Connect with us

Diplomacy

US to establish joint military headquarters with Japan, Beijing reacts

Published

on

The foreign and defence ministers of Japan and the United States on Sunday announced a far-reaching update of their alliance in the face of what they described as “profound global threats” to peace and security.

At a so-called ‘2+2’ meeting in Tokyo, Japanese Foreign Minister Yoko Kamikawa and Defence Minister Minoru Kihara and their US counterparts, Antony Blinken and Lloyd Austin, agreed to establish a new US Joint Forces Headquarters to assume ‘primary responsibility for coordinating security activities in and around Japan’.

This headquarters will be at the centre of efforts to ‘facilitate deeper interoperability and cooperation’ between US and Japanese defence forces in the Indo-Pacific region, the ministers said in a statement. They pledged to strengthen the two countries’ “deterrence capabilities” and expand intelligence sharing and cyber security measures.

During their talks, the ministers highlighted security challenges such as China’s activities in the South and East China Seas, North Korea’s missile development and both countries’ growing cooperation with Russia. They also discussed Russia’s ‘unjustified’ invasion of Ukraine.

We are at a historic crossroads, a critical juncture where today’s decisions will determine our future,’ Kamikawa told the joint press conference.

In their statement, the ministers acknowledged ‘the depth of the global threats to the shared vision and values of our alliance’, reaffirmed their countries’ determination to stand together, and reiterated the US commitment to defend Japan with all the means at its disposal.

Given the increasingly challenging security environment created by recent actions by regional actors’, the United States reaffirmed its ‘unwavering commitment’ to Japan’s defence ‘by all means at its disposal, including nuclear’.

Key to the strengthened alliance would be a ‘reconfigured’ US-Japan Force (USFJ), a joint air, land and sea headquarters reporting to the commander of the US Indo-Pacific Command in Hawaii. The ministers said the USFJ ‘is intended to serve as a key counterpart to the JJOC’.

JJOC refers to Japan Joint Operations Command, a new headquarters that will oversee the air, land and sea units of the Self-Defence Forces and is expected to be established by 2025.

Austin said at the press conference that updating the USFJ ‘will be the most significant change to US Forces Japan since its inception and one of the strongest developments in our military relationship with Japan in 70 years’.

The current USFJ, established in 1957, is headquartered at Yokota Air Base, west of Tokyo. Coordination between the US military and the Japanese Self-Defence Forces (SDF) has been carried out from Hawaii, but will be managed by the USFJ under the new system, which will be implemented ‘in a phased approach’, according to the joint statement.

The new USFJ ‘from peacetime to contingencies’ It will work with the SDF.

Blinken said the ministers were ‘delivering on commitments’ made by US President Joe Biden and Japanese Prime Minister Kishida in Washington in April to revise the command and control framework for regional defence operations.

Right now the alliance is stronger than ever,” Blinken said, adding: ‘I know it will be sustained regardless of the outcome of the elections in our countries.

Sunday’s dialogue came amid heightened tensions in the South China Sea, where there have been several clashes between Chinese and Philippine ships in recent months.

In a statement, the Japanese and US ministers expressed their ‘strong objections’ to China’s ‘threatening and provocative activities in the South China Sea’. They also condemned China’s ‘intensified attempts to unilaterally change the status quo in the East China Sea through force or coercion’ and objected to Russia’s military cooperation with Beijing.

The ministers said China’s foreign policy ‘poses the greatest strategic challenge in the Indo-Pacific region and beyond’.

The ministers reiterated their aim to ‘increase bilateral presence’ in Japan’s southwest islands, the westernmost of which are just 110 kilometres from Taiwan. They warned against ‘provocative actions in the Taiwan Strait’.

They also reaffirmed the need for multilateral coordination to ensure security in the Indo-Pacific region and looked forward to the Quartet foreign ministers’ meeting with Australia and India scheduled for Monday in Tokyo.

On the South China Sea, ministers welcomed greater cooperation with the Philippines. The US, Japan and the Philippines held their first trilateral summit in April and the leaders pledged close cooperation on defence and security in the Indo-Pacific.

The ministers called for deeper cooperation with South Korea over North Korea’s ‘continued reckless ballistic missile launches’ and its growing strategic relationship with Russia.

Sunday’s statement also announced a ‘high-priority’ plan to strengthen Japan-US defence industry cooperation by increasing production in Japan of the Patriot PAC-3 surface-to-air and advanced medium-range air-to-air missiles. Both of these US-developed weapons can be used to intercept ballistic missiles.

Following the two-plus-two meeting, the US and Japan held their first ministerial-level meeting on ‘extended deterrence’, a term referring to the US pledge to use nuclear weapons to defend its allies if attacked. According to a separate statement, the meeting aimed to strengthen bilateral cooperation on ‘arms control, risk reduction and non-proliferation’ in the face of growing nuclear threats from North Korea, China and Russia.

The Tokyo-Washington dialogues followed a trilateral meeting between the defence ministers of South Korea, Japan and the United States on Sunday morning, during which they signed a memorandum of understanding to enhance military cooperation in East Asia. The cooperation will include real-time intelligence sharing on North Korean missile launches, regular ministerial meetings on defence issues, and continued joint military training.

The MoU institutionalises the details of the ‘new era of trilateral partnership’ announced by Kishida, Biden and South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol at a meeting in Camp David, US, last August. With the signing of this memorandum, our trilateral cooperation has become stronger and more steadfast,’ Japanese Defence Minister Kihara told reporters on Sunday.

China reacts

Joint statements by the United States and Japan ‘falsely accused’ China on maritime issues and pointed fingers at its normal military development and defence policy, the Chinese Foreign Ministry said on Monday.

They have maliciously attacked and discredited China on maritime issues and made irresponsible remarks about China’s normal military development and national defence policy,’ Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Lin Jian told a regular press briefing.

‘Beijing is absolutely not satisfied with the exaggeration of China’s threat and malicious speculation about regional tensions,’ Lin added.

‘China has always followed the path of peaceful development, adopted an inherently defensive national defence policy, and its national defence construction and military activities are legitimate and reasonable,’ Lin said, adding that Beijing has ‘always kept its nuclear capability to the minimum necessary for national security and poses no threat to any country’.

‘We call on the United States and Japan to immediately stop interfering in China’s internal affairs and stop creating imaginary enemies,’ the Chinese official added.

Diplomacy

Greece’s Marinakis says paying Hormuz transit fees beats enduring Red Sea shipping crisis detour

Published

on

Evangelos Marinakis, one of Greece’s leading shipowners, has announced that he is prepared to pay up to $200,000 per transit to keep the Strait of Hormuz open to civilian maritime traffic.

Speaking to the Financial Times, Marinakis stated that paying a transit fee would be a far better option for him than having the strait closed to navigation.

As the chairman of Capital Maritime Group, which controls a fleet of 185 vessels including approximately 35 tankers, Marinakis emphasized that shipowners have been forced to use alternative routes around the Cape of Good Hope for years due to attacks launched by the Houthis in the Red Sea, a detour that has generated substantial additional costs.

The Greek shipowner indicated that paying a transit fee of $100,000 or $200,000, depending on the size of the cargo or the vessel, is far more reasonable than enduring the current logistical challenges. He added that such payments could offset all the losses experienced so far.

Following US strikes on Iran and the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, the Tehran administration had introduced transit fees of up to $2 million for certain vessels transiting the waterway.

In May, Iran announced the establishment of a state agency tasked with managing the Strait of Hormuz. It was stated that the institution in question would provide real-time updates regarding maritime activities in the waterway.

Ebrahim Azizi, the chairman of the Iranian Parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, had noted that only commercial vessels and countries cooperating with Iran would be able to benefit from the facilities provided under this “professional mechanism.”

US President Donald Trump has explicitly opposed the imposition of transit fees in the Strait of Hormuz. In a statement on the matter, Trump said, “We want the strait to be open. We do not want any transit fees to be charged. This is an international waterway.”

On the other hand, the draft text of a planned 60-day ceasefire extension agreement between the parties stipulates that the Strait of Hormuz will remain open without any transit fees being demanded.

According to the draft details reviewed by Axios, the US in return commits to lifting the blockade it has imposed on Iranian ports. The Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, however, announced that the management of the Strait of Hormuz has been excluded from the scope of the agreement with the US, asserting that the issue will be addressed solely by littoral states.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Pashinyan promises aid to farmers hit by Russian import restrictions

Published

on

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has pledged compensation for Armenian farmers affected by restrictions on exports to Russia.

According to Sputnik Armenia, Pashinyan made the announcement during an election campaign meeting in the Gegharkunik region.

Speaking at the event, Pashinyan said the subsidies would be designed to offset losses incurred by producers.

The prime minister also acknowledged that some Armenian products had failed to meet required quality standards, adding that such companies would receive support aimed at improving product quality.

Addressing alternative markets for Armenian exports, Pashinyan said several Armenian business delegations were already engaged in negotiations abroad.

He added that Armenia had received offers for the purchase of roses as well as fresh fruits and vegetables.

Pashinyan argued that Armenia’s agricultural output was not particularly large, describing this as an advantage under current circumstances. According to the prime minister, “a respected supermarket chain in Europe” would be capable of selling the entire volume of these products on its own.

Russia’s Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance (Rosselkhoznadzor) imposed temporary restrictions on imports of stone fruits and grapes from Armenia effective July 2.

The ban covers cherries, sour cherries, apricots, plums, peaches and nectarines, among other products.

On the same day, a temporary suspension was also introduced on certification procedures for live fish shipments from Armenia. Russian authorities had previously restricted the entry of flower products originating from Armenia into the Russian market.

In addition, Russia’s Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing (Rospotrebnadzor) halted the import of all consignments of Jermuk mineral water from Armenia.

In a statement, the agency said levels of bicarbonate, chloride and sulfate ions in the mineral water exceeded established limits and could mislead consumers regarding the product’s medicinal properties.

The Russian regulator argued that the growing number of violations stemmed from the abolition of Armenia’s Agriculture Ministry and the transfer of its responsibilities to the Economy Ministry.

Rosselkhoznadzor further stated that Armenia’s Economy Ministry was experiencing structural problems and was unable to adequately perform the supervisory functions assigned to it.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Zelenskyy urges US to grant Ukraine license to produce Patriot missiles

Published

on

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he has asked the United States to grant Ukraine a license to manufacture missiles for the Patriot air defence system.

In a post on social media platform X, Zelenskyy argued that current US production of missile defence interceptors is insufficient and could contribute to crises in different parts of the world.

“Producing 60-65 missiles a month is nothing compared with the challenges we face today. This is no secret, and Russia knows it as well,” Zelenskyy wrote. “We need to expand production. As I requested from the previous US administration, I am asking the current administration to grant Ukraine a license to produce Patriot missiles.”

Zelenskyy said US companies possess advanced technologies that are not available in Ukraine, while Kyiv could contribute its extensive battlefield experience in return.

He also argued that granting such a license would benefit not only Ukraine, but also the Middle East and any country Washington chooses to support.

Washington pledges to maintain defence support

Zelenskyy’s remarks came a day after US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on May 30 that Washington would continue supporting Ukraine’s defence capabilities and ensure military shipments to Kyiv continue.

“We want them to be able to defend themselves, and we will find a way to help them do that,” Hegseth said.

Several days earlier, Yuriy Ihnat, spokesperson for the Ukrainian Air Force, warned that the country’s air defence forces were experiencing a shortage of missiles.

“Due to certain supply problems, we are practically at starvation levels when it comes to missiles today,” Ihnat said.

Concerns persist over air defence missile stocks

In April, Zelenskyy warned that Ukraine’s stockpile of air defence missiles could be exhausted at any moment.

He said that under current conditions, air defence missiles were more critical for Ukraine than the air defence systems themselves.

Highlighting what he described as a critical shortage of Patriot missiles, Zelenskyy said: “We are facing a deficit now that could hardly be worse.”

Concerns that Ukraine could face a severe shortage of US-made air defence missiles had previously been reported by Reuters.

The situation was expected to worsen as the United States and its allies depleted significant portions of their arsenals during tensions with Iran, a point Zelenskyy also underscored.

In a separate statement in January, Zelenskyy said Ukraine lacked sufficient missiles for both US- and European-made air defence systems.

The Ukrainian leader said he had been forced to personally secure every package of missiles from European countries and the United States.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey