America
The debate over Biden’s fitness for the presidency: The circle narrows
Calls are growing in the US for Vice President Joe Biden to withdraw from the presidential race.
Democratic donors have warned that Biden’s refusal to step aside has “drained” funds for the November election and threatens to undermine the party’s efforts to defeat Donald Trump.
According to a report in the Financial Times (FT), donors have become a key audience in the battle over Biden’s future, with some aggressively pushing for his withdrawal even as Democratic members of Congress waver on his candidacy.
Their growing willingness to withdraw from the campaign, expressed in interviews with donors from Wall Street to Hollywood, poses a new risk to Biden’s re-election if he remains in the race for the White House, which is expected to be the most expensive in US history.
Donors say ‘money is drying up’
“As of today, it’s going to be very difficult for the president to raise money from big donors. It’s drying up so fast that it’s going to be extraordinarily difficult for him to stay in the race.”
Another donor, who has been in the party for decades, said the money was “drying up” and added: “When I talk to other donors, nine to one, they don’t plan to contribute … because they’re worried about losing.
Biden has sought to allay donors’ concerns in recent days, and on Monday he addressed them by participating in a conference call moderated by campaign manager Jennifer O’Malley Dillon.
While critical Democrats, including the Congressional Black Caucus and the Hispanic Caucus, have offered support for Biden, the effort has given Biden some breathing room as no member of the official party leadership has openly called for him to step aside.
But several high-profile Biden supporters, including Netflix co-founder Reed Hastings, hotel magnate Stewart Bainum Jr. and actor George Clooney, have explicitly cited the president’s mental instability in their calls for him to step aside.
Some ‘fat wallets’ continue to pour in money
One Democratic donor said a long-time donor had refused to even hear an offer of more money. “It’s really hard to raise money in any way. Since the debate, [donors] have gone from not enthusiastic to just angry,” the fundraiser said.
Biden’s campaign said the president’s poor debate performance against Trump late last month had not hurt fundraising, pointing to $38 million raised shortly after the event.
Roger Hochschild, former chairman of Discover and one of Biden’s biggest donors, suggested in an email on Wednesday that Democrats were “coalescing” around their presumptive presidential nominee after the “initial wave of concern”.
Another major Biden donor, Peter Lowy, former CEO of the Westfield Group and an investor in the English soccer team Leeds United, donated $929,600 to the president’s joint fundraising group on Monday, the largest amount.
“I’m a businessman and I make decisions based on results,” Lowy said, pointing to the strong US economy under Biden as one of the reasons for his support.
In the 2020 race, Biden became the first candidate in US history to raise more than $1 billion, beating Trump, who raised $774 million, according to OpenSecrets. Including outside groups, the 2020 election cost more than $2.7 billion.
Clooney’s call for Biden to ‘step aside’ could be effective
On the other hand, Clooney’s call for Biden to drop out of the race could encourage others to take a similar stance. Last month, the actor spearheaded a $28 million fundraising drive in Hollywood.
Some Wall Street donors are now preparing to put more pressure on Biden to withdraw, but he said he was disappointed by his intransigence.
“I never thought I’d say this, but I’m hoping he makes a big gaffe,” said one Democratic donor in New York, adding that it would force Democratic elders like Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer or South Carolina Congressman Jim Clyburn to give a “time’s up” speech.
Some donors warned that if Biden did not withdraw, the party risked losing both houses of Congress as well as the White House.
Pelosi joins the chorus
On the other hand, Nancy Pelosi also gave a strong indication that she expects Biden to withdraw.
Pelosi, a former speaker of the House of Representatives and one of the party’s most influential members of Congress, said in an interview with MSNBC: “It’s up to the president to decide whether or not to run. We’re all encouraging him to make that decision because time is running out,” Pelosi said in an interview with MSNBC.
Clooney, on the other hand, wrote in an op-ed for the New York Times that he likes Biden, but that “the only battle he cannot win is the battle against time”.
Clooney said: “None of us can win. It’s devastating to say this, but the Joe Biden I was with at the fundraiser three weeks ago was not the Joe ‘big f-ing deal’ Biden of 2010. He wasn’t even the Joe Biden of 2020. He was the man we all saw in the debate,” he said.
America
Musk appointed co-director of Pentagon future warfare initiative
The world’s richest man, Elon Musk, has assumed the co-directorship of a Pentagon initiative focused on the future of warfare, known as “Project Meridian”.
Musk’s new role was announced by US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth.
Musk, who has long expressed his conviction that wars will ultimately be fought with autonomous unmanned aerial vehicles, will advise the project as co-director alongside Palmer Luckey, founder of defence start-up Anduril, and former Speaker of the House of Representatives Newt Gingrich.
In a memorandum issued at the Pentagon, Hegseth stated that the group would “examine the battlefields of the future” and “determine which weapons and technologies warfighters must employ to achieve dominance in these environments.”
During his “State of the Force” address at Marine Corps Base Quantico, Hegseth said:
“The best predictors of future conflict do not reside exclusively within the Pentagon. Obvious biases and risks arise when we task ourselves with both framing the questions and answering them.”
Hegseth stated that this initiative would commence immediately and that, following his address, he would convene with Musk, Luckey, and Gingrich at a secure location.
Project Meridian will have 120 days to “ruthlessly map the trajectory of wars, domains, and technologies”, a process that will culminate in the public disclosure of its findings alongside a classified annex.
Hegseth outlined an expansive mandate extending “from beneath the surface of the Earth to beyond the Moon.”
Rather than formulating new military strategies or policies, the panel will seek to identify “the domains we must seize and the capabilities we must master”, focusing on the effort to “discover, develop, and field” the weapons and systems that next-generation American troops may require.
The group is expected to submit a report containing recommendations to him by the end of January.
In 2024, Musk remarked: “Future wars will be entirely about drones and hypersonic missiles.” This was merely one of several similar statements he has made in recent years.
For Musk, whose oversight role at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) ended in turmoil and escalated into a dispute with President Donald Trump over Trump’s spending bill, this appointment marks his formal return to government in an official capacity.
Musk and Trump ultimately reconciled, and Musk attended a meeting on artificial intelligence safety at the White House this week alongside other technology leaders.
Meridian forms part of a broader push announced by Hegseth to restructure the military around autonomous warfare and rapidly advancing technologies.
Hegseth announced the establishment of the Autonomous Warfare Command (AUTOWARCOM), a new four-star combatant command endowed with what he termed “service-like authorities” to scale autonomous and robotic capabilities across the joint force.
The Department of War will also begin phasing in new occupational frameworks across all military branches to establish specialised career tracks for what Hegseth described as “the next generation of autonomous warfighters.”
“We should have conceived an Autonomous Warfare Command a decade ago,” Hegseth said, explaining that Meridian aims to gaze far enough ahead to enable the military to anticipate the next technological shift rather than lag behind.
America
Pentagon breach exposes personal records of three million people
A cyberattack targeting the US Department of War’s personnel database has resulted in the leak of personal information belonging to approximately 3 million people.
Speaking to ABC News, a Pentagon official stated that the system accessed by unauthorised individuals contained the records of 2,760,000 living persons and 294,000 deceased individuals.
The Military Times portal, which first broke the news, had reported the number of affected individuals as approximately 4 million based on two sources. The Pentagon official subsequently conveyed different figures to ABC News.
The leak encompasses Social Security numbers and duty information belonging to military personnel and civilian employees. According to an official notification examined by Military Times, the compromised records may also include names, dates of birth, contact information, sex, race, and military occupational specialties.
The unauthorised access to the information system of the Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) lasted for approximately nine months, between October 2025 and 16 July 2026.
ABC News reported that the access in question was obtained by a small number of third-party users. The vulnerability was closed after it was identified.
The DMDC is considered one of the Pentagon’s primary personnel records centres. More than 60 million records belonging to active-duty personnel, reservists, civilian staff, contractors, retirees, veterans, and military family members are stored at the centre.
The Pentagon has not detected any evidence that the leaked data has been misused. Military Times reported that affected individuals were offered identity restoration and credit history monitoring services.
A similar data breach previously occurred on the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) recruitment website, FBIJobs.gov. According to information obtained by ABC News from internal communications and sources, the FBI is considering the possibility that data belonging to its entire staff may have been stolen.
The New York Times (NYT) examined a portion of the stolen FBI records. Home addresses, telephone numbers, official email addresses, Social Security numbers, dates of birth, hiring dates, and emergency contact details for relatives were identified within these documents.
The database also contained unit designations, duty roles, and information regarding the supervisors of personnel. Some records revealed assignments within counterintelligence and counternarcotics units, as well as departments examining threats originating from Russia, China, and Iran.
Ciaran Martin, the former head of the UK National Cyber Security Centre, noted that this type of breach could directly affect the FBI’s operational capabilities.
The hacker group known as ShinyHunters had announced that it had seized medical data and security clearance records alongside files belonging to tens of thousands of active and former FBI employees.
Experts evaluating the matter for the NYT warned that this information could be used to track agents, threaten their families, or compile dossiers by foreign intelligence services.
The ShinyHunters group initially threatened to release the data unless the bureau withdrew an advisory it had published concerning the group’s attack methods.
The group later asserted that it had never intended to leak the information and characterised its action as an advertising campaign.
In a report published in May, Reuters noted that the personal data of US military personnel had been used in surveillance and attack preparations.
According to the agency, Washington’s adversaries gained the ability to pinpoint areas where troops were concentrated by exploiting commercially available location data. US lawmakers at the time criticised the Pentagon for failing to adequately protect the personal data of military personnel.
America
Canada diversifies oil and gas exports away from US
US President Donald Trump’s trade policy and the Washington administration’s push to increase Venezuelan oil imports are prompting Canada to diversify its energy exports.
According to a report by The Wall Street Journal, recent developments are accelerating Canada’s development of new oil and natural gas projects.
Steps taken by the Ottawa administration, which aspires to become an energy superpower, are seen as potentially strengthening the country’s position in global markets.
In Canada, the world’s fourth-largest oil producer and fifth-largest natural gas producer, the energy sector accounts for approximately one-fifth of total exports.
Almost all of the country’s natural gas exports and approximately 90% of its oil exports go to the US.
The newspaper writes that the trade war with Washington and the atmosphere of confrontation entered into with Iran have heightened Canada’s desire to turn to alternative markets outside the US.
Officials plan to increase shipments of oil and liquefied natural gas (LNG) to European and Asian markets.
Accelerating infrastructure investments in line with this target, Canada is also shortening approval processes. The government is prioritising the construction of an oil pipeline extending specifically to the west coast.
According to the newspaper’s estimate, if major pipeline projects are implemented, Canada’s daily oil transport capacity could rise to 6.8 million barrels by 2034.
Routes heading to the west coast will make up approximately 30% of this capacity.
The Canadian administration is simultaneously advancing LNG export projects. According to the report, these investments could allow approximately 55% of Canadian natural gas exports to be directed to markets outside the US by the early or mid-2030s.
While the government expands tax incentives for the oil and natural gas sector, the province of Alberta also plans to overhaul its royalty system.
However, the newspaper notes that implementing the new projects requires heavy investment, and the process depends on the final decisions taken by producers as well as the completion of regulatory approval processes.
The expansion of pipeline and LNG infrastructure could gradually reduce Canada’s dependence on the US market while raising its share in the global energy market.
The Canadian Prime Minister’s demand to reduce reliance on the US market had also come to the fore in July.
According to Carney’s statement, the province of Alberta submitted a plan for a pipeline spanning more than 1,000 kilometres to the west coast of British Columbia.
Targeted for completion by September 2027, the line will reach the Pacific coast by following an existing corridor through the mountainous terrain.
This shift in energy comes at a time of strained relations with the US. Donald Trump said that if Canada obtains associate member status in the European Union, he could halt trade with Europe in certain sectors and impose high tariffs.
As reported by the Associated Press, Trump characterised such a rapprochement as a “potentially hostile act”.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen had proposed opening the path for Canada to become the EU’s first associate member. The terms of this associate membership status, which is not defined in EU treaties, are not yet clear and require the approval of member states to enter into force.
Canada, which does not seek full membership, aims for maximum rapprochement with the EU.
Following Trump’s return to the White House, relations between Washington and Ottawa deteriorated. The Trump administration, which repeatedly called on Canada to become the “51st state” of the US, introduced additional tariffs.
In July, the US began imposing 50% tariffs on certain Canadian-origin goods.
-
Europe5 days agoEuropean unions urge governments to scrap all Palantir deals
-
Diplomacy5 days agoEast-West Forum in Istanbul highlights irreversible shift to multipolarity
-
Europe1 week agoEmmanuel Todd says West faces collapse amid Ukraine and Iran crises
-
Europe1 week agoEuropean intelligence chiefs divide over risk of Russian attack
-
Diplomacy1 week agoEast-West Forum in Istanbul to debate multipolarity and global order
-
Middle East1 week agoSharaa says 7 October must not shape Israel policy on Syria
-
America1 week agoRepublican support for Trump’s war with Iran drops sharply in polls
-
Middle East1 week agoPalestinian factions confront legitimacy crisis at Istanbul talks
