Connect with us

MIDDLE EAST

‘Resistance has crossed the borders of Jenin and Nablus’

Published

on

The Israeli army raid on the Jenin Refugee Camp, in which 10 Palestinians were killed, and two attacks on Israelis in occupied East Jerusalem immediately afterwards have raised tensions in the region. Palestinians blame Israeli government’s policies for the escalating violence.

Even before Benjamin Netanyahu’s coalition government with far-right parties has completed its first month in power, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem has intensified again. On the morning of Thursday, January 26, the Israeli military, and other security units conducted a large-scale raid in the Jenin Refugee Camp in the northern West Bank, claiming that “Islamic Jihad militants preparing for an attack were hiding in a house.” In the raid, 10 Palestinians, including an elderly woman and a child, were killed and about 20 wounded. The raid in Jenin was described by Israeli media and residents as “the bloodiest and most violent raid” of the past 15 years. Following the raid in Jenin, clashes broke out across the West Bank and East Jerusalem. Another Palestinian was killed in a fire opened by the Israeli army.

With the recent escalating wave of violence, 35 Palestinians, including women and children, have been killed since the beginning of the year as a result of Israeli security forces or Jewish settlers’ gunfire. These data show that after the United Nations described 2022 as the “bloodiest period of the last 16 years” in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, the deaths in the region did not slow down this year either.

Khaled al-Yamani, one of the leaders of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine in Lebanon, says that the main objective of these bloody Israeli attacks is to suppress the resistance groups and prevent their spread: “The previous Israeli government’s ‘Breakwater’ operation was aimed at suppressing the resistance groups, particularly ‘Arin al-Usud’ in Nablus and the Jenin Brigade. However, despite the crimes committed by the Israeli army, such as the assassination of the resistance leaders, they failed.”

Khaled Yamani

Two separate attacks in 24 hours

On the other hand, two attacks against Israelis took place within 24 hours in occupied East Jerusalem following the Israeli army’s Jenin raid. On the evening of January 27, a Palestinian teenager carried out an armed attack on an illegal Jewish settlement, killing 7 Israelis. Israeli police say they killed the attacker after a car chase. Less than 24 hours after the attack, a 13-year-old Palestinian shot and wounded two Israelis in Silwan neighborhood near the Old City of East Jerusalem. One of the Israelis, whom the Palestinian child shot at, wounded the boy with an automatic weapon and neutralized him. After the attacks on the Israelis, Jewish settler violence erupted in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem. There were dozens of incidents on Saturday and Sunday evenings where Jewish settlers attacked Palestinians, threw stones at their homes and vehicles, and set them on fire.

‘Resistance groups carried out 1,922 operations.’

Yamani believes that the Palestinian counter-“actions” are not surprising given the existence of the racist and extremist Israeli government that commits all kinds of crimes against the Palestinian people, and the display of strength by Israeli army leaders who try to show their courage over the Palestinian people: “The rise of resistance in the West Bank is a result of the policies of the Israeli government. This is due to the intensification of military operations and the resumption of assassinations of resistance fighters in the West Bank.”

According to Yamani, despite all the measures taken by the occupation forces, the Palestinian resistance has spread to all major cities in the West Bank: “The strength and military capabilities of the resistance groups have increased further. These groups, which were initially established with a defensive focus, have now shifted their position to offense. They have reached the capacity to conduct operations against Israeli military outposts, checkpoints, and settlers. In 2022, more than 1,922 operations were carried out against the occupation, resulting in the deaths of 29 Israeli soldiers and settlers and 121 wounded.

Netanyahu’s steps to escalate tensions

Following the attacks on Israelis, the Israeli government, which includes far-right extremists known for their “hawkish” policies against Palestinians and support for fanatical Jewish settlers, has begun to take steps to further escalate tensions. The Israeli parliament has approved a bill that would deport and denaturalize “people arrested for national security offences” if they were found to be receiving money from the Palestinian Authority. The bill, which was approved by a majority of votes, was sent to the Joint Committee on Internal Affairs and the House Committee for review and preparation for the second and third round of voting. The bill provides for the revoke of citizenship or permanent residency of Palestinians in East Jerusalem for persons imprisoned for “committing an offense that violates trust in the State of Israel” if it is proven that they received funds from the Palestinian Authority. It also includes their subsequent deportation to Palestinian-controlled territories or the Gaza Strip. On the other hand, Netanyahu announced he would take steps to facilitate the arming of thousands of Israelis.

“Your blood is no more valuable”

Khaled al-Yamani believes that the activities of Palestinian resistance groups, especially in Jenin and Nablus, have shaken Israeli officials: “Despite all the security and military measures taken by the previous Israeli government, including ‘Breakwater’ operations aimed at blocking resistance and suppressing armed groups, it failed to break the resistance. The resistance has grown in all the cities and refugee camps in the West Bank, and armed resistance is no longer limited to Jenin and Nablus alone.”

Yamani says that all Palestinians agree that the only way to confront the “enemy” occupation policies is through resistance: “The more intense the resistance, the more difficult it is for the enemy army and settlers to commit crimes. The higher the price the enemy has to pay, the more likely they are to retreat. The recent operation in Nabu Yaqub in Jerusalem shows that the people of the West Bank remain committed to the culture of resistance. This operation sent a strong message to the enemy: “Your blood is no more valuable than the blood of our people.”

INTERVIEW

‘What we need from HTS is not to interfere in Lebanon’s internal affairs’

Published

on

Ziad Makary, Minister of Information of Lebanon spoke to Harici: “What we need from HTS is not to interfere in Lebanon’s internal problems or affairs.”

After two months of intense and destructive fighting, Israel and Lebanon have reached a ceasefire. Within 60 days, the ceasefire was to be implemented. According to the agreement, Israeli troops will withdraw from the designated areas, the Lebanese Army will deploy in the areas vacated by Israel and ensure security. A large-scale reconstruction work will be carried out due to mines, unexploded ordnance and destruction of infrastructure in the region. United Nations UNIFIL forces will maintain a presence in southern Lebanon in accordance with UN resolution 1701.

However, Israel has violated the ceasefire more than 100 times so far, which is considered unacceptable by Lebanon. Lebanese Information Minister Ziad Makary answered Dr Esra Karahindiba’s questions on the latest situation in Lebanon.

I would like to start with the latest situation in Lebanon. Even though there is a temporary ceasefire, Israel is not implementing what was promised. Can you tell us about the latest situations, and I’ll ask my other questions?

Well, as you know, we had a deadly war for about two months. As a government, we negotiated a ceasefire for long weeks, and in the end, with the help of the Americans, we reached an agreement to have a ceasefire and to implement it 60 days after the announcement.

In the meantime, there is a military plan: the Lebanese Army will start deploying where the Israelis will withdraw.

There is a lot of work to do. The army will handle this mission because there are many mines, unexploded munitions, destruction, closed roads, displaced people, and a sensitive military situation between Israel and Lebanon.

Israel has violated this ceasefire more than 100 times, and this is, of course, unacceptable. Lebanon is respecting the ceasefire, and we count on the committee formed when the ceasefire was announced.

I am talking about the Americans, French, Lebanese, UNIFIL, and Israelis. Their first meeting was held this week on Monday, and we hope this ceasefire will be implemented seriously as soon as possible because we have a lot to rebuild after the destruction we faced from Israel.

If Israel cancels the ceasefire and continues attacking Lebanon as it did recently, what is Lebanon’s current position? Hezbollah is stepping back from Syria. Maybe more of their troops will return to Lebanon. What about Lebanon’s own army?

I don’t think this ceasefire will be broken. We will have incidents daily, but I believe it will be a serious ceasefire.

I suppose we will have a complete withdrawal in about 40 days from all Lebanese territory. The Lebanese Army will deploy its forces, and we will apply 1701 as required, including southern Lebanon.

Of course, this especially applies to southern Lebanon because 1701 states that weapons are forbidden in southern Lebanon, and the only weapons will be with the Lebanese Army and UNIFIL.

What do you think about the latest situation in Syria? Now Bashar Assad has gone to Russia, and there is a so-called interim government trying to prepare for a transition period. Hezbollah is back. Iran is stepping back. There are no more Russian soldiers, and now a group called HTS is a candidate to shape Syria’s future. What will Lebanon’s position be toward Syria?

So far, we don’t have any relationship with HTS. What I would like to say is that the people of Syria must choose whoever will rule Syria.

What we want in Lebanon is to have good relations with the future government of Syria because we have many interests. We don’t need a fanatic government there.

We need a neighbor who respects Lebanon’s sovereignty and diversity. This is all what we need.

04:19 We will do everything to maintain the necessary relationships to continue ties between our countries as neighbors. We have a lot of interests in the economy, trade, social, political, and even border issues to resolve.

We have millions of Syrian refugees and many problems that need solving with whoever rules Syria. We don’t and should not interfere in Syria’s affairs and at the same time we will not let them interfere to us, too.

I hope and will work to ensure a decent and fruitful cooperation with the future Syrian government.

HTS is on the terrorist group list of the United Nations, and several countries have designated this group as terrorist. But in the near future, things may change. Turkey has appointed a charge daffairs for its embassy to continue diplomatic relations.

What will Lebanon’s position be? Do you consider HTS a terrorist group, or are things changing as they lead the country toward elections?

We don’t have a system of considering groups as terrorists or not. I already mentioned that we will assess the aims of Syria’s future government. What we need from HTS is not to interfere in Lebanon’s internal problems or affairs. Till now, as I told you, we are not the only country that cannot predict how the future of Syria will unfold.

The system theoretically should continue. We are continuing to deal with what we have—for instance, the embassy of Syria in Lebanon, the borders, and other matters. We are waiting for the new state, the new administration, and the new government to emerge, and we will proceed from there.

Will you run your diplomatic mission in Damascus?

Currently, it is not active due to everything that has happened. We will wait, but we hope to have good relations with whatever government emerges because it is in both countries’ interests. After Assad’s departure, Israel has invaded more of the Golan Heights. What is Israel’s position in the region? Many believe their presence may not be temporary.

For Lebanon, it is essential that Israel withdraws from the territory it has conquered. As you said, Israel is not only in the Golan Heights or southern Syria but has also destroyed Syria’s army, air and naval forces, and everything.

This puts Syria in a difficult position. We don’t know what kind of army or security forces the new Syrian government will have or how they will deal with Israel. Everything is unclear now. It’s been just five or six days since all this happened, and we need time to see how things settle down.

One question about Lebanon’s internal politics. After the port blast, you had difficult times with economic problems, and the presidential issue is still ongoing. How did it affect the current situation?

The system in Lebanon is not designed to facilitate such processes. It’s a complex system involving parliament, religion, political groups, and more, making electing a president challenging. It is not easy to elect a president because of our law which is causing things happen late, especially the elecion of president. However, we have a session on January 9, and we hope to have a president soon. We cannot rule a country without a president. Yes, we can manage it; it will continue, it won’t die, it won’t vanish, and it won’t disappear. But it also won’t have prosperity. We cannot develop our country, we cannot build it, and we cannot establish a new, modern administration that reflects the aspirations of young Lebanese people those who are ambitious and want to create a modern country with the protection of freedom and the beautiful Lebanese culture, along with the admirable image of Lebanon.

We hope to have a president, a new government, and renewed relations with Syria, as well as a ceasefire with Israel. In the long run, personally, I am somewhat optimistic about what will happen to Lebanon.

Last question: Do you think remaining without a president during this period makes it harder for Lebanon to address these challenges?

Of course, it has a serious impact. As a caretaker government, we cannot make major decisions, recruit new talent, or pass laws. The system cannot function without a president. We are losing talented young people who are leaving Lebanon, which is not in our interest.

Continue Reading

ASIA

Syria will not follow Afghanistan’s Taliban model of governance

Published

on

In an astonishing statement, Ahmed Shará, also known as Abu Mohamad Jolani, the leader of the Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) said that he will allow the girls to go to schools and will not turn Syria like Afghanistan under the rule of the Taliban.

Jolani, the de facto ruler of Syria, said that he will distance himself from the Taliban’s strict policies on women’s rights, and said that Syria will not follow the Taliban’s mode of governance.  

Jolani, who brought down the government of Bashar al-Assad and also widely welcomed by the Taliban, said that he believes in the education of women and girls and will not make Syria like Afghanistan.

“Syria is a diverse society with various ideas, unlike Afghanistan, which is more tribal. The Afghan model cannot be applied here,” Jolani told a BBC reporter.

Jolani says that Syria is a diverse society with various ideas, unlike Afghanistan, which is more tribal.

Jolani’s comment came when the Taliban congratulated the HTS-led victory by Jolani over Assad’s regime after years of fighting. The Afghan Foreign Ministry celebrated Jolani’s victory through a statement and hoped Jolani can bring peace and stability in the country.

“It is hoped that the power transition process is advanced in a manner that lays the foundation of a sovereign and serve-oriented Islamic government in the line with the aspiration of the Syrian people; that unifies the entire population without discrimination and retribution through adoption of a general assembly; and a positive foreign policy with world countries the safeguard Syria from a threat of negative rivalries of foreign actors and creates conditions for the return of millions of refugees,” the statement by Taliban Foreign Ministry.

However, Jolan’s position on the rights of women and girls is in great contrast with the current view of the Taliban leadership. Women and girls have been banned from education and work since the return of the Taliban in August 2021, following the collapse of the Republic System and withdrawal of the US troops from Afghanistan. Girls and women are even banned from medical institutions and visiting public spaces.

Jolani says he has a plan to create a government based institution and a council chosen by the people. 

The situation got worse when the Taliban’s Ministry for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice called women’s voices “immodest” compounding their exclusion from public life. This year, it has been marked as three years since girls were banned from pursuing education over sixth grade. Besides that, on December 20, 2022, the Taliban’s Ministry of Higher Education announced that women would be barred from attending public and private universities.    

In an interview with CNN, Jolani said that he has a plan to create a government based on institutions and a “council chosen by the people.”

“When we talk about objectives, the goal of the revolution remains the overthrow of this regime. It is our right to use all available means to achieve that goal,” said Jolani.

“The seeds of the regime’s defeat have always been within it… the Iranians attempted to revive the regime, buying it time, and later the Russians also tried to prop it up. But the truth remains: this regime is dead.”

Moreover, he also said the Syrian people are the “rightful owners” of the country after the ouster of Assad, and declared a “new history” has been written for the entire Middle East.

Continue Reading

MIDDLE EAST

U.S. officials to meet with HTS and Jolani in Damascus

Published

on

In a significant diplomatic development, U.S. President Joe Biden has authorized senior American diplomats to engage directly with Abu Mohammed al-Jolani, the leader of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS). This marks the first formal meeting between U.S. officials and HTS leadership since the group’s overthrow of Bashar al-Assad in Syria earlier this month. Despite HTS’s pivotal role in the regime’s fall, the U.S. continues to classify it as a terrorist organization.

The delegation is led by Barbara Leaf, the State Department’s senior Middle East official. She is joined by Roger Carstens, the U.S. Special Envoy for Hostage Affairs, and Daniel Rubenstein, a veteran diplomat recalled from retirement to spearhead U.S. diplomatic efforts in Syria post-Assad. Rubenstein, previously stationed at the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad, is now tasked with navigating Syria’s complex political landscape following the collapse of the Assad regime.

The meeting, taking place on December 20, represents the first direct, face-to-face dialogue between the U.S., and HTS leaders. This engagement comes as HTS appeals to Western nations to lift longstanding sanctions against Syria. U.S. officials have indicated that lifting the ‘terrorist’ designation and easing sanctions could be possible if HTS demonstrates a commitment to inclusive governance and sustained stability.

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken emphasized the importance of HTS addressing critical security concerns, including chemical weapons and the lingering presence of groups like Daesh (ISIS). Speaking in New York, Blinken stated, “If you don’t want this isolation, then there are things you need to do to move the country forward in an inclusive way.”

The U.S. visit follows similar diplomatic engagements in Damascus this week by officials from France, Germany, and Britain, highlighting a coordinated Western effort to shape Syria’s post-Assad future. Speaking to Bloomberg, Blinken reiterated the necessity of direct dialogue in fostering stability.

Washington’s discussions with HTS also aim to expedite efforts to locate Austin Tice, an American journalist kidnapped in Damascus in 2012. Despite HTS’s designation as a terrorist entity, the U.S. maintains that communication is permissible under its legal framework, provided no material support is extended.

Simultaneously, the Pentagon announced an increase in U.S. troop deployments to northeast Syria, doubling the number from 900 to approximately 2,000. Major General Pat Ryder, Pentagon spokesperson, clarified that these troops were already present before Assad’s fall, underscoring the ongoing mission to counter Daesh.

Jonathan Panikoff, a former senior intelligence official now at the Atlantic Council, warned of potential consequences if the U.S. fails to assert influence in Syria. “If Washington and its allies do not actively work to ensure that the leaders and groups in Syria align with U.S. interests, the vacuum in Syria will almost certainly be filled by a country or group hostile to our interests and those of our allies,” Panikoff told the Financial Times.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey