Connect with us

AMERICA

US-Europe productivity gap widens

Published

on

The US overtaking Europe in productivity has fuelled fears that the EU is facing a ‘competitiveness crisis’, with policymakers calling for more public and private investment.

New data released on Friday showed that productivity in the eurozone fell by 1.2 per cent in the fourth quarter from a year earlier, while in the US it rose by 2.6 per cent over the same period, the Financial Times reported. Labour productivity growth in the US has been more than double that of the eurozone and the UK over the past two decades.

Bart van Ark, chief executive of the UK-based Productivity Institute, said: “In the long run, productivity growth in the US is expected to be higher than in Europe. Europe is not showing the same dynamism. This is widening the growth gap between the US and the EU,” said Bart van Ark.

Some economists argue that the US is growing faster than the eurozone partly because its population is younger, growing faster and working longer hours. But much of the output gap is due to the fact that people in the US produce more for every hour they work.

According to the FT, EU policymakers see this trend as deeply worrying and a reflection of a long-standing failure to catch up with US levels of private and public investment.

US worker productivity outperforms EU

Output per hour worked, a standard measure of labour productivity, has increased by more than 6 per cent in the US non-farm business sector since 2019, according to official data. This outpaces the eurozone and the UK, which grew by around 1 per cent over the same period.

In contrast to the ‘green’ stimulus in the US, the Eurozone has received less fiscal support from governments and has experienced a much larger rise in energy prices as a result of the war in Ukraine. The fragmentation of Europe’s financial markets, fiscal policy and regulation also makes it more vulnerable to external pressures than the US.

While there is no doubt that short-term factors have fuelled the US recovery, some economists say there is more to it. Gilles Moëc, chief economist at insurance company Axa, said: “Productivity in the eurozone has stalled. Now that the recovery has been going on for so long, we have to think about the possibility that something structural is going on,” said Gilles Moëc, chief economist at insurance company Axa.

Moëc estimates that if eurozone productivity continues to lag the US by the same amount, GDP growth will be one percentage point lower each year.

European Central Bank (ECB) executive board member Isabel Schnabel said last month that it was “more urgent than ever” for eurozone leaders to close the productivity gap with the US.

This is needed to tackle the “competitiveness crisis” as EU producers face higher energy prices and greater labour challenges than their American or Chinese counterparts, Schnabel said.

The ECB is also weighing when to cut record-high interest rates amid fears that falling productivity will increase labour costs for eurozone companies, raising the risk that inflation will remain high.

Schnabel said one of the main reasons for the eurozone’s weakness was its failure to capitalise on productivity gains from digital technologies, as the US did earlier. Schnabel said that promoting competition will be part of the solution, and called for faster and more effective implementation of the EU’s Next Generation Public Investment Programme.

Mario Draghi, the former head of the ECB, will report to the EU president later this year on more ambitious proposals to boost the EU’s competitiveness. Draghi is reported to have told the bloc’s finance ministers that they would need to find ‘enormous amounts of money, both public and private, in a relatively short period of time’ to boost investment to US levels.

EU decline is temporary, some economists say

However, not all economists are convinced that the recent US strength is evidence of a structural shift.

Erik Neilsen, chief economist at UniCredit, argues that the current weakness in the eurozone is a ‘statistical phenomenon’, as employers who struggled to hire in the post-credit upswing are now hoarding labour in the downturn. In his view, productivity could recover as the ECB’s tight policy squeezes demand until workers are eventually laid off.

Catherine Mann, an outside member of the Bank of England’s monetary policy committee, also told the FT last month that while US labour productivity figures look ‘very attractive’, they are driven by demand factors, notably a budget deficit of over 6%.

By contrast, demand is more subdued in the eurozone and the UK, where the economy entered a technical recession in the fourth quarter.

Claus Vistesen of Pantheon Macroeconomics said there were reasons to be optimistic about European productivity. “If we are indeed on the verge of a new technology-driven productivity boom centred on artificial intelligence and related services, it would be very pessimistic to assume that it will bypass the eurozone altogether,” Vistesen said.

AMERICA

Biden plans to write off Ukraine’s $4.6bn debt ahead of Trump

Published

on

President Joe Biden’s administration has officially notified Congress of its intention to forgive Ukraine’s $4.65 billion debt, a move tied to ongoing efforts to support the country amid its conflict with Russia.

This debt represents half of the $9 billion provided to Kyiv as part of the $61 billion aid package approved by Washington in April. Unlike other forms of assistance, this funding was issued as conditionally repayable loans, with provisions allowing the United States President to cancel up to 50% of the debt if deemed necessary.

In a statement, the U.S. State Department explained that the debt cancellation is intended to “help Ukraine win” and serves the national interests of the U.S., the EU, G7+, and NATO.”

According to Bloomberg, President Biden is determined to maximize aid to Ukraine before President-elect Donald Trump assumes office. However, the decision to write off the debt has drawn sharp criticism from Republicans.

Republican Senator Rand Paul argued that the Biden administration’s decision places undue financial burden on the American public. He pledged to demand a vote in the Senate to challenge the proposal.

Despite this, Bloomberg notes that any effort to overturn the debt cancellation would require approval from both houses of Congress, a scenario that appears unlikely given the Democratic majority in the Senate. Furthermore, President Biden holds veto power, making reversal of the decision even more challenging.

Earlier, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken announced plans to exhaust all remaining aid approved by Congress before President Trump’s inauguration on January 20.

National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan emphasized that one of the administration’s key goals is to position Ukraine as strongly as possible—both militarily and at the negotiating table.

Pentagon officials reported that $9.3 billion in military aid is currently in the pipeline. Pentagon spokeswoman Sabrina Singh confirmed plans for weekly arms deliveries to Kyiv, with the aim of expediting aid distribution before the presidential transition.

On November 20, the Pentagon unveiled an additional $275 million military aid package for Ukraine, further underscoring the administration’s commitment to strengthening Ukraine’s defense capabilities.

Continue Reading

AMERICA

Donald Trump taps Howard Lutnick to lead Commerce Department

Published

on

Donald Trump has announced his intention to nominate Wall Street investor and campaign donor Howard Lutnick as the new head of the U.S. Department of Commerce, placing the billionaire at the forefront of implementing the sweeping tariffs promised during his presidential campaign.

Lutnick, who co-chaired Trump’s transition team, had previously been considered for the role of Treasury Secretary. He is also the CEO of Cantor Fitzgerald, a prominent investment firm.

In a statement on Tuesday, Trump declared that Lutnick would be “directly responsible” for leading the Commerce Department and overseeing the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR).

The USTR, established in 1974 to manage negotiations with U.S. trading partners, traditionally reports directly to the president. If confirmed by the Senate, the 63-year-old Lutnick will play a pivotal role in aiding U.S. businesses and executing Trump’s proposed tariffs on international trade partners.

Trump has outlined plans for a 60% tariff on imports from China and a global tariff of up to 20%, signaling a major shift in U.S. trade policy.

Lutnick, despite lacking prior government experience, has been a steadfast advocate for Trump’s economic agenda. During a New York campaign rally, Lutnick remarked, “When was America great? At the turn of the century, our economy was floundering! That was 125 years ago. We had no income tax and all we had were tariffs.”

While Lutnick has emerged as a major donor to Trump, he has also supported establishment Democrats and Republicans in the past, including Chuck Schumer and Jeb Bush. He contributed to both Hillary Clinton’s 2008 and 2016 campaigns, hosting a fundraiser for her in 2015. Lutnick maintains a personal friendship with the Clintons, noting their attendance at a Cantor Fitzgerald fundraiser in September 2022.

Lutnick has also maintained a long-standing relationship with Trump, even appearing on The Celebrity Apprentice in 2008. He disclosed to the Financial Times in October that he has donated over $10 million to Trump’s 2024 campaign and another $500,000 to the transition team, totaling approximately $75 million.

Treasury Secretary selection process still uncertain

The position of Treasury Secretary, one of the most significant roles in Trump’s administration, remains undecided. Lutnick’s name has been floated for the role, though he faces competition from hedge fund manager Scott Bessent, private equity billionaire Marc Rowan, and former Federal Reserve governor Kevin Warsh.

Marc Rowan, the CEO of Apollo Global Management, has emerged as a leading contender and is expected to meet with Trump to present his case. Rowan’s supporters cite his extensive expertise in financial markets, though competition remains fierce.

Forecasting site Polymarket currently lists Warsh as the favorite for Treasury Secretary, followed by Bessent, Rowan, and William Hagerty. If unsuccessful in his bid for Treasury Secretary, Bessent is reportedly vying for the chairmanship of the National Economic Council.

Trump names Mehmet Oz to run Medicare and Medicaid

Trump also announced on Tuesday his nomination of Dr. Mehmet Oz to lead the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Describing Oz as “one of the most talented physicians” capable of “making America healthy again,” Trump expressed confidence in Oz’s ability to reduce waste and fraud within the nation’s largest government agency.

Dr. Oz, a former heart surgeon and Columbia University professor, rose to prominence as Oprah Winfrey’s health expert before hosting his own popular talk show. However, his career has been controversial, with critics accusing him of promoting scientifically dubious theories and unproven treatments.

Oz’s political experience includes a 2022 Senate race in Pennsylvania, where he was endorsed by Trump but ultimately lost to Democrat John Fetterman.

Continue Reading

AMERICA

U.S. may start its plan to separate Google from Chrome

Published

on

The Department of Justice (DOJ) may move forward with plans to force the sale of Google’s Chrome web browser as part of its ongoing antitrust case against Alphabet (Google).

According to sources familiar with the case, the department intends to ask the judge—who ruled in August that Google illegally monopolized the search market—to address concerns related to artificial intelligence (AI) and the Android smartphone operating system. This information was reported by Bloomberg.

Antitrust officials, along with participating state attorneys, are expected to recommend that federal Judge Amit Mehta impose data licensing requirements on Google. These officials have indicated that Chrome, the world’s most widely used browser, is a critical gateway for many users accessing Google Search. For this reason, they are urging the judge to mandate the sale of Chrome.

Officials stated that a Chrome sale could be considered later if other settlement measures fail to foster a more competitive market. Currently, Google Chrome commands a dominant 61% share of the U.S. browser market, according to StatCounter, a web traffic analysis service.

Over the past three months, state attorneys interviewed numerous companies to prepare their recommendations. Officials noted that some recommendations are still under review, and details may evolve before submission.

While a proposal to force Google to sell its Android platform was considered, officials have since stepped back from this more aggressive option.

If Judge Mehta adopts these recommendations, the ruling could significantly reshape the online search market and influence the emerging artificial intelligence industry.

The case, originally filed during the Trump administration and continued under President Joe Biden, represents one of the most aggressive efforts to regulate a major tech company in decades. The last comparable attempt was Washington’s unsuccessful bid to break up Microsoft in the early 2000s.

Chrome plays a crucial role in Google’s advertising business by providing user data that enhances ad targeting, a primary revenue source. Additionally, Google has been leveraging Chrome to promote Gemini, its new AI bot. Gemini has the potential to evolve from a simple answer bot to a comprehensive assistant, supporting users across the web.

Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Mandeep Singh estimates that Chrome could be worth $15–20 billion if sold, considering its more than 3 billion monthly active users. However, Bob O’Donnell of TECHnalysis Research notes that Chrome’s value depends on its integration with other services, stating: “It’s not directly monetizable. It acts as a gateway to other things. Monetization would depend on how buyers link Chrome to their services.”

Google has strongly opposed the DOJ’s recommendations. Lee-Anne Mulholland, Google’s vice president of regulatory affairs, criticized the move as government overreach, arguing: “This agenda goes far beyond the legal issues in this case and will harm consumers, developers, and American technological leadership at a critical time.”

Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt echoed this sentiment in an interview with CNBC. He emphasized the value of Chrome in enhancing the Google ecosystem, stating: “Singling out these companies won’t fundamentally solve the broader issues.”

In a blog post, Google warned that under new ownership, Chrome might no longer remain free or receive the same level of investment, potentially leading to a shift in its business model.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey