Middle East
Pakistan: Helpless nation in crisis
Pakistan is going through its worst historical point due to violent clashes and enormous confrontation between Imran Khan, the former Prime Minister of Pakistan and the country’s army general Asim Munir. The two sides are brazen out over the principle of governing the nuclear-country with a population of over 240 million.
The rift has come when Pakistan is on the verge of its economic collapse as well. Politically nothing is stable, but even socially and the rule of law is also fragile in the country. The society is so tense that even the army doesn’t let the people talk openly and in the last four days, beside men, several women were also arrested and beaten.
Economic inflation in Pakistan is unprecedentedly recorded and the value of the rupee has dropped significantly plus the unemployment has risen to its worst. It is worth mentioning that political fragmentation of Pakistan’s national sovereignty is threatened.
Pakistan is not trapped in a crisis in just recent years. The country has been in political crisis since its inception in 1947, where no Prime Minister had completed its five years term in office. All of them were either removed by the army or forced to resign and in some cases were targeted. But the current successive security, economic and political crises have put Pakistan into a doldrums, where the army for the first time failed in its attempt to put a leader behind bars. Munir’s men in uniform arrested Khan but that didn’t last. Khan’s supporters took to the streets across Pakistan and went violent in such a way that forced the Pakistan army to step back.
Khan’s arrest on 9th of May from inside Islamabad High Court sparked anger of the supporters who attacked the army headquarters in Rawalpindi and the houses of several army generals. These places are called as the most prestigious institutions of the country which are considered as the guardians of Pakistan’s territory against foreign enemies.
However, the workers of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf Party (PTI) and tens of thousands of Khan’s supporters did not pay any attention to these places as their intention was only to get Khan out of jail. Finally Islamabad High Court on Friday granted Khan protective bail for two weeks and protection from arrest on any other charges he faces.
Khan may be re-arrested
The government of Pakistan under Shahbz Sharif’s rule has apparently been forced to release Khan through a court decision to quell pressure by violent demonstrations of Imran Khan’s supporters. Indeed, Khan has now become one of the most famous political leaders of Pakistan.
Before being released, Khan in a video message inside the court said that he was kept there for three hours. Khan said he has been abducted and accused the army of making security an issue for his release.
Khan was arrested in connection with a case of alleged land fraud, where the court called it “invalid” and “unlawful”.
Finally Khan was free and headed toward his residency in Lahore city. His supporters lined the streets to welcome him. Khan appeared in a YouTube channel, but his speech was not aired in any Pakistani media or major tv channels.
A member of his party said that Imran Khan could be rearrested anytime as he doubts the army’s intention. Zulfiqar Bukhari, a senior figure in Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf party (PTI), said: “He is [expecting it], look, he has to appear in court again, I believe, on Monday.
“Are we going to be facing a similar sort of fiasco? I believe we are,” Bukhari told the nationalnews.
Bukhari, who is Khan’s special assistant during his time as prime minister, warned of a further deterioration in law and order in Pakistan, which is enduring the worst economic crisis in its history.
“He only has bail in this case for two weeks and then will we see the same kind of fiasco again? Yes,” he said.
Meanwhile, the country’s Interior Minister Rana Sanaullah said that Khan might be arrested after Wednesday. “If there is a reason for his arrest, then he will be arrested,” Sanaullah told Geo News, a Pakistani news channel.
Khan’s supporters allegedly torched government buildings
Khan’s supporters immediately took to the streets when Pakistani forces arrested him. After days of violent protest and unrest, the government of Pakistan accused Khan’s supporters of allegedly torching or destroying government buildings and the residences of army officials in several cities, including at the army forces headquarters in Rawalpindi.
However, Khan has dismissed the claims that his supporters were responsible for the violence, and said that his supporters and workers have remained peaceful in the last 27 years of the group’s political activities.

Supporters of Imran Khan clash with police outside the former prime minister’s residence in Lahore. (EPA-EFE)
“I want an independent and complete investigation on the burning of state buildings and firing at unarmed youth protesters. I want the chief justice of Pakistan to make a panel under him for this,” Khan said.
“Violence was incited by certain elements who were not PTI members,” Bukhari told the nationalnews. Bukari said that at least 47 people had been killed in a widespread crackdown on the PTI and its supporters.
“The majority of them, at point-blank, had bullets shot at them by the armed forces in their various forms,” Bukhari said. “We have about 300 people in prison and we have most of our top-tier leadership in prison as well so we mustn’t forget that. We’ve got many people injured, of course, in hospitals,” according to Bukari. However, police and hospital confirmed the death of nine people.
Khan slams Pakistan army for jumping into politics
Mr. Khan strongly criticized the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) and called on the army to stay away from politics. Rejecting allegations against him, he said the spokesperson of the army’s military wing was not even born when he represented Pakistan in the world.
“I kept Pakistan’s flag high all over the world. Never has ISPR made such a statement. You should be ashamed of yourself. You have jumped into politics. Why don’t you make a political party,” Khan said.
Khan’s remarks came in response to ISPR Director-General Major General Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry’s statement in which he called Khan a “hypocrite”.
“Listen to me Mr. DG ISPR you were not even born when I was representing my country in the world and earning a good name for it. You need to be ashamed of yourself for calling me a hypocrite and anti-Army,” he said in a harsh rejoinder. Khan, 70, also tore into Pakistan’s Army chief General Asim Munir and blamed him for his “abduction” after a court set him free.
These accusations are not unprecedented in the political history of Pakistan, but what is unprecedented is Khan’s claim against the army generals, especially General Asim Munir, the army chief. In the last several decades, no politician had ever delivered a single word against the army chief, especially in public. Khan is the first man who is directly accusing the army chief. Khan also openly named a senior ISI general and accused him of planning to kill him. Khan survived an assassination attempt in November last year, but he received several bullets in his leg and he says that this attack was the work of ISI.
Middle East
US waives human rights terms on $320m military aid to Egypt
The US State Department stated that it has waived human rights conditions on more than $300 million in military aid to Egypt.
The statement emphasised that this decision was taken in consideration of Cairo’s “helpful role” since the outbreak of the war against Iran.
Egypt began receiving substantial support from the US after signing a peace treaty with Israel in 1979.
Since the late 1980s, the country has received approximately $1.3 billion annually in US military assistance.
A portion of this aid is subject to conditions related to human rights and democracy, which can be waived on national security grounds.
Withholding funds, including during the administration of former US President Joe Biden, has caused tension between Cairo and Washington in the past.
A letter dated 21 September and addressed to various congressional committees, obtained by Reuters, stated that Secretary of State Marco Rubio “decided to waive the certification requirement under the fiscal year 2025 Foreign Military Financing programme for Egypt of $320 million.”
This waiver was subsequently confirmed by the State Department.
An accompanying memorandum justifying the decision stated that this portion of military aid was “essential for counterterrorism, border security, or non-proliferation programmes, or otherwise important to the national security interests of the United States.”
The memorandum, dated 4 September and bearing Rubio’s signature, stated: “Exercising this waiver authority is critical to the US-Egypt relationship and to US national security priorities, particularly given the helpful role Egypt has played in the aftermath of Operation Epic Fury.”
“Operation Epic Fury” is the designation used by the US military for the campaign launched jointly with Israel against Iran in late February.
The State Department memorandum, whose authenticity was confirmed by two sources in Washington familiar with the letter, did not provide detailed information regarding what was termed Egypt’s “helpful role”.
The State Department’s annual decision on military aid to Egypt typically covers funds allocated for the preceding fiscal year, which ends on 30 September.
A State Department spokesperson stated that Rubio waived the certification in the interest of US national security and that the US continues to cooperate with the Egyptian government across a range of issues.
In an emailed statement, the spokesperson said: “This waiver recognizes the importance of maintaining security cooperation with Egypt at a time of significant security challenges in the region.”
The Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not immediately comment on the matter.
The spillover effects of the Iran war have imposed a heavy toll on US security partners, including Egypt.
Owing to rising fuel prices and other disruptions, the Egyptian economy is passing through a difficult period.
Under the Biden administration, the US withheld portions of the annual military allocation on multiple occasions over Egypt’s human rights record.
In 2024, following the Hamas-led 7 October attack on Israel and the subsequent war in Gaza, the Biden administration set aside human rights conditions, disbursing the entire $1.3 billion allocation to Egypt for the first time in its tenure.
Human rights organisations have long accused Egypt, under the administration of President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, of widespread human rights abuses, including torture and enforced disappearances.
This week, Egyptian police detained six journalists from a fact-checking and investigative media outlet, accusing them of spreading false information on behalf of the banned Muslim Brotherhood.
Egyptian authorities state that they have taken steps to address human rights issues. Sisi said stability is paramount and that the government supports human rights by working to provide for basic needs.
Middle East
Britain expands curbs on arms exports to Israel over Gaza risks
Britain has significantly broadened its military export restrictions targeting Israel, suspending or rejecting more than 80 licences for items the IDF could use in Gaza.
This figure is nearly triple the number affected when the policy was first introduced in September 2024.
United Kingdom Minister of State for the Middle East Stephen Doughty said that as part of what he described as a “tighter system” for assessing exports to Israel, more than 50 further export applications have been refused since approximately 30 licences were initially suspended.
Under the initial decision taken in September 2024, 30 of roughly 350 licences were suspended after the British government concluded there was a “clear risk” that certain military exports could be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of international humanitarian law in Gaza.
The affected equipment included components for military aircraft, drones, naval systems, and targeting gear.
Doughty said additional measures adopted this month established what he termed a “double safeguard” mechanism within the approvals process.
Export applications must now be assessed both against existing international humanitarian law criteria and in light of Britain’s position on the legality of Israel’s presence in the Palestinian territories.
“We have so far suspended or refused more than 80 licences,” Doughty said, adding that he had personally examined each licence.
Despite the wider restrictions, British-origin parts entering the international F-35 fighter jet supply chain continue to be largely exempt.
The UK government argues that preventing British-made components from entering the global F-35 pool could undermine the programme as a whole and have serious consequences for the security of the UK and its allies.
Direct exports of F-35 parts intended specifically for Israel remain suspended.
Doughty defended maintaining the supply of components via the international programme, arguing that halting it could have severe ramifications for the broader European and allied security architecture.
Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Emily Thornberry challenged this position, arguing that the issue was political rather than purely legal.
Thornberry suggested adopting an approach similar to the Dutch model, under which components entering the international supply chain could be flagged as “not intended for aircraft bound for Israel”.
The initial suspension was implemented in September 2024 by then Foreign Secretary David Lammy.
Lammy stressed at the time that the measure did not constitute an arms embargo and applied solely to items assessed as usable in military operations in Gaza.
Since then, the policy has been tightened further under Prime Minister Andy Burnham.
The expanded export restrictions follow the Burnham government’s adoption of a more confrontational policy toward the Israeli government.
Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband drew sustained applause at the Labour Party’s annual conference in Liverpool after delivering a sharp critique of the Netanyahu government’s policies and defending the decision to ban trade with Israeli settlements in the West Bank.
Accusing Israel of committing war crimes in Gaza, Miliband stated that the British government heard public outrage over the conflict, telling delegates: “We hear you. You were right.”
Middle East
Netanyahu holds secret UAE talks with Saudi Arabia and Arab officials
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with representatives of Gulf and Arab nations that lack diplomatic ties with Israel, including Saudi Arabia, during his weekend visit to the United Arab Emirates.
Sources close to the gathering told the Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth on Monday that representatives from Morocco, Libya, Jordan, and Qatar also took part in the meeting.
Netanyahu made a unannounced visit to Abu Dhabi on Sunday, where he met with the country’s leader, Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan.
According to Israeli media, this marked the first time the United Arab Emirates officially confirmed a visit by Netanyahu.
The meeting was arranged by Mossad Director Roman Goffman “at the request of Saudi Arabia, which asked for Israel’s assistance against Houthi attacks in the Red Sea region,” according to Yedioth Ahronoth.
The discussions addressed Iran and the Houthi militia. The newspaper added that the Arab states heard from Israel that “Israel is prepared to assist countries in the region with air defence systems, just as it aided the UAE during the conflict with Iran.”
Conflict in Yemen intensified in September when Ansarullah militiamen launched a rapid offensive that seized Yemen’s entire Red Sea coastline, including the vital maritime corridor of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait.
The Yemeni resistance also imposed a blockade on Saudi Arabia’s energy exports and staged multiple attacks against the kingdom.
Saudi Arabia reportedly sought military assistance from the US to counter Ansarullah.
Washington declined to attack the Houthis directly, but announced that it would provide intelligence and targeting support.
Reporting on the same visit, The Jerusalem Post said Netanyahu spent six hours in the UAE and that the principal subject of his discussions with MBZ was Iran.
Citing sources familiar with the matter, the newspaper added that the trip came “after Netanyahu exerted heavy pressure on the United Arab Emirates to arrange a meeting ahead of the Israeli elections on 27 October.”
Separately, the Associated Press, citing a person with direct knowledge of the meeting, reported that Netanyahu’s visit to the UAE was arranged in part to ask MBZ to deny reports that he had warned the Israeli prime minister of an impending Hamas threat prior to 7 October 2023.
According to Israeli media, Netanyahu’s office denied the AP report, issuing the following statement:
“Fake news. The visit focused solely on strengthening ties between the two countries and on regional issues.”
-
Europe5 days agoEuropean unions urge governments to scrap all Palantir deals
-
Diplomacy5 days agoEast-West Forum in Istanbul highlights irreversible shift to multipolarity
-
Europe1 week agoEmmanuel Todd says West faces collapse amid Ukraine and Iran crises
-
Europe1 week agoEuropean intelligence chiefs divide over risk of Russian attack
-
Diplomacy1 week agoEast-West Forum in Istanbul to debate multipolarity and global order
-
Middle East1 week agoSharaa says 7 October must not shape Israel policy on Syria
-
America1 week agoRepublican support for Trump’s war with Iran drops sharply in polls
-
Middle East1 week agoPalestinian factions confront legitimacy crisis at Istanbul talks
