Connect with us

Asia

The human cost of US aid suspension: Ethical and practical concerns  

Published

on

President Trump’s halt of all existing foreign assistance – with very limited exceptions – will have disastrous consequences for millions of Afghans, among many others around the world. Its approach of a 90-day freeze and stop-work may offer an opportunity for the reform of the international aid system and its bureaucracy, but its potential costs in lives and suffering will raise serious ethical questions.

While the new U.S. administration has legitimate concerns about foreign assistance, it could have taken a more compassionate and responsible approach to address them. First, two of the administration’s concerns – aid efficiency and accountability, as well as diversion by the Taliban and others – are widely shared by the Afghan people, as they undermine the generosity of U.S. taxpayers and other donor nations and divert life-saving resources away from those truly in need.

A serious assessment to enhance efficiency, effectiveness, and accountability within the aid bureaucracy, reduce its hefty overheads, and prevent diversion and misuse was long overdue.

However, linking aid to the interests of the donor – with consistency of foreign aid with U.S. policies cited as the third reason for the suspension – marks a significant departure from long-held international humanitarian principles.

These principles dictate that humanitarian aid should be provided based solely on human needs, forming a key part of the rules-based global order that the U.S. has historically championed and defended. While the international community has applied different rules to development financing as part of their foreign policy, humanitarian aid has remained distinct and often shielded from non-humanitarian considerations.

Second, the suspension of aid poses serious life-threatening risks to hundreds of millions of aid recipients whose lives and livelihoods depend on such assistance. The impact will be extensive given the scale of U.S. foreign assistance, which is the largest among global aid donors. This will be particularly painful and costly for Afghans, of whom, according to a recent UN report, about 11.6 million—roughly 25% of the population—have recently experienced acute food insecurity at “crisis” or higher levels.

Although it is reassuring that emergency food aid is one of the three exceptions—the other two being military aid to Israel and Egypt—the policy details and guidelines remain unclear. In the case of Afghanistan, even if food aid is not part of the suspension, the impact will still be enormously harmful. Millions of Afghan people, including women and children, depend not only on existing U.S. assistance for food aid but also on water, shelter, critical healthcare services, mine clearance, as well as education and agricultural recovery. Even before the uncertain outcome of the U.S. assessment, the speculative impact of the announcement has already caused a 13% depreciation in the value of the Afghan currency against the U.S. dollar, reducing the purchasing power of one of the world’s poorest and most vulnerable populations. It would have been more appropriate for the new administration, both technically and ethically, to conduct the assessment—and possibly implement reform measures—while ensuring the continuation of all life-saving and sustaining assistance. The U.S. is certainly in a better position to manage three more months of inefficiencies within the aid system than the hundreds of millions of hungry and desperate people who now face the risks of this suspension.

The article is written by the former Afghan Foreign Minister Mohammad Haneef Atmar.

Asia

Nvidia CEO visits China amid US AI chip ban

Published

on

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang visited Beijing on Thursday after Washington’s new restrictions on the chipmaker’s sales caused its shares to fall.

Huang’s visit comes at a time when Beijing and Washington are facing off in a tariff war, and Nvidia is one of the US technology leaders bearing the brunt of the trade war. Huang had dinner with US President Donald Trump a week earlier.

According to local media and a person familiar with his travel itinerary, Huang arrived in China on Wednesday to meet with officials and technology leaders to discuss the consequences of Donald Trump’s move to further restrict sales in the country.

According to a post on Chinese state media’s social media site Weibo, Huang’s trip took place at the invitation of the China Council for the Promotion of International Trade, a government-affiliated trade group heavily involved in facilitating US-China business relations.

The Financial Times reported that while in Beijing, Huang also met with Liang Wenfeng, the founder of Chinese artificial intelligence start-up DeepSeek, to discuss developments in the artificial intelligence chip industry.

The post, which showed Huang smiling for the cameras, noted that the visit came after the US President had previously said he wanted to continue working with China.

On Tuesday, the Trump administration announced export restrictions on Nvidia’s H20 chip—a lower-powered version of its artificial intelligence products specifically designed for the Chinese market to comply with US controls.

Nvidia had been under the impression that it could continue selling the chip to China after the meeting between Huang and Trump at Mar-a-Lago earlier this month. The chipmaker had told major Chinese customers such as Alibaba, ByteDance, and Tencent that their H20 purchases would not be affected.

Nvidia announced yesterday that it would take a $5.5 billion hit to earnings as a result of the new controls.

The visit also comes as US lawmakers are requesting information from Nvidia about whether Chinese artificial intelligence group DeepSeek has been able to obtain export-controlled chips.

Continue Reading

Asia

China’s economy exceeds expectations with 5.4% growth in first quarter

Published

on

China’s economy surpassed expectations in the first quarter, driven by robust consumption and industrial production.

According to data released on Wednesday, China’s gross domestic product (GDP) grew by 5.4% year-on-year in the January-March quarter, exceeding the 5.1% increase expected by analysts polled by Reuters.

Xu Tianchen, a senior economist at the Economist Intelligence Unit, described the 5.4% growth rate as “a very good start,” noting that government stimulus had boosted consumption and supported investment.

“In each of the past two years, China’s first quarter has been high, and the second quarter has been low,” Xu said, adding that a “strong and timely policy response” was needed, given the additional pressure from US tariffs.

Exports helped support growth last year, even as a trillion-dollar trade surplus, a prolonged real estate sector slump, and sluggish domestic demand continued to undermine a solid recovery.

Chinese Premier Li Qiang said this week that the country’s exporters would have to cope with “profound” external changes and pledged to support greater domestic consumption.

According to Reuters, analysts are concerned that US tariffs could lead to a sharp decline in the momentum China has gained.

The economy is expected to grow at an annual rate as low as 4.5% in 2025, slowing from last year’s 5.0% pace and falling short of the official target of around 5.0%, according to a Reuters poll. Many analysts have sharply lowered their GDP forecasts for this year.

On Wednesday, ANZ lowered its China 2025 GDP forecast from 4.8% to 4.2% and its 2026 forecast from 4.5% to 4.3%, citing punitive US tariffs.

UBS painted an even more pessimistic picture this week, cutting its 2025 growth forecast for the Asian giant from 4% to 3.4%, assuming continued increases in China-US tariffs and additional stimulus from Beijing.

“We believe the tariff shock poses unprecedented challenges for China’s exports and will also lead to a major adjustment in the domestic economy,” UBS analysts said in a note.

While many other countries are covered by US tariffs, Trump has targeted China for the largest tariffs.

Last week, Trump’s move to raise tariffs on China by 145% led to Beijing raising tariffs on US goods by 125%.

Unemployment and deflation issues

The escalating trade war with the US overshadowed some of the brighter notes in separate data.

Retail sales, a key indicator of consumption, rose 5.9% year-on-year in March, after increasing 4.0% in January-February, while growth in factory output accelerated to 7.7% from 5.9% in the first two months. Both figures exceeded analysts’ forecasts.

The increase in retail sales was driven by sharp double-digit increases in sales of home electronics and furniture, aided by the government’s consumer goods trade-in program.

However, the decline in China’s real estate sector continued to be a drag on overall growth.

Real estate investment fell 9.9% year-on-year in the first three months, widening from a 9.8% drop in January-February. New home prices in March were unchanged from the previous month.

Data released on Wednesday indicated that the economic recovery is still uneven, particularly as high unemployment and persistent deflationary pressures raise concerns about weak demand.

“A good GDP does not represent the overall economic health of an economy,” said Raymond Yeung, chief China economist at ANZ. “Deflation and youth unemployment remain major concerns,” he added.

Broad policy measures required

Moreover, analysts believe that the increase in China’s exports in March—driven by factories rushing shipments to beat Trump’s latest tariffs—could sharply reverse in the coming months as heavy US tariffs take effect.

Analysts expect further support measures in the coming months, following monetary easing steps taken late last year.

Earlier this month, Fitch downgraded China’s credit rating, citing rapidly growing public debt and risks to public finances, signaling a difficult balancing act for policymakers seeking to expand consumption in the face of declining trade.

“The current situation is similar to the negative shocks China has experienced in the past, such as the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and the global financial crisis in 2008,” said Yeung from ANZ.

“We see limited options for Chinese authorities other than a major fiscal expansion to counter the tariff shock,” he assessed.

Continue Reading

Asia

China trade fair: US market ‘frozen’ amid tariff hikes

Published

on

Candice Li, attending the China trade fair in Canton, says that US orders for her firm’s medical devices have dried up after Washington increased tariffs on Chinese goods by 145%.

Speaking to Reuters, Candice Li, marketing manager at Conmo Electronic Co., said, “This is a matter of life and death because 60%-70% of our business is with American clients.” She added, “Goods cannot be exported, and money cannot be collected. This is a very serious situation.”

Li was at her firm’s booth at the Canton Fair in the southern city of Guangzhou, China’s largest trade fair, held twice a year, where more than 30,000 participants display their products in an area larger than 200 soccer fields.

This fair is the first China has held since US President Donald Trump introduced tariffs earlier this month, exceeding 100% for China and at least 10% for the rest of the world.

Most of the exporters Reuters spoke with said that US orders, vital for firms like Li’s, were either delayed or not arriving—a bad sign for the world’s second-largest economy, whose growth last year relied heavily on its trillion-dollar trade surplus.

No other country comes close to China’s sales of over $400 billion in goods to the US annually.

Even though the tariffs Trump will impose on the rest of the world are much lower, they are likely to reduce global demand in the coming months and, indirectly, the appetite for Chinese goods in other countries.

Kobe Huang, a sales representative for Shenzhen Landun Environmental Technology, which produces water filters and smart toilets, said at the China trade fair in Canton that European sales are up for now, but the US market is “frozen.”

“US clients and distributors haven’t canceled orders, but they’ve asked us to wait. So, we’re holding on,” he stated.

Levy Spence, a US importer and president of Air Esscentials, said, “Prices will go up.” He added, “Even for products we source in the United States, many of the raw materials come from all over the world. It’s not just about China tariffs.”

Organizers noted that approximately 170,000 overseas buyers had registered for this month’s fair as of April 8, compared to a record attendance of 253,000 at the previous fair, which ended in November. About 10% of these attendees come from the US and Europe, whereas the previous rate was about 20%.

The fair will take place from April 15 to May 5. Local media reported that a total of $25 billion in deals were made at the previous fair.

Many exporters said they were either moving production bases outside of China or shifting the markets where they sell away from the US.

Henry Han, sales manager at Apexto Electronics Co., which produces SSD and micro SD flash drives, says that the US market, which accounted for 30% before the pandemic, now accounts for only 10% of direct sales. Many of his clients receive shipments of components for final assembly in a third country to avoid tariffs.

Apexto conducted a study last year to see if it could move production to Vietnam or the Philippines to avoid being directly affected by US tariffs, but Han said these plans are currently on hold as these countries may also face high tariffs.

After Trump imposed a 46% tariff on Vietnam and 17% on the Philippines on April 2, he reduced these rates to 10% for the next three months while beginning bilateral negotiations on trade with approximately 75 different countries.

David Du, sales manager for speaker manufacturer Zealot, said that an order for 30,000 speakers to be distributed to Skechers stores in the US was suspended after Trump’s tariffs. However, he said they could rely on other markets.

Zealot had a major and unexpected breakthrough in Nigeria in 2015, where its all-in-one speaker, power bank, and emergency flashlight became a hit, accounting for 40% of total sales and taking 45 containers a month—a market now twice as large as the US.

Du said they are “as big as JBL” in Nigeria, referring to the California-based audio equipment brand.

Medical device maker Li said her firm cannot find new markets overnight. She fears Conmo will soon have to reduce working hours and, eventually, staffing levels.

Li said, “I worry that if the situation remains deadlocked and neither side gives in, it will be ordinary people who ultimately suffer. How will salaries be paid? There will be unemployment.”

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey