Connect with us

ASIA

IS-TTP and Afghanistan-Pakistani’s future security

Published

on

Afghanistan’s capital city has once again plagued by violence with gunfire erupting at the Pakistani embassy to target Pakistan’s chief envoy and a suicide bombing attack to target a famous Afghan politician.

A gunman opened fire from a nearby building near the embassy as Pakistan’s Chargé d’Affaires to Afghanistan Ubaidur Rehman Nizamani, was leaving. Nizamani was unscathed but his guard was critically wounded and evacuated to Pakistan for treatment.

The Islamic State (IS) , also known as the Daesh group, took credit for the attack, claiming two of its members armed with “medium and sniper weapons” targeted the ambassador and his security personnel.

On the same day, two suicide bombers attacked Iman Mosque of Hizb-e-Islami office of Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, in which two guards and two assailants were killed. Some source suggests that the assailants intended to detonate a car bomb, but were interrupted by Hekmatyar’s bodyguards. One of the suicide bombers was wearing a woman’s burka at the time of attack. Gulbuddin Hekmatyar survived the assassination attempt, but lost two of his guards.

While no group is ready to accept responsibility for the attack on Hekmatyar, but the nature and timing indicates that Daesh could be behind that too.

Pakistan asks Afghanistan to beef up security at Kabul embassy

Pakistan’s Special Representative for Afghanistan Muhammad Sadiq asked the Afghan government to “beef up the security of our embassy and its personnel”.

“Our top most priority is the security of members of our mission,” Sadiq said, adding that security guard of Nizamani, Sepoy Israr Mohammad, “who took bullets on chest” was evacuated to Combined Military Hospital in Peshawar by a special plane. No updates were given on his health condition, but officials confirmed he is in ICU.

While saluting the extraordinary courage and devotion to duty of the guard, Sadiq called on the Taliban to beef up the security of Pakistan’s embassy and its personnel.

Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif condemned the “assassination attempt” on the top, demanded immediate investigation and action against perpetrators of this heinous act.

Nizammani landed in Kabul last month to take up his position at one of a few embassies that has continued to function in Afghanistan following seizure of power by Afghanistan last year.

Taliban vows action

Afghan Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi spoke with his Pakistani counterpart Bilawal Bhutto Zardri on phone condemned the attack on the embassy and assured to bring the perpetrators to justice swiftly. He also reiterated Afghanistan’s firm resolve to combat terrorism.

Bilawal said that the Afghan government must prevent the terrorists from undermining relations between Pakistan and Afghanistan. He also reiterated Pakistan’s unwavering commitment to fight terrorism and said that Pakistan will be undeterred by such cowardly attacks.

Zardari also affirmed that his country has no plan to close its embassy or withdraw its diplomats from Kabul.

Although Pakistan does not officially recognize Afghanistan’s Taliban government, but has kept its embassy open and maintains a full diplomatic mission.

Meanwhile, the Afghan security forces arrested a suspect involved in the assassination attempt on Nizamani. Sources say that he was residing on the 8th floor of the nearby building, and the suspect tried to escape, however he was arrested by the Afghan forces. An AK-47 rifle, a long-range automatic rifle, a sniper rifle and other weapons were also discovered from the possession of the suspect.

Mutually useful cooperation remains missing

Now when it is clear that Daesh has taken the responsibility for the attack on the Pakistan embassy, it has unfolded in some dimensions. For a start, it shows that there is still a security failure and gap beside the Taliban maintained security at this point. Another factor could be that some Taliban fighters who think the Taliban as sellouts have joined the Daesh on the sly. This also raises alarm bells for Pakistan, and there is possibility of more attacks against Pakistanis and even the Daesh group could spread its activities inside Pakistan. And In the most pessimistic view, what will happen to Pakistan if Daesh and Tehrik Taliban Pakistan (TTP) will pledge loyalty to each other.

TTP is basically a Pakistani issue, but the Taliban should not underestimate Daesh as it already claimed responsibility for several deadly attacks across Afghanistan since Taliban returned to power in August 2021. If TTP and Daesh become friends, no matter Afghanistan or Pakistan, they only need to follow their agenda, and friends morally help each other.

We should not forget that TTP and Taliban already have great ties and the Taliban were also acting as an honest broker between the TTP and Pakistan. However, the mediation efforts have come to naught, and the TTP is once again on the rampage as it just recently carried a car bombing in Pakistan. TTP also called off a ceasefire with Pakistan and ordered its fighters to carry attacks across the country.

The enemy of my enemy is my friend

There is a great saying that “the enemy of my enemy is my friend”. Taliban are friends to Pakistan and also Taliban are friends to TTP, but TTP is the enemy of Pakistan. TTP had already declared war with Islamabad, and Daesh is now on the same path. At the same time, Daesh is the enemy of Taliban. In this contest, TTP-Daesh is the main point of concern for the peace and safety of Afghanistan and Pakistan as well as the region. It wouldn’t be naïve to think that TTP will not join Daesh to wage more war against Pakistan in the wake of attack on the Pakistan embassy in Kabul. Unluckily, if TTP and Daesh established ties, confronting them will not be painless. Daesh already sent an alliance message to TTP by attacking a Pakistan compound.

At this stage, it is essential that Kabul and Islamabad should stop complaining or to engage in some sort of blame game that seems to be developing, and instead take concert measures that will bring matters under control. This is not really carrying weight to see that both sides agreed that embassy-like attack will not harm the mutual ties between the two countries, but what is important is to think carefully how to deal with Daesh and TTP as they are growing rapidly and splitting out of control.

ASIA

Xi urges global CEOs to safeguard trade and supply chains

Published

on

Chinese President Xi Jinping, in a meeting with a group of executives including Rajesh Subramaniam from FedEx and Bill Winters from Standard Chartered, called on global business leaders to work together to protect supply chains.

Amid a deepening trade war with the US, the Chinese leader told the group of foreign business leaders, including Pascal Soriot from AstraZeneca and Miguel Ángel López Borrego from Thyssenkrupp, that they should resist behaviors that “turn back” history.

Speaking at the meeting held in Beijing on Friday, Xi said, “We hope everyone will have a broad and long-term perspective and not blindly follow actions that disrupt the security and stability of global industrial and supply chains, but instead add more positive energy and certainty to global development.”

The event at the Great Hall of the People marked the second consecutive year that Xi held a carefully arranged meeting with foreign CEOs in the Chinese capital. Last year’s event involved only US business leaders.

The meeting took place at the end of a busy week for Chinese policymakers, who are striving to strengthen relations with the international business community amid rising tensions with the administration of US President Donald Trump.

China’s leading annual CEO conference, the China Development Forum, was held earlier this week in Beijing, followed by the Boao Forum for Asia on the tropical resort island of Hainan.

Beijing is trying to present itself as a bastion of stability in global trade, in contrast to the US, where Trump has launched successive waves of tariffs on many products, from aluminum to automobiles.

Trump pledged on April 2 to impose broad and reciprocal taxes on US trade partners.

Continue Reading

ASIA

Trump’s potential auto tariffs worry Japan and South Korea

Published

on

Following US President Donald Trump’s announcement that he would impose a 25% tariff on imported cars and auto parts, Japan’s Prime Minister sounded the alarm on Thursday.

Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba told lawmakers during a parliamentary session, “We need to consider appropriate responses,” adding, “All options will be on the table.”

This move, seen as undermining a bilateral agreement made between Trump and then-Prime Minister Shinzo Abe in September 2019, came as a surprise to Japan. This limited trade deal had opened Japan’s market to more American agricultural products. The agreement states that the two countries “will refrain from taking measures contrary to the spirit of these agreements.”

Japanese automakers reacted cautiously to the announcement. Toyota, Subaru, Mazda, and Honda issued brief statements saying they were assessing the potential impact.

Imported cars and trucks are currently subject to tariffs of 2.5% and 25%, respectively. When the new tariffs take effect on April 3, these rates will rise to 27.5% and 50%. The 25% tariff will also apply to automotive parts like engines and transmissions, taking effect no later than May 3.

Japan’s Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi said the government intends to negotiate exemptions. Economists say it is unclear how exemptions might be secured, but there are several options.

According to economists, options Japan might consider include voluntary export restraints, a commitment to increase imports of items like natural gas, grain, and meat, and replacing Russian natural gas with gas from the US. In 2023, 8.9% of Japan’s natural gas imports came from Russia, while 7.2% came from the US.

“Japan will likely be looking at all these options,” said Koichi Fujishiro, a senior economist at the Dai-ichi Life Research Institute.

South Korea in a similar situation

South Korea is also expected to seek exemptions. Analysts said that South Korean automaker Hyundai Motor Group’s announcement earlier this week of a $21 billion US investment would help its negotiating position.

Esther Yim, a senior analyst at Samsung Securities, said, “The US has, in principle, applied a 25% tariff on all imported cars,” adding, “Washington can then negotiate with each country, and I think investment can be used as leverage.”

South Korea’s Ministry of Industry pledged an emergency response by April to help the country’s automakers, who are expected to face “significant challenges” when the tariffs take effect.

Over the years, global automakers have shifted to local production to avoid trade friction. According to the Mitsubishi Research Institute, 60% of Japanese cars sold in the US are produced in the US. This figure drops to 40% for Korean cars. For European brands, the rate is as high as 70%.

Although Ishiba insists all options are on the table, few analysts expect Japan to resort to retaliatory measures, at least at this point. “Japan would gain very little by retaliating against US tariffs,” Fujishiro said.

At a summit with Trump in February, Ishiba pointed out that Japan is the largest investor in the US and a significant job creator, promising to work towards increasing Japan’s investment balance from $783.3 billion in 2023 to $1 trillion.

Cars, Japan’s largest export item to the US, are worth 6 trillion yen ($40 billion) and will account for 28% of Japan’s total exports in 2024. This amount is equivalent to 1% of Japan’s nominal gross domestic product.

Takahide Kiuchi from the Nomura Research Institute estimates that a 25% tariff would reduce Japan’s car exports to the US by 15% to 20% and lower Japan’s GDP by 0.2%.

If Japanese automakers try to respond by shifting production to the US, this would reduce domestic employment and hollow out the country’s economy in the long run.

Masanori Katayama, chairman of the Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, said at a press conference last week, “Car exports from Japan are necessary to supplement the domestic production of Japanese automakers and to provide a lineup of attractive cars… to meet the diverse needs of American customers through car dealerships in every US state.”

Katayama said that when the US implements the tariff, “a significant production adjustment is expected. The Japanese auto industry consists not only of automakers but also parts suppliers and employs 5.5 million people.”

Katayama insisted that the industry and the Japanese government must come together to take action and keep domestic supply chains intact.

The tariffs are also expected to harm American automakers because they too source parts and manufacture globally to keep costs down and make their cars competitive in the market.

Nomura analyst Anindya Das said General Motors could fall into an operating loss on an annual basis due to its reliance on factories in Mexico. He added that Toyota could also see a 30% drop in operating profit.

Jennifer Safavian, president and CEO of Autos Drive America, an industry group representing international automakers operating in the US, including Toyota, Honda, Nissan, and others, said, “Tariffs imposed today will make it more expensive to produce and sell cars in the US, ultimately leading to higher prices, fewer choices for consumers, and fewer manufacturing jobs in the US.”

Continue Reading

ASIA

South Korean opposition leader Lee Jae-myung acquitted in election law case

Published

on

A court in South Korea on Wednesday overturned a lower court’s decision, ruling that the main opposition party leader is not guilty of violating election law. If this decision is upheld, it will pave the way for him to run in the next presidential election.

Prosecutors can appeal the decision, which could take the case to the Supreme Court, South Korea’s highest judicial body.

Speaking outside the court after the ruling was announced, Lee Jae-myung thanked the court for the decision, which he described as “the right decision.”

The charges against Lee stem from remarks he made in 2021 while competing in his party’s presidential primary, where he allegedly denied knowing one of the key figures in a real estate development scandal. The scandal involved a redevelopment project in Seongnam city, where Lee was mayor. Prosecutors allege Lee lied about his relationship with businessman Kim Moon-ki to conceal his own culpability in the real estate deal.

Immediately after the court’s decision was announced, Kweon Seong-dong, leader of the ruling People Power Party, called the ruling “regrettable” and urged the Supreme Court to quickly decide the case.

Lee, a trained lawyer and experienced politician, lost the 2022 presidential election by the narrowest margin in South Korea’s democratic history to now-impeached President Yoon Suk Yeol.

Yoon, Lee’s fierce rival, is awaiting a Constitutional Court ruling on his impeachment over charges of leading an insurrection in December. Lawmakers voted to impeach Yoon following his attempt to declare martial law in early December, which he claimed was necessary to protect South Korea from opposition “anti-state forces.” The measure was quickly rejected in the National Assembly, but the attempt triggered a political crisis that continues months later.

The Constitutional Court completed hearings on Yoon’s case late last month and is expected to deliver its verdict within days, although no official date has been announced. If the court finds Yoon not guilty, he will be immediately reinstated. If found guilty, an early election will be held within 60 days.

Data released last week by polling firm Gallup Korea showed Lee as the leading choice among potential candidates for the next presidential election. Lee, with a support rate of 36%, was far ahead of the number 2 likely candidate, conservative Labor Minister Kim Moon-soo.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey