Connect with us

Asia

China-Japan relations in Washington’s shadow

Published

on

In the Asia-Pacific region, the China-US conflict remains intense. Beijing is responding to Washington’s attempt to surround China through regional actors, by strengthening its military and economic position in the region.

This contention, which international relations experts called ‘competition’ and China rejected the definitions of ‘competition’ and ‘power struggle’, was also reflected in the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Leaders’ Summit held in Thailand last week.

In her speech at the summit, U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris underlined Washington’s message that ‘we are here to stay’, referring to its long-term plans and goals in the Indo-Pacific, while Chinese President Xi Jinping stressed that the Asia-Pacific “is nobody’s backyard”. Unlike Harris, Xi’s use of the term “Asia-Pacific” instead of “Indo-Pacific” was another notable message.

The United States, Britain and Australia formed the AUKUS alliance in September last year to suppress China in Asia-Pacific, which attracted a huge reaction from Beijing. The Chinese government said the pact would seriously damage regional peace and stability.

Japan recently announced that it will sign a military agreement with UK for security co-operation in the Asia-Pacific region. It was commented that this pact was a step that could pave the way for UK in the Pacific and expand AUKUS at the same time. As a matter of fact, the U.S. is planning to include Japan and even Canada in the AUKUS alliance against China soon.

‘Maritime’ agreement from the leaders of China and Japan

China, on the other hand, is trying to overcome the surrounding in Asia-Pacific by strengthening economic relations in the region. Chinese President Xi Jinping discussed the issue with Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida in Bangkok, saying they were aiming to build a regional economic cooperation architecture. They agreed to deepen maritime dialogue, manage differences over Taiwan and territorial disputes, and open a military helpline. Just days after the meeting, the two countries exchanged their views on maritime affairs via video conferencing, and officials pledged to “earnestly implement” the agreement reached by the leaders of the two countries.

Bilateral relations have worn out in recent months as Japan increased its alignment with the U.S. over sensitive issues such as Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Xinjiang. However, the two leaders’ 45 minutes of warm talk during the APEC summit rekindled hopes between the two countries.

Despite this, Tokyo today has accused Beijing of entering Japanese territorial waters in the East China Sea.

Tokyo economists are concerned

Japan’s business community, which has an important position in the U.S. strategy of surrounding China, is worried about the “huge losses” from the decoupling from China. Japanese economists and businessmen are discussing the cost of this disintegration as Washington attempts to urge Tokyo completely cut ties with Beijing.

Speaking to the Global Times recently, Japanese experts pointed out that “the full ‘decoupling’ of the Japanese and Chinese economies will be extremely costly, and both countries may lose in the end,” and stressed that “so-called political interests should not precede national interests.”

Japanese media outlet Nikkei Asia reported that Japanese companies are trying to structure supply chains without dependence on China amid China’s growing conflict with the U.S. However, it is stated that this policy will significantly increase the cost of all kinds of products.

In August, it is reported that Honda launched a project to restructure its large-scale supply chain to explore the possibility of producing cars and motorcycles without being dependent on Chinese-made parts. However, China accounts for more than 30 per cent of Honda’s global sales. According to Nikkei Asia, the company’s “policy of making China the basis of its earnings” will not change in the future. The report highlights that the giant carmaker doesn’t currently intend to separate from China but is preparing for potential risks.

Speaking anonymously to the Global Times, a Japanese executive said the Japanese government plans to incorporate the concept of “economic security” into its national security strategy, essentially expanding its scope of security and “intentionally keeping pace with the US.”

Based on studies conducted at Waseda University, production of about 53 trillion yen ($360 billion) could disappear if the Japanese economy breaks away from China, Nikkei Asia reported. This means a loss of about 10 per cent of Japan’s gross domestic product. China accounts for 26 per cent of Japan’s total imports, while the U.S. is behind China with 19 per cent. According to Japanese statistics, China is Japan’s largest trading partner since 2007.

In addition, one of Japan’s main export targets is China. Japan exports semiconductors, chemicals, and many other products to China. It is reported that the Washington administration have asked Tokyo to take action to impose restrictions on its semiconductor exports to China. Forcing Japan to separate from China may also lead to the loss of Japan’s most important export market. It is not clear whether Japanese politicians will risk this loss, but it seems that economists and industrialists will continue to put pressure on the government to do so.

Asia

South Korea emerges as major beneficiary of shifts in global arms market

Published

on

Uncertainty in the global arms market, driven by the United States reassessing its relationships with allies and a broad rearmament drive across many countries, is creating major commercial opportunities for South Korea. According to an analysis published by Politico, Seoul has become the world’s fastest-growing supplier of military equipment.

The report said that large-scale conflicts around the world have created urgent demand for weapons as countries seek both to support allies and strengthen their own defenses against potential future confrontations. At the same time, changes in the US role within the global arms market have opened new opportunities for South Korean manufacturers. Statements and policy decisions by US President Donald Trump regarding NATO have led allies to question Washington’s reliability in times of crisis, increasing uncertainty across the global market. In addition, the diversion of a large share of US weapons supplies to the Middle East because of ongoing conflicts has placed further strain on already overstretched supply chains.

European countries increase purchases from South Korea

Faced with what Politico described as the Trump administration’s more distant approach toward allies, European countries in particular have accelerated arms purchases from South Korea. The publication noted that Seoul’s growing influence as a supplier has been driven largely by major defense contracts signed with Poland.

Following the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine, several Eastern European capitals, including Warsaw, transferred portions of their military inventories to Kyiv, relying on German support to replenish their arsenals. However, Berlin’s slow pace in replacing allied stockpiles generated frustration across the region.

South Korea emerged as an alternative supplier during this period and became a reliable source of military equipment for Eastern European countries. Poland became Seoul’s largest customer through a $13.7 billion agreement covering the purchase of tanks, rocket launchers, self-propelled howitzers and other military equipment.

“We were originally preparing against North Korea, but now we are ready to provide these solutions to customers around the world,” said Choo Hyung-kim, head of the Security Management Institute, a defense analysis organization affiliated with South Korea’s National Assembly.

Lack of political baggage gives Seoul an advantage

Politico reported that one of the greatest advantages enjoyed by South Korean defense companies is the absence of the “political baggage” associated with major arms exporters such as the United States, China, Russia and Israel.

According to the figures cited, the combined projected revenue of South Korea’s largest defense companies, including Hanwha Group, Hyundai Rotem, LIG Nex1 and Korea Aerospace Industries, is expected to reach approximately $37 billion in 2026. That would represent a fourfold increase from their combined revenues in 2021.

Meanwhile, an official from the office of former South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol told the Yonhap news agency in 2024 that the scale of any weapons shipments to Ukraine would depend on Russia’s approach to its relationship with North Korea. Seoul later clarified that it had no plans to provide ammunition directly to Ukraine.

Continue Reading

Asia

DeepSeek raises $7.4 billion in funding round, surpasses $50 billion valuation

Published

on

Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek has raised more than 50 billion yuan ($7.4 billion) in its first funding round. According to Reuters, citing The Information, the company’s valuation has surpassed $50 billion.

The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported that the capital will be used to support the costly development of advanced artificial intelligence technologies.

According to the newspaper, citing sources familiar with the matter, investors valued the company at more than $50 billion. The valuation makes DeepSeek the most valuable AI startup in China.

DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng reportedly owned about 90% of the company before the funding round. Liang is said to have contributed roughly $3 billion during the fundraising process, making him the largest participant in the round.

According to Reuters, the transaction was structured in an unusual way that allows Liang to retain control of the company.

Rather than investing directly in DeepSeek, investors were required to invest through a limited partnership managed by a senior executive of the startup. Under the arrangement, investors were not granted voting rights. The report also said restrictions were placed on the use of invested funds for a period of five years.

The sole exception was the China National Artificial Intelligence Industry Investment Fund. The fund reportedly invested approximately $150 million directly in DeepSeek, allowing it to retain both voting rights and full discretion over its stake.

Other major investors in the funding round included Tencent, which invested approximately $1.5 billion, and Contemporary Amperex Technology, which invested about $740 million.

Bloomberg previously described the transaction as one of the largest fundraising rounds undertaken by a Chinese startup. According to the agency, the investment marks a new stage in the efforts of leading Chinese AI companies to compete with their US rivals.

DeepSeek told prospective investors that it would prioritize foundational and transformative AI research over short-term commercialization.

Based in the Chinese city of Hangzhou, DeepSeek emerged as one of Beijing’s most prominent AI companies after unveiling a more powerful and lower-cost model more than a year ago. The WSJ reported that interest surrounding the company has accelerated AI adoption in China and increased investor appetite for domestic startups.

Liang Wenfeng has previously said he intends to continue developing open-source AI models and ultimately aims to achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI). According to Bloomberg, the strategy continues an approach that has contributed to the spread of open models and influenced companies across China’s AI market, including Alibaba’s Qwen platform.

Bloomberg added that while global rivals such as OpenAI and Anthropic are exploring public offerings and revenue-generation strategies, DeepSeek has maintained its “research first” approach.

Continue Reading

Asia

China issues white paper on global governance reform, urging support for UN-centered international system

Published

on

China’s State Council Information Office on Wednesday released a white paper titled “A More Just and Equitable Global Governance: China’s Principles, Proposals and Actions.”

The white paper was issued to introduce China’s principles, proposals, and actions regarding global governance, to foster a broader consensus within the international community, to enable more effective responses to global challenges, and to build a more just and equitable global governance system.

The document states that global governance is a common endeavor concerning the well-being of all humanity, and that building a just and equitable global governance system is a shared vision long pursued by people around the world. It also emphasizes that China has always been an active participant, contributor, and builder of global governance.

According to the white paper, in the new era, Chinese President Xi Jinping has put forward the vision of building a community with a shared future for mankind. Advancing a global governance system shaped on the basis of extensive consultation, joint contribution, and shared benefits, Xi has called for true multilateralism to promote an equal and orderly multipolar world and an economic globalization that is inclusive and beneficial for all.

In 2025, Xi proposed the Global Governance Initiative (GGI). This initiative was designed to offer China’s solutions to two urgent questions of the era: What kind of global governance system should be established, and how should global governance be reformed and improved?

The white paper notes that shortly after its introduction, the GGI received support from approximately 160 countries and international organizations, with more than 60 countries joining the Group of Friends of the Global Governance Initiative. It states that the international community is of the view that the GGI sends a clear message: to defend multilateralism, join forces, and strive for a just future.

According to the white paper, the GGI aligns with the growing trend toward greater democracy in international relations and strengthens international confidence in the practice of multilateralism. The initiative provides a clear and actionable roadmap for the improvement of global governance, injecting valuable stability and positive energy into a turbulent world.

The white paper emphasizes that China proposed the GGI to accelerate the construction of a more just and equitable global governance system. The document states that firmly defending the authority and status of the United Nations is of fundamental importance for the effective implementation of this initiative.

According to the white paper, success will also depend on major countries acting with a sense of responsibility and all nations working together in unity to bridge deficits in peace and development. It states that rather than attempting to reinvent the wheel, all countries must firmly defend the international system with the UN at its core, maintain the international order based on international law, and uphold the fundamental norms of international relations based on the purposes and principles of the UN Charter.

In addition to the preface and conclusion, the white paper consists of five chapters: “Today’s World Faces Severe and Complex Challenges,” “The Global Governance Initiative Responds to the Challenges of Our Era,” “China’s Contribution to the Development of Global Governance,” “Directing the Course of Change Toward a Bright Future,” and “Advancing Hand in Hand at a Critical Juncture in History.”

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey