Asia
The Taiwan crisis: What does the Chinese media say?
The effects of the US House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan is still resonating. Although it was already well-understood that Beijing will not give an immediate response out of temper, it is still a topic of debate what measures will it take and what kind of responses will China give in the long run.
The Chinese media continues to discuss the policies of the Beijing administration and the position of the United States regarding Pelosi’s visit. There is an expectation within the Chinese public opinion, to deliver a strong response to Pelosi’s action in order to protect Chinese national reputation. Political scientists and academics on the other hand, are in favor of some more inclusive policies that would accelerate the reunification process with Taiwan. There are even comments that Beijing can turn this crisis into an opportunity.
The analysis column published by the Global Times has described Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan as a provocation, while being said that the US has now undermined the peace and stability and changed the status quo within the Taiwan Strait. The article reminds that the US and Western public opinion often targets China over the concepts of peace, stability and status quo, the article describes Pelosi’s visit as a “serious and destructive change” to the status quo in the Taiwan Straits, while calling this move as a “betrayal of the US political commitment to China”. The visit was described to have violated the One-China Principle and the Three Joint Communiques, which form the basis of Beijing-Washington relations, as well as violating the United Nations Resolution No 2758. The article argues that any countermeasures to be taken by China as a sovereign country, to defend its national interests, are both legitimate and necessary.
Hua said China had expressed time and again its opposition to Pelosi's provocative visit & noted her visit would violate one-China principle & infringe China's sovereignty & territorial integrity. pic.twitter.com/Ag4UGYwiEz
— Global Times (@globaltimesnews) August 4, 2022
Intimidating Pelosi
The countermeasures taken by China in this context are summarized as follows; First to define Pelosi as the main target. The main objective in this is to ensure that this risky move by Pelosi backfires at her, so that other American politicians like Pelosi can grasp that Taiwan is not a place they can visit at any instance. An example of China’s military countermeasure that has made Pelosi feel the intimidation was when her plane circled over the South China Sea, fearing the Chinese military firing drills with live ammunition could hit the plane, during Pelosi’s flight on last Tuesday.
Military countermeasures
Secondly, it is being argued that China’s countermeasures should not be a one-time intimidation, but a combination of long-term, decisive and steady actions. The importance and deterrence of the Chinese military’s drills around the island of Taiwan are once again underlined, with joint naval and air exercises in the north, southwest and southeast of the island starting Tuesday night, by long-range artillery firing in the Taiwan Straits and by conventional missile tests in the maritime zones east of the island. It is stressed that these exercises will provide a better understanding that the Strait of Taiwan is not an international water.
WATCH: PLA Army's latest long-range multiple-launch rocket systems spit fire at targets in designated areas in the eastern Taiwan Straits on Thursday. pic.twitter.com/Xa1pc5o1eF
— Global Times (@globaltimesnews) August 4, 2022
This will accelerate the unification process with Taiwan
Third, it is told in the article that China’s countermeasures are fundamentally aimed at promoting the process of national re-unification. And it is told that some actors like Pelosi cannot change “the historical and legal fact that Taiwan is a part of China” and cannot thwart China’s ascension to achieve a full reunification. The article argues that these moves from the USA, will further accelerate the process of reunification: “Every step taken by the foreign powers to escalate the provocations and to implement secret agreements will only further accelerate China’s realization of a full reunification.”
The entire Asia-Pacific theatre will be affected by this
On the CGTN, Pelosi’s visit was published with the headline ” Pelosi lit a fire that could consume the Asia-Pacific.” Describing this action from the US as a “brazen violation of China’s most sacred principle” and a “challenge to internationally recognized legal facts,” the article states that a strong public opinion has been formed in the country, against this message that is intended to be sent with the Taiwan visit.
Emphasizing that China has ” no option but to retaliate to this blatant challenge to its national sovereignty and territorial integrity”, the article refers to the Chinese military exercises around the island of Taiwan. At the conclusion of the article, Beijing-Washington relations are mentioned, and was stated that If the United States can’t find a rational approach to its relationship with China, it will “have to face a dangerous conflict of its own making again”.
PLA on Thursday conducted military exercises and training activities including live-fire drills around Taiwan island. https://t.co/UKJsEe4J3U pic.twitter.com/Uj6DJrsq0L
— CGTN (@CGTNOfficial) August 4, 2022
Pelosi in the front, Washington in the back
In another analysis article also published by the CGTN with the editor signature of Chen Wenling, the chief economist of the China Center for International Economic Exchange (CCIEE), it was argued that while this action could at first glance thought to belong to Pelosi personally, it is essentially a continuation of the US policy of containment of China. The article implies that Pelosi acts just as a side-actress: “Some American politicians seem to try persuading Pelosi to give up her trip to the island at first glance, but in fact they are secretly bringing Pelosi to the front stage”.
In the article it was emphasized that although the US has declared that it respects to the one-China principle, but has not acted accordingly, while giving examples of Washington’s actions: the US Congress has supported the “independence of Taiwan” by legislation; The State Department of the US has removed phrases such as “Taiwan as a part of China” from its official website; Taiwan was officially included in the “American Indo-Pacific Strategy”; Washington has intensified its arms sales to Taiwan to increase the region’s “asymmetric fighting capability” and to support the separatist activities such as the “Taiwanese independence movement”.
As for China’s countermeasures, sanctions are indicated: Taiwan has banned citrus fruits such as grapefruit, lemon and orange, as well as fish types such as grouper and mackerel, from being imported to the mainland. The decision also covers the import of natural sand. Chen Wenling’s analysis article ends with an emphasis on Chinese reunification, like the other articles.
Let us focus on the process, and not on the outcome
The analysis article published at China Daily, blames the Washington administration for the visit and indicates the internal conflicts and political fractures within the United States.
The article states that the main point to be analyzed about Pelosi’s visit is not the outcomes of this visit, but the process that has led to it, and that if these issues are not properly addressed, it is argued that “the flawed US political system will put the world in a constant trouble”. It is commented that Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan does not serve the American national interests, while the US will continue to pay the price for the rise of populism within its political elite. It is also noted that Beijing will take the initiative to turn this event over the Taiwan Strait into an opportunity, and “will not waste this opportunity in any possible way”.
Asia
Pentagon plans covert spy ring for economic war on China, report says
The US Department of War (Pentagon) is reportedly planning to establish an extensive network of deep-cover agents to wage economic warfare against China and other adversaries of the US.
According to a report by The Washington Post citing six sources familiar with the initiative, the plan has not yet been put into effect. The newspaper reported that the initiative remains at the planning stage. The Pentagon, however, denies that any such initiative exists.
The report said the operatives would pose as entrepreneurs or private sector employees while concealing their ties to the US government. The network’s mission would be to gather economic intelligence and counter China.
The programme is led by Tom Rakusa, who spent 39 years at the CIA. Rakusa serves as a senior adviser to Deputy Secretary of Defence Steve Feinberg.
The proposed spy network is seen as part of a broader policy by the Donald Trump administration to sharpen economic competition with other countries.
The US is already resorting to tariffs, export controls, and investment in strategic sectors, alongside expanding its economic intelligence gathering.
According to The Washington Post, the new initiative demonstrates the Pentagon’s growing influence under the Trump administration. The department is currently seeking a record budget of $1.5 trillion.
Trade war flares up again with Trump’s return to the White House
The trade friction between the US and China flared up again following Donald Trump’s return to the White House. In April 2025, Washington raised tariffs on Chinese goods to as much as 145%, and Beijing retaliated with tariffs of up to 125%.
In May, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio described China as the primary geopolitical challenge facing Washington. Rubio said that to avoid war, the two sides needed to manage their conflict of interests.
In July, Chinese expert Zheng Yongnian did not simply warn that underestimating the US could prove to be a “fatal mistake”; he stated it explicitly.
According to Zheng’s assessment, the US maintains its primacy through the role of the dollar, its military superiority, and its technological advantages.
Even so, the two sides agreed in June to declare a truce and lower tariffs. In autumn 2026, the US and China extended their trade truce until 10 January 2027.
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the extension would give the parties more time to discuss economic issues.
Trade deals do not eliminate the strategic contradictions between the two countries. Financial Times columnist Rana Foroohar likened the race between the two nations for commercial, technological, and geopolitical influence to the 19th-century “Great Game” between the Russian and British empires.
Foroohar cited China’s standing in shipbuilding and commercial maritime transport, as well as its expanding footprint in overseas ports, among its key advantages.
Asia
Japan plans curbs on short-term home sales to cool urban prices
Japan’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) plans to restrict short-term property trading to rein in surging home prices in major urban centres, particularly Tokyo.
Led by Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, the party aims to make support for working households a core priority ahead of local elections scheduled for April next year.
The LDP’s research commission on housing and land policy met on Wednesday to discuss the issue.
According to a report by the Nikkei Asia newspaper, Commission Chair and LDP lawmaker Midori Matsushima said at the opening of the meeting: “Prices of newly built condominiums across Tokyo’s 23 wards have doubled over the past decade. We must work on measures ensuring that people who wish to live in these homes can actually afford to buy them.”
Homeownership in the capital has become virtually unattainable for broad segments of the population. According to data from the Real Estate Economic Institute, the average sale price of a newly built condominium in Tokyo’s 23 wards rose %18.5 in fiscal 2025 compared with the previous year, reaching 137.84 million yen (around $872,000).
Meanwhile, statistics from the Ministry of Labour show that the average annual income of a full-time worker in the capital remained at 6.78 million yen in fiscal 2025. This widening gap between incomes and residential property prices is directly shaping political priorities.
During its campaign for the House of Representatives election in February, the LDP pledged to curb speculative transactions across metropolitan Tokyo and other regions. Earlier this month, a party project team focused on policies concerning foreign nationals also submitted a recommendation urging the government to introduce immediate tax measures against rising home prices.
Under current legislation, profits realized from properties sold within five years of acquisition are classified as “short-term capital gains”. These returns face a tax rate approaching %40, including income tax and local inhabitant tax.
Although this rate is twice the approximately %20 levied as “long-term capital gains” tax on properties held for more than five years, several party members argue it remains insufficient to deter speculation. Calls to tighten the framework may be considered as part of the annual tax reform package to be drafted in December alongside the LDP’s coalition partner, the Japan Innovation Party.
The ruling bloc wants to present concrete housing pledges to voters heading to the polls in April across numerous urban centres, including 22 of Tokyo’s wards where local assembly terms expire.
“We need to support families with children, who are typically at the stage of purchasing a home,” a senior LDP official said.
Opposition parties are also preparing alternative proposals that target not only prospective homebuyers, but also residents forced into the rental market by high property prices and now affected by escalating rents.
Tax steps take precedence over limits on foreign buyers
Several countries seeking answers to housing affordability pressures have imposed direct restrictions on foreign purchasers. In South Korea, real estate policies played a major part in the declining public approval ratings of President Lee Jae Myung.
In August 2025, authorities in Seoul introduced an approval requirement for foreign nationals buying homes in the capital and adjacent areas, while also mandating that buyers reside in the properties for at least two years.
Canada and Australia have enacted temporary bans on foreign residential purchases, while Singapore levies a %60 additional stamp duty on foreign buyers.
The role of overseas investors in Japan’s property market also drew debate during the February election. However, restrictions aimed directly at foreign nationals are viewed as potentially conflicting with international trade and services agreements.
Consequently, rather than imposing restrictions based on the nationality of buyers, the government is discussing tax measures aimed at speculative real estate deals, such as rapid resales.
Fears that sharp market measures could shake regional banks
Concerns have also surfaced that aggressive steps to force down prices could harm the wider national economy.
A senior LDP tax official cautioned that a steep drop in land prices could weaken local financial institutions, warning: “We must consider the impact on regional banks.”
The real estate sector accounts for roughly %18 of total lending by Japanese banks. This proportion sits well above the %10 level recorded during Japan’s bubble economy of the mid-to-late 1980s.
At certain regional banks, property lending accounts for nearly half of total loan portfolios.
According to March 2025 data from the Financial Services Agency, approximately one-quarter of all loans extended by regional banks to the real estate sector are concentrated directly in Tokyo’s five central wards.
Buoyant asset valuations, supported in part by rising stock indices, have underpinned strong public approval for the Takaichi administration. Observers note that property interventions designed to cool the market could drag down equity prices and weaken the government’s standing.
A senior official on the LDP research commission stressed that decision-makers must act with caution regarding the scope and timing of any measures intended to bring price increases under control.
Asia
South Korea plans $120B spend on eight US nuclear power plants
South Korea will spend $120 billion to construct eight nuclear power plants in the US under an agreement that provides for $350 billion in investments in exchange for lower tariffs.
The South Korean government also announced that Seoul and Washington will begin examining a liquefied natural gas (LNG) project in Alaska comprising a large-scale pipeline to transport natural gas from the north of the state to the south, alongside the construction of an LNG terminal for exports overseas.
Seoul stated that a decision regarding the LNG project will be made following a commercial feasibility study. However, US President Donald Trump said that South Korea would invest $54 billion in the project, pointing to an apparent lack of full coordination between the two sides on the matter.
Trade and Industry Minister Kim Jung-kwan said in a statement: “This announcement opens a new horizon of cooperation where the two countries join forces to develop joint commercial ventures in strategic areas directly linked to economic security and future sectors such as artificial intelligence, nuclear energy, and LNG.”
“We will adhere to the principle of prioritising national interests and investing solely in commercially viable projects,” Kim said.
Speaking at the White House, Trump characterised South Korea’s plans as “one of the largest energy infrastructure investments in American history”.
The announcement followed a meeting between Trump and South Korean President Lee Jae Myung roughly one year ago at the APEC Economic Leaders’ Meeting held in South Korea, where they agreed on the creation of a $350 billion investment fund.
Under that agreement, $150 billion was allocated to the shipbuilding sector and $200 billion to other sectors. In return, the US announced it would reduce tariffs imposed on goods imported from South Korea from 25% to 15%.
Under the nuclear power project, South Korea’s state-controlled utility will build two plants in the US, while Pennsylvania-based Westinghouse Electric will construct six plants.
According to the South Korean government, this will mark the first instance in which a foreign country builds its own nuclear power plants in the US.
South Korean firms are also evaluating the possibility of acquiring a stake in Westinghouse as part of negotiations over sharing profits generated by the project.
South Korea additionally announced that it will build a $22.3 billion natural gas-fired power plant in Texas with a capacity of 6,472 megawatts.
The facility will be designed to supply electricity directly to nearby data centres. The project’s first phase is targeted to begin commercial operations in 2029, with full-capacity operations slated for 2032.
Seoul also disclosed that it had agreed to allow the US to receive 50% of the profits generated by the projects until South Korea recoups all of its investments.
After South Korea fully recovers its total investment amount, 90% of the profits will go to the US.
-
Europe2 weeks agoBerlin Left Party backs Israel’s right to exist for coalition pact
-
America2 weeks agoTrump weighs presidential memorandum to cut surging US diesel prices
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoSWP urges backing for Gulf trade routes bypassing Strait of Hormuz
-
America2 weeks agoThiel targets Pope and Obama over AI in new ‘Antichrist’ lectures
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoEU and China reach preliminary deal to curb hybrid car imports
-
Europe2 weeks agoLSE study finds post-bailout Greece turned into a cafe economy
-
America2 weeks agoEnergy firms enlist ex-US officials to tap Venezuelan oil
-
Russia2 weeks agoRussia relaxes diesel export curbs after talks with Trump
