Connect with us

Europe

Berlin considers deporting EU citizens over pro-Palestine protests

Published

on

Berlin immigration authorities have ordered three EU citizens and one US citizen to leave Germany, accusing them of “antisemitism and supporting terrorism” for protesting Israel’s attacks in Gaza.

The four activists—two Irish, one Polish, and one US citizen—claim that authorities in the German capital are “weaponizing immigration law” after being told they must leave the country by April 21 or face deportation, based on accusations such as chanting pro-Palestine slogans.

In a joint statement released on Tuesday, the group said their attempted deportation was part of an effort to “silence pro-Palestine voices and political dissent.” They compared their treatment to that of activists like Mahmoud Khalil, a Syrian-born Columbia University graduate and US green card holder who was detained and threatened with deportation by the Trump administration for participating in pro-Palestine demonstrations.

Alexander Gorski, a criminal and immigration lawyer representing two of the Berlin protesters, said he had not previously seen a deportation case where the concept of Staatsräson (the idea that Israel’s security is a central part of Germany’s national interest) was used as part of the justification for the decisions.

According to the Financial Times, the lawyer stated, “Basically, they are arguing that due to the German Staatsräson, it necessitates the heaviest measure that German immigration law knows. I have never seen such a political statement [as a justification for deportation] before.”

The Berlin Ministry of Interior and Sports, which oversees the city’s immigration office, confirmed that it had informed the four activists that their residence permits had been revoked.

The ministry stated that this decision was linked to protests at the Free University of Berlin in October 2024, during which a “violent, masked group” entered the building, causing “significant property damage, including graffiti.”

While criminal proceedings are ongoing, lawyer Gorski did not specify whether these charges applied to the four individuals ordered to leave the country.

Gorski said that the exact accusations against the four individuals at the time remained unclear, stating, “The police claimed that our clients participated in the attempt to occupy the university. But the police have not handed the file to the public prosecutor’s office. We have not been granted access to the files.”

The Berlin city administration declined to provide further information, citing data protection.

Gorski noted that this was not the first time German authorities had used immigration law as “a means of repression against social movements.” He said he had observed a pattern since Hamas’s Operation Al-Aqsa Flood attack on Israel on October 7, 2023.

Gorski stated that he had encountered over a dozen cases of Palestinians and other Arabs whose refugee status or residency had been revoked due to their participation in pro-Palestine rallies or social media posts deemed to support terrorism.

The Intercept, which first reported the story, stated that two of the four individuals were also accused of holding the arms of police officers or other protesters to prevent arrests during sit-in protests. In other instances, they were accused of chanting slogans such as “Free Palestine” and “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.”

Gorski said that these slogans were unfairly interpreted as indirect support for Hamas, which is considered a “terrorist” organization by the US, EU, and Israel.

Only one of the accusations, that 29-year-old Irish citizen Shane O’Brien allegedly called a police officer a “fascist,” went to criminal court. O’Brien was acquitted.

None of the four individuals have any prior convictions. Authorities are basing their decisions, which are being appealed by the protesters, on a provision that allows for the deportation of foreign nationals if they pose a danger to society.

The Berlin city administration stated, “Any criminal convictions will be taken into account in the relevant assessment. However, they do not constitute a prerequisite for the application of appropriate measures.”

Europe

EIB to unveil 15 billion euro tech initiative to scale European startups

Published

on

The European Investment Bank (EIB) will announce a €15 billion initiative today, in collaboration with EU capitals and private investors, aimed at supporting the growth of European technology companies.

For decades, startups on the continent have struggled to raise the large-scale funding rounds necessary to scale on this side of the Atlantic, frequently turning to US investors or relocating abroad as they expand.

“We are catching up. Now we need to accelerate,” EIB President Nadia Calviño said.

Under the existing European Tech Champions Initiative, the EIB had already pooled resources with six EU governments to establish funds that invest in high-growth companies across the EU.

Calviño described the initiative as “very successful,” noting that it has supported 12 European “unicorn” companies valued at over $1 billion, including the German artificial intelligence translation firm DeepL.

The bank is now expanding the program with a new phase nearly four times the size of the original.

Twenty-five EU governments, alongside private investors such as Santander and Danske Bank, are expected to participate in the program.

This initial €15 billion aims to mobilize up to €80 billion in total investment. Calviño stated that this estimate is based on the multiplier effects achieved under previous programs.

As part of these efforts, the EIB also aims to attract European pension funds, which manage immense pools of capital but have historically allocated fewer resources to technology investments compared to their US counterparts.

In addition to the new funding, Calviño noted that the EIB will create a platform providing a single point of access for existing European scale-up initiatives, including the European Commission’s Scaleup Europe Fund, France’s Tibi initiative, and Germany’s Win initiative.

Continue Reading

Europe

Germany to purchase US Tomahawk missiles to build own long-range strike capability

Published

on

Germany will purchase Tomahawk cruise missiles from the United States and deploy them on German territory, Chancellor Friedrich Merz announced on Thursday.

The move marks a shift away from planned US deployments and toward Germany establishing its own long-range strike capability.

Merz told lawmakers that he finalized the agreement with the US government during the NATO summit in Ankara, adding that the talks held on Tuesday and Wednesday had exceeded his expectations.

“While we close a critical strategic gap in our defense, we are also working to develop our own European systems and deploy them in Europe,” the Chancellor said.

According to German government sources, Washington committed in a letter of intent signed on Tuesday to approve Germany’s acquisition of Tomahawk missiles and their land-based Typhon launchers in August.

The number of missiles and launchers Germany plans to purchase was not disclosed because the information is classified.

The planned acquisition appears aligned with US President Donald Trump’s pressure on European allies to cover their own security costs, such as by purchasing US weapons.

The fate of the Tomahawk procurement had become uncertain after Trump announced in May that he would reduce the US military presence in Germany.

That development was seen as a cancellation of a plan made under the previous administration to deploy a US battalion equipped with long-range Tomahawk missiles to Germany.

That original plan was designed as a temporary solution to serve as a strong deterrent against Russia while Europeans developed their own versions of such weapons.

Germany produces its own cruise missile, the Taurus, but its range of approximately 311 miles is three to five times shorter than that of the Tomahawk missiles.

Continue Reading

Europe

Apple loses EU court appeal over Digital Markets Act gatekeeper designation

Published

on

The General Court of the European Union has rejected Apple’s challenges against its “gatekeeper” status designated under the Digital Markets Act (DMA).

With this ruling, the company’s designated status for the App Store and iOS remains valid, while its applications regarding iMessage were also rejected.

Apple had argued that the five separate App Stores it operates for the iPhone, iPad, Apple Watch, Mac, and Apple TV should be evaluated as distinct, individual services.

The court rejected this argument, ruling that these stores serve a common purpose of connecting developers and users, regardless of the specific device.

The court also dismissed Apple’s defense that the DMA’s interoperability obligations violate its fundamental rights.

However, it did not conduct a substantive assessment on the legality of this obligation, stating that a direct legal link could not be established between the regulation in question and the determination of “gatekeeper” status.

Following the ruling, Apple argued that the obligations under the DMA “exceed the boundaries of legality and proportionality.” The company asserted that the new rules jeopardize the work it has carried out for years to ensure user privacy and security.

Apple retains the right to appeal the decision, though a company spokesperson did not comment on whether there are plans to do so.

Apple previously declared that DMA rules prevented the launch of the updated version of Siri in Europe, resulting in European users being unable to benefit from the service.

In force in the European Union since 2024, the DMA covers a total of 22 services and products belonging to Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, ByteDance, Meta Platforms, and Microsoft.

The regulation obliges these companies to share certain data with competitors, provide access to user-generated data, and offer verification tools to advertising partners.

Additionally, it prohibits platforms from engaging in anti-competitive practices that favor their own products. Companies failing to comply with the rules face fines of up to 10% of their global turnover, which can rise to 20% in cases of repeated violations.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey