America
US government shutdown pauses major antitrust lawsuits against Amazon and Apple
Antitrust lawsuits in the US against tech giants Amazon and Apple have been paused due to the government shutdown.
The lawsuits against the four major tech giants—Google, Meta, Apple, and Amazon—are among the most closely watched cases in Washington and the business world.
Additionally, these cases are among the most politically sensitive, as the companies’ CEOs have sought to build closer relationships with Donald Trump and the White House.
The cases against Google and Meta are proceeding during the federal government shutdown. Both companies are near a resolution, with one judge set to finalize a decision in one of Google’s cases and another expected to rule on Meta soon.
On the other hand, the lawsuits that threaten to break up Amazon and Apple were suspended last week. Amazon’s trial will not be heard until February 2027, and Apple’s discovery and deposition processes will continue until January 2027.
The judges in both cases approved the government’s request to suspend the proceedings until federal funding is restored.
How much the shutdown will affect the cases will likely depend on how long the government remains closed. A work stoppage of a few days or weeks is unlikely to cause a major disruption, but a longer delay could postpone the trial dates scheduled for 2027.
Judges also have broad discretion on whether to suspend a case. Even during a shutdown, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) are still obligated to proceed with a case if ordered by the court.
Both the Google and Meta cases have reached their final stages. In one of the lawsuits concerning Google’s search engine empire, the government requested a suspension until it reopens.
However, Washington D.C. District Judge Amit Mehta ruled for the case to continue, noting that antitrust cases proceeded during the 2019 shutdown.
Mehta will hold a hearing on October 8 to finalize a damages ruling in which he declined to break up Google for monopolizing the online search market.
In the DOJ’s other case against Google, which targets the company’s monopoly in the online advertising market, the government did not request a suspension, but the department’s lawyers asked for a stay in court this week and were denied. That case has been in a settlement hearing since last week.
The FTC did not request to suspend its case against Meta’s acquisition of Instagram. That case is awaiting a judge’s decision after going to trial this spring.
In Washington state, District Judge John Chun granted the FTC’s request to suspend the trial in its case against Amazon. This lawsuit concerns allegations that the company prioritizes its own products in its online store. Chun ruled that ongoing depositions may continue.
A day later, District Judge Leda Dunn Wettre approved a similar request from the Department of Justice in New Jersey in a case concerning Apple’s monopoly in the smartphone market.
The federal judiciary announced that courts will remain open until at least October 17, using court fee balances and other funds not affected by the appropriations lapse. The judiciary remained operational throughout the entire five-week shutdown in 2018.
The FTC and DOJ are continuing to accept premerger notification filings during the current shutdown.
America
US nuclear weapons spending jumps 22% to $69.2 billion, ICAN says
US spending on nuclear weapons rose by 22% in 2025 compared with the previous year, according to a report published by the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN).
Washington spent $69.2 billion on its nuclear arsenal during the year, a figure that exceeded the combined nuclear weapons expenditures of all other nuclear-armed states.
The world’s nine nuclear powers — the United States, Russia, China, the United Kingdom, France, India, Pakistan, Israel and North Korea — increased total spending on their arsenals by 19%, reaching a record $119 billion.
China ranked second in spending with $13.5 billion. The United Kingdom spent $12.6 billion, overtaking Russia to become the third-largest spender. France’s nuclear weapons expenditure reached $7.7 billion.
According to data cited in the ICAN report, nuclear-armed states have spent a combined $471 billion on their arsenals over the past five years.
The report emphasized that the amount spent on nuclear weapons in a single day during 2025 would have been sufficient to provide food for 2 million people for a year, while total annual spending could fund the United Nations’ regular budget for 32 years.
Before those developments, Russian Foreign Ministry Ambassador-at-Large Andrey Belousov commented on the issue.
Belousov said Russia continues to insist on the withdrawal of US nuclear weapons from Europe and the dismantling of all infrastructure established in the region to support their deployment.
Under its nuclear-sharing programme, the United States has stationed nuclear weapons in NATO countries across Europe since the 1950s.
Today, US-made B61 nuclear bombs are stored at military bases in Belgium, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Türkiye.
Although NATO does not possess its own nuclear weapons, operational control over those weapons remains with Washington.
Earlier, the Financial Times reported that the United States was considering expanding its nuclear presence in Europe beyond the countries currently participating in the nuclear-sharing programme.
According to the newspaper, Poland and the Baltic states had expressed interest in hosting US nuclear weapons.
Sources cited by the Financial Times linked those discussions to concerns among European allies that the United States could reduce its military presence in the region.
America
Trump-linked crypto ventures gained $2.3 billion as investors suffered losses
Cryptocurrency projects linked to US President Donald Trump and his family have generated roughly $2.3 billion in gains for the family since Trump’s return to the White House, while investors have collectively lost about the same amount, according to a Reuters investigation.
The review examined four major projects associated with Trump and his family: the TRUMP memecoin, World Liberty Financial, American Bitcoin and AI Financial Corp.
According to Reuters, the value of shares or assets tied to those projects has fallen by dozens of percentage points, despite the ventures following a similar operating model.
The investigation found that the Trump family provided branding, promotional support and political visibility to the projects.
Reuters reported that the family either contributed very limited capital to the ventures or, in some cases, made no investment at all.
Investors, meanwhile, committed substantial funds to the projects on the expectation that Trump’s political position and his support for the cryptocurrency industry would generate long-term returns, the report said.
However, Reuters found that while the value of the underlying assets declined sharply over time, the Trump family continued to generate income from capital supplied by investors.
Some individuals interviewed by Reuters argued that investors entered the projects voluntarily and should have been aware of the risks involved.
Wilbur Ross, who served as commerce secretary during Trump’s first administration, said: “If people are buying something speculative, they should understand the risk. If they decided to hold on in the hope of further gains, that was their choice.”
As an example of how the model operated, Reuters cited the experience of investor Fatima Elrgadawi.
Elrgadawi invested $2,000 in the TRUMP memecoin, saying she trusted the “Trump brand.” By the end of May, however, the value of her investment had fallen to just $120.
Reflecting on the experience, Elrgadawi said she believed investors had been exposed to what is commonly known as a “pump and dump” scheme, in which prices are artificially inflated before large-scale selling triggers a sharp decline.
America
World Cup referee from Somalia denied entry to US as immigration scrutiny intensifies
The obstacles imposed by the United States government on African and Middle Eastern referees and football players designated to work at the World Cup are drawing widespread scrutiny.
In the latest development, a World Cup referee from Somalia was denied entry into the United States. US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) stated on Monday that Omar Artan was turned away over the weekend upon landing in Miami on a flight from Istanbul.
CBP did not disclose the specific reason the referee was barred from entry, but Somalia is among approximately 40 countries subjected to enhanced screening or travel restrictions under policies enacted by President Donald Trump.
“Following inspection, it was determined that the passenger, a FIFA World Cup referee, was inadmissible due to security screening, and admission to the United States was denied,” CBP said.
FIFA confirmed it was aware of the US decision to block Artan’s entry and indicated that his status would not change for the time being.
“As has been the case with previous FIFA events, the host government ultimately decides who receives a visa and who is admitted into the country,” the governing body said in a statement.
While this is the first known instance of a World Cup referee being barred from entry by US immigration authorities, several players, coaching staff, and numerous fans have previously encountered difficulties entering the country.
The US State Department said it is working in coordination with the White House, the Department of Homeland Security, and FIFA to support visa processing for World Cup participants, but emphasized that it must simultaneously enforce US laws and administration policies.
“The administration will never compromise on applying US law and the highest standards of national security and public safety in the administration of the visa process,” the State Department said in a statement.
Artan, a former football player who transitioned to refereeing due to injuries, was set to become the first individual from his country to officiate at a World Cup.
In an interview with Al Jazeera prior to the tournament, Artan spoke about the challenges he faced in his home country. “You cannot give up. If you want to reach a place like the World Cup, you have to fight,” he said.
Somalia is one of 12 nations whose citizens were effectively banned from entering the US by Trump in December 2025, with the administration citing terrorism risks.
Trump has repeatedly demonstrated open hostility toward the East African nation, previously describing the country as “smelly” and labeling individuals originating from there as “garbage.”
The administration has also revoked temporary visas for thousands of Somali citizens residing in the US and accused members of the Somali diaspora in Minnesota of fraud.
Beyond entry denials, the treatment of participating teams has sparked significant backlash. Members of the Senegal national team were subjected to exhaustive baggage searches directly on the airport tarmac in San Antonio.
Separately, players from the Uzbekistan national team reportedly faced drug-detection dogs and metal-detector sweeps upon arriving at their training facilities in New York.
Footage and photographs of these security checks rapidly circulated on social media, triggering anger among football fans.
Many observers accused American authorities of treating international footballers “like criminals” rather than guests attending one of the world’s premier sporting events.
The controversy intensified further following reports that Iraqi forward Aymen Hussein was detained for seven hours at Chicago O’Hare International Airport.
Additionally, the photographer for the Iraqi national team was reportedly denied entry into the country after undergoing a security screening that lasted approximately 10 hours.
-
America1 week agoUS Marines test lower-cost counter-drone system to reduce missile dependence
-
Europe1 week agoUkraine reburies OUN leader Melnyk as Poland and Israel condemn honoring of wartime nationalist figures
-
Asia1 week agoChina launches patrols east of Taiwan after Japan and Philippines open maritime boundary talks
-
Diplomacy1 week agoUN faces insolvency risk as US and China delay membership payments
-
Europe1 week agoHungary’s new PM Magyar vows absolute ban on illegal migration, challenging Brussels over fines
-
Middle East1 week agoReport challenges official assessments of damage from Iranian attacks on US military assets
-
Diplomacy1 week agoZelenskyy urges US to grant Ukraine license to produce Patriot missiles
-
Opinion1 week agoChinese diplomacy ascendant under Xi: All roads lead to Beijing
