Diplomacy
Full support for Saudi Arabia against the threats from the US
Following the decision of the OPEC+ group -a group of countries made up of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and some non-OPEC member countries- to reduce their crude oil production, Saudi Arabia has received wide support from the Arab world and Turkey, after receiving political pressures from the United States.
After the decision to reduce the crude oil production, Washington came forth against Saudi Arabia with harsh statements and threats of sanctions, while reactions from all over the Arab world and the countries in the region are now rising. The countries that support the OPEC+ decision, are also opposing the accusations against Saudi Arabia by the United States of America.
While the Secretary-General of the Arab League Ahmed Aboul Gheit has expressed “full support” for Saudi Arabia’s decision to reduce the crude oil production, he also condemned the harsh smear campaign launched against Riyadh administration.
Regarding the accusations from Washington, Gheit stated “They are aimed at politicizing purely economic decisions that everyone realizes are necessary for the stability of the global economy given the dangerous challenges it is facing”.
The speaker of the Arab Parliament Adel Abdulrahman Al Asoomi also said they reject and condemn the accusations made against Saudi Arabia. Asoomi stated that the Arab Parliament is in full solidarity with Saudi Arabia, and that the decisions taken by OPEC and OPEC+ are taken by the unanimous vote of the member states, and that the decision is made taking the supply and demand in the global oil market into account.
Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) Secretary-General Hissein Brahim Taha has also approved the slams from the Saudis, regarding the accusations against it, just after the OPEC+ decision.
Another individual who expressed support for the Riyadh administration, had been the Moroccan Foreign Minister Nasser Bourita. Bourita stated that the Rabat administration supports all decisions of the Saudi foreign policy. Bourita also added that “the Kingdom’s foreign policy in the diplomatic or energy fields is based on a long-term vision, and a rational and wise basis, and is not subject to pressure”.
And the Algerian Energy Minister Mohamed Arkab also said the OPEC+ decision was taken due to “purely technical” needs, given the global economic trends and the current state of the energy market.
Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) have also reiterated their support for the OPEC+ decision, stressing that the decision had no political motivations.
Iraq: We reject the policy of threats and oppression
Iraq was also among the countries that declared its support for the OPEC+ decision and for Saudi Arabia.
The Iraqi Foreign Ministry said on Tuesday they reject any policies that is threatening or oppressive, while reiterating the support for Saudi Arabia.
In a statement issued through the state-owned news agency, the ministry called for “resolving any disagreement related to this case through the natural means and in the context of a direct and balanced dialog”.
Cavusoglu: You have to lift the sanctions if you want prices to fall
Turkey was also among the countries that expressed support for OPEC+ decision to reduce the oil production, and the reactions against Washington’s statements against Saudi Arabia.
In his statement regarding the oil prices, the Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu said, “We are seeing that a country is threatening Saudi Arabia, and this bullying is not correct. Sanctions need to be lifted if the world wants oil prices to decrease, this issue cannot be resolved by threatening a single country”.
The Decision from OPEC and the US reaction to it
The OPEC+ group, which consists of all OPEC members and some non-OPEC oil producers, have taken a decision to reduce daily crude oil extraction by 2 million barrels from the beginning of November, after a meeting held in Vienna, Austria on October 5th.
The United States and Europe, which are among the countries that are affected by the rising oil prices after the Russian intervention in Ukraine, have instead expected Saudi Arabia and other Gulf countries to increase their oil production in order keep the prices stable.
And it was also reported that the US President Joe Biden had asked the Riyadh administration to increase their crude oil production.
The decision contrary to the expectations of the US and Europe, to reduce the oil production led to reactions from the Washington administration. The White House has commented on this decision as “OPEC+ is clearly on the Russian side” while accusing Saudi Arabia of “helping Russia” in the Ukrainian War.
After protesting this decision, Joe Biden said that the US would revise its relationship with Saudi Arabia, threatening that such decision would have uncertain “consequences” for the kingdom.
Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia denies the accusations, saying this decision was taken due to economic reasons.
Saudi Arabia’s refrains to condemn the Russian intervention in Ukraine, despite pressures from the United States and the West, has further strained relations.
Experts share the view that the tensions between the Biden administration and OPEC+, and especially the Gulf members of the group, will increase even further.
OPEC members
OPEC member countries are as follows: Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Venezuela, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Kuwait, Algeria, Angola, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon and Nigeria.
The 10 extra members of the OPEC+ group, which was established in 2016 after a decision to collaborate with 10 other oil producers, are as follows: Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Brunei, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Mexico, Oman, Russia, South Sudan and Sudan.
All these countries listed above, make up about 40 percent of the total crude oil production in the world.
Saudi Arabia stands as the largest producer among OPEC members.
Diplomacy
Greece’s Marinakis says paying Hormuz transit fees beats enduring Red Sea shipping crisis detour
Evangelos Marinakis, one of Greece’s leading shipowners, has announced that he is prepared to pay up to $200,000 per transit to keep the Strait of Hormuz open to civilian maritime traffic.
Speaking to the Financial Times, Marinakis stated that paying a transit fee would be a far better option for him than having the strait closed to navigation.
As the chairman of Capital Maritime Group, which controls a fleet of 185 vessels including approximately 35 tankers, Marinakis emphasized that shipowners have been forced to use alternative routes around the Cape of Good Hope for years due to attacks launched by the Houthis in the Red Sea, a detour that has generated substantial additional costs.
The Greek shipowner indicated that paying a transit fee of $100,000 or $200,000, depending on the size of the cargo or the vessel, is far more reasonable than enduring the current logistical challenges. He added that such payments could offset all the losses experienced so far.
Following US strikes on Iran and the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, the Tehran administration had introduced transit fees of up to $2 million for certain vessels transiting the waterway.
In May, Iran announced the establishment of a state agency tasked with managing the Strait of Hormuz. It was stated that the institution in question would provide real-time updates regarding maritime activities in the waterway.
Ebrahim Azizi, the chairman of the Iranian Parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, had noted that only commercial vessels and countries cooperating with Iran would be able to benefit from the facilities provided under this “professional mechanism.”
US President Donald Trump has explicitly opposed the imposition of transit fees in the Strait of Hormuz. In a statement on the matter, Trump said, “We want the strait to be open. We do not want any transit fees to be charged. This is an international waterway.”
On the other hand, the draft text of a planned 60-day ceasefire extension agreement between the parties stipulates that the Strait of Hormuz will remain open without any transit fees being demanded.
According to the draft details reviewed by Axios, the US in return commits to lifting the blockade it has imposed on Iranian ports. The Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, however, announced that the management of the Strait of Hormuz has been excluded from the scope of the agreement with the US, asserting that the issue will be addressed solely by littoral states.
Diplomacy
Pashinyan promises aid to farmers hit by Russian import restrictions
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has pledged compensation for Armenian farmers affected by restrictions on exports to Russia.
According to Sputnik Armenia, Pashinyan made the announcement during an election campaign meeting in the Gegharkunik region.
Speaking at the event, Pashinyan said the subsidies would be designed to offset losses incurred by producers.
The prime minister also acknowledged that some Armenian products had failed to meet required quality standards, adding that such companies would receive support aimed at improving product quality.
Addressing alternative markets for Armenian exports, Pashinyan said several Armenian business delegations were already engaged in negotiations abroad.
He added that Armenia had received offers for the purchase of roses as well as fresh fruits and vegetables.
Pashinyan argued that Armenia’s agricultural output was not particularly large, describing this as an advantage under current circumstances. According to the prime minister, “a respected supermarket chain in Europe” would be capable of selling the entire volume of these products on its own.
Russia’s Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance (Rosselkhoznadzor) imposed temporary restrictions on imports of stone fruits and grapes from Armenia effective July 2.
The ban covers cherries, sour cherries, apricots, plums, peaches and nectarines, among other products.
On the same day, a temporary suspension was also introduced on certification procedures for live fish shipments from Armenia. Russian authorities had previously restricted the entry of flower products originating from Armenia into the Russian market.
In addition, Russia’s Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing (Rospotrebnadzor) halted the import of all consignments of Jermuk mineral water from Armenia.
In a statement, the agency said levels of bicarbonate, chloride and sulfate ions in the mineral water exceeded established limits and could mislead consumers regarding the product’s medicinal properties.
The Russian regulator argued that the growing number of violations stemmed from the abolition of Armenia’s Agriculture Ministry and the transfer of its responsibilities to the Economy Ministry.
Rosselkhoznadzor further stated that Armenia’s Economy Ministry was experiencing structural problems and was unable to adequately perform the supervisory functions assigned to it.
Diplomacy
Zelenskyy urges US to grant Ukraine license to produce Patriot missiles
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he has asked the United States to grant Ukraine a license to manufacture missiles for the Patriot air defence system.
In a post on social media platform X, Zelenskyy argued that current US production of missile defence interceptors is insufficient and could contribute to crises in different parts of the world.
“Producing 60-65 missiles a month is nothing compared with the challenges we face today. This is no secret, and Russia knows it as well,” Zelenskyy wrote. “We need to expand production. As I requested from the previous US administration, I am asking the current administration to grant Ukraine a license to produce Patriot missiles.”
Zelenskyy said US companies possess advanced technologies that are not available in Ukraine, while Kyiv could contribute its extensive battlefield experience in return.
He also argued that granting such a license would benefit not only Ukraine, but also the Middle East and any country Washington chooses to support.
Washington pledges to maintain defence support
Zelenskyy’s remarks came a day after US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on May 30 that Washington would continue supporting Ukraine’s defence capabilities and ensure military shipments to Kyiv continue.
“We want them to be able to defend themselves, and we will find a way to help them do that,” Hegseth said.
Several days earlier, Yuriy Ihnat, spokesperson for the Ukrainian Air Force, warned that the country’s air defence forces were experiencing a shortage of missiles.
“Due to certain supply problems, we are practically at starvation levels when it comes to missiles today,” Ihnat said.
Concerns persist over air defence missile stocks
In April, Zelenskyy warned that Ukraine’s stockpile of air defence missiles could be exhausted at any moment.
He said that under current conditions, air defence missiles were more critical for Ukraine than the air defence systems themselves.
Highlighting what he described as a critical shortage of Patriot missiles, Zelenskyy said: “We are facing a deficit now that could hardly be worse.”
Concerns that Ukraine could face a severe shortage of US-made air defence missiles had previously been reported by Reuters.
The situation was expected to worsen as the United States and its allies depleted significant portions of their arsenals during tensions with Iran, a point Zelenskyy also underscored.
In a separate statement in January, Zelenskyy said Ukraine lacked sufficient missiles for both US- and European-made air defence systems.
The Ukrainian leader said he had been forced to personally secure every package of missiles from European countries and the United States.
-
Asia2 weeks agoIran conflict accelerates yuan adoption and record CIPS volumes in global oil trade
-
Asia2 weeks agoXi and Putin deepen partnership with call for ‘multipolar world’
-
Europe2 weeks agoFive EU states push gradual single market access for Western Balkans
-
Middle East1 week agoLeaked documents show IRGC routed Chinese military equipment through UAE
-
Europe1 week agoFrench justice minister calls for three-year halt to legal immigration
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoNATO weighs Hormuz security mission if Iran blockade remains in place by July
-
Middle East1 week agoIran says Hormuz transit will remain free but ships must cover operational costs
-
Europe2 weeks agoGermany initiates diplomatic contact with France’s National Rally ahead of presidential election
