Connect with us

Asia

The silent growing of extremism

Published

on

The widespread presence of fighters of various terrorist groups in Afghanistan has always brought many concerns. However, less has been talked about the effects of creating religious and jihadi schools and extremist education in this field.

Sources from government universities say that about 50pc of the subjects that were previously taught as Islamic sciences have now been changed and replaced by new subjects with the Taliban’s ideological approach.

In particular, the themes of “Islamic Belief System” and “Islamic Administrative System” are recently taught in universities. At the same time, religious experts and university professors believe that the educational programs of the Taliban are not in accordance with professional standards from the scientific point of view and the standards of the teaching and training curriculum and are more ideological, fanatical, and brainwashing.

According to them, Afghanistan will become the biggest factory for the production of violent forces that will raise millions of fanatics and victims of extreme brainwashing. They warn that if the conditions become favorable, these forces will bring a crisis not only to Afghanistan, but also to the region.

A reliable source in one of Kabul’s public universities says that the Taliban have made about 50pc changes in the subjects of Islamic sciences. According to him, earlier only one credit was allocated for teaching Islamic culture, but now four credits are allocated for teaching this subject. “New topics such as the political system of Islam, the belief system of Islam and the administrative system of Islam have replaced some of the previous topics,” he added.

Educational programs of schools do not match the professional standards, it is meant for brainwashing.

Mohammad Mohaq, a researcher of religious affairs said that one of the dangerous consequences of the Taliban rule is the indiscriminate and unnecessary expansion of religious schools, which promote radical religious programs regardless of the capacity of the Afghan society.

According to him, the educational programs of these schools do not match the professional standards from the scientific point of view and the standards of the education and training curriculum and are more ideological, fanatical, targeted and brainwashing. He states that the purpose of these programs is to engineer the minds of children and teenagers who study in these institutions.

“Those who study in such institutions are like programmed robots who do not have the ability to think and only look at the world and values from a specific and ideological aspect,” he added.

He furthered that the number of students of religious schools is large and in the future they will become a force equipped with ideology, who lack the necessary skills to improve life, grow society and meet livelihood needs. According to him, this idle but energetic and fanatical force can easily become tools for ideological, military and violent jihadist purposes in the future.

He emphasizes that millions of people who are trained in this way, the only ability they have is to use them for ideological purposes and to recruit soldiers in wars and violence.

Mohaq says that increasing religious and non-professional themes in schools and universities will have unfortunate consequences for the future of Afghanistan. He added that independent schools and universities, which are willing to voluntarily implement the Taliban’s extremist programs in their institutions for their economic goals, expand the scope of promoting such thinking throughout Afghanistan.

There is fear Afghanistan could become biggest factory for the production of violent force.

According to him, part of this extremism is transferred to families by students and professors, especially women who study in religious schools, take this thinking to their homes and want to influence other members of their family. He emphasized that in an environment where access to free information is limited and people are unable to get acquainted with different ideas, extremism conquers homes.

He added that the long-term results of this process will lead to intellectual chaos in the hearts of families and turning homes into ideologically dangerous environments.

He believes that if these forces are absorbed in government institutions, companies and business environments, their radical religious thinking, which is aimed at violence, will take root in the society and in this way they will expose the whole society to ideological engineering.

According to him, from this point of view, Afghanistan will become the biggest factory for the production of violent forces, which cultivates millions of fanatics and victims of extreme brainwashing. He states that if the conditions are favorable, these forces can bring crises to the region in addition to Afghanistan. According to Mohaq, this free fighting force will be free soldiers for future wars not only in Afghanistan but also in neighboring countries.

Shahla Farid, a former professor at Kabul University, told 8Sobh, a local newspaper, that political and social restrictions have hindered freedom of speech and thought. According to her, at present, views opposing the ideology of the Taliban are not allowed to discuss with the extremist thinking of this group in universities, and only discussions are centered around extremist ideologies.

She states that the discussions inside the universities are completely ideological and one-sided, and this situation has made the ground favorable for the growth of extremism in the universities.

The former university professor added that there is no necessary cultural, political and social education for students and they rely on incorrect education that has led to extremism.

According to her, even students do not have proper knowledge of their history, culture and religion. He said that another factor in the growth of extremism is the impact of war and instability, which many young people seek to identify and find meaning in their lives. According to him, in a violent atmosphere, young people are more attracted to these thoughts.

Experts blame Taliban for prompting extremism in universities

She furthered that various factors have caused the growth of extremism in universities, which existed even before the Taliban took over, and some professors also play a role in this process. She highlights the role of government policies and political parties in promoting extremism in universities after the civil wars and says that many extremist groups have used universities as a platform to recruit members and spread their ideas.

Some parties have tried to push the youth towards strict interpretations of religion. She says that the space for free discussion and exchange of opinions in the guilds is limited and this limitation was imposed by the academic and administrative managers in the universities in the past. According to her, professors were not allowed to raise political and cultural discussions freely in the classes.

Meanwhile, a source from Herat says that the Taliban arrest and torture university professors who act contrary to the Taliban’s policies. According to the source, the Taliban, who arrest the teachers, put plastic on the heads of the people and suffocate them so that the effects of torture cannot be seen. “Some time ago, they tortured a professor in the same way,” he said.

Also, the Taliban have applied extensive pressure against religious minorities in Afghanistan in the last three and a half years. This group has forcibly converted a number of Ismaili and Shia followers of twelve imams in Badakhshan province.

Asia

South Korea emerges as major beneficiary of shifts in global arms market

Published

on

Uncertainty in the global arms market, driven by the United States reassessing its relationships with allies and a broad rearmament drive across many countries, is creating major commercial opportunities for South Korea. According to an analysis published by Politico, Seoul has become the world’s fastest-growing supplier of military equipment.

The report said that large-scale conflicts around the world have created urgent demand for weapons as countries seek both to support allies and strengthen their own defenses against potential future confrontations. At the same time, changes in the US role within the global arms market have opened new opportunities for South Korean manufacturers. Statements and policy decisions by US President Donald Trump regarding NATO have led allies to question Washington’s reliability in times of crisis, increasing uncertainty across the global market. In addition, the diversion of a large share of US weapons supplies to the Middle East because of ongoing conflicts has placed further strain on already overstretched supply chains.

European countries increase purchases from South Korea

Faced with what Politico described as the Trump administration’s more distant approach toward allies, European countries in particular have accelerated arms purchases from South Korea. The publication noted that Seoul’s growing influence as a supplier has been driven largely by major defense contracts signed with Poland.

Following the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine, several Eastern European capitals, including Warsaw, transferred portions of their military inventories to Kyiv, relying on German support to replenish their arsenals. However, Berlin’s slow pace in replacing allied stockpiles generated frustration across the region.

South Korea emerged as an alternative supplier during this period and became a reliable source of military equipment for Eastern European countries. Poland became Seoul’s largest customer through a $13.7 billion agreement covering the purchase of tanks, rocket launchers, self-propelled howitzers and other military equipment.

“We were originally preparing against North Korea, but now we are ready to provide these solutions to customers around the world,” said Choo Hyung-kim, head of the Security Management Institute, a defense analysis organization affiliated with South Korea’s National Assembly.

Lack of political baggage gives Seoul an advantage

Politico reported that one of the greatest advantages enjoyed by South Korean defense companies is the absence of the “political baggage” associated with major arms exporters such as the United States, China, Russia and Israel.

According to the figures cited, the combined projected revenue of South Korea’s largest defense companies, including Hanwha Group, Hyundai Rotem, LIG Nex1 and Korea Aerospace Industries, is expected to reach approximately $37 billion in 2026. That would represent a fourfold increase from their combined revenues in 2021.

Meanwhile, an official from the office of former South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol told the Yonhap news agency in 2024 that the scale of any weapons shipments to Ukraine would depend on Russia’s approach to its relationship with North Korea. Seoul later clarified that it had no plans to provide ammunition directly to Ukraine.

Continue Reading

Asia

DeepSeek raises $7.4 billion in funding round, surpasses $50 billion valuation

Published

on

Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek has raised more than 50 billion yuan ($7.4 billion) in its first funding round. According to Reuters, citing The Information, the company’s valuation has surpassed $50 billion.

The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported that the capital will be used to support the costly development of advanced artificial intelligence technologies.

According to the newspaper, citing sources familiar with the matter, investors valued the company at more than $50 billion. The valuation makes DeepSeek the most valuable AI startup in China.

DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng reportedly owned about 90% of the company before the funding round. Liang is said to have contributed roughly $3 billion during the fundraising process, making him the largest participant in the round.

According to Reuters, the transaction was structured in an unusual way that allows Liang to retain control of the company.

Rather than investing directly in DeepSeek, investors were required to invest through a limited partnership managed by a senior executive of the startup. Under the arrangement, investors were not granted voting rights. The report also said restrictions were placed on the use of invested funds for a period of five years.

The sole exception was the China National Artificial Intelligence Industry Investment Fund. The fund reportedly invested approximately $150 million directly in DeepSeek, allowing it to retain both voting rights and full discretion over its stake.

Other major investors in the funding round included Tencent, which invested approximately $1.5 billion, and Contemporary Amperex Technology, which invested about $740 million.

Bloomberg previously described the transaction as one of the largest fundraising rounds undertaken by a Chinese startup. According to the agency, the investment marks a new stage in the efforts of leading Chinese AI companies to compete with their US rivals.

DeepSeek told prospective investors that it would prioritize foundational and transformative AI research over short-term commercialization.

Based in the Chinese city of Hangzhou, DeepSeek emerged as one of Beijing’s most prominent AI companies after unveiling a more powerful and lower-cost model more than a year ago. The WSJ reported that interest surrounding the company has accelerated AI adoption in China and increased investor appetite for domestic startups.

Liang Wenfeng has previously said he intends to continue developing open-source AI models and ultimately aims to achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI). According to Bloomberg, the strategy continues an approach that has contributed to the spread of open models and influenced companies across China’s AI market, including Alibaba’s Qwen platform.

Bloomberg added that while global rivals such as OpenAI and Anthropic are exploring public offerings and revenue-generation strategies, DeepSeek has maintained its “research first” approach.

Continue Reading

Asia

China issues white paper on global governance reform, urging support for UN-centered international system

Published

on

China’s State Council Information Office on Wednesday released a white paper titled “A More Just and Equitable Global Governance: China’s Principles, Proposals and Actions.”

The white paper was issued to introduce China’s principles, proposals, and actions regarding global governance, to foster a broader consensus within the international community, to enable more effective responses to global challenges, and to build a more just and equitable global governance system.

The document states that global governance is a common endeavor concerning the well-being of all humanity, and that building a just and equitable global governance system is a shared vision long pursued by people around the world. It also emphasizes that China has always been an active participant, contributor, and builder of global governance.

According to the white paper, in the new era, Chinese President Xi Jinping has put forward the vision of building a community with a shared future for mankind. Advancing a global governance system shaped on the basis of extensive consultation, joint contribution, and shared benefits, Xi has called for true multilateralism to promote an equal and orderly multipolar world and an economic globalization that is inclusive and beneficial for all.

In 2025, Xi proposed the Global Governance Initiative (GGI). This initiative was designed to offer China’s solutions to two urgent questions of the era: What kind of global governance system should be established, and how should global governance be reformed and improved?

The white paper notes that shortly after its introduction, the GGI received support from approximately 160 countries and international organizations, with more than 60 countries joining the Group of Friends of the Global Governance Initiative. It states that the international community is of the view that the GGI sends a clear message: to defend multilateralism, join forces, and strive for a just future.

According to the white paper, the GGI aligns with the growing trend toward greater democracy in international relations and strengthens international confidence in the practice of multilateralism. The initiative provides a clear and actionable roadmap for the improvement of global governance, injecting valuable stability and positive energy into a turbulent world.

The white paper emphasizes that China proposed the GGI to accelerate the construction of a more just and equitable global governance system. The document states that firmly defending the authority and status of the United Nations is of fundamental importance for the effective implementation of this initiative.

According to the white paper, success will also depend on major countries acting with a sense of responsibility and all nations working together in unity to bridge deficits in peace and development. It states that rather than attempting to reinvent the wheel, all countries must firmly defend the international system with the UN at its core, maintain the international order based on international law, and uphold the fundamental norms of international relations based on the purposes and principles of the UN Charter.

In addition to the preface and conclusion, the white paper consists of five chapters: “Today’s World Faces Severe and Complex Challenges,” “The Global Governance Initiative Responds to the Challenges of Our Era,” “China’s Contribution to the Development of Global Governance,” “Directing the Course of Change Toward a Bright Future,” and “Advancing Hand in Hand at a Critical Juncture in History.”

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey