Connect with us

DIPLOMACY

Iran-US World Cup clash

Published

on

Tensions are set to rise between the US and Iran, the two contention countries in the West and in the Middle East, not only in the political realm but now even in sports. There are several disputation controversies between them, but this time they brought sports to politics. The US and Iran have been bitter ideological foes for more than 40 years, cutting diplomatic relations in the wake of the 1979 Islamic Revolution.

Political antagonism further degenerated when the US Soccer Federation briefly displayed Iran’s national flag on social media without the emblem of the Islamic Republic, terming the move in support of protests in Iran ahead of the two nations’ World Cup match on late Tuesday.

In the posts, the Iranian flag icon was missing its Islamic Republic emblem and only showed its red, white and green stripes. The US Soccer Federation said it had changed the flag for 24 hours to show support for the women in Iran fighting for basic human rights. There have been nationwide protests in Iran since the death of Mahsa Amini, a 22 years old woman in custody on September 16. She was detained for allegedly not wearing a proper headscarf and since then Iranian people took to the streets, demanding more freedom for women.

However, the Federation said they intended to change the flag back, but it immediately earned reactions.

Iran reacted swiftly on the use of an incorrect flag

Iran has strongly condemned the decision to use an incorrect flag, which it said violated the statutes of the Federation Internationale de Football Association (FIFA), world football’s global governing body. The Iranian Football Federation also lodged a protest with the (FIFA), demanding sanctions against the United States team. It also called for the US to be disqualified from the World Cup for its action.

A US soccer federation screenshot displaying Iran’s national flag on social media without the emblem of the Islamic Republic. (AP)

“By posting a distorted image of the flag of the Islamic Republic of Iran on its official account, the US football team breached the FIFA charter, for which a 10-game suspension is the appropriate penalty. Team USA should be kicked out of the World Cup 2022,”semi-official state news agency in Iran (Tasnim) tweeted.

Safia Allah Faghanpour, a legal adviser to Iran’s soccer federation also said that respecting a nation’s flag is an accepted international practice that all other nations must emulate.

Fagahanpour also said that measures taken regarding the “Islamic Republic of Iran flag are against the law” of FIFA competitions and the US must be held responsible.

US coach apologizes for depicting a modified version of Iran’s flag

The United States coach Gregg Berhalter apologized for the furor triggered by a social media post depicting a modified version of Iran’s flag and said they were not part of this as they are focusing more on today’s (Tuesday) match.

USA’s coach Gregg Berhalter gives a press conference at the Qatar National Convention Center (QNCC) in Doha (AFP)

The US players and coaching staff had been unaware about social posts regarding the flag change. “We’re not focused on those outside things and all we can do is apologizing on behalf of the players and the staff, but it’s not something that we were a part of,” Berhalter told newsmen.

“We had no idea what US Soccer put out. The staff, the players, we had no idea. For us our focus is on this match and I don’t want to sound aloof, or we’re not caring by saying that.”

To ease tension, the US State Department said it had no involvement in the US Soccer Federation’s decision to remove the “Islamic Republic” emblem from the Iranian flag in its social posts.

“We look forward to a peaceful and competitive match on the field. The United States continues to find ways to support the Iranian people in the face of state-sponsored violence against women and a brutal crackdown against peaceful protestors,” a State Department spokesperson told CNBC in an emailed statement.

Flag row and crucial football game

The US and Iran are set to meet in a crucial game that already has drawn political undertones. The loser, if there is any, most likely will be eliminated from the tournament. It is in the knockout stages. There were three matches and the last one between Iran-US was in the World Cup in 1998, with the Iranians securing a 2-1 victory. But in the 2022 World Cup, the Iranian side started off their campaign poorly after the 6-2 thrashing by England, only to put on a redeeming, dominant display against Wales, winning 2-0.

Meanwhile, the flag has also become a point of contention among the Iranian football fans as well. The pro-government supporters waved the flag and went on shouting against those demonstrating over Amin’s death. While other Iranian fans waved Iran’s lion and sun flag, an emblem of its former ruler, the late Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi in support of ongoing protests in Iran.

A female Iranian fan was also removed from a match for holding Amin’s T-shirt and some others were arrested by the Qatari police for showing support to the protests in Iran. The arrest was made in the line with the FIFA’s officials fan’s guideline which bans “promoting any political, offensive and/or discriminatory messages.”

Difficult to separate sports from politics

Indeed, fans don’t want politics brought into any sports, especially in football, a favorite sport to millions of people. Every country must refrain from introducing politics into sports because the lovers want sporting prowess to be pure no matter in football or cricket, or basketball, or gymnastics, or etc… It is rational to say that sports are, at a baseline, the ultimate meritocracy. In sports we also have a loser and a winner, but the outcome should never be politicalized.

Throughout history, the sport has generally been viewed as a form of entertainment, separate from serious matters of politics. Sport is often considered as a phenomenon that is not related to politics, and many see sports as a way of escaping politics.

But in this tournament “World Cup 2022” the football has been intrinsically-linked with the political games, where even players and fans are now engaged in political activities on the ground. The Iranian football players did not sing the national anthem and fans are separated between pro-and-anti-protests. This itself is a political move, and an indication that politics is difficult to separate from sports. Today’s match between US and Iran is especially significant for both sides, not only to qualify for the final 16 of the World Cup, but because of the rivalry between Washington and Tehran.

Many people also watched Saudi Arabia and Morocco’s victories over Argentina and Belgium, respectively, as political wins. We must learn to watch sports with no eye toward politics. There is need to remember that politics have appeared in the Olympic Games many times in the past several years, but yet the stated goal of the Olympic Movement was to keep sports and politics separate.  This is what FIFA also needs to do, and the fans must also learn ethics in sports.

DIPLOMACY

Argentina and the IMF: Negotiations begin for a new $44bn agreement

Published

on

Argentina is pursuing a new agreement with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to replace its current $44 billion arrangement. The effort signals a significant shift in the country’s financial strategy under President Javier Milei’s administration.

IMF Chief Spokesperson Julie Kozack confirmed on Thursday that the Milei government is prioritizing the establishment of a new programme over completing the final reviews of the existing deal inherited from the previous administration. According to a Bloomberg report, Kozack stated, “The authorities have formally expressed their desire to move to a new programme, and negotiations are now underway.”

The discussions intensified following a visit earlier this month by officials from Economy Minister Luis Caputo’s office and the central bank to Washington, where they engaged with IMF representatives.

The central question in the negotiations revolves around whether the IMF will extend additional financing beyond the $44 billion already allocated to Argentina. Milei had previously suggested an additional $15 billion, although he has not reiterated this figure recently. However, Caputo indicated this week that new funding could be included as part of the prospective programme.

If the parties reach an agreement, it would mark Argentina’s 23rd programme with the IMF since 1958 and its third since 2018. Historically, the IMF’s interventions in Argentina have faced criticism, as many past agreements failed to stabilize the economy. Successive governments often violated programme objectives, raising doubts about the effectiveness of IMF support in the country.

President Milei and his chief negotiator, Caputo, have a history of strained relations with the IMF. Earlier this year, Milei publicly criticized Rodrigo Valdes, one of the IMF’s senior officials, leading to Valdes stepping back from negotiations. Similarly, Caputo clashed with the IMF during his tenure as finance minister in 2018, particularly over exchange rate policies, which eventually prompted his resignation after a short stint as central bank governor.

Despite these tensions, the IMF has commended the Milei administration for implementing measures to cut spending, reduce inflation, and narrow gaps between the country’s various exchange rates.

Continue Reading

DIPLOMACY

Trump threatens tariffs on the EU over energy purchases

Published

on

U.S. President-elect Donald Trump has issued a warning to the European Union (EU), stating that the bloc may face tariffs if it does not increase its purchases of U.S. oil and gas on a “large scale.”

“I told the European Union that they must close the enormous gap with the United States by buying our oil and gas on a large scale. Otherwise, TARIFFS!!! in every way!!!” Trump declared in a post on the Truth Social platform on Friday.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen previously suggested that the EU could explore the possibility of importing more liquefied natural gas (LNG) from the U.S. “We still buy a lot of LNG from Russia, and why not replace it with American LNG, which is cheaper for us and lowers our energy prices?” von der Leyen remarked to reporters in November.

An EU official, speaking to the Financial Times (FT), noted the peculiarity of Trump’s threat, given von der Leyen’s earlier openness to the idea of increasing LNG imports from the U.S.

Currently, the United States is Europe’s largest supplier of LNG, though Russia remains the EU’s second-largest source. The possibility of replacing Russian LNG with U.S. imports aligns with the EU’s efforts to diversify its energy sources.

Trump has also floated the possibility of a general tariff of up to 20% on all non-Chinese imports, which could have significant implications for EU-U.S. trade relations.

In November, European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde urged European leaders to engage with the U.S. on trade matters, including tariffs, and to consider purchasing more U.S.-manufactured goods. This call for cooperation echoes measures taken during Trump’s first term, when then-European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker pledged to buy more U.S. gas to avert the risk of a trade war.

Global oil prices have shown sensitivity to these developments. On Friday, international oil benchmark Brent crude prices dropped 0.4% to $72.61 per barrel, while West Texas Intermediate (WTI) futures also fell 0.4%, trading at $69.14 per barrel.

The U.S., currently the world’s largest producer of crude oil and exporter of LNG, has been strengthening its energy trade partnerships. Buyers, including the EU and Vietnam, are reportedly considering increased fuel purchases from the U.S., partly to mitigate the risk of potential tariffs.

Continue Reading

DIPLOMACY

London pushes for continued U.S. support to Ukraine amid leadership transition

Published

on

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer urged Donald Trump on Wednesday to ensure that Western allies “stand together” in supporting Ukraine against Russian aggression.

During a phone call with the U.S. president-elect, their second conversation since Trump’s electoral victory in November, Starmer emphasized the importance of unified support for Ukraine, stating that “allies must stand with Ukraine… and ensure that Ukraine is in the strongest possible position.”

A spokesperson for the British Prime Minister’s Office described the discussion as highlighting a “shared desire to strengthen the close and historic relationship between the United Kingdom and the United States.”

Starmer began the call by congratulating Trump on his recent team appointments. Trump responded by “warmly recounting” his recent meeting with Prince William, Prince of Wales, in Paris earlier this month, according to the Prime Minister’s Office.

As Trump prepares to take office next month, he has expressed intentions to seek a deal to end the war in Ukraine, though he has also publicly criticized certain Western policies, including the approval of missile supplies to Ukraine for use on Russian soil.

In an interview with The Sun on Tuesday, Starmer expressed hope to revive trade talks with the incoming U.S. administration. These negotiations had stalled two years ago under President Joe Biden. The leaders also expressed mutual anticipation of meeting in person “at the first opportunity.” According to the i newspaper, Starmer may visit the U.S. in early February.

Meanwhile, The Telegraph reported that Starmer’s chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, conducted private meetings with senior members of Trump’s team earlier this month. McSweeney traveled to Florida to meet Susie Wiles, Trump’s chief of staff-designate, who played a pivotal role in managing his re-election campaign. He also held discussions in Washington with Congressman Mike Waltz, Trump’s incoming National Security Adviser.

A senior source in the Prime Minister’s Office described the interactions as “very warm,” adding that “President Trump has a warm approach to the UK. As the year draws to a close, the Starmer team is confident that the UK is well-placed for a strong bilateral relationship with the new president.”

Starmer’s delegation to the U.S., which began on December 2, included Jonathan Powell, former chief of staff to Tony Blair and now Starmer’s national security adviser. Together with McSweeney, Powell engaged in policy discussions on Ukraine, China, and the Middle East, identifying areas of alignment and divergence between the two leaders.

According to The Telegraph, those close to Starmer believe Trump is currently in “listening mode” on Ukraine, carefully evaluating strategies to fulfill his campaign promise of resolving the conflict “on day one” of his presidency.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey