under current legislation, profits realized from properties sold within five years of acquisition are classified as “short-term capital gains”. These returns face a tax rate approaching %40, including income tax and local inhabitant tax.
Although this rate is twice the approximately %20 levied as “long-term capital gains” tax on properties held for more than five years, several party members argue it remains insufficient to deter speculation. Calls to tighten the framework may be considered as part of the annual tax reform package to be drafted in December alongside the LDP’s coalition partner, the Japan Innovation Party.
The ruling bloc wants to present concrete housing pledges to voters heading to the polls in April across numerous urban centres, including 22 of Tokyo’s wards where local assembly terms expire.
“We need to support families with children, who are typically at the stage of purchasing a home,” a senior LDP official said.
Opposition parties are also preparing alternative proposals that target not only prospective homebuyers, but also residents forced into the rental market by high property prices and now affected by escalating rents.
Tax steps take precedence over limits on foreign buyers
Several countries seeking answers to housing affordability pressures have imposed direct restrictions on foreign purchasers. In South Korea, real estate policies played a major part in the declining public approval ratings of President Lee Jae Myung.
In August 2025, authorities in Seoul introduced an approval requirement for foreign nationals buying homes in the capital and adjacent areas, while also mandating that buyers reside in the properties for at least two years.
Canada and Australia have enacted temporary bans on foreign residential purchases, while Singapore levies a %60 additional stamp duty on foreign buyers.
The role of overseas investors in Japan’s property market also drew debate during the February election. However, restrictions aimed directly at foreign nationals are viewed as potentially conflicting with international trade and services agreements.
Consequently, rather than imposing restrictions based on the nationality of buyers, the government is discussing tax measures aimed at speculative real estate deals, such as rapid resales.
Fears that sharp market measures could shake regional banks
Concerns have also surfaced that aggressive steps to force down prices could harm the wider national economy.
A senior LDP tax official cautioned that a steep drop in land prices could weaken local financial institutions, warning: “We must consider the impact on regional banks.”
The real estate sector accounts for roughly %18 of total lending by Japanese banks. This proportion sits well above the %10 level recorded during Japan’s bubble economy of the mid-to-late 1980s.
At certain regional banks, property lending accounts for nearly half of total loan portfolios.
According to March 2025 data from the Financial Services Agency, approximately one-quarter of all loans extended by regional banks to the real estate sector are concentrated directly in Tokyo’s five central wards.
Buoyant asset valuations, supported in part by rising stock indices, have underpinned strong public approval for the Takaichi administration. Observers note that property interventions designed to cool the market could drag down equity prices and weaken the government’s standing.
A senior official on the LDP research commission stressed that decision-makers must act with caution regarding the scope and timing of any measures intended to bring price increases under control.
Asia
South Korea plans $120B spend on eight US nuclear power plants
South Korea will spend $120 billion to construct eight nuclear power plants in the US under an agreement that provides for $350 billion in investments in exchange for lower tariffs.
The South Korean government also announced that Seoul and Washington will begin examining a liquefied natural gas (LNG) project in Alaska comprising a large-scale pipeline to transport natural gas from the north of the state to the south, alongside the construction of an LNG terminal for exports overseas.
Seoul stated that a decision regarding the LNG project will be made following a commercial feasibility study. However, US President Donald Trump said that South Korea would invest $54 billion in the project, pointing to an apparent lack of full coordination between the two sides on the matter.
Trade and Industry Minister Kim Jung-kwan said in a statement: “This announcement opens a new horizon of cooperation where the two countries join forces to develop joint commercial ventures in strategic areas directly linked to economic security and future sectors such as artificial intelligence, nuclear energy, and LNG.”
“We will adhere to the principle of prioritising national interests and investing solely in commercially viable projects,” Kim said.
Speaking at the White House, Trump characterised South Korea’s plans as “one of the largest energy infrastructure investments in American history”.
The announcement followed a meeting between Trump and South Korean President Lee Jae Myung roughly one year ago at the APEC Economic Leaders’ Meeting held in South Korea, where they agreed on the creation of a $350 billion investment fund.
Under that agreement, $150 billion was allocated to the shipbuilding sector and $200 billion to other sectors. In return, the US announced it would reduce tariffs imposed on goods imported from South Korea from 25% to 15%.
Under the nuclear power project, South Korea’s state-controlled utility will build two plants in the US, while Pennsylvania-based Westinghouse Electric will construct six plants.
According to the South Korean government, this will mark the first instance in which a foreign country builds its own nuclear power plants in the US.
South Korean firms are also evaluating the possibility of acquiring a stake in Westinghouse as part of negotiations over sharing profits generated by the project.
South Korea additionally announced that it will build a $22.3 billion natural gas-fired power plant in Texas with a capacity of 6,472 megawatts.
The facility will be designed to supply electricity directly to nearby data centres. The project’s first phase is targeted to begin commercial operations in 2029, with full-capacity operations slated for 2032.
Seoul also disclosed that it had agreed to allow the US to receive 50% of the profits generated by the projects until South Korea recoups all of its investments.
After South Korea fully recovers its total investment amount, 90% of the profits will go to the US.
-
Europe2 weeks agoBerlin Left Party backs Israel’s right to exist for coalition pact
-
America2 weeks agoHow will Brazil’s presidential runoff work?
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoThe West is preparing for war not with Russia, but with its own people, French analyst Georges Kuzmanovic insists
-
Russia2 weeks ago71 EU lawmakers demand closure of Russian Houses in 15 member states
-
Europe2 weeks agoMI6 investigates potential leaks after former BND chief is detained
-
Russia2 weeks agoUS and Russian figures discuss American stake in Nord Stream lines
-
Russia2 weeks agoDrone strike shuts down Yandex data centre in Russia’s Ryazan region
-
America2 weeks agoTrump weighs presidential memorandum to cut surging US diesel prices
