Middle East
From al-Qaeda affiliate to statesman: Adviser’s role in Syrian leader’s rise questioned
British National Security Adviser Jonathan Powell, alleged to have “put a tie on” al-Qaeda leader Abu Muhammad al-Jolani to create Syrian interim President Ahmed al-Shara, has come under fire from parliament.
Powell, one of Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s most powerful advisers, was accused last weekend of “opening secret diplomatic channels to terrorists” using a team of “outsourced spies and secret agents funded by taxpayer money.”
According to a report in the Daily Mail, National Security Adviser Powell founded this mysterious organization after leaving his post in the Tony Blair government. Powell served as chief of staff during the infamous “dodgy dossier” incident that led the UK into the Iraq invasion.
This organization, called “Inter Mediate,” receives funding from the Foreign Office to establish contact with “non-state armed groups” and appears to have brokered the UK’s deal with Syria that led to the re-establishment of diplomatic relations earlier this month.
Powell, 68, who resigned as CEO of the mysterious NGO where he earned an annual salary of £200,000 upon returning to the corridors of the Prime Minister’s Office in November, also stands out as one of the figures who secured the highly controversial deal to transfer sovereignty of the strategically important Chagos Islands to Mauritius earlier this year.
The move comes amid allegations that “Blairites,” led by Powell and Liz Lloyd—his deputy under Tony Blair and now Starmer’s director of policy implementation—are attempting to launch a ‘power struggle’ within the Labour Party leadership.
Diplomatic sources speaking to the Daily Mail state that Inter Mediate played a central role in re-establishing relations with HTS, once linked to al-Qaeda’s Syrian branch, and the Syrian government led by al-Shara.
After the deal was signed earlier this month, Foreign Secretary David Lammy traveled to Damascus to meet with Ahmed al-Shara, where Inter Mediate is said to have an office in the presidential palace.
Clinton emails: Inter Mediate linked to MI6 and SAS
In one of the emails linked to former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton published by WikiLeaks, Powell wrote that Inter Mediate had close ties with the British foreign intelligence service, MI6.
In an email sent in March 2012 to Jake Sullivan, one of then-US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s top advisers, he said, “We are in close cooperation with the FCO [Foreign and Commonwealth Office], NSC [National Security Council], and SIS [Secret Intelligence Service] in London.”
The emails also show that Powell met with then-Deputy Secretary of State William Burns, whom he described as an “old friend” and who later became CIA chief, adding that Inter Mediate established “secret channels between rebels and governments” and operated in Nigeria, Colombia, Bahrain, Afghanistan, and North Korea.
Powell stated, “We are starting to work in Syria with [former UN Secretary-General] Kofi Annan, as well as in Yemen, Somalia, and Burma,” while Sullivan noted that Inter Mediate operated “under the radar.”
Former MI6 official Martin Griffiths was also among those who co-founded Inter Mediate with Powell.
Al-Shara’s British mentor asked to be accountable to parliament
Over the weekend, a senior Conservative politician called for a parliamentary inquiry into why Powell was given ‘special adviser’ status rather than a direct ministerial role.
This means that despite his role in establishing direct relations with foreign governments and conducting negotiations on the Chagos handover, Powell is not required to be accountable to Parliament.
Alex Burghart, the Shadow Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, said, “It is scandalous enough that we cannot question the national security adviser about his role in the handover of Chagos. But now it turns out he is using his private organization to establish secret channels with terrorist groups. Parliament should absolutely be able to question him on this. If the government had nothing to hide, it wouldn’t go to such lengths to keep Powell out of the cold glare of scrutiny. The Labour Party must reveal the truth and make a statement immediately.”
Inter Mediate features Powell prominently on its website, highlighting his role as “one of the key architects of the 1999 Good Friday Agreement” in Northern Ireland.
The website states that Powell founded the NGO to “share the lessons learned from the Northern Ireland peace talks and to help other leaders facing similar dilemmas.”
The website also says that Powell used his experience to play a “central role in successful peace agreements,” including ending the Basque conflict in Spain, serving as a “peace adviser” to Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos, and working with Mozambican President Filipe Nyusi to end the country’s civil war.
One of the architects of the Iraq invasion, from Blair’s inner circle
Powell’s role in the infamous 2002 dossier on Iraq’s non-existent weapons of mass destruction is now less remembered. It was revealed that Powell had asked a security chief to amend the draft text on the grounds that it “posed a bit of a problem” for Tony Blair’s leadership.
The latest statements from Inter Mediate, which Powell founded in 2011, emphasize that it has “made a greater commitment through a new partnership agreement with the FCDO’s [Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office] conflict, stability and mediation office.”
Government spending records show that Inter Mediate is funded by the UK government to provide a back channel to “non-state armed groups” due to its “high-level access to political elites.”
According to accounts published in January, the company’s total revenue up to March 2024 was £2.96 million, with the highest-paid employee—presumably Powell—earning between £190,000 and £200,000.
Government source: The people in this NGO are outsourced spies and secret agents
A government source said, “These are essentially outsourced spies and secret agents who conduct ‘back-channel’ talks with political leaders and armed groups to achieve reconciliation through negotiation.”
In a letter to Simon Hoare, chairman of the public administration and constitutional affairs committee, Burghart stated that Powell should respond to the call to testify before the parliamentary joint committee on the national security strategy (JCNSS), on the grounds that “all previous national security advisers have testified before the committee since the position was created in 2010.”
Burghart wrote, “I believe this raises significant constitutional issues that require more thorough scrutiny by Parliament. The government’s first duty is to defend the country, yet the government does not want the prime minister’s chief adviser on national security to be subject to scrutiny.”
A government spokesperson responded, “The government is committed to establishing a productive relationship with the JCNSS and to providing the best possible support and evidence for the committee’s important work. In line with long-standing practice, senior officials and ministers responsible for national security will provide evidence to the JCNSS.”
A government source added that Powell’s deputies would appear before the committee.
The source said, “There is an established system for the declaration and management of financial interests. As with previous administrations, interests deemed appropriate for publication for special advisers in No. 10 and the Cabinet Office are published annually. Inter Mediate is a charity that works to resolve armed conflicts around the world. Jonathan severed all ties with this organization when he rejoined the government last year.”
Middle East
US waives human rights terms on $320m military aid to Egypt
The US State Department stated that it has waived human rights conditions on more than $300 million in military aid to Egypt.
The statement emphasised that this decision was taken in consideration of Cairo’s “helpful role” since the outbreak of the war against Iran.
Egypt began receiving substantial support from the US after signing a peace treaty with Israel in 1979.
Since the late 1980s, the country has received approximately $1.3 billion annually in US military assistance.
A portion of this aid is subject to conditions related to human rights and democracy, which can be waived on national security grounds.
Withholding funds, including during the administration of former US President Joe Biden, has caused tension between Cairo and Washington in the past.
A letter dated 21 September and addressed to various congressional committees, obtained by Reuters, stated that Secretary of State Marco Rubio “decided to waive the certification requirement under the fiscal year 2025 Foreign Military Financing programme for Egypt of $320 million.”
This waiver was subsequently confirmed by the State Department.
An accompanying memorandum justifying the decision stated that this portion of military aid was “essential for counterterrorism, border security, or non-proliferation programmes, or otherwise important to the national security interests of the United States.”
The memorandum, dated 4 September and bearing Rubio’s signature, stated: “Exercising this waiver authority is critical to the US-Egypt relationship and to US national security priorities, particularly given the helpful role Egypt has played in the aftermath of Operation Epic Fury.”
“Operation Epic Fury” is the designation used by the US military for the campaign launched jointly with Israel against Iran in late February.
The State Department memorandum, whose authenticity was confirmed by two sources in Washington familiar with the letter, did not provide detailed information regarding what was termed Egypt’s “helpful role”.
The State Department’s annual decision on military aid to Egypt typically covers funds allocated for the preceding fiscal year, which ends on 30 September.
A State Department spokesperson stated that Rubio waived the certification in the interest of US national security and that the US continues to cooperate with the Egyptian government across a range of issues.
In an emailed statement, the spokesperson said: “This waiver recognizes the importance of maintaining security cooperation with Egypt at a time of significant security challenges in the region.”
The Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not immediately comment on the matter.
The spillover effects of the Iran war have imposed a heavy toll on US security partners, including Egypt.
Owing to rising fuel prices and other disruptions, the Egyptian economy is passing through a difficult period.
Under the Biden administration, the US withheld portions of the annual military allocation on multiple occasions over Egypt’s human rights record.
In 2024, following the Hamas-led 7 October attack on Israel and the subsequent war in Gaza, the Biden administration set aside human rights conditions, disbursing the entire $1.3 billion allocation to Egypt for the first time in its tenure.
Human rights organisations have long accused Egypt, under the administration of President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, of widespread human rights abuses, including torture and enforced disappearances.
This week, Egyptian police detained six journalists from a fact-checking and investigative media outlet, accusing them of spreading false information on behalf of the banned Muslim Brotherhood.
Egyptian authorities state that they have taken steps to address human rights issues. Sisi said stability is paramount and that the government supports human rights by working to provide for basic needs.
Middle East
Britain expands curbs on arms exports to Israel over Gaza risks
Britain has significantly broadened its military export restrictions targeting Israel, suspending or rejecting more than 80 licences for items the IDF could use in Gaza.
This figure is nearly triple the number affected when the policy was first introduced in September 2024.
United Kingdom Minister of State for the Middle East Stephen Doughty said that as part of what he described as a “tighter system” for assessing exports to Israel, more than 50 further export applications have been refused since approximately 30 licences were initially suspended.
Under the initial decision taken in September 2024, 30 of roughly 350 licences were suspended after the British government concluded there was a “clear risk” that certain military exports could be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of international humanitarian law in Gaza.
The affected equipment included components for military aircraft, drones, naval systems, and targeting gear.
Doughty said additional measures adopted this month established what he termed a “double safeguard” mechanism within the approvals process.
Export applications must now be assessed both against existing international humanitarian law criteria and in light of Britain’s position on the legality of Israel’s presence in the Palestinian territories.
“We have so far suspended or refused more than 80 licences,” Doughty said, adding that he had personally examined each licence.
Despite the wider restrictions, British-origin parts entering the international F-35 fighter jet supply chain continue to be largely exempt.
The UK government argues that preventing British-made components from entering the global F-35 pool could undermine the programme as a whole and have serious consequences for the security of the UK and its allies.
Direct exports of F-35 parts intended specifically for Israel remain suspended.
Doughty defended maintaining the supply of components via the international programme, arguing that halting it could have severe ramifications for the broader European and allied security architecture.
Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Emily Thornberry challenged this position, arguing that the issue was political rather than purely legal.
Thornberry suggested adopting an approach similar to the Dutch model, under which components entering the international supply chain could be flagged as “not intended for aircraft bound for Israel”.
The initial suspension was implemented in September 2024 by then Foreign Secretary David Lammy.
Lammy stressed at the time that the measure did not constitute an arms embargo and applied solely to items assessed as usable in military operations in Gaza.
Since then, the policy has been tightened further under Prime Minister Andy Burnham.
The expanded export restrictions follow the Burnham government’s adoption of a more confrontational policy toward the Israeli government.
Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband drew sustained applause at the Labour Party’s annual conference in Liverpool after delivering a sharp critique of the Netanyahu government’s policies and defending the decision to ban trade with Israeli settlements in the West Bank.
Accusing Israel of committing war crimes in Gaza, Miliband stated that the British government heard public outrage over the conflict, telling delegates: “We hear you. You were right.”
Middle East
Netanyahu holds secret UAE talks with Saudi Arabia and Arab officials
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with representatives of Gulf and Arab nations that lack diplomatic ties with Israel, including Saudi Arabia, during his weekend visit to the United Arab Emirates.
Sources close to the gathering told the Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth on Monday that representatives from Morocco, Libya, Jordan, and Qatar also took part in the meeting.
Netanyahu made a unannounced visit to Abu Dhabi on Sunday, where he met with the country’s leader, Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan.
According to Israeli media, this marked the first time the United Arab Emirates officially confirmed a visit by Netanyahu.
The meeting was arranged by Mossad Director Roman Goffman “at the request of Saudi Arabia, which asked for Israel’s assistance against Houthi attacks in the Red Sea region,” according to Yedioth Ahronoth.
The discussions addressed Iran and the Houthi militia. The newspaper added that the Arab states heard from Israel that “Israel is prepared to assist countries in the region with air defence systems, just as it aided the UAE during the conflict with Iran.”
Conflict in Yemen intensified in September when Ansarullah militiamen launched a rapid offensive that seized Yemen’s entire Red Sea coastline, including the vital maritime corridor of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait.
The Yemeni resistance also imposed a blockade on Saudi Arabia’s energy exports and staged multiple attacks against the kingdom.
Saudi Arabia reportedly sought military assistance from the US to counter Ansarullah.
Washington declined to attack the Houthis directly, but announced that it would provide intelligence and targeting support.
Reporting on the same visit, The Jerusalem Post said Netanyahu spent six hours in the UAE and that the principal subject of his discussions with MBZ was Iran.
Citing sources familiar with the matter, the newspaper added that the trip came “after Netanyahu exerted heavy pressure on the United Arab Emirates to arrange a meeting ahead of the Israeli elections on 27 October.”
Separately, the Associated Press, citing a person with direct knowledge of the meeting, reported that Netanyahu’s visit to the UAE was arranged in part to ask MBZ to deny reports that he had warned the Israeli prime minister of an impending Hamas threat prior to 7 October 2023.
According to Israeli media, Netanyahu’s office denied the AP report, issuing the following statement:
“Fake news. The visit focused solely on strengthening ties between the two countries and on regional issues.”
-
Europe4 days agoEuropean unions urge governments to scrap all Palantir deals
-
Diplomacy4 days agoEast-West Forum in Istanbul highlights irreversible shift to multipolarity
-
Europe1 week agoEmmanuel Todd says West faces collapse amid Ukraine and Iran crises
-
Europe1 week agoEuropean intelligence chiefs divide over risk of Russian attack
-
Diplomacy1 week agoEast-West Forum in Istanbul to debate multipolarity and global order
-
Middle East1 week agoSharaa says 7 October must not shape Israel policy on Syria
-
America1 week agoRepublican support for Trump’s war with Iran drops sharply in polls
-
Middle East1 week agoPalestinian factions confront legitimacy crisis at Istanbul talks
