Connect with us

AMERICA

Quo Vadis World Economy-II: Uneven blows of inflation and slowing operations

Published

on

US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen first paid homage to a slave memorial in Senegal, then spoke to farmers in a remote village in Zambia, and eventually visited a job retraining facility in South Africa’s coal region on tour to convince the locals of the good intentions of her country.

“We’ve seen inflation come down substantially,” Yellen said about the American economy in South Africa, although “there can be hiccups” and she “wouldn’t predict month-to-month-type changes.”

Despite her belief that rental prices substantially contribute to inflation, Yellen expects that it would come out over the next five or six months, and this cooldown would deaccelerate the price rise. She also said that goods prices have actually been falling, but service prices are rising more rapidly.

Considering the 2.9 percent growth in the fourth quarter is “solid,” Yellen emphasized that slower growth is desirable in this high-inflation environment.

Interim balance sheet in inflation

The New York Fed has published a study that explores which income groups are more affected by inflation. The findings show that inflation had varying effects on different groups in 2021 and 2022.

Middle-income households are hit worst by inflation in 2021. Those with an annual earning between $50,000 and $150,000 are considered middle-incomed.

This income group was most suffered from the rocketed prices of used cars and motor fuel. The lower-income group is more likely to rely on public transportation, while the wealthy are more likely to purchase brand-new cars, and their spendings on gas constitute a much less portion of their income. These made middle-income households the main target of inflation. This outcome is partially attributable to differences in consumption patterns between the well-off and the poor, between peasants and urbanites.

Fuel and used car costs have fallen in recent months. Meanwhile, the rising rental and goods prices are hurting. Inflation now primarily affects the lower-income population since these two are among the necessary expenditures.

For this reason, the poorest 40 percent of the population bears an extra 0.3% inflation.

For example, rural residents experienced 2 percent higher inflation than the national average in the year leading up to February 2022. The same regions are now living below-average inflation.

In early 2022, black and Hispanic households experienced a 1 percent extra inflation rate than white households. As it turns out, the inflation for non-college-educated people is also more severe. These groups are shown to be getting closer to the average inflation rate.

Food and rental prices rise faster than the inflation average (10.6 percent, 7.9 percent, and 7.1 percent, respectively). Therefore, what Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman argued in New York Times last November, “inflation does not hurt the poor disproportionately,” is not true. Krugman bases his argument on the fact that the proportion of pay increases for low-income employees is higher than that for high-wage ones.

The poorest quarter of Americans spends more than half of their income on housing, food, and healthcare, according to statistics from the Bureau of Labor Statistics in the United States. The high-income group disposes of a far more significant percentage of their money to dining out, self-entertainment, vacation, and brand-new and used cars than the low-income group.

Prices of basic needs have risen more rapidly than non-essential goods, as the general and historical tendency suggests.

Decline in consumer spending

It is generally agreed that falling consumer spending is a significant contributor to the recent decline in the inflation rate.

According to statistics released last week, consumer demand fell in December by 0.2% compared to the previous month. This rate rises to 0.3% after adjusting for inflation.

Although December is the Christmas season, consumer demand fell by 1.1% from November, according to data on retail sales.

Perhaps one of the most important indicators of the decline in American consumption is the considerable drop in the trade deficit in November. This month’s greatest monthly loss in a 14-year period highlighted falling consumer demand and increased importing-associated financing costs.

The US trade deficit narrowed by 21% in November, falling to $61.5 billion. While overall imports dropped by 6.4%, imports of products decreased by 7.5%. In November, exports fell 2% as well.

While the dollar’s relative strength lowers the worldwide competitiveness of American manufactured products, the high-interest rate policy of the FED has an impact on reducing demand.

Another issue is that households whose savings seemed to grow thanks to the state’s monetary subsidies during the pandemic are being enticed back to levels in 2005.

Furthermore, consumer loaning is getting dangerously close to its limits. In the third quarter of 2022, payments for credit cards, vehicles, and student loans have peaked since 2008.

Manufacturing industry is alarming

More importantly, a possible “factory recession” in the manufacturing sector in the United States may be the direst of these developments.

A Wall Street Journal survey predicted a 0.1 percent decline in industrial output in December 2022 before the numbers were released. The official statistics revealed a shrinkage of 0.7%, failing all expectations.

Capacity utilization was anticipated at 79.6 percent. The numbers showed a decline, down 78.8 percent compared to November.

Manufacturing continued the downward slide. The manufacturing sector lost another 1.3% in December after shrinking by 1.1% in November.

The industry experienced a 1.8% drop in new orders in November.

The increase in capital expenditures (equipment, buildings, intellectual property) was a modest 0.7 percent. In the third quarter, these rates were 6.3%. Therefore, it stands to reason that investment has slowed down as well.

It is often believed that the manufacturing sector of the American economy is the most vulnerable to a recession. In Q2, a technical recession is likely to occur, but economists expect it to be ‘mild.’

Teeny-weeny recessions

The overall tendency of recent estimates for the American economy is the assumption of a modest recession.

The US economy will be cooled down by the FED’s decision to keep raising interest rates at a slower pace, increasing loaning costs and declining consumer demand.

However, even the “pessimistic” FED believed there was a light at the end of the tunnel. Almost everyone anticipates a quarter-point increase in interest rates at this week’s meeting. A ‘soft landing’ is possible for the American economy, FED Governor Christopher Waller noted in his ‘Cautious Optimism’ address.

In the Bloomberg survey, economists predicted GDP would begin to decline in the second quarter, albeit a modest drop.

On the other hand, the technical definition of a recession is a decline in economic activity that lasts for two consecutive quarters in many countries. However, as Bloomberg points out, this is not the situation in the United States. In private meetings, ‘elite’ scholars of the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), a “non-profit” institution, are responsible for making the “official” declaration of a recession in the United States. Their deliberations often take place for a full year. The common definition of a recession is that the consensus essentially drives Wall Street that a recession is being experienced.

Is the labor market ‘tight’?

All US officials and corporate economists agree that the labor market is ‘tight.’

Unemployment rates are at historic lows, while corporations continue hiring despite the massive layoffs at tech giants.

However, the dismissals by major corporations do not directly indicate that the economy is currently in recession. Since many businesses anticipate a slowdown in 2023, they may now be adopting preventative measures to reduce labor expenses.

As a matter of fact, the formerly ‘tight’ labor market began showing signs of relaxation in December. The ever-increasing new employment after the pandemic has started to cool down. Companies created two hundred thirty thousand new positions in December. Compared to the previous two years, this is the lowest increase.

New jobs opened in 2022 were 4.5 million, clearly lower than the 6.7 million expected in 2021.

The figures may seem optimistic, but more nuanced data is concealed beneath them. The labor force participation rate, which measures the percentage of adults in the United States who are either employed or actively seeking jobs, increased to 62.3% in December; nonetheless, this is still lower than the pre-pandemic levels.

In addition, the average weekly working hours have been falling in the last two years, and in December, it marked 34.3 hours.

Employment with temporary aid services has dropped by 110.000 in the previous five months. Coupled with the data shown above, it means that employers are abandoning temporary aid programs and cutting down on employee hours in response to falling demand from customers.

Wage growth slows down

Several experts, like American Center Vice President Lael Brainard, have pointed out that low-income workers have had less wage increases than high-income workers. It is evident that employees in non-administrative positions have witnessed a lesser salary gain.

However, we have already covered above that the basic expenses of low-wage workers are concentrated in a few key areas and that inflation in these areas is greater than in others. To all this, additional details, including: Prices increased by 14% from early 2021 to late 2022, but low-income employees saw a rise of just 11.5% in their average annual salary.

Similarly, the pace of salary increase has slowed. The average hourly pay in the United States rose 4.6% in December over the previous year. It should be emphasized that inflation in the same period was 7.1 percent.

Despite all this, it is worth noting that consumer optimism is rising in OECD countries. The industrial sector, which was projected to be impacted severely by the rise in energy costs, was spared from collapsing by the mild winter, especially in Europe. In the following article, our focus will be on Europe.

AMERICA

Biden plans to write off Ukraine’s $4.6bn debt ahead of Trump

Published

on

President Joe Biden’s administration has officially notified Congress of its intention to forgive Ukraine’s $4.65 billion debt, a move tied to ongoing efforts to support the country amid its conflict with Russia.

This debt represents half of the $9 billion provided to Kyiv as part of the $61 billion aid package approved by Washington in April. Unlike other forms of assistance, this funding was issued as conditionally repayable loans, with provisions allowing the United States President to cancel up to 50% of the debt if deemed necessary.

In a statement, the U.S. State Department explained that the debt cancellation is intended to “help Ukraine win” and serves the national interests of the U.S., the EU, G7+, and NATO.”

According to Bloomberg, President Biden is determined to maximize aid to Ukraine before President-elect Donald Trump assumes office. However, the decision to write off the debt has drawn sharp criticism from Republicans.

Republican Senator Rand Paul argued that the Biden administration’s decision places undue financial burden on the American public. He pledged to demand a vote in the Senate to challenge the proposal.

Despite this, Bloomberg notes that any effort to overturn the debt cancellation would require approval from both houses of Congress, a scenario that appears unlikely given the Democratic majority in the Senate. Furthermore, President Biden holds veto power, making reversal of the decision even more challenging.

Earlier, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken announced plans to exhaust all remaining aid approved by Congress before President Trump’s inauguration on January 20.

National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan emphasized that one of the administration’s key goals is to position Ukraine as strongly as possible—both militarily and at the negotiating table.

Pentagon officials reported that $9.3 billion in military aid is currently in the pipeline. Pentagon spokeswoman Sabrina Singh confirmed plans for weekly arms deliveries to Kyiv, with the aim of expediting aid distribution before the presidential transition.

On November 20, the Pentagon unveiled an additional $275 million military aid package for Ukraine, further underscoring the administration’s commitment to strengthening Ukraine’s defense capabilities.

Continue Reading

AMERICA

Donald Trump taps Howard Lutnick to lead Commerce Department

Published

on

Donald Trump has announced his intention to nominate Wall Street investor and campaign donor Howard Lutnick as the new head of the U.S. Department of Commerce, placing the billionaire at the forefront of implementing the sweeping tariffs promised during his presidential campaign.

Lutnick, who co-chaired Trump’s transition team, had previously been considered for the role of Treasury Secretary. He is also the CEO of Cantor Fitzgerald, a prominent investment firm.

In a statement on Tuesday, Trump declared that Lutnick would be “directly responsible” for leading the Commerce Department and overseeing the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR).

The USTR, established in 1974 to manage negotiations with U.S. trading partners, traditionally reports directly to the president. If confirmed by the Senate, the 63-year-old Lutnick will play a pivotal role in aiding U.S. businesses and executing Trump’s proposed tariffs on international trade partners.

Trump has outlined plans for a 60% tariff on imports from China and a global tariff of up to 20%, signaling a major shift in U.S. trade policy.

Lutnick, despite lacking prior government experience, has been a steadfast advocate for Trump’s economic agenda. During a New York campaign rally, Lutnick remarked, “When was America great? At the turn of the century, our economy was floundering! That was 125 years ago. We had no income tax and all we had were tariffs.”

While Lutnick has emerged as a major donor to Trump, he has also supported establishment Democrats and Republicans in the past, including Chuck Schumer and Jeb Bush. He contributed to both Hillary Clinton’s 2008 and 2016 campaigns, hosting a fundraiser for her in 2015. Lutnick maintains a personal friendship with the Clintons, noting their attendance at a Cantor Fitzgerald fundraiser in September 2022.

Lutnick has also maintained a long-standing relationship with Trump, even appearing on The Celebrity Apprentice in 2008. He disclosed to the Financial Times in October that he has donated over $10 million to Trump’s 2024 campaign and another $500,000 to the transition team, totaling approximately $75 million.

Treasury Secretary selection process still uncertain

The position of Treasury Secretary, one of the most significant roles in Trump’s administration, remains undecided. Lutnick’s name has been floated for the role, though he faces competition from hedge fund manager Scott Bessent, private equity billionaire Marc Rowan, and former Federal Reserve governor Kevin Warsh.

Marc Rowan, the CEO of Apollo Global Management, has emerged as a leading contender and is expected to meet with Trump to present his case. Rowan’s supporters cite his extensive expertise in financial markets, though competition remains fierce.

Forecasting site Polymarket currently lists Warsh as the favorite for Treasury Secretary, followed by Bessent, Rowan, and William Hagerty. If unsuccessful in his bid for Treasury Secretary, Bessent is reportedly vying for the chairmanship of the National Economic Council.

Trump names Mehmet Oz to run Medicare and Medicaid

Trump also announced on Tuesday his nomination of Dr. Mehmet Oz to lead the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Describing Oz as “one of the most talented physicians” capable of “making America healthy again,” Trump expressed confidence in Oz’s ability to reduce waste and fraud within the nation’s largest government agency.

Dr. Oz, a former heart surgeon and Columbia University professor, rose to prominence as Oprah Winfrey’s health expert before hosting his own popular talk show. However, his career has been controversial, with critics accusing him of promoting scientifically dubious theories and unproven treatments.

Oz’s political experience includes a 2022 Senate race in Pennsylvania, where he was endorsed by Trump but ultimately lost to Democrat John Fetterman.

Continue Reading

AMERICA

U.S. may start its plan to separate Google from Chrome

Published

on

The Department of Justice (DOJ) may move forward with plans to force the sale of Google’s Chrome web browser as part of its ongoing antitrust case against Alphabet (Google).

According to sources familiar with the case, the department intends to ask the judge—who ruled in August that Google illegally monopolized the search market—to address concerns related to artificial intelligence (AI) and the Android smartphone operating system. This information was reported by Bloomberg.

Antitrust officials, along with participating state attorneys, are expected to recommend that federal Judge Amit Mehta impose data licensing requirements on Google. These officials have indicated that Chrome, the world’s most widely used browser, is a critical gateway for many users accessing Google Search. For this reason, they are urging the judge to mandate the sale of Chrome.

Officials stated that a Chrome sale could be considered later if other settlement measures fail to foster a more competitive market. Currently, Google Chrome commands a dominant 61% share of the U.S. browser market, according to StatCounter, a web traffic analysis service.

Over the past three months, state attorneys interviewed numerous companies to prepare their recommendations. Officials noted that some recommendations are still under review, and details may evolve before submission.

While a proposal to force Google to sell its Android platform was considered, officials have since stepped back from this more aggressive option.

If Judge Mehta adopts these recommendations, the ruling could significantly reshape the online search market and influence the emerging artificial intelligence industry.

The case, originally filed during the Trump administration and continued under President Joe Biden, represents one of the most aggressive efforts to regulate a major tech company in decades. The last comparable attempt was Washington’s unsuccessful bid to break up Microsoft in the early 2000s.

Chrome plays a crucial role in Google’s advertising business by providing user data that enhances ad targeting, a primary revenue source. Additionally, Google has been leveraging Chrome to promote Gemini, its new AI bot. Gemini has the potential to evolve from a simple answer bot to a comprehensive assistant, supporting users across the web.

Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Mandeep Singh estimates that Chrome could be worth $15–20 billion if sold, considering its more than 3 billion monthly active users. However, Bob O’Donnell of TECHnalysis Research notes that Chrome’s value depends on its integration with other services, stating: “It’s not directly monetizable. It acts as a gateway to other things. Monetization would depend on how buyers link Chrome to their services.”

Google has strongly opposed the DOJ’s recommendations. Lee-Anne Mulholland, Google’s vice president of regulatory affairs, criticized the move as government overreach, arguing: “This agenda goes far beyond the legal issues in this case and will harm consumers, developers, and American technological leadership at a critical time.”

Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt echoed this sentiment in an interview with CNBC. He emphasized the value of Chrome in enhancing the Google ecosystem, stating: “Singling out these companies won’t fundamentally solve the broader issues.”

In a blog post, Google warned that under new ownership, Chrome might no longer remain free or receive the same level of investment, potentially leading to a shift in its business model.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey