Connect with us

DIPLOMACY

Admirals assess: Sweden’s membership will complete the West’s stronghold in Europe

Published

on

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan met with Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson and NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg at the NATO Summit in Vilnius. In a statement released after the trilateral meeting, it was reported that Turkey will refer Sweden’s NATO Accession Protocols to the Turkish Grand National Assembly (TBMM), while Sweden will support efforts to revitalize Turkey’s European Union (EU) membership process.

As part of this process, Sweden has significantly expanded its counter-terrorism cooperation against the PKK and resumed arms exports to Turkey, in line with all the steps set out in the Trilateral Memorandum agreed in 2022, the statement said, adding that the two countries are working closely together to address Turkey’s legitimate security concerns.

Turkey and Sweden agreed to continue cooperation within the framework of both the Trilateral Permanent Joint Mechanism established at the 2022 Madrid NATO Summit and a new bilateral security mechanism that will meet once every year at the ministerial level and establish appropriate working groups, the statement said:

“At the first meeting of this Security Compact, Sweden will present a roadmap as the basis of its continued fight against terrorism in all its forms and manifestations towards the full implementation of all elements of the Trilateral Memorandum, including article 4. Sweden reiterates that it will not provide support to YPG/PYD, and the organization described as FETÖ in Türkiye. Both Sweden and Türkiye agreed that counter-terrorism cooperation is a long-term effort, which will continue beyond Sweden’s accession to NATO.

Secretary General Stoltenberg also reconfirmed that NATO categorically condemns terrorism in all its forms and manifestations. NATO will be significantly stepping up its work in this area, including by the Secretary General establishing, for the first time at NATO, the post of Special Coordinator for Counter-Terrorism. We commit to the principle that there should be no restrictions, barriers or sanctions to defence trade and investment among Allies. We will work towards eliminating such obstacles.”

Speaking to Harici, Veteran Counter Admiral Deniz Kutluk and Counter Admiral Dr. Alaettin Sevim evaluated Sweden’s NATO membership.

‘International give-and-take exercise’

Counter Admiral Deniz Kutluk, who stated that NATO’s expansion is remarkable while the war in Ukraine continues, underlined that the center of gravity of the summit was Ukraine and said, “NATO is taking steps in terms of linking aid to Ukraine to a program in NATO and other support elements. There is a question of approving the operation plans prepared by NATO in three regions against Russia’s threats. This issue concerns Turkey closely because one of these three programs includes the Black Sea and the Mediterranean.”

Referring to Turkey’s requests for Sweden’s NATO membership, Kutluk said, “There are articles such as NATO’s support for Turkey’s rapprochement with the European Union and the establishment of a committee for the first time in NATO history by regulating Sweden’s attitudes towards terrorism. If you ask me about the European Union, the two organizations cannot influence each other, so Turkey’s membership in the European Union cannot be very successful. However, Turkey has exercised its right to bring this issue to the agenda. As a result, this is an international give-and-take exercise.”

‘Even if a decision is made, the planes will be delivered at least three years later’

Admiral Kutluk responded to questions about Russia’s stance on this issue and agenda issues such as F-16 fighter jets as follows:

“Sweden’s joining NATO is an issue that Russia does not see as a contradiction. Regarding Sweden and Finland, Russia has stated that it will not affect its relations with the two countries as long as no NATO offensive weapons are deployed. As far as the F-16s are concerned, this is a commercial concept. But it has a production time of three years. So if the decision is made today, the planes will be delivered at least three years later. Therefore, it is not known how Turkish-American relations will be in the next three years. US President Joe Biden has said that they will decide on the F-16 issue by considering the mutual interests of the congress. There is no definite map. But at the end of the day, this is a very large arms purchase deal. The US knows very well that there is no country that has surrendered to embargoes. In fact, in the text of the memorandum of understanding with Sweden in NATO, it is stated that no NATO member will impose economic and military embargoes on each other. It should not be forgotten that this is a clause that also binds the US.”

‘The missing pieces of the West in Europe are being put in place’

(V.) Rear Admiral Dr. Alaettin Sevim stated that Sweden’s membership points to a geo-strategic process and said:

“The missing pieces in Europe are to be put in place and with this membership, the West’s stronghold in Europe will be completed. NATO will emerge as a pillar in the developments in the Arctic Region in the North. On the other hand, NATO’s armament budget is to be increased through armaments at a time when the threat of global recession is increasing. The Russia issue is important here. A new process for an arms race to wear Russia down may begin. It was thought that the Soviet Union collapsed due to its inability to manage its economy well. We may face a new application of this event. Because, when we read prominent Western writers, it is clear that there are ideas in favor of Russia’s disintegration.

The issue of entry into the European Union was brought up at the last moment. Other countries in the bloc have also expressed that Sweden’s entry into NATO and Turkey’s entry into the EU are different issues. Therefore, it would not be reasonable to expect progress on this issue. Maybe Turkey can be supported by providing more economic aid to Turkey in the refugee issue.”

‘Russia will take its measures’

“The most important progress on Turkey’s demands could be on the modernization of the F-16s. President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan had said before the summit that they are prioritizing the congress on the F-16 issue, but what will our parliament say about it? This discourse paints a picture like this: If progress is made in the US on the F-16 issue, Turkey’s parliament will make as much progress with the US.

To summarize the NATO membership of Sweden and Finland, I think it is an important step for NATO to close the gaps in Europe. The contribution of Sweden’s arms industry to NATO should be taken into consideration. Of course, to a certain extent, these countries have to make certain investments in NATO armaments. There will be economic aspects related to this. Russia will also have to take certain measures. This could be challenging for the Russian economy. On the map, Russia will have to think more about NATO’s borders, which are moving closer to Russian bases. The Polyarny base, the most important Russian ballistic submarine missile base, is very close to Finland. And more than half of Russia’s submarines with ballistic missiles are based there. Russia will take measures in this regard.”

DIPLOMACY

Why has the US changed its approach to Bangladesh?

Published

on

US Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asian Affairs Donald Lu visited Bangladesh last week. When Lu visited Bangladesh last year, he was beating the US drum for ‘democracy’ ahead of elections that were expected to favour Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and the ruling Awami League. The mood was different last time.

Washington had threatened visa restrictions on officials ‘suspected of obstructing a free vote’. But Hasina was elected for a fourth consecutive term in an election boycotted by the Islamist opposition. Both the US and the UK criticised the elections as ‘not free and fair’.

However, the US appears to have changed its stance on the Hasina government, which it sees as close to China. Lu returned to Dhaka this month with a very different message, focusing on strengthening economic ties and tackling climate change.

Unlike his visit in 2023, the diplomat also skipped meetings with opposition leaders and ‘rights groups’ in a country that Washington has previously said is ‘rapidly sliding into authoritarianism’.

It seems that the United States has, however reluctantly, accepted the reality on the ground and hit the reset button on the relationship,’ Ali Riaz, a professor of politics and government at Illinois State University, told Nikkei Asia.

After a meeting with Bangladesh’s foreign minister, Lu acknowledged that Washington’s earlier warnings about the elections had raised tensions and stressed the need to ‘move forward’ and ‘rebuild trust’.

Bangladesh’s state minister for information and broadcasting, Mohammad Ali Arafat, said of Lu’s three-day visit: ‘I can say that during Lu’s trip, he focused on talking about economic partnership and Bangladesh’s role in the US Indo-Pacific policy. There was no discussion about the opposition, democracy, human rights, politics or elections.

Analysts say Bangladesh is one of the biggest exporters of garments to the US and Washington sees the country of 164 million, sandwiched between India and Myanmar, as a valuable ally in its efforts to contain China’s growing regional influence.

Just a month after the January election, which Washington contested, US President Joe Biden sent a letter to Hasina expressing a ‘sincere desire’ to work together on a range of issues and to ‘partner … in our shared vision for a free and open Indo-Pacific’.

‘The United States attaches increasing strategic importance to Bangladesh at a time of heightened great power rivalry,’ said Michael Kugelman, director of the South Asia Institute at the Wilson Centre in Washington. It sees Bangladesh as a strategic state bordering the Indian Ocean and one that has strengthened its ties with Beijing while maintaining a close relationship with New Delhi,’ Kugelman told Nikkei.

But a week after Lu’s May 14-16 visit, the US government sanctioned retired Bangladeshi army chief Aziz Ahmed and his immediate family on corruption charges.

The Ahmed case is a reminder that US policy in Bangladesh has not put aside the values element,’ said Kugelman: ‘But I wouldn’t exaggerate the impact on the relationship. This is a fairly light punishment – much lighter than economic sanctions – and it targets a retired military leader, not the current government.

Illinois State’s Riaz said Washington wants to exert some influence over the Bangladeshi government while prioritising its commercial and geopolitical interests.

It seems that these concerns are pushing the US to work on the low-hanging fruit and avoid strained relations in the near future,’ Riaz added.

Continue Reading

DIPLOMACY

Six NATO countries plan to build ‘drone wall’ on Russian border

Published

on

Six NATO countries are planning to develop a “drone wall” that they say will help protect their borders with Russia, citing “a series of provocations ranging from forced migration to attempts to change borders”.

Ministers from Finland, Norway, Poland and the three Baltic states said at the weekend that they were discussing the creation of a coordinated drone system along their borders with Russia to prevent smuggling and new provocations, and to help with defence.

“This is something completely new, a drone wall stretching from Norway to Poland … and the aim is to use drones and other technologies to protect our borders … against provocations from unfriendly countries and to prevent smuggling,” Lithuanian Interior Minister Agnė Bilotaitė told the Baltic News Service.

Finnish Interior Minister Mari Rantanen told public broadcaster Yle that the drone wall plan would “develop over time” and could help protect the Nordic country’s 1,340km border with Russia.

No details were given on the timing of the drone wall or how it would work. Bilotaitė said each country would have to do its own “homework”, noting that EU funds could also be used.

Tensions between Russia and NATO countries in the Baltic region have increased in recent weeks. Last week, the Russian defence ministry posted on its website a draft proposal to unilaterally extend its maritime borders with Lithuania and Finland, which was later removed.

A day later, Russian border guards removed 25 buoys marking the border from Estonian waters, sparking anger from NATO and some member states, as well as messages of support for Tallinn.

Many NATO countries believe that Russia could ‘test’ NATO’s borders in the next five to ten years, while intelligence services have suggested a series of sabotage operations on their territory.

The six NATO countries also discussed plans to evacuate large sections of their populations in the event of a conflict. Finnish officials, for example, expressed surprise that Ukraine was keeping its civilian population on or near the front line, and said the Nordic country’s defence plans included evacuating its border population.

Continue Reading

DIPLOMACY

Julian Assange wins right to challenge his extradition to the US

Published

on

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has been given the right to appeal against his extradition to the US on espionage charges.

The High Court in London ruled on Monday that the Australian publisher can appeal against his extradition from Britain to the US, extending Assange’s already lengthy legal battle.

In March, the High Court had granted Assange a temporary reprieve, giving the US government three weeks to provide “satisfactory assurances” that he would receive a fair trial, enjoy his First Amendment rights to freedom of expression and not face the death penalty.

But the court’s ruling on Monday will further delay Assange’s deportation and means his legal status will remain in dispute. The legal arguments on Monday focussed on whether Assange would be entitled to Article 1 protection.

Assange is wanted on 17 charges, including violating the US Espionage Act, obtaining classified military documents and conspiring to hack into the Pentagon computer network. If convicted, he could face up to 175 years in prison.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey