Asia
The end of the Assad regime: Does worse replace bad?
The armed rebels ended the 50-year regime of the Assad family in Syria. The rapid advance of the opposition, while the army of the Assad regime did not show much resistance, surprised everyone — so much so that Assad’s supporters (Russia and Iran) did not find much opportunity to defend him or they considered the intervention useless.
The fact that some people say that the allies of the Assad regime traded him is still a hypothesis, and the fact of the fall cannot be properly analyzed by relying on it. Because this approach underestimates the real factors of the failure of Bashar Assad’s government, or in the worst case, ignores it by overestimating the conspiracy theory. Even if there was such a conspiracy, it can only tell a small part of the reality of the Syrian crisis, not all of it.
What has been revealed so far is not the high power of the armed rebels, but the excessive weakness of the Syrian army and its escape from the front lines of the war, which was least expected.
During the height of the war that started 2011, the army of this country showed a lot of resistance against terrorist groups ISIS and the same groups that were able to prevail over Assad, and later when Russia and Iran came in to support it and Assad were able to suppress the armed opposition with more force. With this knowledge of the Syrian army, it was less conceivable that he would simply give up the war and run away.
The most important lesson that can be learned from this event is that no matter how strong and invincible the armies appear, when they are not motivated to fight and are unable to fight, they will fall as fast as they have achieved impressive victories in the past.
Terrorist groups have proven that the key to their success is, among other factors, stubbornness, single-mindedness, and a high motivation for violence and killing. The Taliban also succeeded in continuing the war against one of the largest armies in the world with the same stubbornness and consistent terrorist motive. In several cases, the commanders of this powerful army have to admit that “we are tired of killing you.” In Syria, when Bashar Assad’s army got tired of fighting, it was the armed opposition who took the initiative in the battlefield and captured areas one after the other.
The Syrian army seemed reluctant to fight, causing a rapid fall of provinces one by one that even Assad’s supporters can’t do anything
When the army practically refused to fight with the terrorist groups, especially the Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), Bashar al-Assad’s allies (Russia and Iran) also looked at the Syrian army with reluctance and disgust and realized that it was no longer possible to save Assad.
It was because they did not act seriously in defense of the Syrian government or acted too late, which had no effect. Whatever it was, the Assad regime has collapsed with his escape from Syria and the armed opposition has dominated the situation.
The fate of this country is now in the hands of armed groups that are not only not well remembered, but also have a much worse track record compared to the Assad government.
Syria is currently a divided country, and each part of it is under the control of a militant group; Groups, some of which are not ideologically similar and have even fought with each other.
Along with numerous militia groups, from world powers (Russia and America) to regional actors such as Israel, each of them has settled in a corner of this country – Iran also had a serious and effective presence in Syria before the fall of the Bashar Assad regime, which It does not seem to have much foothold in that country after this.
Based on the ground reality, it is too soon to talk with full confidence about a better future for Syria.
Therefore, the Assad regime was only one of the actors in the multi-part country called Syria, which has now joined history. The collapse of this regime will strengthen armed groups as well as global and regional actors active in the Syrian crisis.
Right now, not much time has passed since the fall of the Assad regime, the conflict between the forces loyal to different countries and groups which some of them are being supported by the United States of America, has begun. So, the possibility that Syria will witness the escalation of civil war and geopolitical competition between global and regional powers is strongly suggested, and the symptoms of this disastrous situation are already showing themselves.
Although it is still too early to speak with full confidence about the future of Syria; But what we can say for sure based on the current reality on the ground in this country is that the difficult days of Syria have just begun.
Afghanistan’s Taliban celebrated the fall of Bashar Assad’s regime
Local sources in Paktia, Paktika, Logar and Laghman provinces say that the Taliban fighters in these provinces celebrated the fall of Bashar Assad regime and “rejoiced”.
Sources told Harici that the Taliban came to the streets around the cities of these provinces and also the Taliban fired aerial shots and played songs loudly in several districts to celebrate (HTS) victory in Syria.
On the other hand, sources in Laghman said that the Taliban distributed sweets to the people and students of schools yesterday and today. The Taliban called the rebels of HTS their “brothers” and chanted slogans against the former government of Syria, Israel and the United States. Taliban members and soldiers in Khost, Nangarhar, Panjshir, Herat and Ghor provinces also celebrated the fall of the Assad regime by distributing sweets.
The Taliban Prime Minister’s Office also in a statement said that the political commission of this group has held a meeting to discuss the recent developments in Syria and the Middle East.
Asia
South Korea emerges as major beneficiary of shifts in global arms market
Uncertainty in the global arms market, driven by the United States reassessing its relationships with allies and a broad rearmament drive across many countries, is creating major commercial opportunities for South Korea. According to an analysis published by Politico, Seoul has become the world’s fastest-growing supplier of military equipment.
The report said that large-scale conflicts around the world have created urgent demand for weapons as countries seek both to support allies and strengthen their own defenses against potential future confrontations. At the same time, changes in the US role within the global arms market have opened new opportunities for South Korean manufacturers. Statements and policy decisions by US President Donald Trump regarding NATO have led allies to question Washington’s reliability in times of crisis, increasing uncertainty across the global market. In addition, the diversion of a large share of US weapons supplies to the Middle East because of ongoing conflicts has placed further strain on already overstretched supply chains.
European countries increase purchases from South Korea
Faced with what Politico described as the Trump administration’s more distant approach toward allies, European countries in particular have accelerated arms purchases from South Korea. The publication noted that Seoul’s growing influence as a supplier has been driven largely by major defense contracts signed with Poland.
Following the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine, several Eastern European capitals, including Warsaw, transferred portions of their military inventories to Kyiv, relying on German support to replenish their arsenals. However, Berlin’s slow pace in replacing allied stockpiles generated frustration across the region.
South Korea emerged as an alternative supplier during this period and became a reliable source of military equipment for Eastern European countries. Poland became Seoul’s largest customer through a $13.7 billion agreement covering the purchase of tanks, rocket launchers, self-propelled howitzers and other military equipment.
“We were originally preparing against North Korea, but now we are ready to provide these solutions to customers around the world,” said Choo Hyung-kim, head of the Security Management Institute, a defense analysis organization affiliated with South Korea’s National Assembly.
Lack of political baggage gives Seoul an advantage
Politico reported that one of the greatest advantages enjoyed by South Korean defense companies is the absence of the “political baggage” associated with major arms exporters such as the United States, China, Russia and Israel.
According to the figures cited, the combined projected revenue of South Korea’s largest defense companies, including Hanwha Group, Hyundai Rotem, LIG Nex1 and Korea Aerospace Industries, is expected to reach approximately $37 billion in 2026. That would represent a fourfold increase from their combined revenues in 2021.
Meanwhile, an official from the office of former South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol told the Yonhap news agency in 2024 that the scale of any weapons shipments to Ukraine would depend on Russia’s approach to its relationship with North Korea. Seoul later clarified that it had no plans to provide ammunition directly to Ukraine.
Asia
DeepSeek raises $7.4 billion in funding round, surpasses $50 billion valuation
Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek has raised more than 50 billion yuan ($7.4 billion) in its first funding round. According to Reuters, citing The Information, the company’s valuation has surpassed $50 billion.
The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported that the capital will be used to support the costly development of advanced artificial intelligence technologies.
According to the newspaper, citing sources familiar with the matter, investors valued the company at more than $50 billion. The valuation makes DeepSeek the most valuable AI startup in China.
DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng reportedly owned about 90% of the company before the funding round. Liang is said to have contributed roughly $3 billion during the fundraising process, making him the largest participant in the round.
According to Reuters, the transaction was structured in an unusual way that allows Liang to retain control of the company.
Rather than investing directly in DeepSeek, investors were required to invest through a limited partnership managed by a senior executive of the startup. Under the arrangement, investors were not granted voting rights. The report also said restrictions were placed on the use of invested funds for a period of five years.
The sole exception was the China National Artificial Intelligence Industry Investment Fund. The fund reportedly invested approximately $150 million directly in DeepSeek, allowing it to retain both voting rights and full discretion over its stake.
Other major investors in the funding round included Tencent, which invested approximately $1.5 billion, and Contemporary Amperex Technology, which invested about $740 million.
Bloomberg previously described the transaction as one of the largest fundraising rounds undertaken by a Chinese startup. According to the agency, the investment marks a new stage in the efforts of leading Chinese AI companies to compete with their US rivals.
DeepSeek told prospective investors that it would prioritize foundational and transformative AI research over short-term commercialization.
Based in the Chinese city of Hangzhou, DeepSeek emerged as one of Beijing’s most prominent AI companies after unveiling a more powerful and lower-cost model more than a year ago. The WSJ reported that interest surrounding the company has accelerated AI adoption in China and increased investor appetite for domestic startups.
Liang Wenfeng has previously said he intends to continue developing open-source AI models and ultimately aims to achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI). According to Bloomberg, the strategy continues an approach that has contributed to the spread of open models and influenced companies across China’s AI market, including Alibaba’s Qwen platform.
Bloomberg added that while global rivals such as OpenAI and Anthropic are exploring public offerings and revenue-generation strategies, DeepSeek has maintained its “research first” approach.
Asia
China issues white paper on global governance reform, urging support for UN-centered international system
China’s State Council Information Office on Wednesday released a white paper titled “A More Just and Equitable Global Governance: China’s Principles, Proposals and Actions.”
The white paper was issued to introduce China’s principles, proposals, and actions regarding global governance, to foster a broader consensus within the international community, to enable more effective responses to global challenges, and to build a more just and equitable global governance system.
The document states that global governance is a common endeavor concerning the well-being of all humanity, and that building a just and equitable global governance system is a shared vision long pursued by people around the world. It also emphasizes that China has always been an active participant, contributor, and builder of global governance.
According to the white paper, in the new era, Chinese President Xi Jinping has put forward the vision of building a community with a shared future for mankind. Advancing a global governance system shaped on the basis of extensive consultation, joint contribution, and shared benefits, Xi has called for true multilateralism to promote an equal and orderly multipolar world and an economic globalization that is inclusive and beneficial for all.
In 2025, Xi proposed the Global Governance Initiative (GGI). This initiative was designed to offer China’s solutions to two urgent questions of the era: What kind of global governance system should be established, and how should global governance be reformed and improved?
The white paper notes that shortly after its introduction, the GGI received support from approximately 160 countries and international organizations, with more than 60 countries joining the Group of Friends of the Global Governance Initiative. It states that the international community is of the view that the GGI sends a clear message: to defend multilateralism, join forces, and strive for a just future.
According to the white paper, the GGI aligns with the growing trend toward greater democracy in international relations and strengthens international confidence in the practice of multilateralism. The initiative provides a clear and actionable roadmap for the improvement of global governance, injecting valuable stability and positive energy into a turbulent world.
The white paper emphasizes that China proposed the GGI to accelerate the construction of a more just and equitable global governance system. The document states that firmly defending the authority and status of the United Nations is of fundamental importance for the effective implementation of this initiative.
According to the white paper, success will also depend on major countries acting with a sense of responsibility and all nations working together in unity to bridge deficits in peace and development. It states that rather than attempting to reinvent the wheel, all countries must firmly defend the international system with the UN at its core, maintain the international order based on international law, and uphold the fundamental norms of international relations based on the purposes and principles of the UN Charter.
In addition to the preface and conclusion, the white paper consists of five chapters: “Today’s World Faces Severe and Complex Challenges,” “The Global Governance Initiative Responds to the Challenges of Our Era,” “China’s Contribution to the Development of Global Governance,” “Directing the Course of Change Toward a Bright Future,” and “Advancing Hand in Hand at a Critical Juncture in History.”
-
Europe2 weeks agoAfD says Ukraine should compensate Germany over Nord Stream sabotage
-
Asia2 weeks agoPentagon adds Alibaba, Baidu and BYD to list of firms with alleged Chinese military ties
-
Opinion1 week agoA voice rising from New Delhi: BRICS’s manifesto for a new world order
-
Europe2 weeks agoToyota and JLR warn EU ‘Made in Europe’ rules could threaten jobs and investment
-
America2 weeks agoWorld Cup referee from Somalia denied entry to US as immigration scrutiny intensifies
-
Middle East1 week agoMine clearing in Strait of Hormuz could delay shipping traffic for up to 50 days
-
America7 days agoData leak exposes Peter Thiel’s secret ‘Dialog’ network of politicians, regulators, and tech elites
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoTürkiye calls for Azerbaijan-Armenia peace treaty, highlights normalization steps with Yerevan
