Asia
The silent growing of extremism
The widespread presence of fighters of various terrorist groups in Afghanistan has always brought many concerns. However, less has been talked about the effects of creating religious and jihadi schools and extremist education in this field.
Sources from government universities say that about 50pc of the subjects that were previously taught as Islamic sciences have now been changed and replaced by new subjects with the Taliban’s ideological approach.
In particular, the themes of “Islamic Belief System” and “Islamic Administrative System” are recently taught in universities. At the same time, religious experts and university professors believe that the educational programs of the Taliban are not in accordance with professional standards from the scientific point of view and the standards of the teaching and training curriculum and are more ideological, fanatical, and brainwashing.
According to them, Afghanistan will become the biggest factory for the production of violent forces that will raise millions of fanatics and victims of extreme brainwashing. They warn that if the conditions become favorable, these forces will bring a crisis not only to Afghanistan, but also to the region.
A reliable source in one of Kabul’s public universities says that the Taliban have made about 50pc changes in the subjects of Islamic sciences. According to him, earlier only one credit was allocated for teaching Islamic culture, but now four credits are allocated for teaching this subject. “New topics such as the political system of Islam, the belief system of Islam and the administrative system of Islam have replaced some of the previous topics,” he added.
Educational programs of schools do not match the professional standards, it is meant for brainwashing.
Mohammad Mohaq, a researcher of religious affairs said that one of the dangerous consequences of the Taliban rule is the indiscriminate and unnecessary expansion of religious schools, which promote radical religious programs regardless of the capacity of the Afghan society.
According to him, the educational programs of these schools do not match the professional standards from the scientific point of view and the standards of the education and training curriculum and are more ideological, fanatical, targeted and brainwashing. He states that the purpose of these programs is to engineer the minds of children and teenagers who study in these institutions.
“Those who study in such institutions are like programmed robots who do not have the ability to think and only look at the world and values from a specific and ideological aspect,” he added.
He furthered that the number of students of religious schools is large and in the future they will become a force equipped with ideology, who lack the necessary skills to improve life, grow society and meet livelihood needs. According to him, this idle but energetic and fanatical force can easily become tools for ideological, military and violent jihadist purposes in the future.
He emphasizes that millions of people who are trained in this way, the only ability they have is to use them for ideological purposes and to recruit soldiers in wars and violence.
Mohaq says that increasing religious and non-professional themes in schools and universities will have unfortunate consequences for the future of Afghanistan. He added that independent schools and universities, which are willing to voluntarily implement the Taliban’s extremist programs in their institutions for their economic goals, expand the scope of promoting such thinking throughout Afghanistan.
There is fear Afghanistan could become biggest factory for the production of violent force.
According to him, part of this extremism is transferred to families by students and professors, especially women who study in religious schools, take this thinking to their homes and want to influence other members of their family. He emphasized that in an environment where access to free information is limited and people are unable to get acquainted with different ideas, extremism conquers homes.
He added that the long-term results of this process will lead to intellectual chaos in the hearts of families and turning homes into ideologically dangerous environments.
He believes that if these forces are absorbed in government institutions, companies and business environments, their radical religious thinking, which is aimed at violence, will take root in the society and in this way they will expose the whole society to ideological engineering.
According to him, from this point of view, Afghanistan will become the biggest factory for the production of violent forces, which cultivates millions of fanatics and victims of extreme brainwashing. He states that if the conditions are favorable, these forces can bring crises to the region in addition to Afghanistan. According to Mohaq, this free fighting force will be free soldiers for future wars not only in Afghanistan but also in neighboring countries.
Shahla Farid, a former professor at Kabul University, told 8Sobh, a local newspaper, that political and social restrictions have hindered freedom of speech and thought. According to her, at present, views opposing the ideology of the Taliban are not allowed to discuss with the extremist thinking of this group in universities, and only discussions are centered around extremist ideologies.
She states that the discussions inside the universities are completely ideological and one-sided, and this situation has made the ground favorable for the growth of extremism in the universities.
The former university professor added that there is no necessary cultural, political and social education for students and they rely on incorrect education that has led to extremism.
According to her, even students do not have proper knowledge of their history, culture and religion. He said that another factor in the growth of extremism is the impact of war and instability, which many young people seek to identify and find meaning in their lives. According to him, in a violent atmosphere, young people are more attracted to these thoughts.
Experts blame Taliban for prompting extremism in universities
She furthered that various factors have caused the growth of extremism in universities, which existed even before the Taliban took over, and some professors also play a role in this process. She highlights the role of government policies and political parties in promoting extremism in universities after the civil wars and says that many extremist groups have used universities as a platform to recruit members and spread their ideas.
Some parties have tried to push the youth towards strict interpretations of religion. She says that the space for free discussion and exchange of opinions in the guilds is limited and this limitation was imposed by the academic and administrative managers in the universities in the past. According to her, professors were not allowed to raise political and cultural discussions freely in the classes.
Meanwhile, a source from Herat says that the Taliban arrest and torture university professors who act contrary to the Taliban’s policies. According to the source, the Taliban, who arrest the teachers, put plastic on the heads of the people and suffocate them so that the effects of torture cannot be seen. “Some time ago, they tortured a professor in the same way,” he said.
Also, the Taliban have applied extensive pressure against religious minorities in Afghanistan in the last three and a half years. This group has forcibly converted a number of Ismaili and Shia followers of twelve imams in Badakhshan province.
Asia
Pentagon plans covert spy ring for economic war on China, report says
The US Department of War (Pentagon) is reportedly planning to establish an extensive network of deep-cover agents to wage economic warfare against China and other adversaries of the US.
According to a report by The Washington Post citing six sources familiar with the initiative, the plan has not yet been put into effect. The newspaper reported that the initiative remains at the planning stage. The Pentagon, however, denies that any such initiative exists.
The report said the operatives would pose as entrepreneurs or private sector employees while concealing their ties to the US government. The network’s mission would be to gather economic intelligence and counter China.
The programme is led by Tom Rakusa, who spent 39 years at the CIA. Rakusa serves as a senior adviser to Deputy Secretary of Defence Steve Feinberg.
The proposed spy network is seen as part of a broader policy by the Donald Trump administration to sharpen economic competition with other countries.
The US is already resorting to tariffs, export controls, and investment in strategic sectors, alongside expanding its economic intelligence gathering.
According to The Washington Post, the new initiative demonstrates the Pentagon’s growing influence under the Trump administration. The department is currently seeking a record budget of $1.5 trillion.
Trade war flares up again with Trump’s return to the White House
The trade friction between the US and China flared up again following Donald Trump’s return to the White House. In April 2025, Washington raised tariffs on Chinese goods to as much as 145%, and Beijing retaliated with tariffs of up to 125%.
In May, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio described China as the primary geopolitical challenge facing Washington. Rubio said that to avoid war, the two sides needed to manage their conflict of interests.
In July, Chinese expert Zheng Yongnian did not simply warn that underestimating the US could prove to be a “fatal mistake”; he stated it explicitly.
According to Zheng’s assessment, the US maintains its primacy through the role of the dollar, its military superiority, and its technological advantages.
Even so, the two sides agreed in June to declare a truce and lower tariffs. In autumn 2026, the US and China extended their trade truce until 10 January 2027.
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the extension would give the parties more time to discuss economic issues.
Trade deals do not eliminate the strategic contradictions between the two countries. Financial Times columnist Rana Foroohar likened the race between the two nations for commercial, technological, and geopolitical influence to the 19th-century “Great Game” between the Russian and British empires.
Foroohar cited China’s standing in shipbuilding and commercial maritime transport, as well as its expanding footprint in overseas ports, among its key advantages.
Asia
Japan plans curbs on short-term home sales to cool urban prices
Japan’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) plans to restrict short-term property trading to rein in surging home prices in major urban centres, particularly Tokyo.
Led by Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, the party aims to make support for working households a core priority ahead of local elections scheduled for April next year.
The LDP’s research commission on housing and land policy met on Wednesday to discuss the issue.
According to a report by the Nikkei Asia newspaper, Commission Chair and LDP lawmaker Midori Matsushima said at the opening of the meeting: “Prices of newly built condominiums across Tokyo’s 23 wards have doubled over the past decade. We must work on measures ensuring that people who wish to live in these homes can actually afford to buy them.”
Homeownership in the capital has become virtually unattainable for broad segments of the population. According to data from the Real Estate Economic Institute, the average sale price of a newly built condominium in Tokyo’s 23 wards rose %18.5 in fiscal 2025 compared with the previous year, reaching 137.84 million yen (around $872,000).
Meanwhile, statistics from the Ministry of Labour show that the average annual income of a full-time worker in the capital remained at 6.78 million yen in fiscal 2025. This widening gap between incomes and residential property prices is directly shaping political priorities.
During its campaign for the House of Representatives election in February, the LDP pledged to curb speculative transactions across metropolitan Tokyo and other regions. Earlier this month, a party project team focused on policies concerning foreign nationals also submitted a recommendation urging the government to introduce immediate tax measures against rising home prices.
Under current legislation, profits realized from properties sold within five years of acquisition are classified as “short-term capital gains”. These returns face a tax rate approaching %40, including income tax and local inhabitant tax.
Although this rate is twice the approximately %20 levied as “long-term capital gains” tax on properties held for more than five years, several party members argue it remains insufficient to deter speculation. Calls to tighten the framework may be considered as part of the annual tax reform package to be drafted in December alongside the LDP’s coalition partner, the Japan Innovation Party.
The ruling bloc wants to present concrete housing pledges to voters heading to the polls in April across numerous urban centres, including 22 of Tokyo’s wards where local assembly terms expire.
“We need to support families with children, who are typically at the stage of purchasing a home,” a senior LDP official said.
Opposition parties are also preparing alternative proposals that target not only prospective homebuyers, but also residents forced into the rental market by high property prices and now affected by escalating rents.
Tax steps take precedence over limits on foreign buyers
Several countries seeking answers to housing affordability pressures have imposed direct restrictions on foreign purchasers. In South Korea, real estate policies played a major part in the declining public approval ratings of President Lee Jae Myung.
In August 2025, authorities in Seoul introduced an approval requirement for foreign nationals buying homes in the capital and adjacent areas, while also mandating that buyers reside in the properties for at least two years.
Canada and Australia have enacted temporary bans on foreign residential purchases, while Singapore levies a %60 additional stamp duty on foreign buyers.
The role of overseas investors in Japan’s property market also drew debate during the February election. However, restrictions aimed directly at foreign nationals are viewed as potentially conflicting with international trade and services agreements.
Consequently, rather than imposing restrictions based on the nationality of buyers, the government is discussing tax measures aimed at speculative real estate deals, such as rapid resales.
Fears that sharp market measures could shake regional banks
Concerns have also surfaced that aggressive steps to force down prices could harm the wider national economy.
A senior LDP tax official cautioned that a steep drop in land prices could weaken local financial institutions, warning: “We must consider the impact on regional banks.”
The real estate sector accounts for roughly %18 of total lending by Japanese banks. This proportion sits well above the %10 level recorded during Japan’s bubble economy of the mid-to-late 1980s.
At certain regional banks, property lending accounts for nearly half of total loan portfolios.
According to March 2025 data from the Financial Services Agency, approximately one-quarter of all loans extended by regional banks to the real estate sector are concentrated directly in Tokyo’s five central wards.
Buoyant asset valuations, supported in part by rising stock indices, have underpinned strong public approval for the Takaichi administration. Observers note that property interventions designed to cool the market could drag down equity prices and weaken the government’s standing.
A senior official on the LDP research commission stressed that decision-makers must act with caution regarding the scope and timing of any measures intended to bring price increases under control.
Asia
South Korea plans $120B spend on eight US nuclear power plants
South Korea will spend $120 billion to construct eight nuclear power plants in the US under an agreement that provides for $350 billion in investments in exchange for lower tariffs.
The South Korean government also announced that Seoul and Washington will begin examining a liquefied natural gas (LNG) project in Alaska comprising a large-scale pipeline to transport natural gas from the north of the state to the south, alongside the construction of an LNG terminal for exports overseas.
Seoul stated that a decision regarding the LNG project will be made following a commercial feasibility study. However, US President Donald Trump said that South Korea would invest $54 billion in the project, pointing to an apparent lack of full coordination between the two sides on the matter.
Trade and Industry Minister Kim Jung-kwan said in a statement: “This announcement opens a new horizon of cooperation where the two countries join forces to develop joint commercial ventures in strategic areas directly linked to economic security and future sectors such as artificial intelligence, nuclear energy, and LNG.”
“We will adhere to the principle of prioritising national interests and investing solely in commercially viable projects,” Kim said.
Speaking at the White House, Trump characterised South Korea’s plans as “one of the largest energy infrastructure investments in American history”.
The announcement followed a meeting between Trump and South Korean President Lee Jae Myung roughly one year ago at the APEC Economic Leaders’ Meeting held in South Korea, where they agreed on the creation of a $350 billion investment fund.
Under that agreement, $150 billion was allocated to the shipbuilding sector and $200 billion to other sectors. In return, the US announced it would reduce tariffs imposed on goods imported from South Korea from 25% to 15%.
Under the nuclear power project, South Korea’s state-controlled utility will build two plants in the US, while Pennsylvania-based Westinghouse Electric will construct six plants.
According to the South Korean government, this will mark the first instance in which a foreign country builds its own nuclear power plants in the US.
South Korean firms are also evaluating the possibility of acquiring a stake in Westinghouse as part of negotiations over sharing profits generated by the project.
South Korea additionally announced that it will build a $22.3 billion natural gas-fired power plant in Texas with a capacity of 6,472 megawatts.
The facility will be designed to supply electricity directly to nearby data centres. The project’s first phase is targeted to begin commercial operations in 2029, with full-capacity operations slated for 2032.
Seoul also disclosed that it had agreed to allow the US to receive 50% of the profits generated by the projects until South Korea recoups all of its investments.
After South Korea fully recovers its total investment amount, 90% of the profits will go to the US.
-
America2 weeks agoHow will Brazil’s presidential runoff work?
-
Europe2 weeks agoBerlin Left Party backs Israel’s right to exist for coalition pact
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoThe West is preparing for war not with Russia, but with its own people, French analyst Georges Kuzmanovic insists
-
Russia2 weeks ago71 EU lawmakers demand closure of Russian Houses in 15 member states
-
Europe2 weeks agoMI6 investigates potential leaks after former BND chief is detained
-
Russia2 weeks agoUS and Russian figures discuss American stake in Nord Stream lines
-
Russia2 weeks agoDrone strike shuts down Yandex data centre in Russia’s Ryazan region
-
America1 week agoTrump weighs presidential memorandum to cut surging US diesel prices
