Connect with us

AMERICA

US-Europe productivity gap widens

Published

on

The US overtaking Europe in productivity has fuelled fears that the EU is facing a ‘competitiveness crisis’, with policymakers calling for more public and private investment.

New data released on Friday showed that productivity in the eurozone fell by 1.2 per cent in the fourth quarter from a year earlier, while in the US it rose by 2.6 per cent over the same period, the Financial Times reported. Labour productivity growth in the US has been more than double that of the eurozone and the UK over the past two decades.

Bart van Ark, chief executive of the UK-based Productivity Institute, said: “In the long run, productivity growth in the US is expected to be higher than in Europe. Europe is not showing the same dynamism. This is widening the growth gap between the US and the EU,” said Bart van Ark.

Some economists argue that the US is growing faster than the eurozone partly because its population is younger, growing faster and working longer hours. But much of the output gap is due to the fact that people in the US produce more for every hour they work.

According to the FT, EU policymakers see this trend as deeply worrying and a reflection of a long-standing failure to catch up with US levels of private and public investment.

US worker productivity outperforms EU

Output per hour worked, a standard measure of labour productivity, has increased by more than 6 per cent in the US non-farm business sector since 2019, according to official data. This outpaces the eurozone and the UK, which grew by around 1 per cent over the same period.

In contrast to the ‘green’ stimulus in the US, the Eurozone has received less fiscal support from governments and has experienced a much larger rise in energy prices as a result of the war in Ukraine. The fragmentation of Europe’s financial markets, fiscal policy and regulation also makes it more vulnerable to external pressures than the US.

While there is no doubt that short-term factors have fuelled the US recovery, some economists say there is more to it. Gilles Moëc, chief economist at insurance company Axa, said: “Productivity in the eurozone has stalled. Now that the recovery has been going on for so long, we have to think about the possibility that something structural is going on,” said Gilles Moëc, chief economist at insurance company Axa.

Moëc estimates that if eurozone productivity continues to lag the US by the same amount, GDP growth will be one percentage point lower each year.

European Central Bank (ECB) executive board member Isabel Schnabel said last month that it was “more urgent than ever” for eurozone leaders to close the productivity gap with the US.

This is needed to tackle the “competitiveness crisis” as EU producers face higher energy prices and greater labour challenges than their American or Chinese counterparts, Schnabel said.

The ECB is also weighing when to cut record-high interest rates amid fears that falling productivity will increase labour costs for eurozone companies, raising the risk that inflation will remain high.

Schnabel said one of the main reasons for the eurozone’s weakness was its failure to capitalise on productivity gains from digital technologies, as the US did earlier. Schnabel said that promoting competition will be part of the solution, and called for faster and more effective implementation of the EU’s Next Generation Public Investment Programme.

Mario Draghi, the former head of the ECB, will report to the EU president later this year on more ambitious proposals to boost the EU’s competitiveness. Draghi is reported to have told the bloc’s finance ministers that they would need to find ‘enormous amounts of money, both public and private, in a relatively short period of time’ to boost investment to US levels.

EU decline is temporary, some economists say

However, not all economists are convinced that the recent US strength is evidence of a structural shift.

Erik Neilsen, chief economist at UniCredit, argues that the current weakness in the eurozone is a ‘statistical phenomenon’, as employers who struggled to hire in the post-credit upswing are now hoarding labour in the downturn. In his view, productivity could recover as the ECB’s tight policy squeezes demand until workers are eventually laid off.

Catherine Mann, an outside member of the Bank of England’s monetary policy committee, also told the FT last month that while US labour productivity figures look ‘very attractive’, they are driven by demand factors, notably a budget deficit of over 6%.

By contrast, demand is more subdued in the eurozone and the UK, where the economy entered a technical recession in the fourth quarter.

Claus Vistesen of Pantheon Macroeconomics said there were reasons to be optimistic about European productivity. “If we are indeed on the verge of a new technology-driven productivity boom centred on artificial intelligence and related services, it would be very pessimistic to assume that it will bypass the eurozone altogether,” Vistesen said.

AMERICA

Fed cuts interest rates, dollar surges to two-year high

Published

on

The U.S. Federal Reserve reduced interest rates by a quarter percentage point but signaled a slower pace of easing next year. This move drove the U.S. dollar to its highest level in two years and triggered a sell-off in both domestic and international stock markets.

The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) voted on Wednesday to lower the benchmark interest rate to 4.25–4.5%, marking the third consecutive cut. The lone dissenting vote came from Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack, who favored maintaining the current rates.

Officials highlighted concerns about persistent inflation, projecting fewer rate cuts for 2025 than previously expected. Reflecting these worries, policymakers also raised their inflation forecasts for the coming year. Following the announcement, Fed Chair Jay Powell remarked that the current policy settings were “significantly less restrictive,” indicating the Fed’s inclination to adopt a more cautious approach to further easing.

“This decision was a ‘closer call’ than prior meetings,” Powell noted, emphasizing that inflation trends remain “sideways” while risks to the labor market are “diminishing.”

Aditya Bhave, senior U.S. economist at Bank of America, described the Fed’s message as “unabashedly hawkish.” He pointed to the shift in officials’ 2025 forecasts, which now anticipate just two quarter-point rate cuts instead of three, calling it a “wholesale shift.”

JPMorgan Chase, a key player in U.S. bond markets, noted that money markets are pricing in only a 0.31 percentage point rate cut in 2025. This outlook, significantly tighter than the bank’s earlier 0.75-point forecast, underscores the magnitude of the Fed’s policy shift.

The decision triggered a sharp sell-off on Wall Street, with the S&P 500 falling 3% and the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite dropping 3.6%. High-profile winners of the 2024 rally were hit hard, including: Tesla, down 8.3%; Meta (Facebook’s parent company), down 3.6%; Amazon, down 4.6%.

Smaller companies, often seen as more sensitive to US economic fluctuations, also suffered. The Russell 2000 index declined 4.4%.

In Asia, stocks fell in early Thursday trading. Benchmarks in South Korea and Taiwan dropped 1.8% and 1.6%, respectively. Meanwhile, U.S. government bond prices fell, driving the yield on two-year Treasuries—sensitive to Fed policy—up by 0.11 percentage points to 4.35%.

The U.S. dollar surged 1.2% against a basket of six major currencies, reaching its strongest level since November 2022. According to Wells Fargo senior economist Mike Pugliese, the currency had already been rising on expectations of inflationary pressures following Donald Trump’s election victory last month. However, Wednesday’s Fed decision “poured more petrol on the fire.”

The South Korean won dropped to a 15-year low against the dollar, while the Japanese yen weakened 0.5%.

Continue Reading

AMERICA

Amazon pledges $1 billion to Trump inauguration fund

Published

on

Amazon confirmed on Thursday that it will contribute $1 million to Donald Trump’s inauguration fund, a move mirroring similar actions by other major tech companies, including Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram. Amazon also plans to broadcast Trump’s inauguration via its Prime Video service.

This announcement comes as major tech executives seek to establish ties with the incoming U.S. president, despite Trump’s longstanding criticisms of Big Tech. Trump has frequently accused technology companies of censorship and bias against conservative media.

Jeff Bezos, Amazon’s founder and CEO, is reportedly planning to meet Trump at his Mar-a-Lago resort next week, according to The Wall Street Journal, which first reported Amazon’s donation. Similarly, Google CEO Sundar Pichai and Apple CEO Tim Cook have expressed their congratulations to Trump since his election victory in November.

Trump’s relationship with Amazon has been fraught with challenges. During his first term, he accused the company of undercutting competition and criticized its tax policies. In 2018, Trump ordered a review of U.S. Postal Service package pricing, claiming the agency acted as Amazon’s “courier.”

Apple, meanwhile, faces potential risks from Trump’s proposed tariff policies, which could disrupt critical supply chains in China. However, during Trump’s first term, Cook secured exemptions for certain Apple products.

Meta’s CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, and other tech leaders have also engaged with Trump. According to The Information, Zuckerberg dined with Trump after the election. Pichai is also expected to meet Trump this week.

While Trump scrutinized Big Tech during his presidency, Amazon now faces mounting regulatory pressure under President Joe Biden. The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC), led by Lina Khan, has been investigating Amazon for alleged monopoly practices, with several states filing lawsuits last year. The FTC is also examining major cloud service providers, including Amazon, over partnerships in artificial intelligence.

Despite earlier conflicts, Bezos recently praised Trump for his “tremendous grace and courage under real fire” in a post on X (formerly Twitter) following an assassination attempt. Bezos, who also owns The Washington Post, reportedly prevented the newspaper from endorsing Trump’s Democratic opponent Kamala Harris in the 2024 election.

Speculation about a tacit agreement between Bezos and Trump has surfaced, allegedly tied to Blue Origin, Bezos’s rocket company competing with Elon Musk’s SpaceX.

Continue Reading

AMERICA

Investors poured $140 billion into U.S. equities following Trump’s victory

Published

on

Nearly $140 billion has flowed into U.S. equity funds since last month’s election, as investors anticipate Donald Trump’s administration will implement sweeping tax cuts and regulatory reforms.

According to the Financial Times (FT), which cites data from EPFR, U.S. equity funds have seen inflows totaling $139.5 billion since Trump’s victory on November 5. This surge in investment made November the busiest month for equity inflows since records began in 2000.

The massive influx of funds has driven major U.S. stock indexes to a series of record highs, as investors appeared to shrug off concerns about potential economic risks, including inflation and its implications for the Federal Reserve’s interest rate policy.

“The growth agenda that Trump has put on the table is being fully embraced,” said Dec Mullarkey, Chief Executive of SLC Management. He added that Trump’s picks for top administration posts have been seen as “very market friendly.”

Trump has promised to fill his administration with financial experts, including Scott Bessent as Treasury Secretary, and Paul Atkins, a cryptocurrency advocate, as Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

The president-elect has outlined a pro-growth agenda, emphasizing reduced taxes, deregulation, and economic expansion. These proposals have spurred optimism among investors, fueling a rally in the market.

The S&P 500, Wall Street’s primary stock market indicator, has risen 5.3% since Election Day, bringing its total gains for the year to 28%. Smaller companies, which are often seen as more responsive to changes in the U.S. economy, have outperformed larger firms during this period. The Russell 2000 index recently hit a record high for the first time in three years.

While U.S. equity funds have enjoyed record inflows, other global markets have experienced outflows emerging market funds have seen net withdrawals of $8 billion, with China-focused funds accounting for $4 billion; funds investing in Western Europe have lost $14 billion; and Japan-focused funds have seen outflows of approximately $6 billion.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey