Asia
South Korea considers arming Ukraine amid North Korean troop deployment
South Korea’s conservative president, Yoon Suk Yeol, is considering direct arms supplies to Ukraine in response to North Korea’s deployment of troops on Russia’s front line.
Seoul has so far resisted calls from its Western allies to use its substantial stockpile of military hardware, preferring to provide only non-lethal aid to Kyiv. However, analysts and diplomats suggest that North Korea’s deployment of troops in the Kursk region of western Russia, reportedly as many as 8,000 according to U.S. officials on Thursday, is shifting South Korea’s stance.
Yoon and other senior officials in Seoul describe Pyongyang’s involvement in the conflict as a threat to South Korea’s security, noting the “valuable experience” North Korean troops could gain on the battlefield. They also worry that Moscow may share advanced military technology with Pyongyang in return for its support.
In response to the deployment, Yoon vowed not to “sit idly by.” His office confirmed this week that Seoul intends to send a delegation to Ukraine to monitor North Korean forces, following a phone call between Yoon and his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky on Tuesday.
However, the prospect of arming Ukraine faces strong opposition from South Korea’s left-wing opposition, which holds a parliamentary majority. The opposition argues that Yoon’s hardline stance toward North Korea has pushed Pyongyang closer to Moscow.
“Arming Ukraine is an extremely dangerous idea that treats people’s lives like pawns in a chess game,” said Democratic Party leader Park Chan-dae at a recent rally organized by her party. She argued that South Korea has no direct stake in the outcome of the war. Park added that Yoon “should not involve South Korea in a proxy war with North Korea in a distant country,” warning that increased involvement could “risk triggering a military confrontation on the Korean Peninsula.”
“The South Korean government is caught between foreign partners urging it to do more and an opposition calling for restraint,” said Jeongmin Kim, a senior analyst at Seoul-based information service Korea Pro.
South Korea’s decades of preparation for potential conflict with North Korea, along with its formidable defense industry, have resulted in a vast stockpile of weapons, including artillery shells, tanks, howitzers, and surface-to-surface missiles. As a close ally of the United States, South Korea frequently attends NATO summits and supplies many NATO members. Analysts note that South Korea’s weaponry would be largely compatible with equipment already used by Ukraine’s armed forces.
“South Korea’s support for Ukraine could change the course of the entire conflict,” said Henry Haggard, a senior adviser at WestExec Advisors and former counselor for political affairs at the U.S. embassy in Seoul from 2021 to 2023. “Not only do Korean companies produce world-class weapons tailored for Ukraine’s needs, but they also have the manufacturing capacity to deliver essential arms at a pace that could make a difference when needed most,” he told the Financial Times.
South Korea has indirectly supported Ukraine by replenishing U.S. stocks of 155mm artillery shells. According to Ramon Pacheco Pardo, a Korea expert at King’s College London, South Korea is providing more shells to Ukraine, albeit through third countries, than all European countries combined.
Zelensky stated on Thursday that he had sent a representative to Seoul to make “detailed” requests for artillery and air defense systems in response to North Korea’s deployment to Russia.
However, Seoul has thus far refused to provide direct lethal assistance, citing the country’s Foreign Trade Act, which restricts arms exports “other than for peaceful purposes.”
An implicit understanding exists between Seoul and Moscow that South Korea will avoid sending lethal aid to Ukraine, while Russia will limit support to North Korea. But Pacheco Pardo noted that this understanding “has now come to an end.” He added, “I think the Yoon administration will provide lethal assistance to Ukraine if it has evidence that Russia is increasing support for North Korea, especially with technologies that could enhance Pyongyang’s missile, satellite, and other high-tech programs.”
On Wednesday, South Korean Defense Minister Kim Yong-hyun, during a meeting in Washington with U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, remarked that it was “highly likely” North Korea was seeking Russian defense technology in exchange for troop deployments.
A European diplomat based in Seoul remarked that the South Korean government’s stance on arms procurement has “shifted” since the North Korean deployment, though it remains “very, very cautious.” The diplomat suggested that Seoul might wait for the U.S. presidential election’s outcome before making further decisions.
Jeongmin Kim noted that the Yoon administration may argue that providing lethal aid does not require parliamentary approval and would not violate the Foreign Trade Act, asserting that arming Ukraine would contribute to international peace by hastening the end of the war.
Such a decision, however, may face public opposition. According to a Gallup Korea poll conducted shortly after North Korean troops were reported in Russia, only 13% of South Koreans surveyed supported military assistance to Ukraine, while 66% favored limiting aid to non-military and humanitarian support.
Asia
Chinese Politburo signals cautious confidence as Beijing pivots toward targeted tech support
The mid-year meeting of the Communist Party of China (CPC) Politburo has long served as a critical evaluation point for Beijing. The session provides the central government with an opportunity to review developments from the first half of the year and steer the country toward a more realistic economic course in the months ahead.
The latest statement from the top leadership signals cautious confidence. The release indicates that policymakers are favoring a stable, targeted approach over the broad-based stimulus measures that characterized previous years. As China manages its economic transition, the post-Covid era of aggressive spending has clearly drawn to a close. In its place, a strategic and structural approach has taken hold, prioritizing resilience and stability over short-term capital injections.
According to the outcomes of the Politburo meeting, the policy orientation will continue to target specific sectors. Financial support will be directed away from the property market and toward high-tech emerging industries such as artificial intelligence and semiconductors. In the real estate sector, the objective remains stabilizing market confidence and keeping debt risks under control.
Infrastructure investment is likewise being reshaped around the concept of “new infrastructure.” The focus is no longer solely on concrete and physical structures; smart power grids, information technology networks, and data infrastructure have taken precedence.
This approach signifies an investment in future competitiveness rather than simply pumping capital into the economy’s more stagnant sectors. Serving as a new driver of growth, digital infrastructure fulfills a dual purpose: supporting domestic demand in the short term while safeguarding technological competitiveness over the long term.
Finally, Beijing is signaling a more conciliatory posture in international trade. The Chinese leadership aims to establish a more balanced trade framework to mitigate concerns voiced by trade partners such as the European Union over what has been termed “China Shock 2.0.”
As the administration prepares for critical leadership changes next year, its primary focus will remain on stability across both economic and social spheres.
China continues to strike a balance between realistic growth targets and systemic restructuring, maintaining policy leeway to absorb potential external shocks. Beijing’s economic strategy reflects a pragmatic assessment of both domestic and international challenges.
Struggling with weak demand, the domestic economy is not yet in a position to anchor national growth independently. Expansion continues to rely heavily on a record trade surplus alongside the impressive export performance of high-tech and clean energy sectors. However, this reliance has drawn pushback from several trading partners.
To stimulate domestic economic activity and ease trade tensions, Beijing unveiled its first standalone five-year plan focused on consumption. Released in July by the National Development and Reform Commission and the Ministry of Commerce, the plan targets an increase in retail sales to 60 trillion yuan (approximately $8.9 trillion) by 2030. This represents an increase of roughly 20% compared to 2025 levels.
To improve profit margins for small businesses, regulatory authorities are tackling the issue of “involution”—described as excessive internal competition—by curbing platform monopolies and preventing destructive price wars. While these structural adjustments may take longer to yield results, they are viewed as a more sustainable and effective alternative to direct cash handouts.
Asia
Chinese chipmaker profits surge 2,500% on explosive AI computing demand
Major Chinese microchip manufacturers saw their profits surge by 2,579.5% in the first half of 2026, driven by unprecedented demand for artificial intelligence and computing capacity.
Data from China’s National Bureau of Statistics, cited by the South China Morning Post (SCMP), underscored the industry’s sharp upward trajectory.
Yu Weining, senior statistician at China’s National Bureau of Statistics, explained that this surge is directly connected to the accelerating integration of artificial intelligence across various sectors.
Yu noted that this process has increased the need for computing capacity. The demand for computational processes also lifted profits across the entire electronics industry by 97% year-on-year.
Profits of major Chinese industrial enterprises with an annual revenue exceeding 20 million yuan ($2.9 million) rose 18.7% in the first six months of the year, reaching 4 trillion yuan.
In the first half of 2025, before the global data center construction process had begun, industrial profits had dropped by 1.8% to 3.4 trillion yuan, while profit growth in the electronics sector remained at 3.5%.
The SCMP reported that the global AI boom has generated explosive demand for high-performance computing systems and memory chips, causing a structural pivot in China’s industrial landscape.
Data showed that integrated circuit production in the first half of the year grew by 23% year-on-year to reach approximately 280 billion units.
This figure means that the country produced an average of more than 1.5 billion chips per day.
The profit growth is also corroborated by forecasts from China’s leading chipmakers. Shenzhen Longsys Electronics, one of the largest memory module manufacturers, expects its profits to increase by more than 600-fold in the first half of the year.
Flash memory maker GigaDevice projects that its net profit will surge by approximately 1,099% year-on-year due to supply shortages and rising product prices.
Chinese companies in the AI chip segment are also demonstrating strong profit growth, albeit at a more moderate pace compared to the memory market.
Hygon Information Technology, which develops central processing units and computing units for artificial intelligence, projects that its profits will rise by up to 52.3%.
CXMT hits record high on Shanghai Stock Exchange
Shares of Chinese chipmaker CXMT gained more than 500% on their first day of trading on the Shanghai Stock Exchange on July 27, jumping from 8.66 yuan to 55 yuan.
As a result of this sharp surge in its shares, CXMT’s market valuation reached 3.65 trillion yuan ($539 billion), making the company China’s most valuable publicly traded firm.
At the peak of the rally—even though quoted prices underwent a slight correction toward the close of the trading day—CXMT surpassed Tencent, which was trading on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange with a market capitalization of $514 billion.
Asia
Massive student movement over exam leaks forces resignation of India’s education minister
Indian public examination reform proposals follow education minister’s resignation after nationwide youth protests
India’s federal government introduced legislation in parliament on Monday to amend the law governing public examinations, days after the “Cockroach” movement forced the resignation of Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan following nationwide youth protests.
The bill incorporates enhanced sanctions, including longer prison sentences and higher fines for those found responsible for exam leaks and irregularities.
The demonstrations are widely viewed as the most significant youth-led challenge faced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi since he took office in 2014.
What triggered the protests?
Nearly 2 million students took the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET), an undergraduate medical entrance examination, in May. The federal National Testing Agency cancelled the exam on May 12 following allegations that question papers had been leaked. The examination was re-administered on June 21.
Young people took to the streets to protest against examination fraud, youth unemployment, and a perceived lack of future prospects.
According to a BBC report, the unemployment rate among university and college graduates aged 15 to 25 in the country stands at a critically high level of 40%. The addition of corruption in public examinations to existing economic strain broke the patience of the youth.
Abhijeet Dipke, founder of the Cockroach Public Party (CJP) movement, led the protests.
The movement derived its name from remarks made in May by Supreme Court Judge Surya Kant, who used the terms “cockroach” and “parasite” in a derogatory reference to unemployed youth and protesters. Young demonstrators adopted the insult as a symbol and named their movement after it.
How the movement unfolded
Young protesters organized street demonstrations demanding the resignation of Education Minister Pradhan. Dipke, who initiated the movement in New Delhi, subsequently organized protests in other parts of the country.
Sonam Wangchuk, one of the protesters, began a hunger strike at the demonstration site in support of the movement. As his physical condition deteriorated, authorities forcibly transferred him to a hospital.
The reaction to Wangchuk’s forcible removal from the protest site caused crowds at the venue to expand rapidly.
Tens of thousands of protesters faced tear gas and baton charges by police while attempting to march on parliament. Some demonstrators engaged in clashes with law enforcement officers.
CJP leaders held talks with ministers from the Modi government, who requested time to evaluate the protesters’ demands internally.
Modi called for unity among lawmakers in the ruling coalition to implement strict measures against exam paper leaks, punish those responsible, and establish a secure, leak-proof system.
Opposition representatives led by Rahul Gandhi staged a sit-in at the entrance of Modi’s official residence demanding Pradhan’s resignation. They were briefly detained by police before being released.
Opposition lawmakers supporting the student protesters disrupted proceedings in parliament. Demonstrations expanded to other regions of the country, including the financial hub of Mumbai.
In his first direct statement regarding the protests, published in a post on X, Modi announced that special courts would be established to prosecute individuals involved in exam paper leaks. Protesters rejected the proposal.
Movement leaders held a second round of talks with the government after Wangchuk ended his 26-day hunger strike.
Following those discussions, the government requested time until the afternoon of the following day to respond to the demand for Pradhan’s resignation.
Education Minister Pradhan subsequently announced his resignation, stating that he was stepping down in light of the situation at the protest site and across the country, as well as to prevent “external forces” from exploiting the environment.
On July 26, Modi announced the creation of a task force headed by technology entrepreneur Nandan Nilekani to overhaul the country’s examination system.
On Monday, July 27, the government presented a bill to parliament proposing amendments to the law governing public examinations. The legislation introduces stiffer penalties for offenders, including extended prison terms and increased monetary fines.
-
America2 weeks agoUS agricultural superpower status at risk as trade wars shift global markets to Brazil
-
America2 weeks agoUS controls $13 billion in Venezuelan oil revenues with little transparency, raising congressional concerns
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoPalantir CEO Alex Karp says he would not vote for ‘pro-Russian’ AfD in Germany
-
Europe2 weeks agoUS secures multi-billion-dollar energy and AI deals at Three Seas summit in Dubrovnik
-
Middle East2 weeks agoPentagon faces severe budget crunch as Middle East operational costs drain key military funds
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoWorld Bank warns US-Iran conflict could slash global growth to 1.3% as inflation looms
-
Europe2 weeks agoGermany accelerates African energy diplomatic push to secure natural gas and green hydrogen
-
Middle East2 weeks agoOil passes $90 as tanker attacks halt Hormuz shipping
