Connect with us

Middle East

US ceasefire proposal does not meet Hamas demands

Published

on

CIA Director William Burns has presented a proposal for a six-week ceasefire between Israel and Hamas in Gaza, including a prisoner exchange and the “conditional” return of displaced Palestinians to the northern territories.

Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) director William Burns presented a new proposal that would temporarily halt Israeli attacks on Gaza and secure the release of Israeli prisoners.

An anonymous Palestinian source told AA that the new ceasefire proposal consists of three phases. The source said the first phase includes the release of 900 Palestinians, 100 of whom are serving long prison sentences, in exchange for Israeli civilian prisoners and the return of displaced civilians to northern Gaza.

The source specified that the displaced would return to camps set up by international agencies and not to their areas of residence.

If the displaced return to the north, Israeli forces will be stationed a few hundred metres from Salah al-Din Street in the east and Er-Rashid Street in the west.

According to the Wall Street Journal, the first phase of the agreement is a six-week ceasefire.

Israel has been reluctant to agree to this, fearing that Hamas fighters will mix with the civilian population and return to areas Israel says it has already evacuated. Israeli negotiators had previously offered to allow 60,000 Palestinians to return.

The Palestinian source told AA that the second phase of the offer would see an agreed number of Palestinian prisoners released in exchange for all Israeli prisoners, and the third phase would see the bodies of Israeli prisoners handed over.

The mediators expect both Hamas and Israel to respond to the latest offer by this evening.

Qatari foreign ministry spokesman Majid al-Ansari told the BBC that he was increasingly optimistic that a ceasefire agreement could be reached, but added: ‘We are by no means at the final stage of the talks.

Diaa Rashwan, head of Egypt’s state information service, told Cairo-based Alghad TV that a ceasefire could begin as early as tomorrow morning, the first day of Eid al-Fitr, if an agreement is reached.

‘The ceasefire proposal does not meet Hamas’ demands’

Mahmoud Merdawi, a Hamas official, said that the proposal presented by the mediators clearly and unequivocally ignores the ceasefire and the need for Israel to withdraw from Gaza.

Merdawi continued: “We want an agreement that will not lead us to a new war. This agreement should include a comprehensive ceasefire, the complete withdrawal of Israeli troops from Gaza, the unconditional return of the displaced to their homes and reconstruction work, and a prisoner exchange. We do not want an agreement that guarantees the release of Israeli prisoners but leaves our prisoners to negotiations and Israeli arbitrariness. This would mean the continuation of the occupation and the division of the northern and southern parts of the Gaza Strip under Israeli occupation.

Merdawi said the proposal does not include a ceasefire and withdrawal of troops, does not clarify the status of prisoners, and does not include the return of displaced persons, but the division into civilian and military, which means that most of the displaced will not be able to return home.

Hamas said in a statement that Hamas is committed to reaching an agreement that will end the aggression against the Palestinian people, but Israel continues to be stubborn and does not respond positively to any of the demands of the Palestinian people and the resistance.

Despite this, the statement said that the Hamas administration is studying the proposal presented to it with all national responsibility, and it was noted that the mediators will be informed of Hamas’ position on the proposal when the study is completed.

One of the biggest obstacles to an agreement has been whether Israel would accept Hamas’ demands that Gazans be allowed to return fully to the northern part of the settlement and that Israeli troops be withdrawn from the settlements. Israel fears that if these steps are taken together, Hamas could regain power in Gaza and survive the war.

Offer includes 500 trucks of aid

Israel is under international pressure to end the conflict, including from the Biden administration. The White House has been pressuring Israel to increase the amount of aid allowed into Gaza, especially after an Israeli raid killed seven employees of the US-based aid organisation World Central Kitchen. Cogat, the Israeli agency that coordinates humanitarian aid in Gaza, said 419 trucks of aid were inspected and transferred into the territory on Monday, the highest number of trucks entering in a single day since the start of the war. Before the war, Gaza received about 500 trucks a day.

The latest US proposal calls for 500 trucks of humanitarian aid to enter Gaza every day after the ceasefire begins.

Middle East

Israel military weighs legal steps against Gaza documentary makers

Published

on

Israel’s Chief of General Staff, Eyal Zamir, has instructed officials to examine criminal and legal steps against the production team of the documentary “NAZA”, which focuses on testimonies from soldiers and intelligence personnel who served in Gaza operations.

While Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu targeted the production, describing it as “unacceptable”, more than 200 Israeli filmmakers published a joint statement backing the directors.

Maintaining that the documentary slandered the military, Chief of General Staff Zamir asserted that the work had no intention of uncovering the truth.

“In light of the available data, this production is not a work that constructively criticises the military,” Zamir said. “On the contrary, it relies on blood libels, a deliberate distortion of the reality on the ground, and baseless accusations directed at our soldiers and commanders.”

Zamir further claimed that the military was presented as an entity acting unlawfully and that the arguments of anti-Israel circles were adapted for the film.

The Israeli military is establishing a new multidisciplinary, inter-agency working group involving domestic and international experts to counter such allegations.

Meanwhile, the military’s most senior legal official, Itai Ofir, is reviewing the legal procedures that could be initiated against the documentary’s producers.

The military leadership contends that the testimonies lack credibility because the identities, ranks, and operational details of the personnel interviewed in the film were concealed.

Rejecting the assertion that targets were selected by artificial intelligence, military officials stated that all strikes and target approvals were decided by human hands within the framework of military directives.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reacted to the production in a video message shared on Telegram.

“This situation is appalling,” Netanyahu said, voicing his reaction. “While resisting antisemitic incitement conducted globally, it is unacceptable for a similar approach to arise from within ourselves. Two Israeli directors presenting the Israeli military as war criminals are being applauded at the Venice Film Festival.”

The 80-minute production was awarded the Special Jury Prize at the 83rd Venice International Film Festival and received a 25-minute standing ovation in the auditorium at the end of the screening.

In reactions emerging from the cabinet, Minister of Culture and Sports Miki Zohar accused directors Yuval Abraham and Rachel Szor of “high treason”.

“The self-hatred displayed by these producers, who risk harming their own country to win the praise of antisemitic circles worldwide, is beyond comprehension,” Zohar said. Announcing that he would launch an initiative to revoke the directors’ citizenship, Zohar stated that direct accusations of treason could be brought against the individuals.

Far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir also addressed the directors, stating: “You are a source of shame for the entire people of Israel. Get out of here.” Under current Israeli legislation, the culture minister does not have the authority to unilaterally revoke citizenship; decisions in this direction can be made only as a result of legal processes involving the Ministry of Interior and judicial bodies.

Following the mounting backlash, more than 200 Israeli filmmakers, including Ari Folman, Shlomi Elkabetz, Ran Tal, and Michal Aviad, signed a joint declaration of solidarity. The text emphasised that “the primary duty of art and the profession of journalism is to hold up a mirror to the society from which it arises.”

Produced in partnership with The Guardian and JW Films, “NAZA” conveys testimonies from 24 military and intelligence personnel whose identities were kept concealed and who took part in surveillance, targeting, and air strike decisions in Gaza.

Deriving its name from a Hebrew military acronym that designates the number of civilians expected to lose their lives during an operation and corresponds to the concept of “collateral damage”, the film documents that targets were determined using artificial intelligence and mass surveillance networks.

Describing high-tech weaponry and AI-assisted targeting mechanisms, one interviewed soldier made the comparison: “Because everything runs on remote control, the process resembles a video game.”

Another soldier described the deaths on the ground as “unbelievably fun”.

Director Yuval Abraham said: “The intelligence personnel we interviewed stated that the mass deaths were not an accident, but on the contrary rested upon a designed and systematic choice.”

Abraham and Szor stated that the production did not scrutinise individual soldier violations, but directly examined the institutional chain of command and operational doctrines.

The two directors had previously made the Oscar-winning documentary “No Other Land”, which addressed the displacement of Palestinians and settler violence in the occupied West Bank, alongside Palestinian filmmakers Basel Adra and Hamdan Ballal.

While the Ministry of Health in Gaza announced that the number of Palestinians who have lost their lives in the attacks exceeded 73,700, the actual death toll is projected to be far above this figure due to destroyed healthcare infrastructure and casualties lost beneath the rubble.

Continue Reading

Middle East

Saudi Arabia asks UK for military aid to counter Houthis in Yemen

Published

on

British Prime Minister Andy Burnham is considering responding to requests for military assistance directed at Yemen from the Saudi Arabian government.

According to sources speaking to Bloomberg, the prime minister has received various requests for diplomatic and military support from Saudi Arabia.

The sources stated that Saudi Arabia’s requests include providing operational support to its military to repel the advance of Ansarullah (the Houthis) along Yemen’s Red Sea coast towards the strategically vital Bab el-Mandeb Strait, as well as assistance in defending against attacks on oil infrastructure.

Under pressure to take action because of the economic difficulties generated by the war with Iran, Burnham is also concerned about creating the impression that he supports Donald Trump’s war against Iran, given that the UK public overwhelmingly opposes the war.

Reports had emerged that Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman asked Donald Trump to conduct air strikes against the Yemeni resistance.

At present, the UK has approved the deployment of only British military advisers to Saudi Arabia.

This comes despite Saudi Arabia’s request for operational support to halt operations carried out by Yemeni forces along the coastline.

Former UK prime ministers Rishi Sunak and Keir Starmer had provided more comprehensive support to Saudi Arabia against the Yemeni resistance.

The prime minister was also warned by UK officials that the Bab el-Mandeb Strait is of vital importance to global maritime transport and the economy, and that the capture of this strait by the Houthis must be prevented.

Earlier on Monday, Bloomberg reported that Saudi Arabia was seeking to increase the volume of oil shipments transiting the Strait of Hormuz after shutting down its East-West crude pipeline.

Continue Reading

Middle East

Saudi exportable crude stocks risk depletion within a week

Published

on

Saudi Arabia risks exhausting its exportable crude stockpiles if the East-West pipeline to the Red Sea fails to resume operations, according to reports.

Citing companies purchasing Saudi crude as well as market traders, the Reuters news agency reported that such an outcome could trigger a severe contraction in global oil supply.

Oil flows through the pipeline were halted following drone strikes. The government in Riyadh has not yet issued an official statement regarding the extent of the damage or the expected duration of repair works.

Sources familiar with the matter have offered differing estimates regarding the repair timetable.

One source speaking to Reuters noted that works could take five to six weeks, while another source stated that the damage could be repaired more quickly and that partial oil flows could be restored before repairs are entirely completed.

Stocks at Yanbu port reach critical threshold

Traversing the Arabian Peninsula to the Red Sea port of Yanbu, the pipeline carries approximately 4 million barrels of oil per day. This volume represents roughly 4% of global oil supply.

The line previously provided Saudi Arabia with an alternative export route, bypassing the Strait of Hormuz where maritime traffic has faced disruptions due to regional conflict in the Middle East.

Three sources closely tracking shipment schedules indicated that, following the stoppage, oil reserves at Yanbu port would suffice to sustain exports for only five to seven days.

A fourth source stated that additional reserves held in Egypt at the Red Sea port of Ain Sokhna and the Mediterranean terminal of Sidi Kerir afford buyers shipments for several more days.

Storage capacities stand at approximately 35 million barrels at Yanbu, 18 million barrels at Ain Sokhna, and 20 million barrels at Sidi Kerir.

However, sources stressed that these facilities are not currently filled to maximum capacity and warned that these inventories will be entirely depleted if the pipeline is not brought back online.

Output at lowest level in 30 years

According to International Energy Agency data, disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz and Red Sea transit corridors pushed Saudi oil supply in August to its lowest level in 30 years.

Data submitted by the Riyadh government to OPEC show that the kingdom’s crude production fell from 10.9 million barrels per day in February to 6.2 million barrels per day in August.

In July, the Houthis in Yemen announced the launch of a naval blockade against Saudi Arabia. On 8 September, the Saudi Ministry of Energy announced that operations had been suspended at several energy facilities in the southern part of the country.

On the same day, the Saudi Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued an official statement condemning Houthi strikes targeting facilities in the cities of Abha, Khamis Mushait, Jizan, and Najran.

Riyadh authorities reported that 73 civilians, including women and children, were injured in the attacks. US President Donald Trump stated that Iran might be behind this attack on Saudi Arabia.

In oil markets, Brent crude futures recorded their sharpest single-day gain since late July on Thursday, 10 September.

The price of November Brent crude contracts rose by 6.3% to reach $107.6 per barrel. Prices retreated below the $105 mark the following day.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey