Connect with us

Diplomacy

World Anti-Doping Agency ‘disappointed’ at US investigation into Chinese doping case

Published

on

As geopolitical tensions between the United States and China spilled onto the Olympic stage, the World Anti-Doping Agency (Wada) said it had been “unfairly caught in the middle” of the conflict between the two countries.

China’s swimmers have been in the spotlight after a series of doping allegations, followed by controversial US claims that Wada covered them up.

Chinese swimmers travelling to Paris were subjected to twice as many doping tests as some other countries, fuelling accusations of a conspiracy to hinder their performance.

Wada said on Tuesday that it was “caught in the middle of geopolitical tensions between superpowers, but has no mandate to get involved”.

James Fitzgerald, Wada’s head of media relations, told the BBC: “Some people [in the US] are trying to score political points simply because the athletes in question are Chinese. As a result, it has created mistrust and division within the anti-doping system,” Fitzgerald told the BBC.

Last week, Wada said it was considering legal action against its US counterpart Usada over the “defamatory” allegations.

Usada had accused Wada and China’s anti-doping agency Chinada of being among the “dirty hands that covered up positive tests and silenced the voices of brave whistleblowers”.

Members of the US Congress have also accused Wada of failing to properly investigate doping allegations against Chinese swimmers, and last Tuesday even introduced a bill to authorise the White House to cut the agency’s funding.

“When congressmen and senators get involved in the largely technical world of anti-doping, it ceases to be a scientific and legal analysis and moves into the political realm,” Fitzgerald said.

Tainted food and supplements the real culprit

Wada’s announcement on Tuesday followed a New York Times report on a previously undisclosed case in which two Chinese swimmers, one of whom was on this year’s Olympic team, were being investigated for doping.

The two swimmers had tested positive for a banned steroid in 2022, but were allowed to compete. China’s anti-doping agency concluded that the athletes had unknowingly consumed steroids, possibly by eating contaminated hamburgers.

Usada accused Wada of “tilting the field in their favour by allowing China to compete under a different set of rules”. But Wada defended its decision.

Wada said the athletes’ supplements and hair tests had returned negative results and that both swimmers had given control samples that tested negative in the days before and after the positive test. He added that the two swimmers had been suspended for more than a year and that their cases had been closed.

“Judging by the number of cases, it is clear that there is a contamination problem in different countries around the world,” the agency said, adding that the two athletes’ cases were part of a “wider series of cases involving [Chinese] athletes from different sports”.

Wada said in June that athletes who eat meat sometimes test positive for drugs if they take clenbuterol, a banned substance used as a growth promoter for livestock.

The agency is investigating cases of contamination in China as well as Mexico, Guatemala and other countries, it said in response to questions from The New York Times.

The head of the agency, Olivier Niggli, said at the time that the US media “only asked about China when meat contamination is a problem in many countries” and referred to “attempts to politicise the fight against doping”.

US swimming champion Katie Ledecky also weighed in on the debate

All this follows a bigger controversy in April, when the New York Times reported that 23 Chinese swimmers had tested positive for performance-enhancing drugs months before the Tokyo 2021 Olympics.

But they were allowed to compete after Chinese authorities said the results were due to contamination. The 30-strong team won six medals in Tokyo, including three gold.

Eleven of those who tested positive were selected for the Chinese swimming team for the Paris Olympics.

But US swimmer and 11-time Olympic medallist Katie Ledecky said her confidence in anti-doping authorities was at an “all-time low” after the news of the 23 Chinese swimmers.

Independent investigation backs Wada

But Wada’s investigation found that the source of the heart drug trimetazidine (TMZ) was “unable to refute the possibility of contamination”.

The report said the contamination theory was supported by the “consistently low concentrations of TMZ as well as the absence of a doping pattern” among the athletes tested.

That is, test results over several days were not consistent, fluctuating between negative and positive.

An independent investigation found that Wada had not mishandled the case or favoured the Chinese swimmers.

Chinese swimmers tested more than usual

Scandals have piled pressure on anti-doping authorities, and the Chinese swim team was subjected to far more tests than usual when it arrived in Paris.

Since January, each of the 31 members of the team has been tested an average of 21 times by various anti-doping organisations, according to World Aquatics, which oversees swimming.

By contrast, Australia’s 41 swimmers have been tested an average of four times and the USA’s 46 swimmers an average of six times.

The testing inflation has led to a number of other allegations. The Global Times, which is close to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), accused Western powers of “abusing doping tests to disrupt the [Chinese] swimming team”.

Speaking to the Global Times, a professor of international politics in Shanghai accused the US of dominating anti-doping rules.

Shen Yi claimed that “cruel and unethical testing” had disrupted the Chinese team’s training and called it “a disgrace to the Olympics”.

Chinese record swimmer: Our performance is threatened

Chinese swimmer Qin Haiyang, who holds the world record in the men’s 200m breaststroke, said the constant testing “proves that the European and American teams feel threatened by the Chinese team’s performances in recent years”.

“Some tricks are aimed at disrupting our preparation rhythm and destroying our psychological defences. But we are not afraid,” he said.

Qin, who won gold medals in the 50m, 100m and 200m breaststroke at last year’s World Championships, finished seventh in the men’s 100m breaststroke final at the Paris Olympics.

The criticism was echoed by former Chinese diving champion Gao Min, who said the rigorous testing had “corrupted the Chinese swimming team” and described Qin’s performance as “the worst in any competition in the past two years”.

China’s current medal tally is one gold, two silvers and two bronzes.

China’s “butterfly queen” Zhang Yufei, who won silver in the 100 metres in Tokyo, was in tears over her bronze medal in Paris but said the doping tests had not had a major impact on her.

Although the tests were “a bit annoying”, Zhang Yufei said the real pressure was “much greater” than she had imagined.

Diplomacy

OECD warns prolonged Iran energy shock could trigger global recession and spike inflation

Published

on

A prolonged disruption in energy supplies resulting from conflict in Iran would deal a severe blow to the global economy, according to a new economic outlook report published on Wednesday.

The research data indicated that such disruptions are highly likely to push countries into recession and lead to an increase in unemployment.

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) described the effects of the war in question as the “dominant force shaping the global economic outlook.”

The report noted that if disruptions become persistent, global growth could slow down significantly, falling from 2.1% in 2026 to 1.8% in 2027. This deceleration could depress the world economy to levels not seen since the COVID-19 pandemic and the Great Recession.

“With upward pressures from high commodity prices partially offset by weakening final demand, global inflation would rise by 0.4 percentage points in 2026 and by 1.3 percentage points in 2027,” OECD Chief Economist Stefano Scarpetta stated in the report.

Developing economies with limited energy reserves, alongside Asian economies heavily dependent on crude oil, fuel, and natural gas, were identified as being among the hardest hit by this situation.

Focusing on an alternative short-term scenario, researchers reported that if energy production and shipments through the Strait of Hormuz return to pre-conflict levels, growth could rebound to 3.1% in 2027.

The researchers stated that the vulnerability of the global economy to a “single choke point” underscores the necessity of strengthening supply chains and creating a more diversified energy supply. They emphasized that increasing investment to escape dependence on fossil fuel imports is now more urgent than ever.

The report also pointed out that rising defense spending this year is unlikely to expand productive capacity unless it generates spillover effects in non-defense sectors through innovation.

Scarpetta noted that policymakers face difficult decisions, stating, “Central banks could look through supply-driven price increases as long as inflation expectations remain well-anchored and second-round effects are kept under control. However, a policy move may become necessary if price pressures broaden or if growth weakens significantly.”

Iran’s closure of the Strait of Hormuz has kept oil prices high since the US and Israel launched initial strikes against Iran in late February.

Although average fuel prices in the US have declined due to the influence of recent talks aimed at reaching an agreement to end the conflict, they remained high at $4.26, according to data released by AAA on Wednesday.

Following an average of $3.14 last year, the average last week also remained elevated, standing at the $4.50 level.

Public opinion polls conducted since the beginning of the conflict have revealed that a majority of Americans do not support the war due to the prolonged impacts on the cost of living.

The latest poll, published by Politico on Friday, showed that more than 60% of respondents believe President Trump has not done enough to protect Americans from the economic impacts of the war.

Fifty-three percent of those surveyed expressed that the cost of living is at the worst level they can remember, while a majority stated that their financial situation has deteriorated since Trump returned to office.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Five Eyes intelligence alliance warns of Chinese spy recruitment on LinkedIn and job sites

Published

on

The “Five Eyes” international intelligence alliance has warned that Chinese operatives are actively trying to recruit government and military personnel and compromise their loyalty in an effort to gain a tactical advantage over the US and its allies.

In a rare joint statement, the intelligence agencies of the US, Australia, the United Kingdom, Canada, and New Zealand asserted that China is increasingly utilizing professional networking sites and employment platforms, such as LinkedIn and Indeed, to secure access to classified information.

The joint communique noted that the Five Eyes agencies have uncovered multiple cases where individuals handed over sensitive information, subsequently leading to criminal prosecutions.

According to the agencies, Chinese intelligence officers and their accomplices pose as consultants, human resources specialists, or think-tank personnel to post online job advertisements for positions such as foreign policy and defense analysts.

The joint statement declared that the Chinese operatives “ultimately aim to acquire privileged military, political, and economic intelligence that could give China a strategic and tactical advantage over the Five Eyes.”

Western intelligence units have assessed that those targeted include military personnel, among whom are individuals holding top-secret security clearances and others stationed in the Indo-Pacific region.

The targeting efforts by the Chinese state also extend to academics, journalists, and freelance writers, according to the communique.

The Five Eyes agencies have documented a five-stage blueprint used in these recruitment operations, which often involves commissioning reports based on sensitive information related to China, defense, and the Indo-Pacific.

The warning noted that China is prepared to pay between several hundred and several thousand dollars per report.

“Certain types of data could put the lives of frontline military or other personnel at risk, undermine our economic prosperity, and enable interference in our democratic processes,” the statement said, adding that even unclassified information can be valuable to the Chinese state when aggregated with other data already in the possession of its intelligence services.

The bulletin also cautioned that individuals who leak information face criminal prosecution under espionage laws.

The alert follows a previous warning issued last year by the UK’s domestic security service, MI5, which stated that Chinese agents were using LinkedIn to target British lawmakers.

In a statement, UK Security Minister Dan Jarvis said the UK “will continue to tackle hostile activity by a range of states, including China.”

The joint alert also alleged that the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) has been deploying fake remote IT workers to gain access to major corporations.

This North Korean methodology, partially uncovered by Google’s Threat Analysis Group, is driven by a “dual motivation” of fulfilling state objectives and securing personal financial gain, making these actors particularly dangerous, the bulletin noted.

Despite the new warning, Jarvis indicated that the UK would maintain its diplomatic relations with Beijing.

“We are clear that engaging with China is in our national interest, not least because it allows us to directly challenge behaviors we will not tolerate—such as this activity uncovered by MI5 and our partners—while cooperating in areas of clear benefit to the UK,” Jarvis said.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Greece’s Marinakis says paying Hormuz transit fees beats enduring Red Sea shipping crisis detour

Published

on

Evangelos Marinakis, one of Greece’s leading shipowners, has announced that he is prepared to pay up to $200,000 per transit to keep the Strait of Hormuz open to civilian maritime traffic.

Speaking to the Financial Times, Marinakis stated that paying a transit fee would be a far better option for him than having the strait closed to navigation.

As the chairman of Capital Maritime Group, which controls a fleet of 185 vessels including approximately 35 tankers, Marinakis emphasized that shipowners have been forced to use alternative routes around the Cape of Good Hope for years due to attacks launched by the Houthis in the Red Sea, a detour that has generated substantial additional costs.

The Greek shipowner indicated that paying a transit fee of $100,000 or $200,000, depending on the size of the cargo or the vessel, is far more reasonable than enduring the current logistical challenges. He added that such payments could offset all the losses experienced so far.

Following US strikes on Iran and the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, the Tehran administration had introduced transit fees of up to $2 million for certain vessels transiting the waterway.

In May, Iran announced the establishment of a state agency tasked with managing the Strait of Hormuz. It was stated that the institution in question would provide real-time updates regarding maritime activities in the waterway.

Ebrahim Azizi, the chairman of the Iranian Parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, had noted that only commercial vessels and countries cooperating with Iran would be able to benefit from the facilities provided under this “professional mechanism.”

US President Donald Trump has explicitly opposed the imposition of transit fees in the Strait of Hormuz. In a statement on the matter, Trump said, “We want the strait to be open. We do not want any transit fees to be charged. This is an international waterway.”

On the other hand, the draft text of a planned 60-day ceasefire extension agreement between the parties stipulates that the Strait of Hormuz will remain open without any transit fees being demanded.

According to the draft details reviewed by Axios, the US in return commits to lifting the blockade it has imposed on Iranian ports. The Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, however, announced that the management of the Strait of Hormuz has been excluded from the scope of the agreement with the US, asserting that the issue will be addressed solely by littoral states.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey