ASIA
Afghan women are protesting against Taliban university ban

A small group of Afghan women staged defiant protests in the capital Kabul and northern Takhar province on Thursday against a Taliban order banning them from universities. Taliban also arrested some of them in Kabul.
In the latest move to further restrict women’s rights to education, Taliban’s minister for higher education on Wednesday ordered all public and private universities to bar women from attending classes until further notice.
Soon after the decision, male students in Nangarhar and in Kandahar provinces abandoned their classes in solidarity with their female classmates. They also avoid writing any exams until female students are not attending.
The protestors in Kabul called for equal rights to both boys and girls. “They expelled women from universities. Oh, people support women’s rights. Education rights should be for everyone or no one,” the protesters were chanting.
Taliban detained some women demonstrators
In a video clip, one of the protesters said that some of the girls were detained by the Taliban. “Five female demonstrators were arrested by the Taliban,” a female demonstrator told Harici. Three reporters covering the event were also detained. Two of the girls were later released while the Taliban still took the three others in custody.
“Taliban started beating the women demonstrators. They also threatened to kill us if we don’t stop the demonstration,” she added, speaking on condition of anonymity.
“Taliban closed the schools, everyone remained silent, they closed universities, yet again everyone is silent, and now they’ve come and closed our courses. What are we supposed to do? Kill ourselves?” a group of devastated Afghan girls said in a footage.
A small group of women also staged a protest in Takhar province after the Taliban stopped them from entering the university campus.
A video circulating on social media showed that Taliban drenched a young woman in Takhar with water from a fire engine as she was protesting against banning universities. “Death to Taliban, death to the men of Afghanistan, death to the international community that cannot defend us and our rights,” the footage showed the female student as saying.

Guards stopped hundreds of women from entering universities, a day after the nationwide ban on women attending university was announced. Photo: AFP
The National Students Movement (NSM) of the National Democratic Movement in Pakistan also protested on Thursday at Agriculture University in Peshawar against the Taliban banning Afghan women from universities.
Mohsin Dawar, a member of the national assembly of Pakistan said that NSM held a similar protest at Islamia College on Wednesday and NSM will hold a protest in Quetta tomorrow (Friday).
Taliban breaks silence on university ban
In the wake of global outcry against Taliban’s decision to ban women from university, Taliban’s Minister of Higher Education said that that decision was adopted after the students did not follow Taliban’s instructions over the past 16 months.
In an interview with RTA, the Taliban-run TV channel, Neda Mohammad Nadim put four reasons for university closures for girls; “girl’s hostels, traveling of students without male guardians, non-adherence of hijab and persistent of mixed classes.” Nadim also said that of the 160 subjects taught at universities, many were in contravention of Islam and Afghan dignity.
Since the Taliban seized power last year, have banned teenage girls from secondary school, pushed out many women from government jobs, prevented them from traveling without a male relative and ordered women to cover up outside of the home, ideally with burqa (hijab).
Taliban’s ban on women education against Islam
Following the news on prohibition of girls from higher education, the international community, including Islamic nations has slammed the decision by the Taliban and most have called on the group to reverse the ruling.
Turkish Foreign Minister, Mevlut Cavusoglu said that the “Taliban’s decision to ban women from universities in Afghanistan has no basis in Islam.”
While terming the ban as a serious source of concern, Cavusoglu said that “this ban is neither Islamic nor humanistic.” He further went on saying that Islam encourages education, and reiterated Turkey’s support to the women’s and girls’ rights to education.
Meanwhile, foreign ministers of Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Switzerland, the UK, the US, and the High Representative of the European Union strongly condemned Taliban’s decisions to ban women from universities.
They also lamented the Taliban’s decisions to continue bar girls from secondary schools, and to impose other harsh restrictions on the ability of women and girls in Afghanistan to exercise their human rights and fundamental freedoms.
“The Taliban’s oppressive measures against Afghan girls and women have been relentless and systemic. Over the last 16 months, the Taliban have issued no fewer than 16 decrees and edicts that, among other things, constrain women’s mobility, remove women from places of work, require head-to-toe coverings for women, ban women from using public spaces such as parks and gyms and leave widows and women-headed households in dire circumstances by the requirement of male guardianship,” the foreign ministers said in a joint statement.
Taliban urged to respect education for women and girls
These top officials of the several foreign countries also said that these policies make clear the Taliban’s disregard for the human rights and fundamental freedoms of the people of Afghanistan.
“Afghan women’s ingenuity and dynamism are needed urgently to help relieve profound and staggering economic and humanitarian needs. A stable, economically viable, and peaceful Afghanistan is only attainable and sustainable if all Afghans, including women and girls, can fully, equally, and meaningfully participate in and contribute to the country’s future and development,” they added.
They urged the Taliban to immediately abandon the new oppressive measures with respect to university education for women and girls and to, without delay, reverse the existing decision to prohibit girls’ access to secondary school.
The UK’s Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak, condemned the order, and said that “As a father to daughters, I cannot imagine a world in which they’re denied an education. The women of Afghanistan have so much to offer. Denying them access to university is a grave step backwards. The world is watching. We will judge the Taliban by their actions.”
ASIA
Xi urges global CEOs to safeguard trade and supply chains

Chinese President Xi Jinping, in a meeting with a group of executives including Rajesh Subramaniam from FedEx and Bill Winters from Standard Chartered, called on global business leaders to work together to protect supply chains.
Amid a deepening trade war with the US, the Chinese leader told the group of foreign business leaders, including Pascal Soriot from AstraZeneca and Miguel Ángel López Borrego from Thyssenkrupp, that they should resist behaviors that “turn back” history.
Speaking at the meeting held in Beijing on Friday, Xi said, “We hope everyone will have a broad and long-term perspective and not blindly follow actions that disrupt the security and stability of global industrial and supply chains, but instead add more positive energy and certainty to global development.”
The event at the Great Hall of the People marked the second consecutive year that Xi held a carefully arranged meeting with foreign CEOs in the Chinese capital. Last year’s event involved only US business leaders.
The meeting took place at the end of a busy week for Chinese policymakers, who are striving to strengthen relations with the international business community amid rising tensions with the administration of US President Donald Trump.
China’s leading annual CEO conference, the China Development Forum, was held earlier this week in Beijing, followed by the Boao Forum for Asia on the tropical resort island of Hainan.
Beijing is trying to present itself as a bastion of stability in global trade, in contrast to the US, where Trump has launched successive waves of tariffs on many products, from aluminum to automobiles.
Trump pledged on April 2 to impose broad and reciprocal taxes on US trade partners.
ASIA
Trump’s potential auto tariffs worry Japan and South Korea

Following US President Donald Trump’s announcement that he would impose a 25% tariff on imported cars and auto parts, Japan’s Prime Minister sounded the alarm on Thursday.
Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba told lawmakers during a parliamentary session, “We need to consider appropriate responses,” adding, “All options will be on the table.”
This move, seen as undermining a bilateral agreement made between Trump and then-Prime Minister Shinzo Abe in September 2019, came as a surprise to Japan. This limited trade deal had opened Japan’s market to more American agricultural products. The agreement states that the two countries “will refrain from taking measures contrary to the spirit of these agreements.”
Japanese automakers reacted cautiously to the announcement. Toyota, Subaru, Mazda, and Honda issued brief statements saying they were assessing the potential impact.
Imported cars and trucks are currently subject to tariffs of 2.5% and 25%, respectively. When the new tariffs take effect on April 3, these rates will rise to 27.5% and 50%. The 25% tariff will also apply to automotive parts like engines and transmissions, taking effect no later than May 3.
Japan’s Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi said the government intends to negotiate exemptions. Economists say it is unclear how exemptions might be secured, but there are several options.
According to economists, options Japan might consider include voluntary export restraints, a commitment to increase imports of items like natural gas, grain, and meat, and replacing Russian natural gas with gas from the US. In 2023, 8.9% of Japan’s natural gas imports came from Russia, while 7.2% came from the US.
“Japan will likely be looking at all these options,” said Koichi Fujishiro, a senior economist at the Dai-ichi Life Research Institute.
South Korea in a similar situation
South Korea is also expected to seek exemptions. Analysts said that South Korean automaker Hyundai Motor Group’s announcement earlier this week of a $21 billion US investment would help its negotiating position.
Esther Yim, a senior analyst at Samsung Securities, said, “The US has, in principle, applied a 25% tariff on all imported cars,” adding, “Washington can then negotiate with each country, and I think investment can be used as leverage.”
South Korea’s Ministry of Industry pledged an emergency response by April to help the country’s automakers, who are expected to face “significant challenges” when the tariffs take effect.
Over the years, global automakers have shifted to local production to avoid trade friction. According to the Mitsubishi Research Institute, 60% of Japanese cars sold in the US are produced in the US. This figure drops to 40% for Korean cars. For European brands, the rate is as high as 70%.
Although Ishiba insists all options are on the table, few analysts expect Japan to resort to retaliatory measures, at least at this point. “Japan would gain very little by retaliating against US tariffs,” Fujishiro said.
At a summit with Trump in February, Ishiba pointed out that Japan is the largest investor in the US and a significant job creator, promising to work towards increasing Japan’s investment balance from $783.3 billion in 2023 to $1 trillion.
Cars, Japan’s largest export item to the US, are worth 6 trillion yen ($40 billion) and will account for 28% of Japan’s total exports in 2024. This amount is equivalent to 1% of Japan’s nominal gross domestic product.
Takahide Kiuchi from the Nomura Research Institute estimates that a 25% tariff would reduce Japan’s car exports to the US by 15% to 20% and lower Japan’s GDP by 0.2%.
If Japanese automakers try to respond by shifting production to the US, this would reduce domestic employment and hollow out the country’s economy in the long run.
Masanori Katayama, chairman of the Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, said at a press conference last week, “Car exports from Japan are necessary to supplement the domestic production of Japanese automakers and to provide a lineup of attractive cars… to meet the diverse needs of American customers through car dealerships in every US state.”
Katayama said that when the US implements the tariff, “a significant production adjustment is expected. The Japanese auto industry consists not only of automakers but also parts suppliers and employs 5.5 million people.”
Katayama insisted that the industry and the Japanese government must come together to take action and keep domestic supply chains intact.
The tariffs are also expected to harm American automakers because they too source parts and manufacture globally to keep costs down and make their cars competitive in the market.
Nomura analyst Anindya Das said General Motors could fall into an operating loss on an annual basis due to its reliance on factories in Mexico. He added that Toyota could also see a 30% drop in operating profit.
Jennifer Safavian, president and CEO of Autos Drive America, an industry group representing international automakers operating in the US, including Toyota, Honda, Nissan, and others, said, “Tariffs imposed today will make it more expensive to produce and sell cars in the US, ultimately leading to higher prices, fewer choices for consumers, and fewer manufacturing jobs in the US.”
ASIA
South Korean opposition leader Lee Jae-myung acquitted in election law case

A court in South Korea on Wednesday overturned a lower court’s decision, ruling that the main opposition party leader is not guilty of violating election law. If this decision is upheld, it will pave the way for him to run in the next presidential election.
Prosecutors can appeal the decision, which could take the case to the Supreme Court, South Korea’s highest judicial body.
Speaking outside the court after the ruling was announced, Lee Jae-myung thanked the court for the decision, which he described as “the right decision.”
The charges against Lee stem from remarks he made in 2021 while competing in his party’s presidential primary, where he allegedly denied knowing one of the key figures in a real estate development scandal. The scandal involved a redevelopment project in Seongnam city, where Lee was mayor. Prosecutors allege Lee lied about his relationship with businessman Kim Moon-ki to conceal his own culpability in the real estate deal.
Immediately after the court’s decision was announced, Kweon Seong-dong, leader of the ruling People Power Party, called the ruling “regrettable” and urged the Supreme Court to quickly decide the case.
Lee, a trained lawyer and experienced politician, lost the 2022 presidential election by the narrowest margin in South Korea’s democratic history to now-impeached President Yoon Suk Yeol.
Yoon, Lee’s fierce rival, is awaiting a Constitutional Court ruling on his impeachment over charges of leading an insurrection in December. Lawmakers voted to impeach Yoon following his attempt to declare martial law in early December, which he claimed was necessary to protect South Korea from opposition “anti-state forces.” The measure was quickly rejected in the National Assembly, but the attempt triggered a political crisis that continues months later.
The Constitutional Court completed hearings on Yoon’s case late last month and is expected to deliver its verdict within days, although no official date has been announced. If the court finds Yoon not guilty, he will be immediately reinstated. If found guilty, an early election will be held within 60 days.
Data released last week by polling firm Gallup Korea showed Lee as the leading choice among potential candidates for the next presidential election. Lee, with a support rate of 36%, was far ahead of the number 2 likely candidate, conservative Labor Minister Kim Moon-soo.
Yoon’s impeachment delay: Legal rigour or political deadlock?
-
EUROPE4 days ago
F-35 debate intensifies across Germany and Europe
-
EUROPE1 week ago
Europe plans for US absence in NATO with 5-10 year strategy
-
ASIA2 weeks ago
China’s AsiaInfo expands with DeepSeek-powered AI
-
EUROPE1 week ago
French defense industry gears up for war amid EU strategic autonomy push
-
AMERICA1 week ago
Trump’s tariffs drive Nvidia to invest heavily in US manufacturing
-
DIPLOMACY5 days ago
Trump’s proposed fees on Chinese ships threaten US maritime industry
-
DIPLOMACY2 weeks ago
US, Britain, and Türkiye excluded from EU armament fund
-
ASIA1 week ago
India shelves $23 billion plan to rival China’s factories