Connect with us

Middle East

Shara proposes Trump Tower in Damascus for US meeting

Published

on

Ahmed Shara, Syria’s interim President, reportedly presented a proposal during his recent Gulf tour aiming to secure a face-to-face meeting with US President Donald Trump. This offer allegedly includes the construction of a Trump Tower in Damascus, the normalization of relations with Israel, and granting the US access to Syria’s oil and natural gas resources.

Still designated a terrorist by the US, Shara is actively seeking an agreement to normalize relations with Washington, secure the lifting of sanctions, and achieve international recognition. His proposal is framed as a strategic offer that addresses both US economic interests and regional stability.

According to a Reuters report, Jonathan Bass, an American businessman and staunch Trump supporter, is working with several Gulf countries and Syrian figures to facilitate a meeting between Ahmed Shara and Trump. This potential encounter, though considered a low probability, would occur during Trump’s planned visit to Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates.

Syria has prioritized the lifting of US sanctions to initiate its recovery process following more than 14 years of continuous conflict. However, implementing the conditions set by Washington continues to pose substantial challenges within the country.

Jonathan Bass contends that Shara’s presence in the same room as Trump, despite Shara’s past affiliation with Al-Qaeda and his continued presence on the US terror list, could potentially soften the White House’s outlook on Damascus and alleviate tensions along the Syria-Israel front.

Bass remarked, “Shara wants a business deal for his country’s future,” further explaining that this proposal encompasses energy cooperation, joint action against Iran, and direct engagement with Israel. Bass recounted, “He told me he wants a Trump Tower in Damascus. He wants peace with his neighbors. What he said was good for both the region and Israel.” Bass also conveyed that Shara personally identified with Trump, noting, “Both have survived assassination attempts in the past.”

Syrian government officials and the presidential office have not commented on the matter. However, the Syrian Presidency announced that Shara held a meeting with Saudi Arabian Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman last Sunday.

A source close to Shara indicated that a meeting with Trump remains a possibility, although it is currently unclear whether an official invitation has been extended. The source added, “Whether the meeting takes place will only be known at the last minute.”

A direct meeting between Ahmed Shara and Trump during Trump’s Middle East tour is considered improbable due to the demanding schedule, Trump’s evolving priorities, and a notable lack of consensus within his own team concerning Syria policy.

However, sources indicate that while a high-level US-Syrian meeting is planned during Trump’s visit, it is not expected to be a direct encounter between Trump and Shara.

Charles Lister, Director of the Syria Initiative at the Middle East Institute, commented, “Direct contact with Trump is viewed as the most effective approach, primarily because numerous ideological obstacles exist within the administration.”

Washington has yet to develop a comprehensive and consistent policy regarding Syria. Nevertheless, according to three distinct sources, including a US official, the US administration has recently been framing its relations with Syria predominantly through the lens of counter-terrorism.

This approach was also evident in the meeting between the US and Syrian Foreign Minister Esad Hasan Al-Shaybani in New York last month. The inclusion of a high-ranking counter-terrorism official from the State Department in the US delegation was interpreted as a clear signal of this focus.

Sources indicate that US officials conveyed to Al-Shaybani their assessment that the steps taken, particularly concerning the removal of foreign fighters serving in the Syrian army from high-ranking positions and their maximal expulsion, were deemed insufficient.

Furthermore, the US Treasury Department also communicated its own demands to the Damascus administration, consequently elevating the total number of Washington’s conditions to over 12.

James Hewitt, Spokesperson for the White House National Security Council, stated that the actions undertaken by Syria’s interim administration will largely determine whether the US will extend support or ease sanctions.

One of the primary objectives of Syria’s overtures to Washington is to convey that the country poses no threat to Israel. Notably, since the change of government in Damascus at the end of 2024, Israel has intensified its air strikes on Syria.

Israeli ground forces have occupied certain areas in the country’s southwest. While Tel Aviv asserts these actions are intended to protect minority communities in Syria, the Damascus administration perceives the attacks as a significant escalation of tension.

Last week, Shara confirmed that indirect talks with Israel were conducted via the United Arab Emirates. Reuters had previously reported that these contacts aimed to de-escalate regional tensions.

Jonathan Bass also stated that Shara had conveyed certain messages through him that could potentially pave the way for direct contact with Israel.

However, despite these overtures, Israel initiated new air strikes targeting areas near the presidential palace in Damascus. Tel Aviv asserted these attacks were carried out to protect the Druze minority in Syria.

Bass remarked, “Shara extended an olive branch to Israel, and Israel responded with a missile,” and he added, “Trump is needed to mend this relationship.”

Middle East

US waives human rights terms on $320m military aid to Egypt

Published

on

The US State Department stated that it has waived human rights conditions on more than $300 million in military aid to Egypt.

The statement emphasised that this decision was taken in consideration of Cairo’s “helpful role” since the outbreak of the war against Iran.

Egypt began receiving substantial support from the US after signing a peace treaty with Israel in 1979.

Since the late 1980s, the country has received approximately $1.3 billion annually in US military assistance.

A portion of this aid is subject to conditions related to human rights and democracy, which can be waived on national security grounds.

Withholding funds, including during the administration of former US President Joe Biden, has caused tension between Cairo and Washington in the past.

A letter dated 21 September and addressed to various congressional committees, obtained by Reuters, stated that Secretary of State Marco Rubio “decided to waive the certification requirement under the fiscal year 2025 Foreign Military Financing programme for Egypt of $320 million.”

This waiver was subsequently confirmed by the State Department.

An accompanying memorandum justifying the decision stated that this portion of military aid was “essential for counterterrorism, border security, or non-proliferation programmes, or otherwise important to the national security interests of the United States.”

The memorandum, dated 4 September and bearing Rubio’s signature, stated: “Exercising this waiver authority is critical to the US-Egypt relationship and to US national security priorities, particularly given the helpful role Egypt has played in the aftermath of Operation Epic Fury.”

“Operation Epic Fury” is the designation used by the US military for the campaign launched jointly with Israel against Iran in late February.

The State Department memorandum, whose authenticity was confirmed by two sources in Washington familiar with the letter, did not provide detailed information regarding what was termed Egypt’s “helpful role”.

The State Department’s annual decision on military aid to Egypt typically covers funds allocated for the preceding fiscal year, which ends on 30 September.

A State Department spokesperson stated that Rubio waived the certification in the interest of US national security and that the US continues to cooperate with the Egyptian government across a range of issues.

In an emailed statement, the spokesperson said: “This waiver recognizes the importance of maintaining security cooperation with Egypt at a time of significant security challenges in the region.”

The Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not immediately comment on the matter.

The spillover effects of the Iran war have imposed a heavy toll on US security partners, including Egypt.

Owing to rising fuel prices and other disruptions, the Egyptian economy is passing through a difficult period.

Under the Biden administration, the US withheld portions of the annual military allocation on multiple occasions over Egypt’s human rights record.

In 2024, following the Hamas-led 7 October attack on Israel and the subsequent war in Gaza, the Biden administration set aside human rights conditions, disbursing the entire $1.3 billion allocation to Egypt for the first time in its tenure.

Human rights organisations have long accused Egypt, under the administration of President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, of widespread human rights abuses, including torture and enforced disappearances.

This week, Egyptian police detained six journalists from a fact-checking and investigative media outlet, accusing them of spreading false information on behalf of the banned Muslim Brotherhood.

Egyptian authorities state that they have taken steps to address human rights issues. Sisi said stability is paramount and that the government supports human rights by working to provide for basic needs.

Continue Reading

Middle East

Britain expands curbs on arms exports to Israel over Gaza risks

Published

on

Britain has significantly broadened its military export restrictions targeting Israel, suspending or rejecting more than 80 licences for items the IDF could use in Gaza.

This figure is nearly triple the number affected when the policy was first introduced in September 2024.

United Kingdom Minister of State for the Middle East Stephen Doughty said that as part of what he described as a “tighter system” for assessing exports to Israel, more than 50 further export applications have been refused since approximately 30 licences were initially suspended.

Under the initial decision taken in September 2024, 30 of roughly 350 licences were suspended after the British government concluded there was a “clear risk” that certain military exports could be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of international humanitarian law in Gaza.

The affected equipment included components for military aircraft, drones, naval systems, and targeting gear.

Doughty said additional measures adopted this month established what he termed a “double safeguard” mechanism within the approvals process.

Export applications must now be assessed both against existing international humanitarian law criteria and in light of Britain’s position on the legality of Israel’s presence in the Palestinian territories.

“We have so far suspended or refused more than 80 licences,” Doughty said, adding that he had personally examined each licence.

Despite the wider restrictions, British-origin parts entering the international F-35 fighter jet supply chain continue to be largely exempt.

The UK government argues that preventing British-made components from entering the global F-35 pool could undermine the programme as a whole and have serious consequences for the security of the UK and its allies.

Direct exports of F-35 parts intended specifically for Israel remain suspended.

Doughty defended maintaining the supply of components via the international programme, arguing that halting it could have severe ramifications for the broader European and allied security architecture.

Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Emily Thornberry challenged this position, arguing that the issue was political rather than purely legal.

Thornberry suggested adopting an approach similar to the Dutch model, under which components entering the international supply chain could be flagged as “not intended for aircraft bound for Israel”.

The initial suspension was implemented in September 2024 by then Foreign Secretary David Lammy.

Lammy stressed at the time that the measure did not constitute an arms embargo and applied solely to items assessed as usable in military operations in Gaza.

Since then, the policy has been tightened further under Prime Minister Andy Burnham.

The expanded export restrictions follow the Burnham government’s adoption of a more confrontational policy toward the Israeli government.

Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband drew sustained applause at the Labour Party’s annual conference in Liverpool after delivering a sharp critique of the Netanyahu government’s policies and defending the decision to ban trade with Israeli settlements in the West Bank.

Accusing Israel of committing war crimes in Gaza, Miliband stated that the British government heard public outrage over the conflict, telling delegates: “We hear you. You were right.”

Continue Reading

Middle East

Netanyahu holds secret UAE talks with Saudi Arabia and Arab officials

Published

on

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with representatives of Gulf and Arab nations that lack diplomatic ties with Israel, including Saudi Arabia, during his weekend visit to the United Arab Emirates.

Sources close to the gathering told the Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth on Monday that representatives from Morocco, Libya, Jordan, and Qatar also took part in the meeting.

Netanyahu made a unannounced visit to Abu Dhabi on Sunday, where he met with the country’s leader, Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan.

According to Israeli media, this marked the first time the United Arab Emirates officially confirmed a visit by Netanyahu.

The meeting was arranged by Mossad Director Roman Goffman “at the request of Saudi Arabia, which asked for Israel’s assistance against Houthi attacks in the Red Sea region,” according to Yedioth Ahronoth.

The discussions addressed Iran and the Houthi militia. The newspaper added that the Arab states heard from Israel that “Israel is prepared to assist countries in the region with air defence systems, just as it aided the UAE during the conflict with Iran.”

Conflict in Yemen intensified in September when Ansarullah militiamen launched a rapid offensive that seized Yemen’s entire Red Sea coastline, including the vital maritime corridor of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait.

The Yemeni resistance also imposed a blockade on Saudi Arabia’s energy exports and staged multiple attacks against the kingdom.

Saudi Arabia reportedly sought military assistance from the US to counter Ansarullah.

Washington declined to attack the Houthis directly, but announced that it would provide intelligence and targeting support.

Reporting on the same visit, The Jerusalem Post said Netanyahu spent six hours in the UAE and that the principal subject of his discussions with MBZ was Iran.

Citing sources familiar with the matter, the newspaper added that the trip came “after Netanyahu exerted heavy pressure on the United Arab Emirates to arrange a meeting ahead of the Israeli elections on 27 October.”

Separately, the Associated Press, citing a person with direct knowledge of the meeting, reported that Netanyahu’s visit to the UAE was arranged in part to ask MBZ to deny reports that he had warned the Israeli prime minister of an impending Hamas threat prior to 7 October 2023.

According to Israeli media, Netanyahu’s office denied the AP report, issuing the following statement:

“Fake news. The visit focused solely on strengthening ties between the two countries and on regional issues.”

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey