Connect with us

MIDDLE EAST

Netanyahu dampens prospects for ceasefires in Gaza and Lebanon

Published

on

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has poured cold water on the likelihood of ceasefires in Lebanon and Gaza, arguing that the current conditions do not meet Israel’s demands and that an agreement can only be reached on terms achievable through continued conflict.

Optimistic reports of imminent ceasefires in Lebanon and Gaza quickly faded.

Meanwhile, three senior U.S. officials have arrived in the region: Amos Hochstein, senior adviser to President Joe Biden on Lebanon; Brett McGurk, the Middle East adviser (in Israel); and CIA Director William Burns (in Egypt).

Netanyahu’s position on ceasefire conditions

Netanyahu has reiterated that any agreement with Lebanon must ensure Israel’s freedom of action in the region. In a meeting with Hochstein and McGurk, he stated, “What matters is not the various articles of the agreement or numbers like 1701 or 1556, but Israel’s ability and determination to implement the agreement in a way that allows our people to return home safely and eliminates threats from Lebanon.”

Lebanon’s interim Prime Minister Najib Mikati recently expressed hopes for a ceasefire with Israel, following reports in Israeli media of a draft agreement for a 60-day truce with Hezbollah. This draft, reportedly leaked from Washington, stated that Israel would withdraw its forces from Lebanon within the first week of the ceasefire.

However, White House National Security spokesman Sean Savett tempered expectations, saying, “Many reports and drafts circulating do not reflect the current stage of the negotiations.”

Israeli military’s perspective on the conflict

A senior Israeli general staff official criticized Netanyahu’s stance, telling the Asharq Al-Awsat newspaper, “It is difficult to know what he is waiting for or what he truly wants. Netanyahu’s approach gives the impression that he wants to buy time, but time is not always on our side and could lead to an uncertain war of attrition.”

The official noted that ending the conflict would require more than occupying villages in southern Lebanon, stating, “Even if the Israeli army does not launch a ground operation to dismantle Hezbollah forces and enable the return of residents to northern towns, it must still escalate its operations to compel Hezbollah and the Lebanese government to negotiate in Israel’s favor if a permanent agreement remains out of reach.”

Military analyst Yossi Yehoshua from Yediot Aharonot warned that if the conflict drags on, Israeli forces may have to deepen their operations beyond the initial plan, potentially establishing a security belt in the north to protect against prolonged hostilities.

After a month of ground fighting, five Israeli divisions and a reserve brigade have struggled to make significant progress in southern Lebanon, with more than 50,000 troops deployed but failing to capture a single village.

In U.S.-brokered negotiations, Israel has demanded that the Lebanese army and UNIFIL monitor any ceasefire and that the Lebanese army dismantle Hezbollah’s military infrastructure in the south. However, the Israeli government is doubtful Lebanon will accept these terms, reducing optimism for Hochstein’s success in this round of talks.

MIDDLE EAST

Israel’s reserve crisis deepens amid Gaza plans

Published

on

As the Israeli army prepares to intensify its attacks in Gaza, the crisis within its reserve forces, considered the “backbone of the army,” is growing.

According to a report in Haaretz, tens of thousands of reserve soldiers are expected to be recalled to duty as Israel prepares to escalate its operations in Gaza. However, army officials report that motivation is declining, and an increasing number of reservists are stating they will not report for duty. Officials indicate that the reasons for this drop in motivation include war fatigue, the lack of clear objectives for the ongoing conflict, and anger towards government policies.

A senior reserve commander informed Haaretz that brigade and battalion commanders are handling numerous cases involving reserve soldiers refusing to report for duty. The most frequently cited reason is the perception that the government is making insufficient efforts to rescue the hostages. This is followed by anger over the proposed law exempting ultra-Orthodox Jews from military service and discontent regarding judicial reform plans.

Another reserve officer reported that soldiers and commanders suffer from severe burnout after serving hundreds of days over the past year. He expressed that they struggle to commit to new missions not only for political reasons but also due to physical and psychological fatigue.

Among those refusing service is combat pilot Alon Gur, who publicly announced his resignation last week after 16 years of service. Declaring his departure from the Air Force, Gur stated on social media, “The line has been crossed,” accusing the government of “prioritizing politics over human life.” After Gur was relieved of duty, other reserve soldiers began taking similar actions, causing significant concern within the army command.

According to Israeli army data, as of February, the reserve participation rate stood at 85%. At the start of the war, however, almost all called-up reservists reported for duty, marking the highest reserve mobilization in Israeli history.

Israel, with its relatively small population, relies on its reserve forces system to sustain the army during prolonged conflicts. This system, which involves recalling individuals who have returned to civilian life after compulsory military service back to active duty when needed, is considered one of the cornerstones of Israel’s security doctrine. This system allows tens of thousands of experienced soldiers to be rapidly deployed to the front lines during times of war or crisis.

Continue Reading

MIDDLE EAST

Hamas retains guerrilla capacity and political role in Gaza, says US intelligence

Published

on

According to the 2025 Threat Assessment Report from the US Intelligence Community, the umbrella organization for 18 separate intelligence agencies, Hamas retains the capacity to sustain low-intensity guerrilla warfare and remains a primary political actor in Gaza. In Lebanon, Hezbollah, noted as weakened post-war, is still described as posing a threat to Israel and the US.

According to a report in Haaretz, the assessment predicted that “tension will persist regarding the situation in Gaza, as well as in the Israel-Hezbollah and Israel-Iran dynamics” and stated that Hamas “will continue to pose a threat to Israel’s security even in its weakened state.”

The report also noted that Hamas’s October 7 attack on Israel disrupted the diplomatic progress achieved through the Abraham Accords and the trend toward stability in the Middle East.

Pointing out that Hamas has preserved thousands of its fighters and a significant portion of its underground infrastructure, the report warned that the organization “likely used the ceasefire to bolster its military capacity and replenish ammunition stocks.”

The report stated, “Hamas retains the capacity to reignite low-intensity guerrilla resistance and will remain the dominant political actor in Gaza for the foreseeable future. The low expectations among the parties for a permanent ceasefire and the absence of a post-war political and reconstruction plan point towards instability that could last for years.”

Noting that support for Hamas among Palestinians in the West Bank is higher compared to the Palestinian Authority, the report assessed that “the long-term trajectory of Israeli-Palestinian relations will depend on developments in the increasingly unstable West Bank.”

The report also highlighted that the Palestinian Authority’s capacity to provide security and public services in the West Bank is progressively weakening, emphasizing that Israeli operations in the West Bank, attacks by Jewish settlers, and the activities of Palestinian armed groups, including Hamas, could further deepen the governance crisis.

It added, “A potential leadership change within the Palestinian Authority could exacerbate governance challenges. Furthermore, how Israel will govern post-war Gaza and whether its operations in the West Bank will undermine the Palestinian Authority will also be crucial factors.”

The report also drew attention to the fragile dynamics between Israel and Lebanon, warning that a resumption of large-scale Israeli operations in Lebanon could heighten sectarian tensions, weaken Lebanese security forces, and worsen the humanitarian crisis.

The report concluded, “Despite being weakened, Hezbollah retains the capacity to target Americans and US interests regionally and globally, and even, to a limited extent, on US soil.”

Continue Reading

MIDDLE EAST

US presents conditions to HTS for potential sanctions relief

Published

on

According to six sources speaking to Reuters, the US has presented Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), which seized power in Syria, with a list of conditions to fulfill in exchange for partial sanctions relief. These conditions reportedly include ensuring foreigners do not hold senior management roles.

Two individuals, an American official and a Syrian source knowledgeable about the matter, told the news agency that US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Levant and Syria Natasha Franceschi conveyed the list of demands during a face-to-face meeting with Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shaybani. The meeting took place at the Syria donors conference in Brussels on March 18.

The sources indicated that the conditions put forward by the US include Syria “destroying its remaining chemical weapons stockpiles” and “cooperating in the fight against terrorism.”

Additionally, American officials and one source in Washington stated that another demand involves ensuring foreign militants are not appointed to senior government positions within Syria’s administrative structure. Criticism had previously arisen over Syria’s appointment of thousands of foreign militants—including Uyghurs, Jordanians, Chechens, and individuals of other nationalities—to the defense ministry.

According to two sources, Washington also requested that Syria appoint a liaison officer to assist in efforts to locate US journalist Austin Tice, who disappeared in Syria more than a decade ago.

The source also indicated that the US wants Syria to issue a statement supporting its own territorial integrity.

Washington reportedly did not provide a specific timeline for the fulfillment of these conditions.

While the HTS administration has not commented on the matter, the US State Department stated, “We do not discuss our private diplomatic conversations publicly.”

Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce mentioned last week that Washington is monitoring the actions of the interim administrators.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey