Connect with us

ASIA

Taliban denounces US drones, ostensibly Pakistan allow them enter Afghan airspace  

Published

on

The Taliban has confirmed that US drones have conducted surveillance over Afghanistan’s airspace, and described it as a clear violation of the country’s sovereignty. Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid on Monday said that these operations must not be repeated again, but did not specify the numbers of provinces where the surveillance had been carried out.

It has been reported that these drones were carried out in southern Kandahar, northeast Badakhshan, Panjshir and eastern Kunar provinces. These operations were conducted in the last three days, and Mujahid called for an immediate cessation of such reconnaissance missions by the US. “It is a violation of Afghanistan’s airspace and incompatible with international law,” Mujahid said, calling on the countries giving facilities to these flights through their airspace to stop doing this.

The statement comes as Afghan masses witnessed an increase in drone surveillance operations in Kandahar, the birthplace of the Taliban, and other provinces in the last three days. The US did not react to this report so far, but the Taliban said that these operations are typically conducted for intelligence and reconnaissance purposes due to security concerns.

US drones come from Pakistan

Increasing uncertainty about drones in the Afghan sky and more discreet collaboration with the US, some sources blamed Pakistan for giving permission to the US drones to fly over Afghanistan’s airspace. A source said that US drones came from Pakistan and said the Taliban ministry of foreign affairs will talk with the Pakistani officials in this regard.

At the same time it also created doubts on the secret cooperation between US and the Taliban in the fight against Daesh, but the presence of drones over Afghan skies from Kunar to Kandahar, from Nimroz, Panjshir to Badakhshan provinces deep in northeastern Afghanistan on the border with China and Tajikistan, have unleashed confusion and so many questions.

Mujahid said that these drones were carried out for intelligence and reconnaissance missions of the US which send a message that the US is still fighting against IS-K, which supports the narrative of the Biden administration that Afghanistan should not become breeding ground of IS-K.

This comes amid a devastating bombing in Kandahar last week that resulted in the killing of dozens of people. Daesh claimed responsibility for the attack that has heightened tensions in the region, with authorities scrambling to investigate the source of the blast amidst fears of further violence.

Amidst the hasty withdrawal, there has been a concerning rise in IS-K operations across the country, a group that has already intensified its attacks, targeting both civilians and Taliban forces, mosques, shrines and has been posing a grave threat to stability and security in Afghanistan.

Taliban and US cooperating to fight against Daesh

Jan Achakzai, the former Minister of Intelligence of Pakistan’s Baluchistan province, has claimed that there are reports that the Taliban’s intelligence in Kandahar has given the US a base to fly drones. Achakzai in a statement in X said that “the truth is something else” in connection with the protest of Mujahid against US aircraft patrols in Afghanistan’s airspace.

Achakzai has also said that the purpose of giving this base to the US is to cooperate in the fight against Daesh, the branch of Khorasan. He also claimed that the base was provided by the Taliban intelligence in the framework of cooperation with US contractors, but the Taliban did not comment yet on Achakzai’s statement.

This comes just days after former US president Donald Trump’s Special Assistant, Christopher Costa said that US and the Taliban should work together in order to defeat IS-K in Afghanistan.

In an article in the New York Times,  Costa wrote that “the Taliban are not a reliable force to defeat IS-K or control other terrorist groups in Afghanistan, but this group should be encouraged to speed up its activities against IS-K.”

After the recent attack in Moscow concert attack that killed and wounded dozens of people, the regional countries and the world have expressed concern about the reactivation of IS-K group, and the world called IS-K a big threat to all countries.

Daesh name is being used as political tool

Taliban spokesman Mujahid said that Daesh has no ground in Afghanistan and lacks the ability to recruit and carry attacks, and said the world wants to use the name of Daesh to reach its political goals. There is no fact about recent comments on the activities of Daesh in Afghanistan, Mujahid said, adding that these comments are meant to give popularity to the group and to exaggerate Daesh.

Mujahid said that the name of Daesh is only being used for political objectives and blamed some media for spreading misinformation.

However, the South China Morning Post in its recent report said that Daesh cells have used Afghan soil to launch attacks on targets in Russia, Pakistan, Iran, and Turkey.

The report said that Daesh cells using Afghanistan as a base have closely cooperated with various national and regional branches to carry out deadly attacks on four countries this year.

Meanwhile, former Head of US Central Command, Gen Frank McKenzie said that the threat is growing and that IS-K will attack the United States and other foreign powers.

“IS-K in particular, but ISIS in general, has a strong desire to attack our homeland,” McKenzie told ABC News. “We should believe them when they say that. They’re going to try to do it, and I think the threat is growing. It began to grow as soon as we left Afghanistan and took pressure off IS-K.”

“I think we should expect further attempts of this nature against the United States as well as our partners and other nations abroad,” McKenzie said. “I think this is inevitable.”

ASIA

Xi urges global CEOs to safeguard trade and supply chains

Published

on

Chinese President Xi Jinping, in a meeting with a group of executives including Rajesh Subramaniam from FedEx and Bill Winters from Standard Chartered, called on global business leaders to work together to protect supply chains.

Amid a deepening trade war with the US, the Chinese leader told the group of foreign business leaders, including Pascal Soriot from AstraZeneca and Miguel Ángel López Borrego from Thyssenkrupp, that they should resist behaviors that “turn back” history.

Speaking at the meeting held in Beijing on Friday, Xi said, “We hope everyone will have a broad and long-term perspective and not blindly follow actions that disrupt the security and stability of global industrial and supply chains, but instead add more positive energy and certainty to global development.”

The event at the Great Hall of the People marked the second consecutive year that Xi held a carefully arranged meeting with foreign CEOs in the Chinese capital. Last year’s event involved only US business leaders.

The meeting took place at the end of a busy week for Chinese policymakers, who are striving to strengthen relations with the international business community amid rising tensions with the administration of US President Donald Trump.

China’s leading annual CEO conference, the China Development Forum, was held earlier this week in Beijing, followed by the Boao Forum for Asia on the tropical resort island of Hainan.

Beijing is trying to present itself as a bastion of stability in global trade, in contrast to the US, where Trump has launched successive waves of tariffs on many products, from aluminum to automobiles.

Trump pledged on April 2 to impose broad and reciprocal taxes on US trade partners.

Continue Reading

ASIA

Trump’s potential auto tariffs worry Japan and South Korea

Published

on

Following US President Donald Trump’s announcement that he would impose a 25% tariff on imported cars and auto parts, Japan’s Prime Minister sounded the alarm on Thursday.

Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba told lawmakers during a parliamentary session, “We need to consider appropriate responses,” adding, “All options will be on the table.”

This move, seen as undermining a bilateral agreement made between Trump and then-Prime Minister Shinzo Abe in September 2019, came as a surprise to Japan. This limited trade deal had opened Japan’s market to more American agricultural products. The agreement states that the two countries “will refrain from taking measures contrary to the spirit of these agreements.”

Japanese automakers reacted cautiously to the announcement. Toyota, Subaru, Mazda, and Honda issued brief statements saying they were assessing the potential impact.

Imported cars and trucks are currently subject to tariffs of 2.5% and 25%, respectively. When the new tariffs take effect on April 3, these rates will rise to 27.5% and 50%. The 25% tariff will also apply to automotive parts like engines and transmissions, taking effect no later than May 3.

Japan’s Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi said the government intends to negotiate exemptions. Economists say it is unclear how exemptions might be secured, but there are several options.

According to economists, options Japan might consider include voluntary export restraints, a commitment to increase imports of items like natural gas, grain, and meat, and replacing Russian natural gas with gas from the US. In 2023, 8.9% of Japan’s natural gas imports came from Russia, while 7.2% came from the US.

“Japan will likely be looking at all these options,” said Koichi Fujishiro, a senior economist at the Dai-ichi Life Research Institute.

South Korea in a similar situation

South Korea is also expected to seek exemptions. Analysts said that South Korean automaker Hyundai Motor Group’s announcement earlier this week of a $21 billion US investment would help its negotiating position.

Esther Yim, a senior analyst at Samsung Securities, said, “The US has, in principle, applied a 25% tariff on all imported cars,” adding, “Washington can then negotiate with each country, and I think investment can be used as leverage.”

South Korea’s Ministry of Industry pledged an emergency response by April to help the country’s automakers, who are expected to face “significant challenges” when the tariffs take effect.

Over the years, global automakers have shifted to local production to avoid trade friction. According to the Mitsubishi Research Institute, 60% of Japanese cars sold in the US are produced in the US. This figure drops to 40% for Korean cars. For European brands, the rate is as high as 70%.

Although Ishiba insists all options are on the table, few analysts expect Japan to resort to retaliatory measures, at least at this point. “Japan would gain very little by retaliating against US tariffs,” Fujishiro said.

At a summit with Trump in February, Ishiba pointed out that Japan is the largest investor in the US and a significant job creator, promising to work towards increasing Japan’s investment balance from $783.3 billion in 2023 to $1 trillion.

Cars, Japan’s largest export item to the US, are worth 6 trillion yen ($40 billion) and will account for 28% of Japan’s total exports in 2024. This amount is equivalent to 1% of Japan’s nominal gross domestic product.

Takahide Kiuchi from the Nomura Research Institute estimates that a 25% tariff would reduce Japan’s car exports to the US by 15% to 20% and lower Japan’s GDP by 0.2%.

If Japanese automakers try to respond by shifting production to the US, this would reduce domestic employment and hollow out the country’s economy in the long run.

Masanori Katayama, chairman of the Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, said at a press conference last week, “Car exports from Japan are necessary to supplement the domestic production of Japanese automakers and to provide a lineup of attractive cars… to meet the diverse needs of American customers through car dealerships in every US state.”

Katayama said that when the US implements the tariff, “a significant production adjustment is expected. The Japanese auto industry consists not only of automakers but also parts suppliers and employs 5.5 million people.”

Katayama insisted that the industry and the Japanese government must come together to take action and keep domestic supply chains intact.

The tariffs are also expected to harm American automakers because they too source parts and manufacture globally to keep costs down and make their cars competitive in the market.

Nomura analyst Anindya Das said General Motors could fall into an operating loss on an annual basis due to its reliance on factories in Mexico. He added that Toyota could also see a 30% drop in operating profit.

Jennifer Safavian, president and CEO of Autos Drive America, an industry group representing international automakers operating in the US, including Toyota, Honda, Nissan, and others, said, “Tariffs imposed today will make it more expensive to produce and sell cars in the US, ultimately leading to higher prices, fewer choices for consumers, and fewer manufacturing jobs in the US.”

Continue Reading

ASIA

South Korean opposition leader Lee Jae-myung acquitted in election law case

Published

on

A court in South Korea on Wednesday overturned a lower court’s decision, ruling that the main opposition party leader is not guilty of violating election law. If this decision is upheld, it will pave the way for him to run in the next presidential election.

Prosecutors can appeal the decision, which could take the case to the Supreme Court, South Korea’s highest judicial body.

Speaking outside the court after the ruling was announced, Lee Jae-myung thanked the court for the decision, which he described as “the right decision.”

The charges against Lee stem from remarks he made in 2021 while competing in his party’s presidential primary, where he allegedly denied knowing one of the key figures in a real estate development scandal. The scandal involved a redevelopment project in Seongnam city, where Lee was mayor. Prosecutors allege Lee lied about his relationship with businessman Kim Moon-ki to conceal his own culpability in the real estate deal.

Immediately after the court’s decision was announced, Kweon Seong-dong, leader of the ruling People Power Party, called the ruling “regrettable” and urged the Supreme Court to quickly decide the case.

Lee, a trained lawyer and experienced politician, lost the 2022 presidential election by the narrowest margin in South Korea’s democratic history to now-impeached President Yoon Suk Yeol.

Yoon, Lee’s fierce rival, is awaiting a Constitutional Court ruling on his impeachment over charges of leading an insurrection in December. Lawmakers voted to impeach Yoon following his attempt to declare martial law in early December, which he claimed was necessary to protect South Korea from opposition “anti-state forces.” The measure was quickly rejected in the National Assembly, but the attempt triggered a political crisis that continues months later.

The Constitutional Court completed hearings on Yoon’s case late last month and is expected to deliver its verdict within days, although no official date has been announced. If the court finds Yoon not guilty, he will be immediately reinstated. If found guilty, an early election will be held within 60 days.

Data released last week by polling firm Gallup Korea showed Lee as the leading choice among potential candidates for the next presidential election. Lee, with a support rate of 36%, was far ahead of the number 2 likely candidate, conservative Labor Minister Kim Moon-soo.

Yoon’s impeachment delay: Legal rigour or political deadlock?

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey