Connect with us

Middle East

Is the FBI’s ‘Shireen’ investigation a message to Netanyahu?

Published

on

The FBI will investigate the murder of US citizen Palestinian journalist Shireen Abu Akleh. The investigation to which Israel reacted is discussed in terms of relations of the potential Israeli government led by Netanyahu with the Biden government.

The FBI will investigate the murder of US citizen Palestinian journalist Shireen Abu Akleh. The investigation to which Israel reacted is discussed in terms of relations of the potential Israeli government led by Netanyahu with the Biden government.

The US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has started an investigation into the murder of Palestinian journalist Shireen Abu Akleh, who is also an American citizen. The US Department of Justice has informed the Israeli Ministry of Justice about the FBI’s investigation into the death of Al Jazeera reporter Abu Akleh, who was killed on 11 May in the occupied West Bank. At the end of the process, it was stated that the United States could make a request for the investigation of Israeli soldiers that are involved in the incident.

The investigation decision came after more than 20 US senators signed a joint letter calling for an independent FBI investigation. “This is an overdue but necessary and important step in the pursuit of justice and accountability in the shooting death of American citizen and journalist Shireen Abu Akleh,” US Democratic Senator Chris Van Hollen said on Twitter, welcoming the decision. Republican Senator Ted Cruz, a prominent figure in the Israeli lobby, criticised the decision, saying that the Biden government is addressing Netanyahu and Israel: “Joe Biden and his government view Israel and his elected Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as political enemies and therefore respond to them the way they respond to all their political enemies: unleashing the FBI on them.”

Israel is reactive while Palestinian is content

The news of the investigation shocked Israel. “I made it clear to the United States that we will not cooperate with any external investigations and that we will not allow any interference in Israel’s internal affairs,” Israeli Defence Minister Benny Gantz said on his Twitter account, describing the decision to investigate as a “serious mistake”. Israeli Prime Minister Yair Lapid also said that they would not allow the FBI or any other foreign country organization to investigate Israeli soldiers, no matter how friendly, and added: “Our strong protest has been passed on to the Americans.”

The Palestinian Ministry of Foreign Affairs is satisfied with the decision: “This decision reflects the belief on the American side that, although it was overdue, there was no serious investigation by Israel, that Israel saw it as a formality and that it was using it as an attempt to cover up criminals and murderers.”

What happened?

Al Jazeera’s experienced field reporter, Abu Akleh, had been killed by fire opened by Israeli soldiers on 11 May while covering an attack by Israeli forces on a refugee camp in the West Bank city of Cenin. Ali es-Sumudi, the journalist who was with Abu Aqilah, was also injured in the back. The fact that Abu Akleh was shot dead by Israeli soldiers with real bullets, even though she was wearing a vest with “press” written on it while she was on her duty, caused reactions. Investigations and inquisitions made by several international institutions have concluded that Abu Aqile was targeted and killed by Israeli soldiers. The Israeli army, which has repeatedly denied responsibility for the incident and blamed the Palestinian armed groups, announced in its final report, issued on 5 September following international reactions, that “it is highly possible Abu Akleh was accidentally killed by the fire of the Israeli army”.

Far-right and democrats of Israel

It was noteworthy that after the elections in Israel, the former Prime Minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, was given the task of forming a government, followed by this step from the United States. The possibility of giving important ministries to Itimar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, with whom Netanyahu is preparing to form a coalition, is making the Western “democracies” uneasy due to the strict and formalist anti-Arabism of these names. US President Joe Biden’s government is forcing Netanyahu not to appoint Smotrich as defence minister, Israeli media reported. In this context, the Israeli general opinion in the press regarding the FBI investigation is that the decision was made under pressure of the Democrats in Congress. On the other hand, it is remarked that it reveals the changes in the relations between the Democratic Party and Israel and that the relations between the two countries are at a turning point in their history.

How will it affect the investigation at the ICC?

Jerusalem Post’s intelligence, terrorism and legal analyst Yonah Jeremy Bob discussed the possible effects of FBI’s investigation on the “war crimes commited in Israel” investigation at the ICC in his analysis that is titled “Is the Ben-Gvir effect wounding Israel before he even takes office?”. Former ICC Chief Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda announced in March 2021 that Israeli authorities had launched an investigation into alleged war crimes in Gaza, the West Bank and East Jerusalem. However, no concrete steps were taken in the investigation after Bensouda handed over his seat to Karim Khan in June 2021. In his analysis, Yonah Jeremy Bob pointed out that the discovery of Israeli local courts’ neglect of any war crimes allegations would strengthen the hand of the ICC’s Chief Prosecutor. Because, in accordance with the principle of “a person cannot be tried twice for a crime”, the ICC cannot file a lawsuit if the perpetrator of the crime is subject to the trial of the state in which he/she is a national. However, some gaps such as “ the collapsed judicial system” give the ICC jurisdiction.

At this point, Jeremy Bob says, “If even Israel’s most powerful ally, the US, is ready to launch its own investigation against Israelis, and if the Israeli Defence Forces’ investigation is declared inadequate, what could stop the ICC from concluding that the broader Israeli legal system is inadequate.”

‘Biden’s method of threatening’

Without any suspects and direct evidence, which Israel has already announced it will not share, the FBI’s investigation will be very limited. Bob doesn’t think Biden is planning to put bilateral relations in a major crisis by blaming a higher-level Israeli soldier. The only possibility that prompted Biden to take this step is the Itamar Ben-Gvir effect, according to Bob: “The US announcement of the FBI investigation came shortly after American authorities reportedly warned Netanyahu not to assign Ben-Gvir and Betzalel Smotrich to key security posts. There is no implicit threat: the Biden government has made it clear that they will not work with any of these men as Secretary of Defense or Minister of Public Security. (…) In addition, at least one wing of the Democrats (against Israel) is campaigning for an investigation, and the by-elections in the US are now over, meaning that a new fight with Israel will not cost the US a great deal in the elections. This could be a method for the Biden government to threaten Netanyahu about how bad he could get if he gave Ben-Gvir some real power. ”

‘Slap in the face of the Israeli government’

The issue was also addressed in the editorial of the Jerusalem Post. “It is hard to believe that the FBI will conclude anything other than the completed investigations,” the editorial said, pointing out that some of the results of Israeli investigations into the murder of Abu Aqile, including the US, have been shared with Washington. Israel, however, is a slap in the face of Jerusalem (referred to as West Jerusalem) as it moves to a new government led by Yair Lapid and Benjamin Netanyahu. ”

Although they understand the investigation into the death of a murdered American citizen, it seems to have upset and shocked the Jerusalem Post editors that the country in question is Israel: “Such investigations are not the norm when it comes to a close ally of the United States, such as Israel, who knows that Washington respects the supremacy of law and has an independent, reliable judiciary. Friends don’t treat friends that way, and we strongly invite our American allies to reconsider their decisions. ”

According to Israeli media, the United States told Netanyahu that it would not be able to establish relations with Smotrich or Ben-Gvir if they were appointed to the Defence and Homeland Security Ministries.

‘As if the occupation was an internal matter…’

Although the Israeli press is stunned and angry, there are those who do not agree with the United States. One of them is Israel’s oldest daily newspaper, Haaretz, which stands out with its leftist views. Haaretz criticizes the Israeli investigation into the murder and its consequences in his editorial titled “If the army investigates itself”. The Israeli Army’s internal investigation points out that it took Abu Akleh four months to accept the possibility that she was killed by a bullet from the Israeli soldier’s gun. In addition, the editorial cited that even this semi-joint acceptance comes after the results of an investigation conducted by a number of organisations, including the UN, points out that “if the investigation were conducted by an independent Israeli judiciary rather than by the Israeli Army, the results might be more acceptable”. In this context, it is pointed out that if the new Israeli government’s plan to control the judiciary is put into effect, Israel’s demands for “intervention” in its internal affairs will even be stronger.

According to the editorial, it is wrong to associate the FBI’s investigation decision with pressure that is put by Democrats demanding a firm stance against Israel: “Instead, Israel better start internalising that the world, including the United States, is beginning to look at what is happening in Israel more harshly. The possibility that the international community – as if the occupation of another country for more than 50 years were all about Israel’s own internal matter – will not interfere with ‘Israel’s internal affairs’ is losing its power. ”

Asia

Iran-Israel war: Why US discusses regional conflict with Pakistan

Published

on

US President Donald Trump and Pakistan’s Army Chief General Asim Munir held a special and important meeting during a time when tensions are rising in the Asian region. The meeting was held on Trump’s invitation and was not open to the media. However, both sides have released official statements afterward, which states that the main topics were discussed

The meeting focused on the ongoing conflict between Iran and Israel, Pakistan–India relations, especially the Kashmir issue, the situation in Afghanistan and future US–Pakistan cooperation.

Pakistan has recently improved its strategic position in the region. It has shown strong ties with China and is the only South Asian country openly supporting Iran in its conflict with Israel. Meanwhile, Pakistan remains an important player in Afghanistan.

Why the Pakistani Army Chief was invited to the US?

Although Pakistan has an elected civilian government, important decisions—especially related to foreign affairs and security—are often handled by the military. That’s why General Asim Munir was invited to meet Trump instead of the Prime Minister, General Munir’s influence has grown recently. After tensions with India, he was given the title of Field Marshal. His meeting with Trump is seen as a sign of his importance in both Pakistani and international politics.

According to the Pakistan Army’s media wing (ISPR): General Munir thanked President Trump for helping to ease recent tensions between Pakistan and India. Trump praised Pakistan’s role in fighting terrorism. Both agreed to work together in the future, especially in: Trade, Technology Minerals and energy Artificial intelligence Crypto currency and regional peace efforts as well.

President Trump also appreciated General Munir’s leadership during difficult times. Munir invited Trump to visit Pakistan, and Trump reportedly accepted the offer in principle.

Why US former peace envoy to Afghanistan, Khalilzad is not trusting Pakistan’s army chief

Former U.S. diplomat Zalmay Khalilzad criticized the meeting. He said General Munir cannot be trusted and reminded the U.S. that Pakistan has supported groups that harmed American soldiers in the past. According to Khalilzad, General Munir may be trying to get U.S. support for his interests in Afghanistan, which he believes could be risky for America.

Though no official list of US demands was made public, reports suggest a meeting was held in Saudi Arabia earlier, where American officials spoke with top Pakistani leaders. During that meeting, the U.S. reportedly made four key requests:  Pakistan should help the U.S. in counterterrorism operations when needed. Pakistan should slowly reduce its relations with China. Pakistan should recognize Israel after Saudi Arabia does. If the U.S. attacks Iran, Pakistan should support the U.S. instead of staying neutral.

These demands are similar to earlier U.S.–Pakistan arrangements during the Cold War and the War on Terror.

What could be expected in the future?

This meeting could mark the beginning of a new phase in US–Pakistan relations. In the past, Pakistan helped the U.S. during the Soviet-Afghan War and after 9/11. Now, with tensions involving Iran, India, and Afghanistan—and China expanding its role—the U.S. may again be looking to Pakistan as a key partner in the region.

Time will tell whether this leads to a long-term partnership or just another temporary agreement based on short-term goals.

Continue Reading

Middle East

Iran retaliates with missile barrage after Israel strikes Arak nuclear facility

Published

on

Israel’s overnight attacks targeted the Arak nuclear facility, prompting a severe retaliatory response from Iran. Missiles fired at Tel Aviv and Beersheba were aimed at the Israeli army’s command and intelligence headquarters. Prime Minister Netanyahu has ordered an escalation of attacks against Iran.

The week-long escalating tension between Israel and Iran reached a new level on Thursday morning with mutual attacks. The Israeli army announced it had conducted airstrikes on several targets in Iran, including the Arak nuclear facility. In retaliation, Iran launched nearly 30 missiles at various regions, primarily targeting Tel Aviv and the southern city of Beersheba.

The Israeli army confirmed it had attacked Iran’s Arak Heavy Water Nuclear Facility (Shahid Khandab Research Reactor) last night. Military officials claimed the facility housed equipment that could accelerate the development of nuclear weapons.

However, a written statement from the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran’s Information Center stated, “There were no casualties or injuries in the attack. Thanks to pre-emptive security measures, there is no risk or harm to the public in the area surrounding the facility.” Iranian state television also reported that there was no nuclear leakage at the site.

Retaliation at first light

Iran’s retaliation for these attacks came in the morning. More than 20 missiles fired from Iran directly hit several locations around the capital, Tel Aviv, and in the southern Negev region.

Israel’s Yedioth Ahronoth newspaper reported that air defense systems were attempting to intercept the missiles launched from Iran. The report noted that over 20 missiles were fired, striking at least four locations in the country’s central and southern regions.

In the central region, missiles reportedly struck buildings directly in Tel Aviv, Ramat Gan, and Holon. In the south, a missile aimed at Beersheba was alleged to have hit Soroka Hospital.

Israel’s Magen David Adom emergency service stated that they received reports of direct hits during the attacks around 7:10 AM and had dispatched teams to the areas. A written statement from Magen David Adom reported that 65 people were injured in Iran’s morning retaliatory missile strike, with three in serious condition. The statement added that two others were moderately injured, while the rest sustained injuries from shrapnel, the blast’s impact, or while running to shelters.

Meanwhile, the Israeli army estimated that Iran had fired around 30 missiles in its morning retaliation.

A statement from the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs alleged that Iranian missiles had struck Soroka Hospital in the southern city of Beersheba. It is known that Israeli soldiers wounded in Gaza are treated at Soroka Hospital.

According to a report by the semi-official Tasnim News Agency, which is close to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), Iran’s retaliatory attack this morning targeted the Israeli army’s command and intelligence headquarters. The report claimed that Israeli media was attempting to portray the location as a “hospital,” but the actual targets were the Israel Defense Forces’ command and intelligence (IDF C4I) headquarters next to the hospital and an army intelligence camp in the Gav-Yam Technology Park. The report also stated that the targeted structures housed thousands of military personnel, digital command systems, and cyber operations systems belonging to the Israeli army.

Furthermore, according to Lebanon-based Al Mayadeen, Soroka Hospital, located between two military bases, was evacuated following the attack due to a suspected hazardous material leak.

Netanyahu orders an ‘increase in attacks’

Following Iran’s morning retaliation, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ordered the Israeli army to intensify its attacks on Iran. In a written statement, Netanyahu threatened that Iranian officials would “pay a price.”

Defense Minister Yisrael Katz also asserted on his social media account that Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, would “pay the price” for the morning’s retaliation.

In his first televised address since Friday, Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, defied President Trump’s call for Iran’s surrender. “Any US military intervention will cause absolutely irreversible damage,” he said, adding, “The Iranian people will not surrender.”

While Iran’s retaliation was underway, Chief of the General Staff of the Iranian Armed Forces, Major General Abdolrahim Mousavi, visited a missile base belonging to the IRGC Aerospace Force. “We will continue our attacks relentlessly against all types of targets belonging to the Zionist occupying regime. We see no obstacles before us,” Mousavi declared.

Continue Reading

Middle East

Iran warns of harsh response if US enters war

Published

on

As mutual attacks between Iran and Israel, which began on June 13, continue to escalate tensions in the region, the US is signaling its potential involvement in the war. The Iranian government has threatened the US with a harsh response in such a scenario.

Ambassador Ali Bahreyni, Iran’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations Office at Geneva, stated, “If at any point we conclude that the US is directly involved in attacks against Iran, we will begin to respond to the US.”

Bahreyni met with journalists from the Association of Accredited Correspondents at the United Nations (ACANU) in Geneva to discuss the conflict that started with Israel’s attacks on Iran.

Recalling that the Israeli regime has been conducting attacks on Iran since June 13, Bahreyni remarked, “This is Israeli aggression targeting civilians, women, children, civilian infrastructure, and even our country’s peaceful nuclear facilities. During these attacks, hundreds of innocent people, including many children and women, have been killed. There is a great danger surrounding our peaceful nuclear facilities, not only in Iran but also due to the potential exposure of people in our region to dangerous leaks.”

Bahreyni criticized the financial, logistical, and military support provided to Israel by the US and many other Western countries.

Stating that Israel attacked Iran without provocation, Bahreyni said, “During these attacks, Israel violated the principles of discrimination, proportionality, and public notification by targeting civilians. Israel has violated all norms of international law and human rights. Iran is determined to respond to Israeli attacks. We will show no doubt or hesitation in defending our people, our security, and our territory. We will respond very seriously and forcefully. This is what we are doing now. We cannot focus on anything other than defending ourselves.”

Bahreyni pointed out that the US is complicit in Israel’s actions, adding, “Without the US, Israel is nothing. Whatever Israel does, it does with the military and intelligence support of the US. We will monitor the actions of the US. If at any point we conclude that the US is directly involved in attacks against Iran, we will begin to respond to the US.”

Noting that the UN Security Council and other international organizations have failed to stop the crimes committed by Israel during this process, Bahreyni said that these international bodies have lost their reason for existence.

Bahreyni emphasized that Iran’s nuclear program is peaceful.

‘If our red lines are crossed, there will be a response’

In response to a question from Anadolu Agency about whether he views US President Donald Trump’s recent statements on the tensions as an intervention, Bahreyni replied:

“Yes, we are monitoring the statements of US officials, including the US President. We see these as irresponsible attitudes toward the challenges facing Iran, and we believe that US policy toward Iran has been hostile for the last 40 years. This is not new. US threats against Iran are not new. It is clear that the US has a hostile attitude toward Iran. Iran has previously stood against the arrogant policies of the US. The statements made by Trump are completely unbalanced. We cannot ignore these statements.”

Bahreyni stated that Iran has red lines and will respond if they are crossed.

In a large-scale air operation launched by Israel last Friday, critical centers of Iran’s nuclear program and high-ranking military officials were targeted. Iranian media reports that thousands of people have been evacuated from the capital, Tehran, and other major cities following the attacks.

Although the US has not yet carried out a direct attack, it is providing indirect defensive support, such as destroying missiles aimed at Israel in the air. The Pentagon announced that it has sent additional fighter jets and air power reinforcements to the region.

Pezeshkian emphasizes national unity

While the US raises the stakes against Iran to compel it to comply with its nuclear demands, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, in a speech at a cabinet meeting, said that the country’s internal solidarity is the greatest guarantee against external threats. According to a statement published on the presidential website, Pezeshkian said:

“If the people are with us, no problem can threaten the country. All steps must be taken to preserve national unity.”

Pezeshkian also thanked the many countries, especially neighboring ones, that sent messages of support to Iran during the Israeli attacks. At the end of the meeting, it was requested that security measures be kept at the maximum level and that all state officials act in accordance with the instructions of the relevant authorities.

People take to the streets in Tehran

Despite Israel’s attacks and US threats, large crowds gathered in Palestine Square in Tehran to support the country’s leadership.

Citizens who gathered in Palestine Square, located near the residence of Iranian leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, carried posters of Khamenei and Iranian flags and chanted slogans against Israel and the US.

It was noteworthy that some families brought their children to the demonstration, despite US President Donald Trump’s threat to “evacuate Tehran.” Some police and soldiers were also seen participating in the demonstrations.

Khamenei: No negotiations with Zionists

Meanwhile, Iranian leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei stated in a post on his X account that they will continue to respond to Israel’s attacks and will never negotiate with them: “The terrorist Zionist regime must be fought with determination. We will never negotiate with the Zionists.”

Damage to nuclear facilities is limited

Statements were also made regarding Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, which has been a direct target of the conflict. Mohammad Eslami, the head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, said in an interview on state television, “The condition of the nuclear facilities is good. The morale of the employees is high.”

Organization spokesman Behrouz Kamalvandi had previously stated that minor damage occurred after the attack on the Fordow Nuclear Facility in the city of Qom, but no nuclear leak occurred. The Natanz Nuclear Facility in Isfahan was more affected by the attack, but it was announced that the nuclear contamination there did not spread outside the facility.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey