Europe
Why Rishi Sunak?
Rishi Sunak of the Conservative Party has become the new leader of the UK after the end of Liz Truss’s brief 49-day prime ministerial term. Sunak has become the new prime minister without even needing British citizens’ votes; following the resignation of Boris Johnson, together with Liz Truss, he was one of the new candidates for prime minister but had lost the race to his predecessor.
Brought down by Truss and Sunak, Boris Johnson’s understanding of the economy during and after the Covid crisis was somewhat “heterodox” and “populist”: Contrary to the general downsizing trend in western countries, Johnson had prioritized economic growth and low taxes and declared that he favored measures to pump demand. In fact, Johnson had signaled that he could implement state-led fiscal policies that were not well received by the mainstream.
Boris Johnson took office after the Brexit process, when Britain left the EU, and acted to bring his country back on the world stage as a strong player. When Covid was added to the great recession that plagued capitalist economies, Johnson’s “unstable” actions lead to his downfall. Johnson, who wanted to pursue a looser monetary policy, was thought not to have a coherent and comprehensive economic policy towards the Bank of England’s and the finance’s “orthodox” understanding.
And that’s when Liz Truss became Johnson’s successor. In her debate with Sunak, she also talked about economic growth and the reduction of taxes. She also tried to implement this plan: a $50 billion tax deduction package came into effect to be compensated by borrowing, but the response of the “markets” was harsh. Sterling has declined to unprecedented levels, panicked investors have sold $500 million in assets, and the real estate industry is on the brink. The Bank of England launched an emergency bond-buying program to prevent pension funds from going bankrupt, and the IMF criticized Truss and urged her to reconsider the program.
Perhaps the sign of the resignation came from her ally on the other side of the Atlantic: on October 16, US President Joe Biden called Liz Truss’s tax package a “mistake”. Liz Truss had already begun her U-turn and fired finance minister Kwasi Kwarteng, but it was too late.
Britain’s stalemate
We must accept that Sunak “warned” Truss in a way. During the debate, he said that Truss’s promises of tax cuts, borrowing and economic growth were unrealistic and argued that these policies would not work in an inflationary environment: Raising borrowing to historic and dangerous levels would mean pouring gasoline over the fire.
Speaking to the Financial Times before Truss’s resignation, he said the new prime minister and the new government’s overriding priority was to control inflation. He explains that Truss’ unfunded debts will exacerbate the situation and fuel inflation, and calls out directly to her, “Liz, we have to be honest. Borrowing your way out of inflation isn’t a plan, it’s a fairytale.”
Thus, ex-Goldman Sachs executive and parliament’s richest deputy, Rishi Sunak, emerged as a heartfelt supporter of monetary policies in developed capitalist countries: focusing on fighting inflation, cutting spending, raising interest rates, tight monetary policy. The new prime minister says he supports the Bank of England’s “independence” but promises tax cuts only after inflation is controlled.
But the dilemma persists. Britain went into recession as of October, according to polls published by Financial Times. Interest rate increases and monetary tightening have not been able to reduce inflation fueled by rising energy costs due to the Ukraine-Russia war and sanctions imposed on Russia. Sunak’s plan to cut expenditures seems to trigger the social crisis even more, given the increasing number of people in need of help in society. Besides, when he was the Ministry of Finance between 2020 and 2022, Sunak brought in the highest taxes Britain had seen since the 1950s. Again, even though he preaches “discipline”, Sunak promises higher public expenditures.
There is no jolt in the foreign policy line
Sunak was a supporter of Brexit policy, but there are those in his party who think he has too much sympathy for Brussels. The debate on the Northern Ireland Protocol (NIP) will also be a test for Sunak in this sense. NIP kept Northern Ireland within the EU’s integrated market for goods; it left it loose on its border with the Republic of Ireland and subjected it to additional controls in trade with the rest of Britain. NIP, signed by Boris Johnson in 2020, is criticized by Sunak, but Sunak believes a more conciliatory language is needed, unlike the hardcore Brexiters in his party.
Rishi Sunak, on the other hand, wants to tighten border controls, especially on the issue of immigrants, and to get rid of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) “obstacle.” Arguing that the ECHR was exploited by “lefty ” lawyers and its designation was gradually expanding, he said that the option to leave the ECHR was also on the table. Sunak also supported the plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda.
Stressing the “special relationship” between the United States and Britain in a phone call with Joe Biden, Sunak reiterated his support for Ukraine and said they would stand up to China. In Ukraine, the prospect of Boris Johnson’s return was welcomed, and after Truss’s resignation, the government’s official Twitter account even tweeted about Boris and quickly deleted it, but Sunak’s appointment of the ministries of defense and foreign affairs to Ben Wallace and James Cleverly, who also served in the previous cabinet, was recorded as a gesture that Ukrainian politics would remain unchanged. It was also meaningful that Sunak’s first telephone conversation as prime minister was with Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelenskyy. However, Sunak does not support Liz Truss’s and Ben Wallace’s promise to raise defence spending to 3% of GDP. In addition, allies of Johnson’s pushed rumors that during his polemic with Sunak, the new prime minister was less committed to the war than Johnson, and a deal would one day have to be done with Putin.
Internal tensions of the Conservatives and The Talented Mr. Sunak
On the other hand, Sunak is not settled on a solid ground within the party. Boris Johnson’s leadership was the result of contradictions within the Conservative Party (Tories). Most of the Tory MPs in parliament depend on the politics of low taxation and free market sovereignty. But on the other hand, especially representatives from the northern regions of the party demand more government spending, a larger and more interventionist state, and they are very influential within the party.
The Northern Research Group (NRG), an influential team within the party, called on Liz Truss to continue the Tories’ levelling-up policy in the 2019 election manifesto. The NRG is composed of Tories selected from regions traditionally held by the Labour Party and wants more investment in the north.
Johnson chose to manage these contradictions rather than solve them. He was both conservative and pro-free market; he had promised to increase government spending and cut taxes. His speeches in the Brexit campaign included “more prosperity, less Europe”, “more freedom, less regulation”, “more dynamism, less migration.”
Apparently, Rishi Sunak is the answer given in Britain to these contradictions and the current trends of world capitalism. The economy needs to be reorganized under titles such as “green transition” and large investments are required, and the public power needs to increase at a time when private sector investments are in the bottom due to the crisis. The distance between capital groups and the state should be shorter. In addition, the ongoing war in Europe means that the regulatory authority of the state over the society is also extended to wider areas.
All this highlights a figure like Rishi Sunak. He is the member of an Indian family, who were cooperative during the colonial period, ex-Goldman Sachs manager; wealthy; professional and self-educated child of cooperative families of former colonial countries who had migrated to the West in the 1960s and had the opportunity to get into good universities…
Europe
EIB to unveil 15 billion euro tech initiative to scale European startups
The European Investment Bank (EIB) will announce a €15 billion initiative today, in collaboration with EU capitals and private investors, aimed at supporting the growth of European technology companies.
For decades, startups on the continent have struggled to raise the large-scale funding rounds necessary to scale on this side of the Atlantic, frequently turning to US investors or relocating abroad as they expand.
“We are catching up. Now we need to accelerate,” EIB President Nadia Calviño said.
Under the existing European Tech Champions Initiative, the EIB had already pooled resources with six EU governments to establish funds that invest in high-growth companies across the EU.
Calviño described the initiative as “very successful,” noting that it has supported 12 European “unicorn” companies valued at over $1 billion, including the German artificial intelligence translation firm DeepL.
The bank is now expanding the program with a new phase nearly four times the size of the original.
Twenty-five EU governments, alongside private investors such as Santander and Danske Bank, are expected to participate in the program.
This initial €15 billion aims to mobilize up to €80 billion in total investment. Calviño stated that this estimate is based on the multiplier effects achieved under previous programs.
As part of these efforts, the EIB also aims to attract European pension funds, which manage immense pools of capital but have historically allocated fewer resources to technology investments compared to their US counterparts.
In addition to the new funding, Calviño noted that the EIB will create a platform providing a single point of access for existing European scale-up initiatives, including the European Commission’s Scaleup Europe Fund, France’s Tibi initiative, and Germany’s Win initiative.
Europe
Germany to purchase US Tomahawk missiles to build own long-range strike capability
Germany will purchase Tomahawk cruise missiles from the United States and deploy them on German territory, Chancellor Friedrich Merz announced on Thursday.
The move marks a shift away from planned US deployments and toward Germany establishing its own long-range strike capability.
Merz told lawmakers that he finalized the agreement with the US government during the NATO summit in Ankara, adding that the talks held on Tuesday and Wednesday had exceeded his expectations.
“While we close a critical strategic gap in our defense, we are also working to develop our own European systems and deploy them in Europe,” the Chancellor said.
According to German government sources, Washington committed in a letter of intent signed on Tuesday to approve Germany’s acquisition of Tomahawk missiles and their land-based Typhon launchers in August.
The number of missiles and launchers Germany plans to purchase was not disclosed because the information is classified.
The planned acquisition appears aligned with US President Donald Trump’s pressure on European allies to cover their own security costs, such as by purchasing US weapons.
The fate of the Tomahawk procurement had become uncertain after Trump announced in May that he would reduce the US military presence in Germany.
That development was seen as a cancellation of a plan made under the previous administration to deploy a US battalion equipped with long-range Tomahawk missiles to Germany.
That original plan was designed as a temporary solution to serve as a strong deterrent against Russia while Europeans developed their own versions of such weapons.
Germany produces its own cruise missile, the Taurus, but its range of approximately 311 miles is three to five times shorter than that of the Tomahawk missiles.
Europe
Apple loses EU court appeal over Digital Markets Act gatekeeper designation
The General Court of the European Union has rejected Apple’s challenges against its “gatekeeper” status designated under the Digital Markets Act (DMA).
With this ruling, the company’s designated status for the App Store and iOS remains valid, while its applications regarding iMessage were also rejected.
Apple had argued that the five separate App Stores it operates for the iPhone, iPad, Apple Watch, Mac, and Apple TV should be evaluated as distinct, individual services.
The court rejected this argument, ruling that these stores serve a common purpose of connecting developers and users, regardless of the specific device.
The court also dismissed Apple’s defense that the DMA’s interoperability obligations violate its fundamental rights.
However, it did not conduct a substantive assessment on the legality of this obligation, stating that a direct legal link could not be established between the regulation in question and the determination of “gatekeeper” status.
Following the ruling, Apple argued that the obligations under the DMA “exceed the boundaries of legality and proportionality.” The company asserted that the new rules jeopardize the work it has carried out for years to ensure user privacy and security.
Apple retains the right to appeal the decision, though a company spokesperson did not comment on whether there are plans to do so.
Apple previously declared that DMA rules prevented the launch of the updated version of Siri in Europe, resulting in European users being unable to benefit from the service.
In force in the European Union since 2024, the DMA covers a total of 22 services and products belonging to Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, ByteDance, Meta Platforms, and Microsoft.
The regulation obliges these companies to share certain data with competitors, provide access to user-generated data, and offer verification tools to advertising partners.
Additionally, it prohibits platforms from engaging in anti-competitive practices that favor their own products. Companies failing to comply with the rules face fines of up to 10% of their global turnover, which can rise to 20% in cases of repeated violations.
-
Middle East2 weeks agoQatar and Saudi Arabia acquire hundreds of millions of dollars in Israeli defense technology, report says
-
Europe2 weeks agoBuckingham Palace updates King’s official role to focus on securing faith in multi-faith Britain
-
Interview2 weeks ago“Capitalism does not require a free social order”
-
Asia2 weeks agoSouth Korea unveils $518 billion plan for new southwestern semiconductor cluster
-
Europe2 weeks agoBillionaire Peter Thiel deepens ties with German and Austrian right-wing political elite
-
Europe2 weeks agoGermany’s BSW proposes cooperation with AfD to break political ‘firewall’
-
America2 weeks agoAnthropic withdraws covert China user tracking feature after online backlash
-
Europe2 weeks agoEurope faces 15-year low in winter gas reserves as June storage targets fall short
