Connect with us

Middle East

US Ambassador Barrack outlines Trump’s new approach to Syria, US-Türkiye ties

Published

on

Tom Barrack, the US Ambassador to Ankara and Special Representative for Syria, gave an interview to NTV channel after assuming his post.

In the interview broadcast yesterday, Barrack made critical assessments regarding the Russia-Ukraine war, the situation in Gaza, Syrian policy, and Türkiye-US relations.

The Ambassador stated that President Donald Trump’s patience, particularly concerning the Russia-Ukraine issue, has reached its limit and that Türkiye could assume a central role in the resolution process.

‘Türkiye plays a key role’

Referring to the peace negotiations between Russia and Ukraine, Barrack highlighted Türkiye’s significance in this process.

Barrack said, “Yes, I believe Türkiye plays a key role. All these senseless wars are a disaster for all of us. Türkiye has traditional cooperation with both Russia and Ukraine. This enables you to establish a crucial dialogue.”

Noting that President Trump’s efforts to pressure Russian President Vladimir Putin have not yet yielded the desired outcome, the Ambassador addressed reports that the Russian leader, in response to Türkiye’s proposal for a quadrilateral meeting, wished to meet directly with Trump instead of Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

Barrack stated, “Of course, I cannot speak on behalf of President Trump. However, it certainly needs to be a meaningful meeting where the decisions made are effective and come with security guarantees. Türkiye can assist in narrowing down a few issues necessary to formulate a sensible solution for all relevant parties.”

Ambassador Barrack continued: “President Trump’s patience has now run out; you cannot say he is a very patient person. With Türkiye intervening at this point and eliminating operational problems, a summit-level meeting between leaders could occur. And I believe we can resolve this issue for everyone.”

‘Our Syria policy will not resemble the policy of the last 100 years’

Barrack also provided important insights into the US’s future strategy in Syria, emphasizing that the current policy will change.

Barrack said, “Of course, what I can assure you is this: our Syria policy today will not resemble the Syria policy of the last 100 years, because none of those approaches worked.”

In response to whether the US would withdraw from Syria, he referred to President Trump’s previous statements, indicating that the number of US military bases would be reduced.

Barrack added, “Certainly, the reduction of our military bases is also significant. The number will eventually decrease from 8 bases to 1.”

When the interviewer, Kilislioğlu, reminded him that US support for the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) was justified by the fight against ISIS and asked, “When do you think the US will say, ‘Okay, we don’t need the YPG’?” Barrack responded, “I don’t believe the outcome you are referring to is the anticipated one. Because the SDF is an ally. The support provided to the SDF is support given to an ally. This is a very important factor for our Congress. Guiding them towards integration into a new Syrian government is exceptionally crucial. Everyone needs to maintain reasonable expectations.”

The Ambassador mentioned that President Trump, together with President Erdoğan, said he would “give the new regime a chance,” an outcome nobody had predicted.

Türkiye-Israel tension in Syria and regional dynamics

Addressing the Türkiye-Israel tension in Syria, Barrack recalled that Türkiye was among the first nations to recognize Israel, stressing that the issue is not a religious conflict.

Stating that the Golan Heights issue pertains to water and security, Barrack said, “Therefore, the dialogue between Türkiye and Israel coincides with the dialogue between the YPG and Türkiye, and Türkiye is a very critical, key element here. It is a key element that will persuade the rest of the regional powers that Israel does not seek territorial expansion and is not attempting to seize Syria. Moreover, Türkiye has no designs on Syrian territory.”

Barrack suggested that a new commercial sphere could emerge in the region, fostering cooperation among Turkish companies, Gulf capital, and Israeli innovation.

“I believe all these borders trace back to Sykes-Picot, to the San Remo Agreement, to all the failed demarcations. It is simply time for reassignment and to reach an agreement,” Barrack stated, adding that the situation in Lebanon would likely follow a similar trajectory, requiring Hezbollah and Hamas to take a subordinate role. He characterized Iran as “a completely different question.”

Noting Türkiye’s location in a challenging geopolitical area, Barrack said, “We live in a very difficult region, a very challenging zip code, but Türkiye is coping incredibly well. However, the future lies in regional respectability, meaning not just as a NATO ally.” He also criticized Türkiye’s non-acceptance into the European Union as “utterly ridiculous.”

‘There is a senseless massacre in Gaza’

Ambassador Barrack, also responding to questions about the situation in Gaza, described the events as a “senseless massacre.”

Barrack stated, “Of course, I cannot speak on behalf of the administration, but I believe I can speak on behalf of the American people. There is a senseless massacre in Gaza, and this is horrifying for everyone.”

While condemning Hamas’s actions, he asserted that Palestinians should not be equated with Hamas.

Explaining that the solution to the problem is complex and that individuals like Steve Witkoff are working with President Trump towards a resolution, Barrack said, “I believe the President’s intention is to resolve all these issues in the very near future. We can refer to this as a two-state solution or a permanent solution.”

Barrack summarized the Trump administration’s foreign policy philosophy with President Trump’s words: “He says, ‘Do not trust us for long if you do not want to end senseless deaths everywhere, because America will no longer be globalist, it is not in neocon thinking; we want peace, prosperity, and understanding.’”

A new era in US-Türkiye relations?

Referring to relations between Türkiye and the US, Barrack highlighted the complexity of the S-400 issue. He explained that Türkiye shot down a Russian jet in 2015, experienced a coup attempt in 2016, and required air defense systems. Barrack noted that Türkiye turned to Russia due to difficulties in acquiring Patriot missiles at that time. Barrack said, “This, naturally, caused confusion for everyone. Because while NATO is intended to protect against Russia, Türkiye never used the S-400s, not even taking them out of the box.”

Emphasizing that Türkiye has developed its own air defense industry and the importance of TB2 drones and the Kaan jet, Barrack stated, “The relationship this President wants to establish with Türkiye, with your President, is a different kind of relationship—not strategic, not event-oriented, not transactional. It elevates it to a different level where America is not dictating defense directives to Europe; it is a completely different echelon.”

He indicated that Trump views Türkiye as being in a position where it can be most effective within a geography that has become the most influential region globally.

Middle East

US waives human rights terms on $320m military aid to Egypt

Published

on

The US State Department stated that it has waived human rights conditions on more than $300 million in military aid to Egypt.

The statement emphasised that this decision was taken in consideration of Cairo’s “helpful role” since the outbreak of the war against Iran.

Egypt began receiving substantial support from the US after signing a peace treaty with Israel in 1979.

Since the late 1980s, the country has received approximately $1.3 billion annually in US military assistance.

A portion of this aid is subject to conditions related to human rights and democracy, which can be waived on national security grounds.

Withholding funds, including during the administration of former US President Joe Biden, has caused tension between Cairo and Washington in the past.

A letter dated 21 September and addressed to various congressional committees, obtained by Reuters, stated that Secretary of State Marco Rubio “decided to waive the certification requirement under the fiscal year 2025 Foreign Military Financing programme for Egypt of $320 million.”

This waiver was subsequently confirmed by the State Department.

An accompanying memorandum justifying the decision stated that this portion of military aid was “essential for counterterrorism, border security, or non-proliferation programmes, or otherwise important to the national security interests of the United States.”

The memorandum, dated 4 September and bearing Rubio’s signature, stated: “Exercising this waiver authority is critical to the US-Egypt relationship and to US national security priorities, particularly given the helpful role Egypt has played in the aftermath of Operation Epic Fury.”

“Operation Epic Fury” is the designation used by the US military for the campaign launched jointly with Israel against Iran in late February.

The State Department memorandum, whose authenticity was confirmed by two sources in Washington familiar with the letter, did not provide detailed information regarding what was termed Egypt’s “helpful role”.

The State Department’s annual decision on military aid to Egypt typically covers funds allocated for the preceding fiscal year, which ends on 30 September.

A State Department spokesperson stated that Rubio waived the certification in the interest of US national security and that the US continues to cooperate with the Egyptian government across a range of issues.

In an emailed statement, the spokesperson said: “This waiver recognizes the importance of maintaining security cooperation with Egypt at a time of significant security challenges in the region.”

The Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not immediately comment on the matter.

The spillover effects of the Iran war have imposed a heavy toll on US security partners, including Egypt.

Owing to rising fuel prices and other disruptions, the Egyptian economy is passing through a difficult period.

Under the Biden administration, the US withheld portions of the annual military allocation on multiple occasions over Egypt’s human rights record.

In 2024, following the Hamas-led 7 October attack on Israel and the subsequent war in Gaza, the Biden administration set aside human rights conditions, disbursing the entire $1.3 billion allocation to Egypt for the first time in its tenure.

Human rights organisations have long accused Egypt, under the administration of President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, of widespread human rights abuses, including torture and enforced disappearances.

This week, Egyptian police detained six journalists from a fact-checking and investigative media outlet, accusing them of spreading false information on behalf of the banned Muslim Brotherhood.

Egyptian authorities state that they have taken steps to address human rights issues. Sisi said stability is paramount and that the government supports human rights by working to provide for basic needs.

Continue Reading

Middle East

Britain expands curbs on arms exports to Israel over Gaza risks

Published

on

Britain has significantly broadened its military export restrictions targeting Israel, suspending or rejecting more than 80 licences for items the IDF could use in Gaza.

This figure is nearly triple the number affected when the policy was first introduced in September 2024.

United Kingdom Minister of State for the Middle East Stephen Doughty said that as part of what he described as a “tighter system” for assessing exports to Israel, more than 50 further export applications have been refused since approximately 30 licences were initially suspended.

Under the initial decision taken in September 2024, 30 of roughly 350 licences were suspended after the British government concluded there was a “clear risk” that certain military exports could be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of international humanitarian law in Gaza.

The affected equipment included components for military aircraft, drones, naval systems, and targeting gear.

Doughty said additional measures adopted this month established what he termed a “double safeguard” mechanism within the approvals process.

Export applications must now be assessed both against existing international humanitarian law criteria and in light of Britain’s position on the legality of Israel’s presence in the Palestinian territories.

“We have so far suspended or refused more than 80 licences,” Doughty said, adding that he had personally examined each licence.

Despite the wider restrictions, British-origin parts entering the international F-35 fighter jet supply chain continue to be largely exempt.

The UK government argues that preventing British-made components from entering the global F-35 pool could undermine the programme as a whole and have serious consequences for the security of the UK and its allies.

Direct exports of F-35 parts intended specifically for Israel remain suspended.

Doughty defended maintaining the supply of components via the international programme, arguing that halting it could have severe ramifications for the broader European and allied security architecture.

Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Emily Thornberry challenged this position, arguing that the issue was political rather than purely legal.

Thornberry suggested adopting an approach similar to the Dutch model, under which components entering the international supply chain could be flagged as “not intended for aircraft bound for Israel”.

The initial suspension was implemented in September 2024 by then Foreign Secretary David Lammy.

Lammy stressed at the time that the measure did not constitute an arms embargo and applied solely to items assessed as usable in military operations in Gaza.

Since then, the policy has been tightened further under Prime Minister Andy Burnham.

The expanded export restrictions follow the Burnham government’s adoption of a more confrontational policy toward the Israeli government.

Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband drew sustained applause at the Labour Party’s annual conference in Liverpool after delivering a sharp critique of the Netanyahu government’s policies and defending the decision to ban trade with Israeli settlements in the West Bank.

Accusing Israel of committing war crimes in Gaza, Miliband stated that the British government heard public outrage over the conflict, telling delegates: “We hear you. You were right.”

Continue Reading

Middle East

Netanyahu holds secret UAE talks with Saudi Arabia and Arab officials

Published

on

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with representatives of Gulf and Arab nations that lack diplomatic ties with Israel, including Saudi Arabia, during his weekend visit to the United Arab Emirates.

Sources close to the gathering told the Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth on Monday that representatives from Morocco, Libya, Jordan, and Qatar also took part in the meeting.

Netanyahu made a unannounced visit to Abu Dhabi on Sunday, where he met with the country’s leader, Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan.

According to Israeli media, this marked the first time the United Arab Emirates officially confirmed a visit by Netanyahu.

The meeting was arranged by Mossad Director Roman Goffman “at the request of Saudi Arabia, which asked for Israel’s assistance against Houthi attacks in the Red Sea region,” according to Yedioth Ahronoth.

The discussions addressed Iran and the Houthi militia. The newspaper added that the Arab states heard from Israel that “Israel is prepared to assist countries in the region with air defence systems, just as it aided the UAE during the conflict with Iran.”

Conflict in Yemen intensified in September when Ansarullah militiamen launched a rapid offensive that seized Yemen’s entire Red Sea coastline, including the vital maritime corridor of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait.

The Yemeni resistance also imposed a blockade on Saudi Arabia’s energy exports and staged multiple attacks against the kingdom.

Saudi Arabia reportedly sought military assistance from the US to counter Ansarullah.

Washington declined to attack the Houthis directly, but announced that it would provide intelligence and targeting support.

Reporting on the same visit, The Jerusalem Post said Netanyahu spent six hours in the UAE and that the principal subject of his discussions with MBZ was Iran.

Citing sources familiar with the matter, the newspaper added that the trip came “after Netanyahu exerted heavy pressure on the United Arab Emirates to arrange a meeting ahead of the Israeli elections on 27 October.”

Separately, the Associated Press, citing a person with direct knowledge of the meeting, reported that Netanyahu’s visit to the UAE was arranged in part to ask MBZ to deny reports that he had warned the Israeli prime minister of an impending Hamas threat prior to 7 October 2023.

According to Israeli media, Netanyahu’s office denied the AP report, issuing the following statement:

“Fake news. The visit focused solely on strengthening ties between the two countries and on regional issues.”

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey