Connect with us

DIPLOMACY

Restrictions on exports from Turkey to Israel: Important, but must be backed up by diplomatic measures

Published

on

The Turkish Ministry of Trade has decided to impose export restrictions on 54 product groups against Israel, which continues its attacks on Palestine. We spoke to Emir Aşnas, a researcher and writer, about the decision and Israel’s reaction to it.

Turkey’s trade with Israel has long been a subject of debate due to Israel’s operations in Gaza since October. Following criticism from within the country, the Ministry of Trade took action and imposed export restrictions on 54 product groups to Israel.

The first reaction to Ankara’s decision came from Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz. In a statement on the social media platform, Katz used the following statements in his post, in which he referred to President Tayyip Erdoğan:

Israel will ask US to impose sanctions

“Erdogan is once again sacrificing the economic interests of the Turkish people for the sake of his support for the Hamas murderers who are raping, murdering and desecrating the bodies of women, girls and adults in Gaza and burning children alive. Israel will not give in to violence and blackmail, will not tolerate unilateral violations of trade agreements and will take parallel measures against Turkey that will damage its economy. We will ask our friends in the United States to draw up another list of products that Israel will prevent Turkey from exporting, to contact US organisations, to stop investments in Turkey and to prevent the import of products from Turkey. Congress will investigate violations of the boycott laws and impose sanctions on Turkey accordingly”.

‘A total export ban is not possible’

Emir Aşnas, a researcher and writer specialising in international trade and investment, public administration and commercial diplomacy, explained the difference between an export restriction and an export ban: “A restriction can take different forms. For example, a certain product may be allowed to be exported within a certain quota, i.e. up to a certain amount, and the amount above that may not be allowed. In the case of a ban, the export of that good may be prohibited altogether. Again, the restriction can be for a certain period of time; in a prohibition, the export of that good is stopped indefinitely.”

More importantly, Aşnas pointed out that it is not possible to ban exports completely and indefinitely within the framework of GATT-WTO (World Trade Organisation) agreements and rules, reminding that both Turkey and Israel are WTO members.

Aşnas explained that the legislation on the application of the restriction has not yet been published in the Official Gazette and said, “Therefore, we do not yet have a clear idea about the scope, principles, duration and implementation methods of this application. At this stage, it is possible to make some predictions based on the official statement of the Ministry of Trade. In this context, we understand that Turkey has suspended the export to Israel of 54 products and product groups listed in the Ministry of Trade’s statement until further notice”.

‘Technical definition of banned goods should be made’

Aşnas provided the following information on how the restriction decision will be implemented in practice: “The Ministry of Trade will issue the relevant legislation, and the customs tariff statistical items will be determined and announced for the technical description and definition of the products subject to the restriction, along with the principles of implementation. In addition, the customs department of the Ministry of Trade will not approve customs declarations for the export of these goods to Israel, and thus the exports will not take place”.

However, he also pointed out that “it is of course possible for the goods in question to be registered with our customs as being destined for another destination and then shipped to Israel from that destination”.

Aşnas pointed out that in order to have a complete idea of how the restriction decision will affect Turkey’s exports to Israel, the technical definition of the goods whose exports will be restricted and the customs tariff statistical items should be determined, and said, “I think the relevant units of the Ministry of Trade are currently carrying out this work. Otherwise, there cannot be a sound application”.

A blow to Israel’s iron and steel imports

Aşnas gave the following information about the product groups announced to be restricted

“Among the products and product groups listed in the Ministry of Trade’s announcement, a significant portion of iron-steel and ferrous metals and products – and even metalworking machinery and chemicals used in metal processing – will be subject to the restriction. Exports of metals and products account for the largest share (over 20 per cent) of Turkey’s exports to Israel by sector. Moreover, Turkey is Israel’s first and most important supplier, especially in the iron and steel sector.”

“However, it can be seen that automotive products (main and sub-industry), which are the second largest sector of Turkey’s exports to Israel, are not or only partially included in this restriction. The list also includes many products and product groups for the chemical and construction sectors. When this list is analysed, it is expected that Turkey’s exports to Israel will be significantly restricted. However, as I have said before, it would be appropriate to wait for the technical definition of the goods within the scope of the restriction in order to make a clearer and more precise judgement on this issue”.

‘The decision seems to have been taken in haste’

Aşnas said it was clear that the decision on the restriction was taken in reaction and in haste, saying, “Otherwise, legal arrangements should have been made on this issue,” and continued, “The second point is that some products that have a significant share in exports to Israel (especially the automotive industry) are excluded from the list; In other words, it is understood that the metal, chemical and construction materials sectors that can be used ‘for military purposes’, which have attracted the most public reaction in the formation of the list, are to be ‘compulsorily’ included, and otherwise an attempt is being made to be selective according to the situation of the sectors. ”

Aşnas said that the Trade Ministry’s statement, “In fact, our country has not authorised and does not authorise the sale of any products or services that can be used for military purposes to Israel for a long time”, is understood to have been written in a “rush of guilt” and in order to ease the reactions of Turkish public opinion on the issue.

Commenting on the Trade Ministry’s statement that the export restrictions were based on UN resolutions and International Court of Justice (ICJ) rulings, Mr Aşnas said: “The UN Security Council resolutions cited, for example, have nothing to do with exports to Israel. They are about allowing humanitarian aid into Gaza, not blocking it. However, one of the resolutions referred to by the Department of Commerce is the injunction issued by the ICJ on 26 January 2024 in the genocide case brought by South Africa against Israel. Of course, this raises the legitimate question of why such a decision has been delayed until today. It is also an important question why Turkey, perhaps the most assertive country in the world on the Palestinian issue, has not itself filed a case with the ICJ.

Aşnas gave the following assessment of whether these export restrictions, which will be temporary until a ceasefire is implemented in Gaza, will be sufficient:

“It is understood that although it is important in terms of the products covered, it is insufficient and the arbitrariness will be seen more clearly after the legal and technical regulations on this issue are finalised. It can be said that this export restriction decision, which was announced hastily and without legal and technical arrangements, is aimed at appeasing the increasing reactions of the Turkish public opinion rather than fulfilling the ICJ decision, and that this export restriction decision, which is not supported by diplomatic/political measures, is a tactical and temporary step”.

The product groups for which the Ministry of Trade has decided to restrict exports to Israel are as follows:

1- Aluminium profiles

2- Aluminium wires

3- Paints

4- Copper profiles, rods and wires

5- Concrete mixers6- Steel tubes and fittings

7- Steel wire rod

8- Steel containers and tanks

9- Steel bridge components10 – Steel towers11- Steel profiles

12- Cement

13- Cement, concrete or artificial stone building blocks and slabs14- All iron and steel building materials15- All iron and steel wire

16- Excavators

17- Electrical cables

18- Electrical panels

19- Tiles

20 – Fibre optic cables and electric conductors21 – Forklifts22 – Granite

23 – Ropes and cables24- Hardware products25 – Hydraulic oils

26 – Rebar

27 – Construction machinery

28 – Building insulation

29 – Glass used in construction

30 – Chemical compounds

31 – Chemical fertilisers

32 – Clinker

33 – Buckets, scoops, shovels, clamps and hooks

34 – Sulphur

35 – Mineral oils

36 – Roller chains

37 – Marble

38 – Metalworking machinery

39 – Chemicals used in metalworking

40 – Mineral fertilisers

41 – Motor oils

42 – Pallets

43 – Plastic pipes

44 – Sandwich panels

45 – Ceramics

46 – Solvent paints

47 – Wire drawing machines

48 – Sawing machines

49 – Bricks

50 – Aircraft gasoline and kerosene

51 – Paints

52 – Cranes

53 – Adhesives and glues

54- Flat steel products

DIPLOMACY

Hamas and Fatah meet in China, pledge to continue dialogue for unity

Published

on

Hamas and Fatah have agreed to resume dialogue aimed at ending their split following talks in Beijing, China’s Foreign Ministry said on Tuesday.

The ministry confirmed that the two Palestinian sides held talks in Beijing at a time when China is stepping up efforts to broker reconciliation between the rival factions amid escalating fighting in Gaza.

“[Fatah and Hamas] held an in-depth and sincere dialogue on promoting internal reconciliation in Palestine,” ministry spokesman Lin Jian said, adding that the two sides fully expressed their political will to achieve reconciliation through dialogue and consultation, discussed many specific issues and made positive progress.

“The two sides agreed to continue this dialogue process and strive for the unity and reunification of Palestine as soon as possible,” Lin said: “Both sides appreciated China’s strong support for the just cause of the Palestinian people to restore their legitimate national rights, thanked China for its efforts to strengthen Palestinian internal unity, and agreed on ideas for future dialogues.”

China’s stance and mediation efforts on the Palestinian issue

The talks underlined China’s renewed efforts to promote reconciliation in Palestine, which has been divided since the Fatah-Hamas conflict in 2007. Fatah heads the Palestinian Authority, which controls parts of the Israeli-occupied West Bank. Hamas, which has long had strained relations with Fatah, controls the Gaza Strip.

Reuters reported last week that senior Fatah official Azzam Al-Ahmad and senior Hamas official Mousa Abu Marzouk travelled to China on Friday for talks. This is the first known Hamas visit to China since the Gaza conflict began in October. Chinese envoy Wang Kejian met Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh in Qatar last month.

A similar meeting was held in Russia in February, during which the two sides were urged to unite before negotiating with Israel. The meeting came amid a major power shift in the Palestinian Authority, which is under increasing pressure from the West to reform in order to take control of Gaza after the war ends.

China is believed to have good relations with both Hamas and Fatah. Beijing has long called for unity in Palestine, whose independence it supports.

Since the start of the Gaza conflict, Beijing has become increasingly vocal about the legitimate rights of the Palestinians and has called for an immediate cessation of hostilities in Gaza.

Beijing also supports Palestine’s full membership of the United Nations. This position has repeatedly brought it into conflict with the United States in the UN Security Council. Washington, a close ally of Israel, recently vetoed a Palestinian bid to join the organisation, drawing sharp criticism from Beijing.

China appears to be strengthening its position in the Middle East amid growing rivalry with the United States. China has also stepped up its role as a mediator in global conflicts, having brokered a historic rapprochement between Iran and Saudi Arabia last year.

Continue Reading

DIPLOMACY

Blinken will travel to China amid concerns of global issues

Published

on

Ahead of US Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s visit to China, US officials have adopted the tactic of expressing strong concern over China’s support for Russia and the Taiwan issue to put pressure on Beijing. Chinese observers, however, said that the recent frequent visits to China by Blinken and a number of US officials show that Washington cannot solve domestic and global problems without China’s cooperation.

Blinken will meet with senior Chinese officials in both Shanghai and Beijing during his 24-26 April visit, CNN reported on Saturday, citing a senior US State Department official.

Blinken will discuss “a range of bilateral, regional and global issues,” including the Middle East, the war in Ukraine, the South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait, the US State Department said on Saturday.

State Department spokesman Matthew Miller said Blinken would also discuss progress in “resuming counternarcotics cooperation, military-to-military communications, artificial intelligence, and strengthening people-to-people ties” and reaffirm the importance for the United States and China to “responsibly manage competition, even in areas where our countries disagree,” according to media reports.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Lin Jian welcomed Blinken’s visit at a press briefing on Thursday, but gave no further details.

Tensions remain

Although Sino-US relations have stabilised somewhat since the two leaders met in San Francisco last year, tensions remain. During Blinken’s visit to China, the Philippines and the US will hold the largest Balikatan exercise to date in an area that includes waters China recognises as its sovereign territory. Washington also deployed the Typhon medium-range surface-to-surface missile launcher in the region for the first time, despite Beijing’s objections. China reacted to the deployment of the system and the exercise, which came very close to it.

The trilateral and bilateral summits of the US, Japan and the Philippines at the White House in mid-April targeted China’s influence in the region while taking historic decisions on trilateral military and defence cooperation. Beijing sees the expansion of the US military and intelligence presence in the region through its Asian allies as an attempt to “contain” it, while Washington opposes it.

Lü Xiang, a research fellow at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, told the Global Times on Sunday that the purpose of Blinken’s visit was to implement the consensus of the two leaders, but given the so-called focus points announced by the US administration, it is possible that the visit will widen differences and create more negative factors.

Lü cited as an example the annual joint military exercises between Philippine and US forces, which are believed to be aimed at China.

During his visit, Blinken will also reportedly ask Beijing to refrain from “provocative” actions during next month’s swearing-in ceremony for Lai Ching-te, who was elected Taiwan’s regional leader in January, AFP quoted a US official as saying.

Chinese experts say the Biden administration is trying to “show some teeth” on global issues because of the upcoming US presidential election, but also because Biden wants to stabilise relations with China to avoid possible incidents that could harm his election chances.

Aid package for Ukraine

CNN quoted a US State Department official as saying on Saturday that Blinken plans to “reiterate our deep concerns about the PRC’s support for Russia’s defence industrial base, as well as its human rights abuses and unfair economic and trade practices”.

The US House of Representatives on Saturday approved billions of dollars in new US military aid to Ukraine. The foreign aid package passed on Saturday also includes military support for Israel and funding for allies in the Asia-Pacific region, including the island of Taiwan.

According to Chinese experts, after overcoming the obstacles to sending aid to Ukraine, Washington will inevitably focus on blocking China’s trade with Russia. China will face a new challenge from the United States in defending its sovereignty in foreign trade, they said, while Washington should be aware that it has few tools to pressure China on this issue.

Continue Reading

DIPLOMACY

US agrees to pull troops out of Niger

Published

on

The United States is withdrawing its troops from Niger at the request of the government that took power after a military coup.

According to local media reports, the decision to withdraw troops came after talks in Washington between US Assistant Secretary of State Kurt Campbell and Niger’s Prime Minister Ali Mahaman Lamine Zeine. News reports said the US had agreed to close the unmanned aerial vehicle base.

The US, which has around 1,100 troops in Niger, continues to operate from two bases. The most important of these is the $100 million Niger Air Base 201, located near the city of Agadez at the southern end of the Sahara.

A US delegation is expected to travel to Niger’s capital, Niamey, in the next few days to ensure an orderly withdrawal of troops.

Senior US officials travelled to Niger last month to try to ensure that the US would maintain its base in the country despite the suspension of military and development aid to Niger’s coup government. But after three days of waiting, the US delegation left without meeting the country’s military commander, General Abdurrahmane Tchiani, and a day later Niger announced the end of the military partnership Washington had come to secure.

In Niger, President Mohammed Bazum was arrested by elements of the presidential guard regiment on 26 July 2023, and the military announced the seizure of power that evening. General Abdurrahmane Tchiani, commander of the presidential guard regiment, became head of the transitional government, called the National Council for the Protection of the Homeland (CNSP). The CNSP appointed Lamine Zeine as Prime Minister and formed a 21-member cabinet of military and civilians.

After announcing the end of security ties with Washington, Niamey hosted a delegation of Chinese oil executives interested in expanding mining operations in the country, met directly with Russian President Vladimir Putin to strengthen security ties, and welcomed dozens of Russian military trainers and an advanced air defence system. Niger hosted the Iranian ambassador to finalise the establishment of official diplomatic relations with Tehran, which is reportedly keen to invest in the country’s uranium sector.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey