Connect with us

Middle East

US intelligence knew of Israeli plans to use Palestinians as human shields, former officials say

Published

on

Amid ongoing accusations that Israel has used Palestinians as “human shields” in violation of international law, it has emerged that the US possessed its own intelligence on this practice.

Two former US officials, speaking to the Reuters news agency, stated that Washington obtained intelligence last year about Israeli officials discussing plans to send Palestinians into tunnels suspected of being rigged with explosives.

This intelligence was reportedly shared with the White House during the final weeks of then-US President Joe Biden’s term and was analyzed by American intelligence agencies.

International law explicitly prohibits the use of civilians as “human shields” in military operations.

Washington gathered its own evidence

Numerous documents and testimonies have previously been published regarding Israel’s use of Palestinians as human shields in Gaza and the occupied West Bank. However, the report from Reuters serves as a rare confirmation that Washington has gathered its own evidence on the matter.

The former officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of security issues, did not provide details on whether the Palestinians mentioned in the intelligence were civilians or “detainees.” Reuters could not determine if the Biden administration shared this intelligence with the Israeli government.

Israeli military reports it is investigating the claims

In a written response to questions on the topic, the Israeli military stated that “the use of civilians as human shields or forcing them to participate in military operations in any way is prohibited.” The military also reported that its Military Police Criminal Investigation Division is examining “allegations regarding the use of Palestinians in military missions.”

‘War crime’ concerns among US officials

According to the former US officials, the intelligence about the Israeli military using civilians as human shields was just one of many memos circulating within the government during the final period of the Biden administration. During this time, intelligence agencies began to more intensively analyze new streams of information reflecting Israel’s internal debates about its military practices in Gaza.

The officials stated that the new intelligence from within Israel caused serious concern among some high-level figures. According to these officials, the information was seen by some circles within the US government as supporting allegations that Israel was committing war crimes.

It was considered that if Israel were found responsible for war crimes, the US could also be held legally responsible for supplying weapons to Israel, and Washington might be forced to halt its intelligence sharing with Israel.

Despite this, US lawyers representing various agencies who convened in the final weeks of the Biden administration concluded that the existing evidence did not demonstrate that Israel had committed war crimes. Thus, a consensus formed that the US could continue providing weapons and intelligence support to Israel.

Some former US officials argued that the comprehensive intelligence package received late in the Biden administration described isolated incidents in Gaza but that it could not be concluded that these reflected a general Israeli practice or official policy.

Other ‘human shield’ and torture allegations

In May of this year, seven Palestinians who said they were used as human shields in Gaza and the occupied West Bank described their experiences in an interview with AP.

In June 2024, a video verified by Al Jazeera showed Israeli soldiers tying a wounded Palestinian man named Mujahid Azmi to the hood of a military jeep during a raid in the West Bank city of Jenin and driving past two ambulances.

In a statement following the incident, the Israeli military claimed the soldiers involved had “violated procedure.” A US State Department spokesperson described the footage as “disturbing” and said it was a “clear violation” of the Israeli military’s “orders and procedures.”

Israel has also been frequently accused of using torture throughout its nearly two-year war in Gaza.

In one of the most resonant incidents, a video leaked from the Sde Teiman military prison, which has become a symbol of mistreatment, showed Israeli soldiers sexually assaulting a Palestinian detainee.

Furthermore, it has been reported that signs of torture were found on the bodies of numerous Palestinian prisoners returned to Gaza since the ceasefire began.

The UN Committee Against Torture is expected to release its non-binding concluding observations, which will include its assessment of the torture allegations against Israel, at the end of November.

Middle East

US waives human rights terms on $320m military aid to Egypt

Published

on

The US State Department stated that it has waived human rights conditions on more than $300 million in military aid to Egypt.

The statement emphasised that this decision was taken in consideration of Cairo’s “helpful role” since the outbreak of the war against Iran.

Egypt began receiving substantial support from the US after signing a peace treaty with Israel in 1979.

Since the late 1980s, the country has received approximately $1.3 billion annually in US military assistance.

A portion of this aid is subject to conditions related to human rights and democracy, which can be waived on national security grounds.

Withholding funds, including during the administration of former US President Joe Biden, has caused tension between Cairo and Washington in the past.

A letter dated 21 September and addressed to various congressional committees, obtained by Reuters, stated that Secretary of State Marco Rubio “decided to waive the certification requirement under the fiscal year 2025 Foreign Military Financing programme for Egypt of $320 million.”

This waiver was subsequently confirmed by the State Department.

An accompanying memorandum justifying the decision stated that this portion of military aid was “essential for counterterrorism, border security, or non-proliferation programmes, or otherwise important to the national security interests of the United States.”

The memorandum, dated 4 September and bearing Rubio’s signature, stated: “Exercising this waiver authority is critical to the US-Egypt relationship and to US national security priorities, particularly given the helpful role Egypt has played in the aftermath of Operation Epic Fury.”

“Operation Epic Fury” is the designation used by the US military for the campaign launched jointly with Israel against Iran in late February.

The State Department memorandum, whose authenticity was confirmed by two sources in Washington familiar with the letter, did not provide detailed information regarding what was termed Egypt’s “helpful role”.

The State Department’s annual decision on military aid to Egypt typically covers funds allocated for the preceding fiscal year, which ends on 30 September.

A State Department spokesperson stated that Rubio waived the certification in the interest of US national security and that the US continues to cooperate with the Egyptian government across a range of issues.

In an emailed statement, the spokesperson said: “This waiver recognizes the importance of maintaining security cooperation with Egypt at a time of significant security challenges in the region.”

The Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not immediately comment on the matter.

The spillover effects of the Iran war have imposed a heavy toll on US security partners, including Egypt.

Owing to rising fuel prices and other disruptions, the Egyptian economy is passing through a difficult period.

Under the Biden administration, the US withheld portions of the annual military allocation on multiple occasions over Egypt’s human rights record.

In 2024, following the Hamas-led 7 October attack on Israel and the subsequent war in Gaza, the Biden administration set aside human rights conditions, disbursing the entire $1.3 billion allocation to Egypt for the first time in its tenure.

Human rights organisations have long accused Egypt, under the administration of President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, of widespread human rights abuses, including torture and enforced disappearances.

This week, Egyptian police detained six journalists from a fact-checking and investigative media outlet, accusing them of spreading false information on behalf of the banned Muslim Brotherhood.

Egyptian authorities state that they have taken steps to address human rights issues. Sisi said stability is paramount and that the government supports human rights by working to provide for basic needs.

Continue Reading

Middle East

Britain expands curbs on arms exports to Israel over Gaza risks

Published

on

Britain has significantly broadened its military export restrictions targeting Israel, suspending or rejecting more than 80 licences for items the IDF could use in Gaza.

This figure is nearly triple the number affected when the policy was first introduced in September 2024.

United Kingdom Minister of State for the Middle East Stephen Doughty said that as part of what he described as a “tighter system” for assessing exports to Israel, more than 50 further export applications have been refused since approximately 30 licences were initially suspended.

Under the initial decision taken in September 2024, 30 of roughly 350 licences were suspended after the British government concluded there was a “clear risk” that certain military exports could be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of international humanitarian law in Gaza.

The affected equipment included components for military aircraft, drones, naval systems, and targeting gear.

Doughty said additional measures adopted this month established what he termed a “double safeguard” mechanism within the approvals process.

Export applications must now be assessed both against existing international humanitarian law criteria and in light of Britain’s position on the legality of Israel’s presence in the Palestinian territories.

“We have so far suspended or refused more than 80 licences,” Doughty said, adding that he had personally examined each licence.

Despite the wider restrictions, British-origin parts entering the international F-35 fighter jet supply chain continue to be largely exempt.

The UK government argues that preventing British-made components from entering the global F-35 pool could undermine the programme as a whole and have serious consequences for the security of the UK and its allies.

Direct exports of F-35 parts intended specifically for Israel remain suspended.

Doughty defended maintaining the supply of components via the international programme, arguing that halting it could have severe ramifications for the broader European and allied security architecture.

Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Emily Thornberry challenged this position, arguing that the issue was political rather than purely legal.

Thornberry suggested adopting an approach similar to the Dutch model, under which components entering the international supply chain could be flagged as “not intended for aircraft bound for Israel”.

The initial suspension was implemented in September 2024 by then Foreign Secretary David Lammy.

Lammy stressed at the time that the measure did not constitute an arms embargo and applied solely to items assessed as usable in military operations in Gaza.

Since then, the policy has been tightened further under Prime Minister Andy Burnham.

The expanded export restrictions follow the Burnham government’s adoption of a more confrontational policy toward the Israeli government.

Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband drew sustained applause at the Labour Party’s annual conference in Liverpool after delivering a sharp critique of the Netanyahu government’s policies and defending the decision to ban trade with Israeli settlements in the West Bank.

Accusing Israel of committing war crimes in Gaza, Miliband stated that the British government heard public outrage over the conflict, telling delegates: “We hear you. You were right.”

Continue Reading

Middle East

Netanyahu holds secret UAE talks with Saudi Arabia and Arab officials

Published

on

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with representatives of Gulf and Arab nations that lack diplomatic ties with Israel, including Saudi Arabia, during his weekend visit to the United Arab Emirates.

Sources close to the gathering told the Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth on Monday that representatives from Morocco, Libya, Jordan, and Qatar also took part in the meeting.

Netanyahu made a unannounced visit to Abu Dhabi on Sunday, where he met with the country’s leader, Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan.

According to Israeli media, this marked the first time the United Arab Emirates officially confirmed a visit by Netanyahu.

The meeting was arranged by Mossad Director Roman Goffman “at the request of Saudi Arabia, which asked for Israel’s assistance against Houthi attacks in the Red Sea region,” according to Yedioth Ahronoth.

The discussions addressed Iran and the Houthi militia. The newspaper added that the Arab states heard from Israel that “Israel is prepared to assist countries in the region with air defence systems, just as it aided the UAE during the conflict with Iran.”

Conflict in Yemen intensified in September when Ansarullah militiamen launched a rapid offensive that seized Yemen’s entire Red Sea coastline, including the vital maritime corridor of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait.

The Yemeni resistance also imposed a blockade on Saudi Arabia’s energy exports and staged multiple attacks against the kingdom.

Saudi Arabia reportedly sought military assistance from the US to counter Ansarullah.

Washington declined to attack the Houthis directly, but announced that it would provide intelligence and targeting support.

Reporting on the same visit, The Jerusalem Post said Netanyahu spent six hours in the UAE and that the principal subject of his discussions with MBZ was Iran.

Citing sources familiar with the matter, the newspaper added that the trip came “after Netanyahu exerted heavy pressure on the United Arab Emirates to arrange a meeting ahead of the Israeli elections on 27 October.”

Separately, the Associated Press, citing a person with direct knowledge of the meeting, reported that Netanyahu’s visit to the UAE was arranged in part to ask MBZ to deny reports that he had warned the Israeli prime minister of an impending Hamas threat prior to 7 October 2023.

According to Israeli media, Netanyahu’s office denied the AP report, issuing the following statement:

“Fake news. The visit focused solely on strengthening ties between the two countries and on regional issues.”

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey