Connect with us

Diplomacy

Starmer blocks US access to British bases for potential Iran strikes citing international law

Published

on

Prime Minister Keir Starmer is blocking a request from US President Donald Trump to utilize British sovereign bases for potential aerial strikes against Iran, citing concerns that such an operation would violate international law.

According to reports from The Times, a deepening diplomatic rift has emerged as the Prime Minister informed President Trump that the United Kingdom will not grant permission for US assets to launch from the sovereign base on Diego Garcia or from RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire. These strategic installations serve as critical hubs for the US fleet of heavy bombers across Europe and the Indian Ocean.

Under the terms of long-standing bilateral agreements with Washington, these facilities may only be utilized for military operations against third-party nations with the prior explicit consent of the British government.

This refusal has reportedly prompted President Trump to withdraw his administration’s support for a landmark deal to transfer sovereignty of the Chagos Islands from the UK to Mauritius.

The President addressed the escalating tension regarding Iran and the United Kingdom’s role via a post on the social media platform Truth Social. He suggested that British support would be “legal under international law” because of the inherent threat an Iranian strike could pose to the UK itself.

“If Iran decides not to make a deal [regarding its nuclear program], the US may need to use the airfield located at Diego Garcia and Fairford to eliminate a potential attack by a highly unstable and dangerous regime,” the President stated.

On Thursday, President Trump indicated that the world would learn “probably within the next ten days” whether the US would reach a diplomatic accord with Tehran or pivot toward military intervention.

“We may or may not have to go a step further now. They cannot have a nuclear weapon. It is very simple. There can be no peace in the Middle East if they have nuclear weapons,” Trump asserted.

Government sources suggested that Britain remains unlikely to support a preemptive military strike, following London’s refusal last summer to participate in a presidential plan targeting Iranian nuclear facilities. In the wake of previous discussions regarding military action against Iran, ministers have repeatedly declined to confirm whether UK government lawyers believe such strikes meet the threshold of international legality.

The White House is understood to be drafting comprehensive military contingencies for an assault on Iran that would incorporate the use of Diego Garcia and RAF Fairford. Defense officials have reportedly briefed President Trump that following the largest military buildup in the region since the 2003 invasion of Iraq, US forces will be combat-ready by Saturday, Feb. 21.

“A political process supported by the UK continues between the US and Iran,” a government spokesperson said. “Iran must never be able to develop a nuclear weapon, and our priority remains security in the region.”

When questioned specifically on the use of British bases, the government maintained its standard protocol: “As a matter of routine, we do not comment on operational matters.”

Information obtained by The Times suggests that British officials fear granting base access would implicate the UK in a breach of international law. Specifically, they are concerned with statutes that do not distinguish between the state carrying out an illegal act and a supporting state that is “aware of the circumstances of the internationally wrongful act.”

President Trump spoke with Starmer on Tuesday night to discuss his ultimatum to Tehran regarding the nuclear program. The following day, the President issued a statement criticizing the Chagos sovereignty agreement.

In 2021, John Healey—the current Defense Secretary—sought clarification from the then-Conservative government while in opposition regarding the “red lines” for US forces using British bases. He was informed at the time that any proposed military operation must align with both UK domestic law and the British government’s interpretation of relevant international law.

The Conservative opposition is now urging Starmer to grant the US access. Shadow Defense Secretary James Cartlidge stated:

“Iran’s nuclear program poses a grave threat to the UK and our allies. If the US determines that further measures are required to deal with this specific threat, and we believe that such action is in our national interest and intended to protect the vital security interests of the UK, we should permit the use of our bases.”

Prior to the invasion of Iraq, then-Attorney General Lord Goldsmith argued that international law only permitted the use of force in self-defense during an actual or imminent attack. Goldsmith later contended that a UN resolution regarding Iraq rendered that specific conflict legal.

The government has repeatedly emphasized that the handover deal with Mauritius—which is projected to cost taxpayers £35 billion—is essential for security and would prevent a protracted and costly legal battle over the territory.

While President Trump initially appeared receptive to the plan, his stance shifted during recent debates concerning the future of Greenland. Senior government officials have described the current situation as “bleak,” noting that the Chagos agreement cannot feasibly proceed without American endorsement.

RAF Fairford and other British military installations were most recently utilized by the US last month during a military operation to seize the registered tanker Bella 1. However, that operation was conducted with the full support of the United Kingdom, with ministers affirming its justification under international law at the time.

On Thursday, Alex Davies-Jones, the Victims’ Commissioner, insisted that Starmer would “deliver” the deal and return the necessary legislation to Parliament as swiftly as possible.

Speaking to Times Radio, she said: “We will continue to work with our allies on this, including the Americans, but national security must be the priority above all else, and this government is committed to ensuring that. Only two weeks ago they supported the deal, and the US supported the deal this week. Discussions will continue with the Americans and other allies, but as I said, the priority is our base and our national security.”

Diplomacy

Greece’s Marinakis says paying Hormuz transit fees beats enduring Red Sea shipping crisis detour

Published

on

Evangelos Marinakis, one of Greece’s leading shipowners, has announced that he is prepared to pay up to $200,000 per transit to keep the Strait of Hormuz open to civilian maritime traffic.

Speaking to the Financial Times, Marinakis stated that paying a transit fee would be a far better option for him than having the strait closed to navigation.

As the chairman of Capital Maritime Group, which controls a fleet of 185 vessels including approximately 35 tankers, Marinakis emphasized that shipowners have been forced to use alternative routes around the Cape of Good Hope for years due to attacks launched by the Houthis in the Red Sea, a detour that has generated substantial additional costs.

The Greek shipowner indicated that paying a transit fee of $100,000 or $200,000, depending on the size of the cargo or the vessel, is far more reasonable than enduring the current logistical challenges. He added that such payments could offset all the losses experienced so far.

Following US strikes on Iran and the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, the Tehran administration had introduced transit fees of up to $2 million for certain vessels transiting the waterway.

In May, Iran announced the establishment of a state agency tasked with managing the Strait of Hormuz. It was stated that the institution in question would provide real-time updates regarding maritime activities in the waterway.

Ebrahim Azizi, the chairman of the Iranian Parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, had noted that only commercial vessels and countries cooperating with Iran would be able to benefit from the facilities provided under this “professional mechanism.”

US President Donald Trump has explicitly opposed the imposition of transit fees in the Strait of Hormuz. In a statement on the matter, Trump said, “We want the strait to be open. We do not want any transit fees to be charged. This is an international waterway.”

On the other hand, the draft text of a planned 60-day ceasefire extension agreement between the parties stipulates that the Strait of Hormuz will remain open without any transit fees being demanded.

According to the draft details reviewed by Axios, the US in return commits to lifting the blockade it has imposed on Iranian ports. The Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, however, announced that the management of the Strait of Hormuz has been excluded from the scope of the agreement with the US, asserting that the issue will be addressed solely by littoral states.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Pashinyan promises aid to farmers hit by Russian import restrictions

Published

on

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has pledged compensation for Armenian farmers affected by restrictions on exports to Russia.

According to Sputnik Armenia, Pashinyan made the announcement during an election campaign meeting in the Gegharkunik region.

Speaking at the event, Pashinyan said the subsidies would be designed to offset losses incurred by producers.

The prime minister also acknowledged that some Armenian products had failed to meet required quality standards, adding that such companies would receive support aimed at improving product quality.

Addressing alternative markets for Armenian exports, Pashinyan said several Armenian business delegations were already engaged in negotiations abroad.

He added that Armenia had received offers for the purchase of roses as well as fresh fruits and vegetables.

Pashinyan argued that Armenia’s agricultural output was not particularly large, describing this as an advantage under current circumstances. According to the prime minister, “a respected supermarket chain in Europe” would be capable of selling the entire volume of these products on its own.

Russia’s Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance (Rosselkhoznadzor) imposed temporary restrictions on imports of stone fruits and grapes from Armenia effective July 2.

The ban covers cherries, sour cherries, apricots, plums, peaches and nectarines, among other products.

On the same day, a temporary suspension was also introduced on certification procedures for live fish shipments from Armenia. Russian authorities had previously restricted the entry of flower products originating from Armenia into the Russian market.

In addition, Russia’s Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing (Rospotrebnadzor) halted the import of all consignments of Jermuk mineral water from Armenia.

In a statement, the agency said levels of bicarbonate, chloride and sulfate ions in the mineral water exceeded established limits and could mislead consumers regarding the product’s medicinal properties.

The Russian regulator argued that the growing number of violations stemmed from the abolition of Armenia’s Agriculture Ministry and the transfer of its responsibilities to the Economy Ministry.

Rosselkhoznadzor further stated that Armenia’s Economy Ministry was experiencing structural problems and was unable to adequately perform the supervisory functions assigned to it.

Continue Reading

Diplomacy

Zelenskyy urges US to grant Ukraine license to produce Patriot missiles

Published

on

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he has asked the United States to grant Ukraine a license to manufacture missiles for the Patriot air defence system.

In a post on social media platform X, Zelenskyy argued that current US production of missile defence interceptors is insufficient and could contribute to crises in different parts of the world.

“Producing 60-65 missiles a month is nothing compared with the challenges we face today. This is no secret, and Russia knows it as well,” Zelenskyy wrote. “We need to expand production. As I requested from the previous US administration, I am asking the current administration to grant Ukraine a license to produce Patriot missiles.”

Zelenskyy said US companies possess advanced technologies that are not available in Ukraine, while Kyiv could contribute its extensive battlefield experience in return.

He also argued that granting such a license would benefit not only Ukraine, but also the Middle East and any country Washington chooses to support.

Washington pledges to maintain defence support

Zelenskyy’s remarks came a day after US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on May 30 that Washington would continue supporting Ukraine’s defence capabilities and ensure military shipments to Kyiv continue.

“We want them to be able to defend themselves, and we will find a way to help them do that,” Hegseth said.

Several days earlier, Yuriy Ihnat, spokesperson for the Ukrainian Air Force, warned that the country’s air defence forces were experiencing a shortage of missiles.

“Due to certain supply problems, we are practically at starvation levels when it comes to missiles today,” Ihnat said.

Concerns persist over air defence missile stocks

In April, Zelenskyy warned that Ukraine’s stockpile of air defence missiles could be exhausted at any moment.

He said that under current conditions, air defence missiles were more critical for Ukraine than the air defence systems themselves.

Highlighting what he described as a critical shortage of Patriot missiles, Zelenskyy said: “We are facing a deficit now that could hardly be worse.”

Concerns that Ukraine could face a severe shortage of US-made air defence missiles had previously been reported by Reuters.

The situation was expected to worsen as the United States and its allies depleted significant portions of their arsenals during tensions with Iran, a point Zelenskyy also underscored.

In a separate statement in January, Zelenskyy said Ukraine lacked sufficient missiles for both US- and European-made air defence systems.

The Ukrainian leader said he had been forced to personally secure every package of missiles from European countries and the United States.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey