Connect with us

Middle East

Seymour Hersh claims US attack on Iran was misrepresented by media

Published

on

Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative journalist Seymour Hersh has alleged that the US airstrike on Iran’s nuclear facilities on June 22 was successful, setting back Tehran’s nuclear ambitions for years, contrary to initial media reports.

Hersh stated that the portrayal of the attack as a failure was based on an incomplete report leaked to media organizations driven by animosity toward President Donald Trump.

He noted that outlets such as CNN and MSNBC based their reports, which claimed the strike failed to achieve its primary objective, on an analysis purportedly from the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA).

However, Hersh clarified that there was no complete DIA analysis. The leaked document was, in fact, an initial “after-action report” prepared by the US Central Command (CENTCOM) following the operation.

‘Media reports were politically motivated leaks’

Citing a US official involved in planning the attack, Hersh wrote that this initial report was summarized and leaked for “political purposes” with the aim of immediately casting doubt on the operation’s success.

“The first reports even suggested that Iran’s nuclear program was unaffected by the attack,” Hersh commented.

He recalled that the operation involved seven US B-2 Spirit bombers taking off from their base in Missouri, each armed with two 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs, to target the Fordo nuclear facility, which is hidden deep inside a mountain 20 miles north of Qom.

‘The real target was Isfahan’

According to Hersh, the planning for the attack began with the knowledge that the main operational area at Fordo was located at least 260 feet below the rocky surface. The gas centrifuges operating there were enriching uranium to 60% purity, not the 90% weapons-grade level.

Hersh stated that the US Air Force planning group received intelligence before the attack, likely through Israeli sources, that more than 450 pounds of enriched gas stored at Fordo had been moved to Isfahan, 215 miles south of Tehran. He emphasized that Isfahan housed the only facility capable of converting enriched gas into highly enriched metal—a critical first step in making a bomb.

“Isfahan was a separate target in the attack on Fordo and was leveled by Tomahawk missiles fired from a US submarine operating in the Gulf of Aden off the coast of Yemen,” Hersh wrote.

The journalist underscored that even if the centrifuges at Fordo survived the attack, Iran could not produce a nuclear bomb without the Isfahan facility.

‘The glass is half full’

The American official who briefed Hersh said the planners’ first question was, “How big was the actual working area at Fordo?”

The official explained that the area was estimated to be about the size of two hockey rinks (34,000 square feet) and that the bombs carried by the B-2s were more than powerful enough to destroy it.

Referring to the bunker-buster bombs, the official stated, “The bombs made their own holes. We created a 30,000-pound steel dart.”

The official highlighted that the absence of any radioactive traces in the area after the attack was the most significant evidence that the enriched uranium had been moved to Isfahan before the operation.

The official, noting that the operation, codenamed “Midnight Hammer,” also struck another facility in Natanz, remarked, “The Air Force hit everything on the list. Even if Iran rebuilds some centrifuges, they will need Isfahan. Without it, they have no conversion capability.”

When Hersh asked, “So why isn’t the public being told about the operation’s success?” the official replied, “There will be a top-secret report on all of this, but we don’t tell people how hard we work. We tell the public what we think they want to hear.”

The official clarified that the goal of the attack was not to “completely annihilate” Iran’s nuclear program but to prevent it from building a nuclear weapon in the near term.

The official explained the situation with an analogy:

“Annihilation means the glass is full. The planning and the results show the glass is half full. For Trump’s critics, the results mean the glass is half empty. The reality is that the glass is half full. The result? A delay of several years and an uncertain future.”

Hersh concluded his article by stating, “This is about a successful US mission that became the subject of much sloppy reporting because of a despised president. It would be a landmark if someone in the mainstream press talked about the double standard that protects Israel and its nuclear umbrella, but that remains a taboo in America.”

Middle East

US waives human rights terms on $320m military aid to Egypt

Published

on

The US State Department stated that it has waived human rights conditions on more than $300 million in military aid to Egypt.

The statement emphasised that this decision was taken in consideration of Cairo’s “helpful role” since the outbreak of the war against Iran.

Egypt began receiving substantial support from the US after signing a peace treaty with Israel in 1979.

Since the late 1980s, the country has received approximately $1.3 billion annually in US military assistance.

A portion of this aid is subject to conditions related to human rights and democracy, which can be waived on national security grounds.

Withholding funds, including during the administration of former US President Joe Biden, has caused tension between Cairo and Washington in the past.

A letter dated 21 September and addressed to various congressional committees, obtained by Reuters, stated that Secretary of State Marco Rubio “decided to waive the certification requirement under the fiscal year 2025 Foreign Military Financing programme for Egypt of $320 million.”

This waiver was subsequently confirmed by the State Department.

An accompanying memorandum justifying the decision stated that this portion of military aid was “essential for counterterrorism, border security, or non-proliferation programmes, or otherwise important to the national security interests of the United States.”

The memorandum, dated 4 September and bearing Rubio’s signature, stated: “Exercising this waiver authority is critical to the US-Egypt relationship and to US national security priorities, particularly given the helpful role Egypt has played in the aftermath of Operation Epic Fury.”

“Operation Epic Fury” is the designation used by the US military for the campaign launched jointly with Israel against Iran in late February.

The State Department memorandum, whose authenticity was confirmed by two sources in Washington familiar with the letter, did not provide detailed information regarding what was termed Egypt’s “helpful role”.

The State Department’s annual decision on military aid to Egypt typically covers funds allocated for the preceding fiscal year, which ends on 30 September.

A State Department spokesperson stated that Rubio waived the certification in the interest of US national security and that the US continues to cooperate with the Egyptian government across a range of issues.

In an emailed statement, the spokesperson said: “This waiver recognizes the importance of maintaining security cooperation with Egypt at a time of significant security challenges in the region.”

The Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not immediately comment on the matter.

The spillover effects of the Iran war have imposed a heavy toll on US security partners, including Egypt.

Owing to rising fuel prices and other disruptions, the Egyptian economy is passing through a difficult period.

Under the Biden administration, the US withheld portions of the annual military allocation on multiple occasions over Egypt’s human rights record.

In 2024, following the Hamas-led 7 October attack on Israel and the subsequent war in Gaza, the Biden administration set aside human rights conditions, disbursing the entire $1.3 billion allocation to Egypt for the first time in its tenure.

Human rights organisations have long accused Egypt, under the administration of President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, of widespread human rights abuses, including torture and enforced disappearances.

This week, Egyptian police detained six journalists from a fact-checking and investigative media outlet, accusing them of spreading false information on behalf of the banned Muslim Brotherhood.

Egyptian authorities state that they have taken steps to address human rights issues. Sisi said stability is paramount and that the government supports human rights by working to provide for basic needs.

Continue Reading

Middle East

Britain expands curbs on arms exports to Israel over Gaza risks

Published

on

Britain has significantly broadened its military export restrictions targeting Israel, suspending or rejecting more than 80 licences for items the IDF could use in Gaza.

This figure is nearly triple the number affected when the policy was first introduced in September 2024.

United Kingdom Minister of State for the Middle East Stephen Doughty said that as part of what he described as a “tighter system” for assessing exports to Israel, more than 50 further export applications have been refused since approximately 30 licences were initially suspended.

Under the initial decision taken in September 2024, 30 of roughly 350 licences were suspended after the British government concluded there was a “clear risk” that certain military exports could be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of international humanitarian law in Gaza.

The affected equipment included components for military aircraft, drones, naval systems, and targeting gear.

Doughty said additional measures adopted this month established what he termed a “double safeguard” mechanism within the approvals process.

Export applications must now be assessed both against existing international humanitarian law criteria and in light of Britain’s position on the legality of Israel’s presence in the Palestinian territories.

“We have so far suspended or refused more than 80 licences,” Doughty said, adding that he had personally examined each licence.

Despite the wider restrictions, British-origin parts entering the international F-35 fighter jet supply chain continue to be largely exempt.

The UK government argues that preventing British-made components from entering the global F-35 pool could undermine the programme as a whole and have serious consequences for the security of the UK and its allies.

Direct exports of F-35 parts intended specifically for Israel remain suspended.

Doughty defended maintaining the supply of components via the international programme, arguing that halting it could have severe ramifications for the broader European and allied security architecture.

Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Emily Thornberry challenged this position, arguing that the issue was political rather than purely legal.

Thornberry suggested adopting an approach similar to the Dutch model, under which components entering the international supply chain could be flagged as “not intended for aircraft bound for Israel”.

The initial suspension was implemented in September 2024 by then Foreign Secretary David Lammy.

Lammy stressed at the time that the measure did not constitute an arms embargo and applied solely to items assessed as usable in military operations in Gaza.

Since then, the policy has been tightened further under Prime Minister Andy Burnham.

The expanded export restrictions follow the Burnham government’s adoption of a more confrontational policy toward the Israeli government.

Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband drew sustained applause at the Labour Party’s annual conference in Liverpool after delivering a sharp critique of the Netanyahu government’s policies and defending the decision to ban trade with Israeli settlements in the West Bank.

Accusing Israel of committing war crimes in Gaza, Miliband stated that the British government heard public outrage over the conflict, telling delegates: “We hear you. You were right.”

Continue Reading

Middle East

Netanyahu holds secret UAE talks with Saudi Arabia and Arab officials

Published

on

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with representatives of Gulf and Arab nations that lack diplomatic ties with Israel, including Saudi Arabia, during his weekend visit to the United Arab Emirates.

Sources close to the gathering told the Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth on Monday that representatives from Morocco, Libya, Jordan, and Qatar also took part in the meeting.

Netanyahu made a unannounced visit to Abu Dhabi on Sunday, where he met with the country’s leader, Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan.

According to Israeli media, this marked the first time the United Arab Emirates officially confirmed a visit by Netanyahu.

The meeting was arranged by Mossad Director Roman Goffman “at the request of Saudi Arabia, which asked for Israel’s assistance against Houthi attacks in the Red Sea region,” according to Yedioth Ahronoth.

The discussions addressed Iran and the Houthi militia. The newspaper added that the Arab states heard from Israel that “Israel is prepared to assist countries in the region with air defence systems, just as it aided the UAE during the conflict with Iran.”

Conflict in Yemen intensified in September when Ansarullah militiamen launched a rapid offensive that seized Yemen’s entire Red Sea coastline, including the vital maritime corridor of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait.

The Yemeni resistance also imposed a blockade on Saudi Arabia’s energy exports and staged multiple attacks against the kingdom.

Saudi Arabia reportedly sought military assistance from the US to counter Ansarullah.

Washington declined to attack the Houthis directly, but announced that it would provide intelligence and targeting support.

Reporting on the same visit, The Jerusalem Post said Netanyahu spent six hours in the UAE and that the principal subject of his discussions with MBZ was Iran.

Citing sources familiar with the matter, the newspaper added that the trip came “after Netanyahu exerted heavy pressure on the United Arab Emirates to arrange a meeting ahead of the Israeli elections on 27 October.”

Separately, the Associated Press, citing a person with direct knowledge of the meeting, reported that Netanyahu’s visit to the UAE was arranged in part to ask MBZ to deny reports that he had warned the Israeli prime minister of an impending Hamas threat prior to 7 October 2023.

According to Israeli media, Netanyahu’s office denied the AP report, issuing the following statement:

“Fake news. The visit focused solely on strengthening ties between the two countries and on regional issues.”

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey