Connect with us

DIPLOMACY

Full support for Saudi Arabia against the threats from the US

Published

on

Following the decision of the OPEC+ group -a group of countries made up of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and some non-OPEC member countries- to reduce their crude oil production, Saudi Arabia has received wide support from the Arab world and Turkey, after receiving political pressures from the United States.

After the decision to reduce the crude oil production, Washington came forth against Saudi Arabia with harsh statements and threats of sanctions, while reactions from all over the Arab world and the countries in the region are now rising. The countries that support the OPEC+ decision, are also opposing the accusations against Saudi Arabia by the United States of America.

While the Secretary-General of the Arab League Ahmed Aboul Gheit has expressed “full support” for Saudi Arabia’s decision to reduce the crude oil production, he also condemned the harsh smear campaign launched against Riyadh administration.

Regarding the accusations from Washington, Gheit stated “They are aimed at politicizing purely economic decisions that everyone realizes are necessary for the stability of the global economy given the dangerous challenges it is facing”.

The speaker of the Arab Parliament Adel Abdulrahman Al Asoomi also said they reject and condemn the accusations made against Saudi Arabia. Asoomi stated that the Arab Parliament is in full solidarity with Saudi Arabia, and that the decisions taken by OPEC and OPEC+ are taken by the unanimous vote of the member states, and that the decision is made taking the supply and demand in the global oil market into account.

Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) Secretary-General Hissein Brahim Taha has also approved the slams from the Saudis, regarding the accusations against it, just after the OPEC+ decision.

Another individual who expressed support for the Riyadh administration, had been the Moroccan Foreign Minister Nasser Bourita. Bourita stated that the Rabat administration supports all decisions of the Saudi foreign policy. Bourita also added that “the Kingdom’s foreign policy in the diplomatic or energy fields is based on a long-term vision, and a rational and wise basis, and is not subject to pressure”.

And the Algerian Energy Minister Mohamed Arkab also said the OPEC+ decision was taken due to “purely technical” needs, given the global economic trends and the current state of the energy market.

Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) have also reiterated their support for the OPEC+ decision, stressing that the decision had no political motivations.

Iraq: We reject the policy of threats and oppression

Iraq was also among the countries that declared its support for the OPEC+ decision and for Saudi Arabia.

The Iraqi Foreign Ministry said on Tuesday they reject any policies that is threatening or oppressive, while reiterating the support for Saudi Arabia.

In a statement issued through the state-owned news agency, the ministry called for “resolving any disagreement related to this case through the natural means and in the context of a direct and balanced dialog”.

Cavusoglu: You have to lift the sanctions if you want prices to fall

Turkey was also among the countries that expressed support for OPEC+ decision to reduce the oil production, and the reactions against Washington’s statements against Saudi Arabia.

In his statement regarding the oil prices, the Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu said, “We are seeing that a country is threatening Saudi Arabia, and this bullying is not correct. Sanctions need to be lifted if the world wants oil prices to decrease, this issue cannot be resolved by threatening a single country”.

The Decision from OPEC and the US reaction to it

The OPEC+ group, which consists of all OPEC members and some non-OPEC oil producers, have taken a decision to reduce daily crude oil extraction by 2 million barrels from the beginning of November, after a meeting held in Vienna, Austria on October 5th.

The United States and Europe, which are among the countries that are affected by the rising oil prices after the Russian intervention in Ukraine, have instead expected Saudi Arabia and other Gulf countries to increase their oil production in order keep the prices stable.

And it was also reported that the US President Joe Biden had asked the Riyadh administration to increase their crude oil production.

The decision contrary to the expectations of the US and Europe, to reduce the oil production led to reactions from the Washington administration. The White House has commented on this decision as “OPEC+ is clearly on the Russian side” while accusing Saudi Arabia of “helping Russia” in the Ukrainian War.

After protesting this decision, Joe Biden said that the US would revise its relationship with Saudi Arabia, threatening that such decision would have uncertain “consequences” for the kingdom.

Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia denies the accusations, saying this decision was taken due to economic reasons.

Saudi Arabia’s refrains to condemn the Russian intervention in Ukraine, despite pressures from the United States and the West, has further strained relations.

Experts share the view that the tensions between the Biden administration and OPEC+, and especially the Gulf members of the group, will increase even further.

OPEC members

OPEC member countries are as follows: Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Venezuela, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Kuwait, Algeria, Angola, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon and Nigeria.

The 10 extra members of the OPEC+ group, which was established in 2016 after a decision to collaborate with 10 other oil producers, are as follows: Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Brunei, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Mexico, Oman, Russia, South Sudan and Sudan.

All these countries listed above, make up about 40 percent of the total crude oil production in the world.

Saudi Arabia stands as the largest producer among OPEC members.

DIPLOMACY

EU, Mercosur aim to finalize trade deal by early December

Published

on

The European Commission and Mercosur countries are working to complete negotiations on a long-anticipated trade deal by early December, sources familiar with the discussions told POLITICO.

Farmers are expected to rally against the deal in Brussels on Wednesday, with additional protests in France later in the week.

The upcoming G20 summit in Rio de Janeiro was initially seen as the ideal opportunity to finalize the agreement, which has been under negotiation for nearly 25 years.

“All the cards are on the table,” said one person familiar with the EU-Mercosur talks. “They want to ensure a near-finalized deal, so Ursula [von der Leyen] doesn’t make the trip in vain.” However, the signing of the agreement might be delayed over concerns that China could overshadow the summit.

A European Commission official confirmed that face-to-face talks are scheduled for the week of November 25 in Brazil to resolve any outstanding issues. While the official refrained from specifying a completion date, they emphasized that the Mercosur nations—Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay, and new member Bolivia—are pushing to sign the agreement promptly.

Uruguay is set to host the Mercosur summit from December 2–4, with Argentina, under newly elected Javier Milei, assuming the bloc’s presidency.

China concerns accelerate EU-Mercosur deal timeline

This “cows-for-cars” trade deal would eliminate trade barriers and establish a common market encompassing around 800 million people, representing 20% of global GDP. For European countries, particularly Germany, this agreement is viewed as overdue, especially given China’s expanding economic footprint in South America, where European firms are increasingly being sidelined.

“If we don’t reach a trade agreement with [Mercosur], China will inevitably fill the void,” remarked Kaja Kallas, the EU’s new foreign minister, on Tuesday. Citing data, she added that Chinese investment in Latin America surged 34-fold between 2020 and 2022.

Those familiar with the negotiations indicated that certain issues remain unresolved, including public procurement regulations, environmental provisions, and the legal structure of the agreement.

Mercosur nations are particularly keen on securing more flexibility from the EU and additional time for local firms to compete with European counterparts. Brazil has also expressed a desire to protect its domestic automotive industry from EU imports, especially electric vehicles.

France’s reluctance and Macron’s challenges

French Trade Minister Sophie Primas recently stated to POLITICO that Mercosur countries are eager to finalize the deal before the Mercosur summit. However, Primas remains skeptical that the agreement will enable the EU to effectively counter China’s influence in Latin America.

Amid concerns over a potential surge in agricultural imports, France successfully blocked the Mercosur negotiations in January, just as they were nearing completion. This time, however, President Emmanuel Macron faces a tougher challenge, especially after recent electoral setbacks in the European Parliament and National Assembly.

In a recent letter published in Le Monde, over 600 French MPs from both parliamentary chambers urged von der Leyen not to proceed with the deal, citing unmet democratic, economic, environmental, and social standards for an agreement with Mercosur.

Paris falls short of blocking coalition

Despite recent efforts to secure opposition, Paris is unlikely to gather the qualified minority—representing at least 35% of the EU population—needed to block the deal when it comes to a vote among EU member states.

France has also launched a diplomatic campaign to persuade other EU nations to oppose the agreement. However, two diplomats with direct knowledge report that Italy has not been swayed.

Italy remains cautious in supporting the deal, wary of the potential for political fallout like that seen in France.

‘France’s opposition is symbolic; the battle is lost’

Over the weekend, Macron traveled to Argentina to meet with Milei ahead of the G20 summit in Brazil. Meanwhile, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni is scheduled to visit Buenos Aires on November 20.

Although French ministers have vehemently opposed the deal and increased efforts to build a blocking minority, Prime Minister Michel Barnier has kept a low profile. Barnier is expected to meet with von der Leyen and EU Trade Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis in Brussels today (November 13) and will likely address the Mercosur agreement, which he opposes in its current form.

Critics argue that France’s resistance is mostly symbolic, and that Paris has already lost this battle.

For years, France has insisted on incorporating the Paris Agreement and enacting legally binding deforestation commitments as part of the Mercosur deal. In response, the European Commission has indicated its intent to support French demands in the final phase of negotiations, although Mercosur countries have repeatedly signaled their resistance to any form of sanctions.

Continue Reading

DIPLOMACY

Japan, UK to launch bilateral economic dialogue ahead of potential Trump tariffs

Published

on

Japan and the UK are set to initiate an economic version of the “two plus two” dialogue—a regular meeting between foreign and trade ministers—due to rising concerns about possible tariffs from U.S. President-elect Donald Trump.

Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and his British counterpart, Keir Starmer, are scheduled to meet in Rio de Janeiro during the upcoming G20 Summit on Monday, November 18. According to officials from both governments, the goal is to establish a bilateral economic dialogue.

This development follows Trump’s recent election victory and his anticipated return to the White House in January. During his campaign, Trump pledged to impose tariffs of 60% on imports from China and 10-20% on imports from other nations, including Japan and the UK.

The Japan-UK economic dialogue aims to strengthen cooperation in upholding the international economic order, including principles of free trade.

Topics at the meeting will cover a wide range of strategic and geopolitical issues. Both partners are expected to explore ways to initiate a trade dialogue with the U.S. to prevent a potential tariff hike. Sources indicate that countermeasures may also be on the table if U.S. import tariffs do increase.

In 2023, 20% of Japan’s exports and 15% of the UK’s exports were destined for the U.S., underscoring the potential economic impact of increased tariffs.

Additionally, the UK hopes that a strengthened partnership with Japan can help offset its reduced influence since leaving the European Union (EU) in 2020.

During the previous Trump administration, the EU (of which the UK was then a member) imposed retaliatory tariffs on U.S. steel and motorcycles in response to Washington’s high import duties.

Continue Reading

DIPLOMACY

Azerbaijan plans to boost oil and gas production as it hosts COP29

Published

on

The 29th Conference of the Parties (COP29) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) has commenced in Baku, Azerbaijan’s capital. As the host nation, Azerbaijan is also looking to expand its fossil fuel production, positioning itself at the intersection of climate policy and energy expansion.

According to the Financial Times, Azerbaijan’s state oil and gas company SOCAR (State Oil Company of Azerbaijan Republic) is set to increase production of new fossil fuel sources during the COP29 summit. The summit, a key gathering on global climate change, underscores a paradox for Azerbaijan: pledging climate action while pursuing expanded oil and gas output.

A report by campaign group Global Witness, which analyzed data from independent consultancy Rystad Energy, estimates that 44% of SOCAR’s production will be new oil and gas by 2050—the second-highest proportion among national oil companies globally. This report examined production projections based on both developed and undeveloped fields as well as undiscovered fossil fuel reserves.

According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), new long-term oil and gas projects conflict with the goal of limiting the average global temperature rise to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels—the target set by the Paris Agreement. This expansion aligns Azerbaijan with Europe’s aim to diversify energy sources, especially given the EU’s push to replace Russian gas following the Ukraine conflict.

Meanwhile, SOCAR has increased production in recent years as Europe seeks to replace Russian natural gas with resources from other nations, including Azerbaijan. This has drawn criticism, particularly as Azerbaijan—through Muhtar Babayev, COP29 President and Minister of Ecology and Natural Resources—continues to call for limiting global warming to 1.5°C.

At COP28 last year in Dubai, almost 200 nations committed to phasing out fossil fuels by mid-century. Nevertheless, Azerbaijan has signed multiple oil and gas deals since securing COP29 hosting rights, including SOCAR’s first international investment in upstream oil and gas—a $468 million stake in UAE gas projects.

“Azerbaijan is Europe’s strategic supplier of natural gas and is expanding capacity to meet European energy demands after the 2022 supply disruptions,” a COP29 spokesperson stated. Additionally, Azerbaijan is “expanding its renewable energy exports to serve the region and European markets,” he added. SOCAR did not respond to requests for comment.

Azerbaijan’s COP presidency has sparked criticism, echoing concerns raised during the UAE’s COP28 role. Richard Kinley, former executive secretary of the UN climate panel, expressed disappointment: “It is deeply disturbing that they can’t even seem to draw a ‘sanitary cordon’ around the COP presidency to prevent fossil fuel interests from undermining its purpose.”

Danish Climate Minister Lars Aagaard—attending COP29—remarked that Azerbaijan’s energy strategy also includes renewable energy initiatives, with Ørsted, a prominent wind energy company, present at the summit. However, European diplomats told the Financial Times that Azerbaijani officials have raised gas deal discussions alongside climate negotiations, mainly in relation to replacing Russian gas supplies transiting through Ukraine, with this contract ending soon.

According to Bloomberg, companies in Hungary and Slovakia are finalizing a deal with Azerbaijan to substitute gas from the Ukrainian pipeline. Energy analysts have cautioned that this agreement could mask continued Russian gas flows. Additionally, a recent report from Chatham House highlighted Azerbaijan’s strategy to secure long-term European gas supply agreements.

“By positioning itself at the heart of the multilateral climate process, the Azerbaijani government may seek to shape the global energy transition dialogue to ensure its oil and gas reserves remain profitable as long as possible,” the report suggests.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey