Connect with us

Middle East

Lebanese government postpones Hezbollah disarmament decision amid cabinet crisis

Published

on

Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salam announced after yesterday’s critical Council of Ministers meeting that the decision on Hezbollah’s disarmament and ensuring the state’s monopoly on all weapons has been postponed until next week.

“We have decided to postpone the discussion on the US proposal [for Hezbollah’s disarmament] until next Thursday,” Salam said.

The Prime Minister emphasized Lebanon’s commitment to UN Security Council Resolution 1701 and pledged to ensure the state’s monopoly on weapons by the end of the year. “The Lebanese army has been tasked with developing an implementation plan for weapons and presenting this plan to the Council of Ministers before August 31,” he said.

Hezbollah and Amal Movement ministers left the meeting

Ministers affiliated with Hezbollah and the Amal Movement walked out of the meeting before it concluded on Tuesday evening. Lebanese journalist Khalil Nasrallah interpreted this as “an attempt to create a fait accompli in the process of disarming the resistance and a sign of a trap being set.”

Nasrallah stated, “The Council of Ministers did not task the army with preparing a plan to defend Lebanon against Israeli attacks; instead, it asked it to prepare a plan to limit weapons (Hezbollah’s weapons) and to present this plan at the end of August. This reveals the state of so-called ‘defense’ thinking in Lebanon. We are facing the mentality of a group that has embraced cowardice.”

Information Minister Paul Morcos also stated after the meeting that Hezbollah and the Amal Movement left the meeting “due to a disagreement over the decision that the monopoly on weapons belongs to the state.”

The meeting reportedly began at 3:00 PM and lasted for about five hours.

Qassem: The attacks will not end if we surrender our weapons

Speaking during the meeting, Hezbollah’s Deputy Secretary-General Naim Qassem stated clearly that the resistance will not surrender its weapons. “The attacks will not stop if we surrender our weapons; Israeli officials are saying this openly,” he said.

Qassem also stressed that the resistance is part of the Taif Agreement and, being a constitutional issue, is subject to national consensus, not a vote. Qassem asked, “The government program speaks of protecting sovereignty. Is surrendering weapons at the request of Israel, the US, and some Arab countries protecting sovereignty?”

“You talk to us about deterring attacks. But where is the state that will protect this country from disaster? Where is the mechanism to defend the borders? Since you cannot do this, at least allow us to maintain and develop our own defense capabilities,” Qassem said.

Qassem also revealed that the US representative, Tom Barrack, had demanded that Hezbollah surrender all its weapons within 30 days. He also warned, “If Israel launches a large-scale attack, missiles will rain down on its territory.”

Sources close to Hezbollah said that Qassem’s harsh statements were made in response to Washington’s latest demands.

The crisis over “pressure to disarm” grows for the government

Sources close to the government reported that no political force in Lebanon aims to overthrow the government. However, the Lebanese Forces Party, which is close to the US, is insisting on a timetable for Hezbollah’s disarmament and has signaled it will “escalate tensions” if this is not achieved.

Washington is also applying intense pressure on the Lebanese government to disarm Hezbollah. Hezbollah, on the other hand, states that its weapons can be considered under the umbrella of the state as part of a defense strategy, but this is a purely internal matter, and such a discussion cannot begin before Israeli attacks cease.

Hezbollah also presents as a fundamental precondition Israel’s withdrawal from the five points in southern Lebanon that it has occupied since last year’s ceasefire.

The US and Israel rejected Lebanon’s conditions

The Lebanese government prepared a response to the US-proposed roadmap, which includes the disarmament of Hezbollah. This response emphasized that the first step must be Israel’s withdrawal from the occupied areas in Lebanon and a halt to its daily attacks.

However, it is reported that Israel and the US have rejected these conditions, increasing the likelihood of a new military escalation in the region.

Israeli attacks continue

Hezbollah had announced its withdrawal to the north of the Litani River as part of the ceasefire agreement. However, since the ceasefire reached in November 2023, more than 200 people have been killed in Israeli attacks on southern and eastern Lebanon.

The Israeli press has written that the Tel Aviv administration will continue its attacks until Hezbollah is completely disarmed and is ready for a new war if necessary.

On Monday, one person was killed and four were injured in an attack by an Israeli drone in southern Lebanon.

Sources speaking to Reuters reported that Washington will no longer pressure Israel to stop its attacks or withdraw, but first expects the Lebanese government to commit to rapidly disarming Hezbollah. The US is said to be demanding a cabinet decision to approve this process.


Middle East

US waives human rights terms on $320m military aid to Egypt

Published

on

The US State Department stated that it has waived human rights conditions on more than $300 million in military aid to Egypt.

The statement emphasised that this decision was taken in consideration of Cairo’s “helpful role” since the outbreak of the war against Iran.

Egypt began receiving substantial support from the US after signing a peace treaty with Israel in 1979.

Since the late 1980s, the country has received approximately $1.3 billion annually in US military assistance.

A portion of this aid is subject to conditions related to human rights and democracy, which can be waived on national security grounds.

Withholding funds, including during the administration of former US President Joe Biden, has caused tension between Cairo and Washington in the past.

A letter dated 21 September and addressed to various congressional committees, obtained by Reuters, stated that Secretary of State Marco Rubio “decided to waive the certification requirement under the fiscal year 2025 Foreign Military Financing programme for Egypt of $320 million.”

This waiver was subsequently confirmed by the State Department.

An accompanying memorandum justifying the decision stated that this portion of military aid was “essential for counterterrorism, border security, or non-proliferation programmes, or otherwise important to the national security interests of the United States.”

The memorandum, dated 4 September and bearing Rubio’s signature, stated: “Exercising this waiver authority is critical to the US-Egypt relationship and to US national security priorities, particularly given the helpful role Egypt has played in the aftermath of Operation Epic Fury.”

“Operation Epic Fury” is the designation used by the US military for the campaign launched jointly with Israel against Iran in late February.

The State Department memorandum, whose authenticity was confirmed by two sources in Washington familiar with the letter, did not provide detailed information regarding what was termed Egypt’s “helpful role”.

The State Department’s annual decision on military aid to Egypt typically covers funds allocated for the preceding fiscal year, which ends on 30 September.

A State Department spokesperson stated that Rubio waived the certification in the interest of US national security and that the US continues to cooperate with the Egyptian government across a range of issues.

In an emailed statement, the spokesperson said: “This waiver recognizes the importance of maintaining security cooperation with Egypt at a time of significant security challenges in the region.”

The Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not immediately comment on the matter.

The spillover effects of the Iran war have imposed a heavy toll on US security partners, including Egypt.

Owing to rising fuel prices and other disruptions, the Egyptian economy is passing through a difficult period.

Under the Biden administration, the US withheld portions of the annual military allocation on multiple occasions over Egypt’s human rights record.

In 2024, following the Hamas-led 7 October attack on Israel and the subsequent war in Gaza, the Biden administration set aside human rights conditions, disbursing the entire $1.3 billion allocation to Egypt for the first time in its tenure.

Human rights organisations have long accused Egypt, under the administration of President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, of widespread human rights abuses, including torture and enforced disappearances.

This week, Egyptian police detained six journalists from a fact-checking and investigative media outlet, accusing them of spreading false information on behalf of the banned Muslim Brotherhood.

Egyptian authorities state that they have taken steps to address human rights issues. Sisi said stability is paramount and that the government supports human rights by working to provide for basic needs.

Continue Reading

Middle East

Britain expands curbs on arms exports to Israel over Gaza risks

Published

on

Britain has significantly broadened its military export restrictions targeting Israel, suspending or rejecting more than 80 licences for items the IDF could use in Gaza.

This figure is nearly triple the number affected when the policy was first introduced in September 2024.

United Kingdom Minister of State for the Middle East Stephen Doughty said that as part of what he described as a “tighter system” for assessing exports to Israel, more than 50 further export applications have been refused since approximately 30 licences were initially suspended.

Under the initial decision taken in September 2024, 30 of roughly 350 licences were suspended after the British government concluded there was a “clear risk” that certain military exports could be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of international humanitarian law in Gaza.

The affected equipment included components for military aircraft, drones, naval systems, and targeting gear.

Doughty said additional measures adopted this month established what he termed a “double safeguard” mechanism within the approvals process.

Export applications must now be assessed both against existing international humanitarian law criteria and in light of Britain’s position on the legality of Israel’s presence in the Palestinian territories.

“We have so far suspended or refused more than 80 licences,” Doughty said, adding that he had personally examined each licence.

Despite the wider restrictions, British-origin parts entering the international F-35 fighter jet supply chain continue to be largely exempt.

The UK government argues that preventing British-made components from entering the global F-35 pool could undermine the programme as a whole and have serious consequences for the security of the UK and its allies.

Direct exports of F-35 parts intended specifically for Israel remain suspended.

Doughty defended maintaining the supply of components via the international programme, arguing that halting it could have severe ramifications for the broader European and allied security architecture.

Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Emily Thornberry challenged this position, arguing that the issue was political rather than purely legal.

Thornberry suggested adopting an approach similar to the Dutch model, under which components entering the international supply chain could be flagged as “not intended for aircraft bound for Israel”.

The initial suspension was implemented in September 2024 by then Foreign Secretary David Lammy.

Lammy stressed at the time that the measure did not constitute an arms embargo and applied solely to items assessed as usable in military operations in Gaza.

Since then, the policy has been tightened further under Prime Minister Andy Burnham.

The expanded export restrictions follow the Burnham government’s adoption of a more confrontational policy toward the Israeli government.

Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband drew sustained applause at the Labour Party’s annual conference in Liverpool after delivering a sharp critique of the Netanyahu government’s policies and defending the decision to ban trade with Israeli settlements in the West Bank.

Accusing Israel of committing war crimes in Gaza, Miliband stated that the British government heard public outrage over the conflict, telling delegates: “We hear you. You were right.”

Continue Reading

Middle East

Netanyahu holds secret UAE talks with Saudi Arabia and Arab officials

Published

on

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with representatives of Gulf and Arab nations that lack diplomatic ties with Israel, including Saudi Arabia, during his weekend visit to the United Arab Emirates.

Sources close to the gathering told the Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth on Monday that representatives from Morocco, Libya, Jordan, and Qatar also took part in the meeting.

Netanyahu made a unannounced visit to Abu Dhabi on Sunday, where he met with the country’s leader, Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan.

According to Israeli media, this marked the first time the United Arab Emirates officially confirmed a visit by Netanyahu.

The meeting was arranged by Mossad Director Roman Goffman “at the request of Saudi Arabia, which asked for Israel’s assistance against Houthi attacks in the Red Sea region,” according to Yedioth Ahronoth.

The discussions addressed Iran and the Houthi militia. The newspaper added that the Arab states heard from Israel that “Israel is prepared to assist countries in the region with air defence systems, just as it aided the UAE during the conflict with Iran.”

Conflict in Yemen intensified in September when Ansarullah militiamen launched a rapid offensive that seized Yemen’s entire Red Sea coastline, including the vital maritime corridor of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait.

The Yemeni resistance also imposed a blockade on Saudi Arabia’s energy exports and staged multiple attacks against the kingdom.

Saudi Arabia reportedly sought military assistance from the US to counter Ansarullah.

Washington declined to attack the Houthis directly, but announced that it would provide intelligence and targeting support.

Reporting on the same visit, The Jerusalem Post said Netanyahu spent six hours in the UAE and that the principal subject of his discussions with MBZ was Iran.

Citing sources familiar with the matter, the newspaper added that the trip came “after Netanyahu exerted heavy pressure on the United Arab Emirates to arrange a meeting ahead of the Israeli elections on 27 October.”

Separately, the Associated Press, citing a person with direct knowledge of the meeting, reported that Netanyahu’s visit to the UAE was arranged in part to ask MBZ to deny reports that he had warned the Israeli prime minister of an impending Hamas threat prior to 7 October 2023.

According to Israeli media, Netanyahu’s office denied the AP report, issuing the following statement:

“Fake news. The visit focused solely on strengthening ties between the two countries and on regional issues.”

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey