Asia
Crisis: Responsibilities and the necessity of a new approach
Afghanistan, a country with a long history of war and instability, is still in the grip of one of its most difficult crises. This crisis is not only the product of the performance of a group or a single factor, but the result of a complex and multidimensional interaction between the ruling group, the international community, political strata and the people of Afghanistan.
In order to successfully overcome this situation and achieve lasting peace and stability, it is necessary to examine the factors of the crisis and its solutions with a deeper look and a more comprehensive assessment.
1. Governing group: Totalitarian ideology
The Taliban’s way of governing, whether in the first period of rule or during the last three years, shows the management under the control of an extreme, closed and exclusive ideology.
This ideology not only denies intellectual, cultural and religious diversity, but also considers and suppresses any difference as a threat to its survival. The policies of the Taliban in order to institutionalize this ideology can be seen in the following cases:
Systematic repression: The Taliban try to maintain power with tools such as field trials, torture, physical elimination and brutal revenge against opponents. These practices, which have been widely documented by reputable national and international bodies, have not only not decreased, but have intensified.
Ignoring all legal mechanisms and standards (national and international) and denying people’s basic rights has trapped the society in a cycle of deep fear and mistrust towards the present and the future.
Monopoly of power: The Taliban have not only excluded different ethnicities and classes from participating in power, but also severely suppress any dissenting voice, even among themselves. This exclusivity is the main obstacle in the way of creating an inclusive system.
Instrumental use of religion: With a limited and distorted interpretation of Islam, the Taliban consider any opposition to their rule as blasphemy and consider any change based on the correct interpretation of religion and international standards as a sin.
The leaders of this group believe that only they have a true understanding of Islam and expect unconditional allegiance from the people of Afghanistan, while they also ask the international community to follow their orders without question. This approach has not only put the Afghan society in an intellectual dilemma, but also distorted the face of Islam in the world.
2. Global society: Passive or interest-oriented?
Over the past three years, the international community’s response to the Afghan crisis has been passive at best and opportunistic at worst. This situation is caused by several key factors:
Conflict of interest: Instead of focusing on the sustainable solution of the Afghan crisis through a transparent and comprehensive mechanism, the world’s powerful countries have focused more on their short-term interests. Some have cooperated with the Taliban under the pretext of fighting terrorism and drug trafficking, while others have had limited support for this group due to regional rivalries. Meanwhile, the Taliban are still considered a threat to regional and global security.
Lack of a comprehensive strategy: So far, the international community has not been able to create a single and coherent strategy to deal with the Taliban. This dispersion enabled the Taliban to exploit the existing contradictions and strengthen their positions.
3. Afghan people: Internal responsibility for change
The role of the ruling group and the international community in the Afghan crisis is undeniable, but the Afghan people must also accept their responsibility in this situation. Without understanding this responsibility, sustainable change will not be possible. The main obstacles in this path are:
Silence against oppression: Afghan women and girls have bravely stood up against oppression for the past three years. If men were also with them, maybe today’s situation would be different.
Lack of national unity: Ethnic, linguistic and political differences are the main obstacle to the development and formation of a common national identity. Afghan people should put aside their differences and unite for a common goal.
Flight of elites: The mass migration of elites has deprived Afghanistan of its valuable human resources. These people should return and play a role in the reconstruction of the country if the conditions are met.
The role of political classes: Some former political leaders no longer have a place among the people. Their abuse of ethnic feelings will lead to their isolation and notoriety. Instead, clean-handed politicians should focus on integration and building a national system instead of revenge.
Consequences of the continuation of the crisis for Afghanistan and the world.
For Afghanistan: Increase in poverty and unemployment, suppression of freedoms, widespread violation of human rights and deprivation of women from education are among the consequences of this crisis. The continuation of this process will turn Afghanistan into an isolated and defeated country.
For the region and the world: Afghanistan under the control of the Taliban has become a safe base for terrorist groups and will threaten regional and global security. Also, the current government will question human values and cause the spread of extremism.
Solutions: Joint responsibility and multilateral approach
To get out of this crisis, all parties must accept their responsibility:
Pressure on the Taliban: The international community should use economic, political and legal tools to put pressure on the Taliban. Targeted sanctions and support for civil institutions can reduce the Taliban’s power.
Strengthening internal unity: The people and political strata of Afghanistan should learn from past differences and strive to create a national system based on law and public opinion.
Investing in education and awareness: Education and awareness are the keys to sustainable change in Afghanistan. The international community and Afghan elites should focus on strengthening the educational infrastructure.
Conclusion: Afghanistan’s future depends on a law-based system
Afghanistan will overcome the current crisis only when a political system based on law, justice and public participation with broad social foundations is established. Such a system should be representative of all ethnicities and classes and be based on the principles of equality, human rights and the rule of law.
This goal will be achieved only through the responsible cooperation of all parties. The future of this country depends on a deep understanding of this shared responsibility.
Asia
South Korea emerges as major beneficiary of shifts in global arms market
Uncertainty in the global arms market, driven by the United States reassessing its relationships with allies and a broad rearmament drive across many countries, is creating major commercial opportunities for South Korea. According to an analysis published by Politico, Seoul has become the world’s fastest-growing supplier of military equipment.
The report said that large-scale conflicts around the world have created urgent demand for weapons as countries seek both to support allies and strengthen their own defenses against potential future confrontations. At the same time, changes in the US role within the global arms market have opened new opportunities for South Korean manufacturers. Statements and policy decisions by US President Donald Trump regarding NATO have led allies to question Washington’s reliability in times of crisis, increasing uncertainty across the global market. In addition, the diversion of a large share of US weapons supplies to the Middle East because of ongoing conflicts has placed further strain on already overstretched supply chains.
European countries increase purchases from South Korea
Faced with what Politico described as the Trump administration’s more distant approach toward allies, European countries in particular have accelerated arms purchases from South Korea. The publication noted that Seoul’s growing influence as a supplier has been driven largely by major defense contracts signed with Poland.
Following the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine, several Eastern European capitals, including Warsaw, transferred portions of their military inventories to Kyiv, relying on German support to replenish their arsenals. However, Berlin’s slow pace in replacing allied stockpiles generated frustration across the region.
South Korea emerged as an alternative supplier during this period and became a reliable source of military equipment for Eastern European countries. Poland became Seoul’s largest customer through a $13.7 billion agreement covering the purchase of tanks, rocket launchers, self-propelled howitzers and other military equipment.
“We were originally preparing against North Korea, but now we are ready to provide these solutions to customers around the world,” said Choo Hyung-kim, head of the Security Management Institute, a defense analysis organization affiliated with South Korea’s National Assembly.
Lack of political baggage gives Seoul an advantage
Politico reported that one of the greatest advantages enjoyed by South Korean defense companies is the absence of the “political baggage” associated with major arms exporters such as the United States, China, Russia and Israel.
According to the figures cited, the combined projected revenue of South Korea’s largest defense companies, including Hanwha Group, Hyundai Rotem, LIG Nex1 and Korea Aerospace Industries, is expected to reach approximately $37 billion in 2026. That would represent a fourfold increase from their combined revenues in 2021.
Meanwhile, an official from the office of former South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol told the Yonhap news agency in 2024 that the scale of any weapons shipments to Ukraine would depend on Russia’s approach to its relationship with North Korea. Seoul later clarified that it had no plans to provide ammunition directly to Ukraine.
Asia
DeepSeek raises $7.4 billion in funding round, surpasses $50 billion valuation
Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek has raised more than 50 billion yuan ($7.4 billion) in its first funding round. According to Reuters, citing The Information, the company’s valuation has surpassed $50 billion.
The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported that the capital will be used to support the costly development of advanced artificial intelligence technologies.
According to the newspaper, citing sources familiar with the matter, investors valued the company at more than $50 billion. The valuation makes DeepSeek the most valuable AI startup in China.
DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng reportedly owned about 90% of the company before the funding round. Liang is said to have contributed roughly $3 billion during the fundraising process, making him the largest participant in the round.
According to Reuters, the transaction was structured in an unusual way that allows Liang to retain control of the company.
Rather than investing directly in DeepSeek, investors were required to invest through a limited partnership managed by a senior executive of the startup. Under the arrangement, investors were not granted voting rights. The report also said restrictions were placed on the use of invested funds for a period of five years.
The sole exception was the China National Artificial Intelligence Industry Investment Fund. The fund reportedly invested approximately $150 million directly in DeepSeek, allowing it to retain both voting rights and full discretion over its stake.
Other major investors in the funding round included Tencent, which invested approximately $1.5 billion, and Contemporary Amperex Technology, which invested about $740 million.
Bloomberg previously described the transaction as one of the largest fundraising rounds undertaken by a Chinese startup. According to the agency, the investment marks a new stage in the efforts of leading Chinese AI companies to compete with their US rivals.
DeepSeek told prospective investors that it would prioritize foundational and transformative AI research over short-term commercialization.
Based in the Chinese city of Hangzhou, DeepSeek emerged as one of Beijing’s most prominent AI companies after unveiling a more powerful and lower-cost model more than a year ago. The WSJ reported that interest surrounding the company has accelerated AI adoption in China and increased investor appetite for domestic startups.
Liang Wenfeng has previously said he intends to continue developing open-source AI models and ultimately aims to achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI). According to Bloomberg, the strategy continues an approach that has contributed to the spread of open models and influenced companies across China’s AI market, including Alibaba’s Qwen platform.
Bloomberg added that while global rivals such as OpenAI and Anthropic are exploring public offerings and revenue-generation strategies, DeepSeek has maintained its “research first” approach.
Asia
China issues white paper on global governance reform, urging support for UN-centered international system
China’s State Council Information Office on Wednesday released a white paper titled “A More Just and Equitable Global Governance: China’s Principles, Proposals and Actions.”
The white paper was issued to introduce China’s principles, proposals, and actions regarding global governance, to foster a broader consensus within the international community, to enable more effective responses to global challenges, and to build a more just and equitable global governance system.
The document states that global governance is a common endeavor concerning the well-being of all humanity, and that building a just and equitable global governance system is a shared vision long pursued by people around the world. It also emphasizes that China has always been an active participant, contributor, and builder of global governance.
According to the white paper, in the new era, Chinese President Xi Jinping has put forward the vision of building a community with a shared future for mankind. Advancing a global governance system shaped on the basis of extensive consultation, joint contribution, and shared benefits, Xi has called for true multilateralism to promote an equal and orderly multipolar world and an economic globalization that is inclusive and beneficial for all.
In 2025, Xi proposed the Global Governance Initiative (GGI). This initiative was designed to offer China’s solutions to two urgent questions of the era: What kind of global governance system should be established, and how should global governance be reformed and improved?
The white paper notes that shortly after its introduction, the GGI received support from approximately 160 countries and international organizations, with more than 60 countries joining the Group of Friends of the Global Governance Initiative. It states that the international community is of the view that the GGI sends a clear message: to defend multilateralism, join forces, and strive for a just future.
According to the white paper, the GGI aligns with the growing trend toward greater democracy in international relations and strengthens international confidence in the practice of multilateralism. The initiative provides a clear and actionable roadmap for the improvement of global governance, injecting valuable stability and positive energy into a turbulent world.
The white paper emphasizes that China proposed the GGI to accelerate the construction of a more just and equitable global governance system. The document states that firmly defending the authority and status of the United Nations is of fundamental importance for the effective implementation of this initiative.
According to the white paper, success will also depend on major countries acting with a sense of responsibility and all nations working together in unity to bridge deficits in peace and development. It states that rather than attempting to reinvent the wheel, all countries must firmly defend the international system with the UN at its core, maintain the international order based on international law, and uphold the fundamental norms of international relations based on the purposes and principles of the UN Charter.
In addition to the preface and conclusion, the white paper consists of five chapters: “Today’s World Faces Severe and Complex Challenges,” “The Global Governance Initiative Responds to the Challenges of Our Era,” “China’s Contribution to the Development of Global Governance,” “Directing the Course of Change Toward a Bright Future,” and “Advancing Hand in Hand at a Critical Juncture in History.”
-
Europe2 weeks agoAfD says Ukraine should compensate Germany over Nord Stream sabotage
-
Asia2 weeks agoPentagon adds Alibaba, Baidu and BYD to list of firms with alleged Chinese military ties
-
Opinion1 week agoA voice rising from New Delhi: BRICS’s manifesto for a new world order
-
Europe2 weeks agoToyota and JLR warn EU ‘Made in Europe’ rules could threaten jobs and investment
-
America2 weeks agoWorld Cup referee from Somalia denied entry to US as immigration scrutiny intensifies
-
Middle East1 week agoMine clearing in Strait of Hormuz could delay shipping traffic for up to 50 days
-
America7 days agoData leak exposes Peter Thiel’s secret ‘Dialog’ network of politicians, regulators, and tech elites
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoTürkiye calls for Azerbaijan-Armenia peace treaty, highlights normalization steps with Yerevan
