Asia
Unprecedented tension between Taliban and Pakistan
Tensions between the Afghan Taliban and Pakistani officials have heightened after the recent attack in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) province that left 23 Pakistani soldiers dead. The attack involved suicide bombings from Afghanistan, targeted Pakistani forces in Dera Ismail Khan neighborhood of PK.
Soon after the attack, the Tehreek-e-Jihad Pakistan, TJP, a group reportedly known as prominent branch of Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) had claimed responsibility for the attack, a statement caused anger among the Pakistani officials and called on the Afghan Taliban to stop harboring these groups inside their country.
Though, the Taliban has often claimed that they will not let any group to use Afghanistan soil against any other countries, but this narrative flattens when Qari Shakir, a resident of the Musa Qala district of Helmand province and member of the Afghan Taliban carried out suicide bombing. The bomber Shakir also appeared in a video clip, openly admitting to do suicide bombing.
This was when the Pakistani foreign ministry didn’t bear this open statement by an Afghan Taliban bomber and immediately summoned the Taliban ambassador in Islamabad. In the behind the door meeting, Pakistani authorities asked the ambassador to take action against the TTP group in Afghanistan and arrested their leaders.

A Pakistani soldier at the bombing site that killed his 23 comrades in the bombing. (AP)
In response, the Taliban have said they detained 13 members of the TTP. However, the arrest exposed the lie of the Taliban about TTP members that are not inside Afghanistan. If the TTP fighters are not in Afghanistan, who are the 13 TTP members? Pakistan asked Talian to hand these militants to them and also asked Taliban to strongly condemn the incident and launch a thorough investigation in the bombing.
Pakistan should stop blaming others for its own failure
Khawaja Muhammad Asif, Pakistan’s former defense minister had called Afghanistan as the origin of the terrorism. Asif said in response to the Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid, who said that “attributing every issue to another country is not a solution.” Mujahid had directly said that Pakistan should look after its internal affairs and don’t blame other countries for their own failure.
Meanwhile, John Achakzai, minister of information of Balochistan State, also labeled Afghanistan a “terrorism place” and suggested Washington carry drone attacks to target Islamic State (IS) militants and al-Qaeda members inside Afghanistan.
This was while General Asim Munir, the Chief of Staff of the Pakistan Army had visited the US and held talks with Lloyd Austin, US Defense Minister, and US officials.
Taliban not taking Pakistan seriously
A very simple question is why the Taliban is not paying heed to Pakistan’s request to start a crackdown against TTP. The first thing that we get is maybe the Taliban wants something in return. What that could be. Anything special. The critical issue for the Taliban is their recognition. So far, no country, including Pakistan which is very close to the Taliban, did not recognize their regime. This could be the first thing that the Taliban are up to.
Taliban somehow wants Pakistan to officially recognize their government and then the Taliban will launch an operation against TTP. This could be one scenario that the Taliban are not willing to take any action against the TTP. Honestly, the Taliban are right in their wish. Islamabad has been a prominent Taliban supporter and now Islamabad is not recognizing them. This is really hurtful to have such a dual policy from a friend.
Pakistan yet to recognize Taliban government while it did in 1996
It is a logical question from the Taliban side as to why Pakistan is not recognizing their government while Islamabad had recognized their Emirate between 1996-2001, followed by two other countries, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. Why this time Pakistan is not willing for a unilateral recognition of the Taliban. Though a number of its officials in international platforms are lobbying for the Taliban, that is not enough.
Taliban is smart and has been playing games with Pakistan by using the TTP as a tool. Taliban knows that if Pakistan officially recognized their government, it would make the way easy for other countries to follow Islamabad’s footstep.
Taliban not happy over Pakistan-US ties
Meanwhile, the Taliban has a lot of observations over Pakistan and US ties. The Taliban believes that Pakistan will help US anything Washington wants and even if it’s against the Taliban current government. It has been alleged that Pakistan has provided its airspace to the US. The allegation was turned right when a US drone strike killed Ayman al-Zawahiri, the leader of al-Qaeda in downtown Kabul, the Afghan capital city. The Taliban Defense Minister, Mullah Yaqoob Mujahid had said that US drones are violating Afghanistan’s airspace through Pakistan. He also called the airstrike a clear violation of Doha agreement between Taliban and US. Another Taliban official, Sher Mohammad Abbas Stanikzai, Taliban Political Deputy of Foreign Affairs also accused Pakistan of receiving millions of dollars in exchange for the US using its airspace.
Taliban rage over expulsion of Afghan refugees from Pakistan
Pakistani authorities have unexpectedly decided to deport millions of Afghan refugees, including those who were born in Pakistan and lived there for decades. The Taliban had repeatedly called on Islamabad to stop the process of deportation, but it fell down to the deaf ears. The mass deportation caused the Taliban to further support the TTP instead of working Islamabad against the group.

Refugees arrive in trucks at the Pakistan-Afghanistan crossing point.
This was out of expectation for Islamabad and that’s why its interim Prime Minister had said that Pakatan’s interest is first and said that deportation of Afghan refugees will be continued.
Islamabad has been trying to use refugees as a tool against the Taliban while Taliban using TTP, but between them the poor Afghan refugees are the victims.
Apparently, Pakistan has only one serious issue with the Taliban – the harboring of the TTP leadership and fighters. Pakistan has never opposed the Taliban Emirate, even when the Talian stop girls from schools and women from workplaces. Islamabad called this restriction as an internal matter of Afghanistan and said they will not interfere in this regard. When the entered Kabul in 15 August 2021, following the withdrawal of US troops, Pakistan ex-spy chief visited Kabul and was very happy.
Pakistan’s chief of army’s flop US trip
Frustrating from the Taliban, the Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir visited US in order to explain the situation and encourage Washington to convince the Taliban to arrested TTP leaders. Munir will also call for a military campaign against TTP members and also try to justify the deportation of Afghan refugees. The Pakistani general knows that the Taliban still receives financial support from the US and Washington could play an important role in this area.
But this is not an easy decision because the Taliban will oppose them, and the US is also very careful with the Taliban. The regional countries have been maintaining good ties with the Taliban and the US doesn’t want to spoil its relation with Kabul at any condition. Seemingly, Munir’s visit to the US would be a big flop.
Asia
South Korea emerges as major beneficiary of shifts in global arms market
Uncertainty in the global arms market, driven by the United States reassessing its relationships with allies and a broad rearmament drive across many countries, is creating major commercial opportunities for South Korea. According to an analysis published by Politico, Seoul has become the world’s fastest-growing supplier of military equipment.
The report said that large-scale conflicts around the world have created urgent demand for weapons as countries seek both to support allies and strengthen their own defenses against potential future confrontations. At the same time, changes in the US role within the global arms market have opened new opportunities for South Korean manufacturers. Statements and policy decisions by US President Donald Trump regarding NATO have led allies to question Washington’s reliability in times of crisis, increasing uncertainty across the global market. In addition, the diversion of a large share of US weapons supplies to the Middle East because of ongoing conflicts has placed further strain on already overstretched supply chains.
European countries increase purchases from South Korea
Faced with what Politico described as the Trump administration’s more distant approach toward allies, European countries in particular have accelerated arms purchases from South Korea. The publication noted that Seoul’s growing influence as a supplier has been driven largely by major defense contracts signed with Poland.
Following the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine, several Eastern European capitals, including Warsaw, transferred portions of their military inventories to Kyiv, relying on German support to replenish their arsenals. However, Berlin’s slow pace in replacing allied stockpiles generated frustration across the region.
South Korea emerged as an alternative supplier during this period and became a reliable source of military equipment for Eastern European countries. Poland became Seoul’s largest customer through a $13.7 billion agreement covering the purchase of tanks, rocket launchers, self-propelled howitzers and other military equipment.
“We were originally preparing against North Korea, but now we are ready to provide these solutions to customers around the world,” said Choo Hyung-kim, head of the Security Management Institute, a defense analysis organization affiliated with South Korea’s National Assembly.
Lack of political baggage gives Seoul an advantage
Politico reported that one of the greatest advantages enjoyed by South Korean defense companies is the absence of the “political baggage” associated with major arms exporters such as the United States, China, Russia and Israel.
According to the figures cited, the combined projected revenue of South Korea’s largest defense companies, including Hanwha Group, Hyundai Rotem, LIG Nex1 and Korea Aerospace Industries, is expected to reach approximately $37 billion in 2026. That would represent a fourfold increase from their combined revenues in 2021.
Meanwhile, an official from the office of former South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol told the Yonhap news agency in 2024 that the scale of any weapons shipments to Ukraine would depend on Russia’s approach to its relationship with North Korea. Seoul later clarified that it had no plans to provide ammunition directly to Ukraine.
Asia
DeepSeek raises $7.4 billion in funding round, surpasses $50 billion valuation
Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek has raised more than 50 billion yuan ($7.4 billion) in its first funding round. According to Reuters, citing The Information, the company’s valuation has surpassed $50 billion.
The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported that the capital will be used to support the costly development of advanced artificial intelligence technologies.
According to the newspaper, citing sources familiar with the matter, investors valued the company at more than $50 billion. The valuation makes DeepSeek the most valuable AI startup in China.
DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng reportedly owned about 90% of the company before the funding round. Liang is said to have contributed roughly $3 billion during the fundraising process, making him the largest participant in the round.
According to Reuters, the transaction was structured in an unusual way that allows Liang to retain control of the company.
Rather than investing directly in DeepSeek, investors were required to invest through a limited partnership managed by a senior executive of the startup. Under the arrangement, investors were not granted voting rights. The report also said restrictions were placed on the use of invested funds for a period of five years.
The sole exception was the China National Artificial Intelligence Industry Investment Fund. The fund reportedly invested approximately $150 million directly in DeepSeek, allowing it to retain both voting rights and full discretion over its stake.
Other major investors in the funding round included Tencent, which invested approximately $1.5 billion, and Contemporary Amperex Technology, which invested about $740 million.
Bloomberg previously described the transaction as one of the largest fundraising rounds undertaken by a Chinese startup. According to the agency, the investment marks a new stage in the efforts of leading Chinese AI companies to compete with their US rivals.
DeepSeek told prospective investors that it would prioritize foundational and transformative AI research over short-term commercialization.
Based in the Chinese city of Hangzhou, DeepSeek emerged as one of Beijing’s most prominent AI companies after unveiling a more powerful and lower-cost model more than a year ago. The WSJ reported that interest surrounding the company has accelerated AI adoption in China and increased investor appetite for domestic startups.
Liang Wenfeng has previously said he intends to continue developing open-source AI models and ultimately aims to achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI). According to Bloomberg, the strategy continues an approach that has contributed to the spread of open models and influenced companies across China’s AI market, including Alibaba’s Qwen platform.
Bloomberg added that while global rivals such as OpenAI and Anthropic are exploring public offerings and revenue-generation strategies, DeepSeek has maintained its “research first” approach.
Asia
China issues white paper on global governance reform, urging support for UN-centered international system
China’s State Council Information Office on Wednesday released a white paper titled “A More Just and Equitable Global Governance: China’s Principles, Proposals and Actions.”
The white paper was issued to introduce China’s principles, proposals, and actions regarding global governance, to foster a broader consensus within the international community, to enable more effective responses to global challenges, and to build a more just and equitable global governance system.
The document states that global governance is a common endeavor concerning the well-being of all humanity, and that building a just and equitable global governance system is a shared vision long pursued by people around the world. It also emphasizes that China has always been an active participant, contributor, and builder of global governance.
According to the white paper, in the new era, Chinese President Xi Jinping has put forward the vision of building a community with a shared future for mankind. Advancing a global governance system shaped on the basis of extensive consultation, joint contribution, and shared benefits, Xi has called for true multilateralism to promote an equal and orderly multipolar world and an economic globalization that is inclusive and beneficial for all.
In 2025, Xi proposed the Global Governance Initiative (GGI). This initiative was designed to offer China’s solutions to two urgent questions of the era: What kind of global governance system should be established, and how should global governance be reformed and improved?
The white paper notes that shortly after its introduction, the GGI received support from approximately 160 countries and international organizations, with more than 60 countries joining the Group of Friends of the Global Governance Initiative. It states that the international community is of the view that the GGI sends a clear message: to defend multilateralism, join forces, and strive for a just future.
According to the white paper, the GGI aligns with the growing trend toward greater democracy in international relations and strengthens international confidence in the practice of multilateralism. The initiative provides a clear and actionable roadmap for the improvement of global governance, injecting valuable stability and positive energy into a turbulent world.
The white paper emphasizes that China proposed the GGI to accelerate the construction of a more just and equitable global governance system. The document states that firmly defending the authority and status of the United Nations is of fundamental importance for the effective implementation of this initiative.
According to the white paper, success will also depend on major countries acting with a sense of responsibility and all nations working together in unity to bridge deficits in peace and development. It states that rather than attempting to reinvent the wheel, all countries must firmly defend the international system with the UN at its core, maintain the international order based on international law, and uphold the fundamental norms of international relations based on the purposes and principles of the UN Charter.
In addition to the preface and conclusion, the white paper consists of five chapters: “Today’s World Faces Severe and Complex Challenges,” “The Global Governance Initiative Responds to the Challenges of Our Era,” “China’s Contribution to the Development of Global Governance,” “Directing the Course of Change Toward a Bright Future,” and “Advancing Hand in Hand at a Critical Juncture in History.”
-
Europe2 weeks agoAfD says Ukraine should compensate Germany over Nord Stream sabotage
-
Asia2 weeks agoPentagon adds Alibaba, Baidu and BYD to list of firms with alleged Chinese military ties
-
Opinion1 week agoA voice rising from New Delhi: BRICS’s manifesto for a new world order
-
Europe2 weeks agoToyota and JLR warn EU ‘Made in Europe’ rules could threaten jobs and investment
-
America2 weeks agoWorld Cup referee from Somalia denied entry to US as immigration scrutiny intensifies
-
Middle East1 week agoMine clearing in Strait of Hormuz could delay shipping traffic for up to 50 days
-
America7 days agoData leak exposes Peter Thiel’s secret ‘Dialog’ network of politicians, regulators, and tech elites
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoTürkiye calls for Azerbaijan-Armenia peace treaty, highlights normalization steps with Yerevan
