Connect with us

AMERICA

The US contacted the Canada against the truckers

Published

on

In a rare moment in Canadian history, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau testified before the Emergencies Act for an independent public investigation. The reason for the investigation was whether the state of emergency powers exercised against the protests of the truckers who locked Ottawa in January and February of this year were legitimate.

Trudeau stood firm in the face of the investigation. Claiming that the use of extraordinary powers is “unavoidable”, the Canadian leader said it is not possible to negotiate with protesters. “They didn’t want their voices heard, they wanted obedience,” Trudeau said, noting the threat of violence and the inadequacy of the police.

The Canadian prime minister added that he was “absolutely serene and confident” in his choice to exercise exceptional powers. The State of Emergency Law, which took its current form in the 1980s, had never been used in this form before.

One of the convoy lawyers told Trudeau, “When did you and your government become so afraid of your own citizens?” The Canadian replied: “I am not and we are not.”

What was done to the truckers?

Truckers organized under the name of “Freedom Convoy” had locked up the capital Ottawa to protest the COVID-19 vaccine mandate and public restrictions.

The matter was that the vaccine exemption for truckers crossing the US border should end on both sides of the border and the requirement for vaccination to cross the border was introduced. Truckers were saying that the COVID-19 vaccine mandate should be dropped.

The protests, which began on 29th January, entered a new phase after the meeting between Joe Biden and Justin Trudeau on February 11th. Three days later, the Canadian government began implementing the Emergency Act.

The law gave the government the right to block meetings and send federal forces to help local police. Furthermore, the bank accounts of people “believed to be supporting the convoy” could be temporarily suspended. The government also exercised this authority.

The pressure from the US and banks has worked

Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland, a member of the cabinet who testified before the commission, argued that Canada has faced a “dangerous moment” during the protests. What Freeland meant was that the blockade of truckers closed the vital trade corridor with the United States.

Trudeau went further and told US President Joe Biden during the protests that he was trying to reassure him that Canada would “continue to be a reliable partner”.

Chrystia Freeland described the phone call Biden had with one of her economic advisers, Brian Deese, on February 10th, as a “defining” moment. Deese said that if the blockade does not end within 12 hours, all automotive factories in the northeast of the United States will be shut down.

On February 13th, the day before the implementation of Emergency Act, the meeting with Canada’s senior bank CEOs also confirmed US’ concerns.

The CEOs felt that the protests were putting Canada’s reputation at risk. A CEO said he spent a week in the US and that the protests made Canada seem like a “joke” to his neighbour. CEOs complained of the inadequacy of the laws in force and made recommendations to cut off financial support for the protest organizers.

In fact, an unnamed CEO wanted the government to act quickly by declaring protesters “terrorists”. Freeland also made an interesting suggestion, calling it “deplorable” when a foreign investor, whom one of the CEOs tried to convince, called Canada a “banana republic.” “Remind him of Brexit if the foreign investor is British, remind him of the Yellow Vests if he is French, remind him of how badly they are currently managing Russia if he is German.”

‘How many tanks are you asking for?’

As part of the commission’s investigation, obtaining messages among the ministers also revealed shocking remarks.

The phone messages between Public Security Minister Marco Mendicino and Justice Minister David Lametti are an example to this. “You need to get the police to act,” Lametti wrote to Mendicino on 2nd February 2022. And CAF if necessary, ”he said. Mendicino’s answer is nothing more than a “joke”: “How many tanks are you asking for?”

The pair then complained of the inadequacy and inability of the Ottawa police chief to maintain order. The messages suggest that the Justice Minister is considering implementing the Emergency Act only on 30th January 2022. “I was just being cautious,” Lametti says.

Intelligence chief’s advice to Trudeau

Another fact that emerged during the investigation is that David Vigneault, chief of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS), was the one to have recommended the use of the Emergency Act to the Canadian government.

Testifying to the commission, Vigneault said the truckers’ protests did not pose a national security threat to the CSIS Act, but the Emergency Act was still necessary.

Shaping media narrative

On the other hand, it was revealed how the Canadian government wanted to determine the media narrative against truckers. Trudeau adviser Mary-Liz Power sends a message to Alexander Cohen, communications director at the Department of Public Safety, outlining a media strategy that the truckers’ protest will resemble those of 6th January 2021 in the United States.

In another text message with Cohen, Power says that global and other media outlets are working on some news. Indeed, Global News, one of Canada’s largest media outlets, cited the headline on 25th January 2022: “Extreme right-wing groups hope that trucker protests will be Canada’s ‘January 6th’.”

AMERICA

Will Biden withdraw?

Published

on

The debate that began after US President Joe Biden’s poor performance in the televised debate against Donald Trump, his rival in the November election, is growing.
Amid growing calls for him to withdraw from the race, Biden held a meeting with his campaign team, the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Democratic governors.

According to Politico, the president, who met with the DNC and his campaign team via Zoom, said he was in the race for the long haul, despite reports that he had privately admitted to allies that his candidacy was shaky.

He also acknowledged that the days since his debate with former President Donald Trump last week had been “damaging,” according to two people present at the meeting who requested anonymity to discuss the sensitive topic.
Biden said in the Zoom interview: “Let me say this as clearly as I can, as simply as I can: I am staying. Nobody is pushing me out. I am not leaving. I am in this race to the end and we are going to win,” he said.

Vice President Kamala Harris, who has recently come to the fore as Democrats focus on her as a possible running mate, sat next to Biden on the video call.

Harris said in the meeting: “We will not back down. We will follow the path of our president. We will fight and we will win,” Harris said.

The President thanked everyone who worked on his campaign and reminded them of what was at stake. Biden said: “There is no one I would rather be with in this fight than all of you. So let’s link arms. Let’s finish this job. You, me, the vice president. Together,” he said.

Biden also called congressional Democratic leaders earlier on Wednesday and met with Democratic governors in the evening. Some of the governors travelled from across the country to attend the meeting in person, rather than virtually.

Governors endorse Biden

Democratic governors threw their support behind Joe Biden after talks at the White House, despite a series of poor polls for the president and calls from some members of Congress for him to withdraw from the US presidential race.

Biden, who met with more than 20 influential governors, tried to convince them that he was committed to his re-election campaign.

Three governors emerged from the White House insisting that they had full confidence in the president. “The governors are behind him,” said Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, adding that Biden was “fit for the job”.

“The president has continued to tell us and show us everything,” said Maryland Governor Wes Moore, while New York Governor Kathy Hochul added: “President Joe Biden is in this to win.”

Others at the meeting included Gavin Newsom of California, Gretchen Whitmer of Michigan and JB Pritzker of Illinois.

Newsom later posted on X: “I heard four words from the President tonight: he’s fully on board. And so am I. Joe Biden has our support. Now it’s his turn,” he said.
Among the leaked information is that Biden told the governors he met with that he had “had a checkup”.

Congressional Democrats’ letter of withdrawal

According to a report in the Financial Times (FT), a group of moderate Democratic House members with a focus on national security have drafted a letter calling on Biden to withdraw from the race.

Bloomberg first reported that dozens of Democratic members of Congress were privately considering signing a letter urging Biden to step aside.

At the same time, Arizona Democratic Congressman Raúl Grijalva on Wednesday became the second member of the House of Representatives to publicly call for Biden to suspend his re-election bid.

Grijalva told the New York Times, “This is an opportunity to look elsewhere. What [Biden] needs to do is take responsibility … part of that responsibility is to withdraw from the race,” Grijalva told the New York Times.

Democratic Congressman Seth Moulton of Massachusetts also issued his own statement, saying he had “serious concerns” about Biden’s ability to defeat Trump.

Some donors have also given up on Biden

As the cauldron within the Democratic Party continues to boil, some of Biden’s campaign donors have begun to speak out.

Damon Lindelof, who has been a major donor to Democrats for years, including the campaigns of Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden, became the first high-profile donor to raise a kettle against Biden.

“I have been a lifelong Democrat and I love my complex, glorious country. I’m not writing this anonymously because I’m asking others in positions of influence to do the same. I don’t know if what I have to say matters, but I know what my eyes, ears and heart tell me. I’ve been asleep at the wheel, and it’s time to wake up,” Lindelof said.

According to Axios, “concerned Democratic donors” grilled Biden campaign officials in a Zoom call on Monday, pressing Biden’s team on how to deal with new concerns about his fitness for office.

According to Axios, the donors’ questions revealed deep doubts within the Democratic Party about whether Biden has the stamina, skill and substance to go head-to-head with former President Trump over the next four months, defeat him on November 5 and serve another four-year term.

Continue Reading

AMERICA

Coup attempt foiled in Bolivia

Published

on

Armoured vehicles broke through the gates of the government palace in Bolivia on Wednesday in an attempted coup against President Luis Arce.

The coup attempt failed when Arce’s supporters and trade unions took to the streets against the coup and Arce refused to surrender.

Supporters of the president took to the streets with Bolivian flags and the troops withdrew from the presidential palace. At the same time, Arce appointed a new army commander who ordered the troops to withdraw.

The Bolivian leader said: ‘Here we are, standing firm in Casa Grande to resist any coup attempt. We need the organisation of the Bolivian people,” said the Bolivian leader.

In a video broadcast on Bolivian television, Arce confronted Juan José Zúñiga, the army commander believed to be leading the rebellion, in the corridor of the palace. “I am your leader and I order you to withdraw your troops and I will not tolerate this disobedience,” Arce is heard saying.

Putschist Zúñiga’s hesitation leads to defeat

“Of course there will soon be a new council of ministers, our country, our state cannot continue like this,” Zúñiga told reporters in the square before entering the government building, but said that “for the time being” he recognised Arce as commander-in-chief.

Zúñiga did not explicitly say he was leading a coup, but said at the palace that the military was trying to “restore democracy and free political prisoners”.

Arce, for his part, called for “respect for democracy” in a message posted on his X account. “We cannot allow coup attempts to take the lives of Bolivians again,” Arce said from inside the palace, surrounded by government officials, in a video message sent to news agencies.

An hour later, to cheers from supporters, Arce announced the new heads of the army, navy and air force. The video showed soldiers setting up barricades outside the government palace.

“I order all those who are mobilised to return to their units. No one wants the images we see on the streets,” said newly appointed army commander José Wilson Sánchez.

Putschist general accuses Arce of ‘orchestrating coup’

Zúñiga was taken into custody after the Bolivian Attorney General’s Office issued an arrest warrant for General Zúñiga.

At the time of his arrest, the officer accused Luis Arce of orchestrating a coup attempt to “increase his popularity”.

At the time of his arrest, Zúñiga said: “I met with the president on Sunday at the La Salle school, and the president told me: ‘The situation is terrible, this week is going to be critical. So I must prepare something to increase my popularity,'” Zúñiga is reported to have said.

The general went on to describe his alleged conversation with Arce, claiming that when he asked Arce “if they should remove the armoured vehicles”, Arce replied in the affirmative. According to Zúñiga, military vehicles were mobilised that night and preparations began.

Before his arrest, Zúñiga claimed that this was a “self-coup”.

Local media reported that the general would be charged with terrorism and armed rebellion against the security and sovereignty of the state.

The authorities later announced the arrest of a second person implicated in Wednesday’s events, Juan Arnez Salvador, former commander of the Bolivian navy.

The US is ‘closely monitoring the situation’

Following the coup attempt, Latin American and Caribbean countries such as Brazil, Cuba, Colombia, Mexico, Venezuela, Chile and Honduras also expressed their support for Arce.

The United States, on the other hand, said only that it was “closely monitoring the situation”.

Earlier this week, Bolivian government sources warned that a US-backed coup was being prepared.

Morales-Arce rivalry in the ruling MAS party?

In addition to economic problems, Bolivia has been rocked for some time by rifts at the highest levels of the ruling party.

Arce and his former ally, former president Evo Morales, are fighting over the future of the Movement Towards Socialism (MAS) ahead of elections in 2025.

Zuniga was ousted on Monday after appearing on television and saying he would arrest Morales if he ran again next year.

Laws limiting presidential terms do not allow Morales to run again.

In several public statements, Arce had claimed that he was the target of a “soft coup” aimed at “shortening his term” and that Morales’ supporters were behind it.

The former president, for his part, has said that Arce is trying to undermine his desire to run for president again by taking over the leadership of the MAS.

Bolivia is also facing a severe economic crisis due to fuel and foreign currency shortages. Arce blamed Morales for unions taking to the streets in response.

Continue Reading

AMERICA

A ‘new McCarthyism’ in the US: Pro-Palestinian university professors lose their jobs

Published

on

As police crackdowns in the US target pro-Palestinian student protests on campus, university administrators are cutting ties with pro-Palestinian faculty members.

Since the beginning of the Israeli invasion of Gaza, academics in politics, sociology, Japanese literature, public health, Latin American and Caribbean studies, Middle Eastern and African studies, mathematics, education and many other fields have been fired or suspended for their pro-Palestinian and anti-Israeli rhetoric.

According to The Intercept, there is no official data on the number of academics who have lost their jobs or been suspended for supporting Palestine, largely because higher education in the country is fragmented, often privatised and based on short-term contracts.

In general, professors who have lost their jobs and been suspended over Palestine have brought these allegations to public attention by making them themselves. A large number of academics across the country are likely to be investigated, and many will see their contracts quietly expire without renewal.

The Intercept spoke to more than ten professors, both adjunct and tenured, whose jobs have been threatened because of their pro-Palestinian views. All of the professors the publication spoke to have been investigated at some point since 7 October, and some of the investigations have been closed with no evidence of wrongdoing.

Several have received varying degrees of suspension, and four of the professors have lost their jobs or face losing them next week when the semester ends without renewal of their contracts.

“A large number of our investigations, even lawsuits, involve due process violations related to non-reappointment, dismissal, tenure, and the like,” said Anita Levy, senior programme officer for the American Association of University Professors.

Levy said the non-profit organisation, which advocates for faculty rights and academic freedom, has filed five cases in recent months related to pro-Palestinian speech.

“It is unusual to file five or six cases in a two-month period when social media posts about a current event, such as the war in Gaza, are suspended,” Levy said. None of the cases we filed were related to pro-Israel rhetoric. They were all in support of the Palestinian cause,” he said.

Levy said the US was at the beginning of a “new McCarthyism”, noting that what had happened “could be the tip of the iceberg”.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey