Middle East
Israel moves to reactivate West Bank land registry in step toward de facto annexation
Israel’s decision to reactivate the land registration process in the occupied West Bank marks a definitive shift toward the systematic dispossession of Palestinian territory, according to human rights advocates and legal experts.
The move, which accelerates the transfer of Palestinian lands to Israeli control, has been condemned by Israeli rights organizations as a violation of international law designed to facilitate the displacement of Palestinian communities.
After a hiatus of nearly 60 years, the land registration initiative was formally reinstituted following a cabinet approval on Sunday. The proposal was jointly submitted by the Israeli Ministers of Finance, Justice, and Defense. This decision mandates an expansive survey of land titles and a comprehensive reorganization of property ownership across the West Bank.
Bimkom, an Israeli human rights organization specializing in planning and property rights, warned that this administrative maneuver provides a “legal” veneer for the expansion of settlements while institutionalizing the seizure of Palestinian assets.
Palestinians face insurmountable hurdles in proving ownership
Rights groups emphasize that the new regulatory framework creates a nearly impossible evidentiary burden for the vast majority of Palestinian landowners. Because significant portions of the West Bank were never formally registered under previous administrations, countless families now face the imminent risk of being unable to document their ancestral holdings.
Michal Braier, Research Director at Bimkom, noted that the registration process is functionally inaccessible to large segments of the Palestinian population. “There are numerous Palestinians who have never officially registered their land or lack the specific documentation required to satisfy the new criteria,” Braier stated.
Braier further explained that land records dating back to the period of Jordanian administration cover only approximately 30% of the West Bank.
“Roughly 70% of the West Bank remains entirely unregistered, making it exceptionally difficult to determine legal titleholders under the current parameters,” Braier said. “The legal threshold for proving ownership has been set so high that most Palestinians will simply lack the requisite paperwork to meet it.”
The loss of physical deeds over decades of conflict, combined with the displacement of families, has severely undermined the ability of Palestinians to assert their claims. Braier warned that in cases where ownership cannot be “proven” to the satisfaction of Israeli authorities, the land will be designated as “state land” and subsumed under Israeli jurisdiction.
New regulations provide legal cover for settlement expansion
Analysts argue that this registration drive is intended to provide a formal legal structure to the land seizures Israel has carried out for years via military orders and administrative decrees. By codifying these seizures, the state can more easily facilitate the transfer of land—where private ownership is not “verified”—to the Israeli government or settler organizations.
Peace Now, an Israeli NGO that monitors settlement activity, characterized the move as a step toward the de facto annexation of the West Bank.
“This is a calculated method for Israel to consolidate its grip on the West Bank,” said Hagit Ofran, a veteran member of Peace Now.
Ofran noted that the authorities frequently demand archaic documentation dating back to the British Mandate or the Jordanian era. Since it is rare for Palestinian families to possess such pristine historical records, the default outcome is the registration of the land in the name of the State of Israel.
According to rights organizations, the overarching objective of the regulation is to bolster Israel’s claims of sovereignty over the territory while confining Palestinians to increasingly diminished enclaves.
The East Jerusalem precedent signals massive property loss
A similar land registration model was previously deployed in occupied East Jerusalem, where the results were overwhelmingly skewed in favor of the Israeli state and Jewish property claimants.
According to research conducted by Bimkom, between 2018 and 2024, only 1% of the land registered in East Jerusalem was titled to Palestinians. The remaining 99% was transferred to the Israeli state or private Israeli owners.
This precedent suggests that the West Bank initiative will drastically accelerate the loss of Palestinian property and fundamentally alter the demographic and legal landscape of the region.
Under international law, an occupying power is prohibited from altering the property structure of occupied territory or transferring its own civilian population into such areas. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has repeatedly affirmed that Israel’s land and property adjustments in the occupied Palestinian territories lack legal validity.
Rights groups remain steadfast in their assessment: the reactivation of land registration in the West Bank is a strategic effort to finalize Israeli control over the region and permanently sever Palestinian access to their land.
Middle East
US waives human rights terms on $320m military aid to Egypt
The US State Department stated that it has waived human rights conditions on more than $300 million in military aid to Egypt.
The statement emphasised that this decision was taken in consideration of Cairo’s “helpful role” since the outbreak of the war against Iran.
Egypt began receiving substantial support from the US after signing a peace treaty with Israel in 1979.
Since the late 1980s, the country has received approximately $1.3 billion annually in US military assistance.
A portion of this aid is subject to conditions related to human rights and democracy, which can be waived on national security grounds.
Withholding funds, including during the administration of former US President Joe Biden, has caused tension between Cairo and Washington in the past.
A letter dated 21 September and addressed to various congressional committees, obtained by Reuters, stated that Secretary of State Marco Rubio “decided to waive the certification requirement under the fiscal year 2025 Foreign Military Financing programme for Egypt of $320 million.”
This waiver was subsequently confirmed by the State Department.
An accompanying memorandum justifying the decision stated that this portion of military aid was “essential for counterterrorism, border security, or non-proliferation programmes, or otherwise important to the national security interests of the United States.”
The memorandum, dated 4 September and bearing Rubio’s signature, stated: “Exercising this waiver authority is critical to the US-Egypt relationship and to US national security priorities, particularly given the helpful role Egypt has played in the aftermath of Operation Epic Fury.”
“Operation Epic Fury” is the designation used by the US military for the campaign launched jointly with Israel against Iran in late February.
The State Department memorandum, whose authenticity was confirmed by two sources in Washington familiar with the letter, did not provide detailed information regarding what was termed Egypt’s “helpful role”.
The State Department’s annual decision on military aid to Egypt typically covers funds allocated for the preceding fiscal year, which ends on 30 September.
A State Department spokesperson stated that Rubio waived the certification in the interest of US national security and that the US continues to cooperate with the Egyptian government across a range of issues.
In an emailed statement, the spokesperson said: “This waiver recognizes the importance of maintaining security cooperation with Egypt at a time of significant security challenges in the region.”
The Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not immediately comment on the matter.
The spillover effects of the Iran war have imposed a heavy toll on US security partners, including Egypt.
Owing to rising fuel prices and other disruptions, the Egyptian economy is passing through a difficult period.
Under the Biden administration, the US withheld portions of the annual military allocation on multiple occasions over Egypt’s human rights record.
In 2024, following the Hamas-led 7 October attack on Israel and the subsequent war in Gaza, the Biden administration set aside human rights conditions, disbursing the entire $1.3 billion allocation to Egypt for the first time in its tenure.
Human rights organisations have long accused Egypt, under the administration of President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, of widespread human rights abuses, including torture and enforced disappearances.
This week, Egyptian police detained six journalists from a fact-checking and investigative media outlet, accusing them of spreading false information on behalf of the banned Muslim Brotherhood.
Egyptian authorities state that they have taken steps to address human rights issues. Sisi said stability is paramount and that the government supports human rights by working to provide for basic needs.
Middle East
Britain expands curbs on arms exports to Israel over Gaza risks
Britain has significantly broadened its military export restrictions targeting Israel, suspending or rejecting more than 80 licences for items the IDF could use in Gaza.
This figure is nearly triple the number affected when the policy was first introduced in September 2024.
United Kingdom Minister of State for the Middle East Stephen Doughty said that as part of what he described as a “tighter system” for assessing exports to Israel, more than 50 further export applications have been refused since approximately 30 licences were initially suspended.
Under the initial decision taken in September 2024, 30 of roughly 350 licences were suspended after the British government concluded there was a “clear risk” that certain military exports could be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of international humanitarian law in Gaza.
The affected equipment included components for military aircraft, drones, naval systems, and targeting gear.
Doughty said additional measures adopted this month established what he termed a “double safeguard” mechanism within the approvals process.
Export applications must now be assessed both against existing international humanitarian law criteria and in light of Britain’s position on the legality of Israel’s presence in the Palestinian territories.
“We have so far suspended or refused more than 80 licences,” Doughty said, adding that he had personally examined each licence.
Despite the wider restrictions, British-origin parts entering the international F-35 fighter jet supply chain continue to be largely exempt.
The UK government argues that preventing British-made components from entering the global F-35 pool could undermine the programme as a whole and have serious consequences for the security of the UK and its allies.
Direct exports of F-35 parts intended specifically for Israel remain suspended.
Doughty defended maintaining the supply of components via the international programme, arguing that halting it could have severe ramifications for the broader European and allied security architecture.
Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Emily Thornberry challenged this position, arguing that the issue was political rather than purely legal.
Thornberry suggested adopting an approach similar to the Dutch model, under which components entering the international supply chain could be flagged as “not intended for aircraft bound for Israel”.
The initial suspension was implemented in September 2024 by then Foreign Secretary David Lammy.
Lammy stressed at the time that the measure did not constitute an arms embargo and applied solely to items assessed as usable in military operations in Gaza.
Since then, the policy has been tightened further under Prime Minister Andy Burnham.
The expanded export restrictions follow the Burnham government’s adoption of a more confrontational policy toward the Israeli government.
Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband drew sustained applause at the Labour Party’s annual conference in Liverpool after delivering a sharp critique of the Netanyahu government’s policies and defending the decision to ban trade with Israeli settlements in the West Bank.
Accusing Israel of committing war crimes in Gaza, Miliband stated that the British government heard public outrage over the conflict, telling delegates: “We hear you. You were right.”
Middle East
Netanyahu holds secret UAE talks with Saudi Arabia and Arab officials
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with representatives of Gulf and Arab nations that lack diplomatic ties with Israel, including Saudi Arabia, during his weekend visit to the United Arab Emirates.
Sources close to the gathering told the Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth on Monday that representatives from Morocco, Libya, Jordan, and Qatar also took part in the meeting.
Netanyahu made a unannounced visit to Abu Dhabi on Sunday, where he met with the country’s leader, Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan.
According to Israeli media, this marked the first time the United Arab Emirates officially confirmed a visit by Netanyahu.
The meeting was arranged by Mossad Director Roman Goffman “at the request of Saudi Arabia, which asked for Israel’s assistance against Houthi attacks in the Red Sea region,” according to Yedioth Ahronoth.
The discussions addressed Iran and the Houthi militia. The newspaper added that the Arab states heard from Israel that “Israel is prepared to assist countries in the region with air defence systems, just as it aided the UAE during the conflict with Iran.”
Conflict in Yemen intensified in September when Ansarullah militiamen launched a rapid offensive that seized Yemen’s entire Red Sea coastline, including the vital maritime corridor of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait.
The Yemeni resistance also imposed a blockade on Saudi Arabia’s energy exports and staged multiple attacks against the kingdom.
Saudi Arabia reportedly sought military assistance from the US to counter Ansarullah.
Washington declined to attack the Houthis directly, but announced that it would provide intelligence and targeting support.
Reporting on the same visit, The Jerusalem Post said Netanyahu spent six hours in the UAE and that the principal subject of his discussions with MBZ was Iran.
Citing sources familiar with the matter, the newspaper added that the trip came “after Netanyahu exerted heavy pressure on the United Arab Emirates to arrange a meeting ahead of the Israeli elections on 27 October.”
Separately, the Associated Press, citing a person with direct knowledge of the meeting, reported that Netanyahu’s visit to the UAE was arranged in part to ask MBZ to deny reports that he had warned the Israeli prime minister of an impending Hamas threat prior to 7 October 2023.
According to Israeli media, Netanyahu’s office denied the AP report, issuing the following statement:
“Fake news. The visit focused solely on strengthening ties between the two countries and on regional issues.”
-
Europe5 days agoEuropean unions urge governments to scrap all Palantir deals
-
Diplomacy5 days agoEast-West Forum in Istanbul highlights irreversible shift to multipolarity
-
Europe1 week agoEmmanuel Todd says West faces collapse amid Ukraine and Iran crises
-
Europe1 week agoEuropean intelligence chiefs divide over risk of Russian attack
-
Diplomacy1 week agoEast-West Forum in Istanbul to debate multipolarity and global order
-
Middle East1 week agoSharaa says 7 October must not shape Israel policy on Syria
-
America1 week agoRepublican support for Trump’s war with Iran drops sharply in polls
-
Middle East1 week agoPalestinian factions confront legitimacy crisis at Istanbul talks
