Diplomacy
Türkiye freezes assets of 31 Iranian individuals and entities linked to nuclear program
Türkiye has decided to freeze the assets of 16 individuals and 15 organizations stated to be linked to Iran’s nuclear program.
The decision, signed by President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and published in the Official Gazette on October 1, 2025, was based on the relevant resolutions of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC).
The action was taken under Law No. 7262, the “Law on the Prevention of the Financing of the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction.” The Ministry of Treasury and Finance will be responsible for the implementation of the decision.
The individuals and organizations whose assets have been frozen have the right to apply to the Audit and Cooperation Commission for their appeal to be forwarded to the UNSC.
Meanwhile, there is a disagreement between Western countries and Russia and China regarding the legal validity of the UN sanctions.
Western countries argue that Iran has violated its obligations under the nuclear deal and state that they have initiated the “trigger mechanism” that automatically restores UN sanctions.
In response, Russia and China emphasize that the activation of this mechanism lacks a legal basis, as the US withdrew from the agreement and the European parties failed to fulfill their commitments.
Moscow and Beijing had therefore announced that they do not recognize the interpretation that UN sanctions have been reinstated.
Who is on the list?
The annex to the decision published in the Official Gazette provides a detailed list of scientists, administrators, and critical institutions involved in various stages of Iran’s nuclear program.
The decision orders the freezing of assets of 16 individuals who are stated to have played a direct role in Iran’s nuclear activities.
Prominent among these names are experts working in fields such as uranium enrichment, reactor management, and material procurement.
— Davud Agha-Jani: Head of the Pilot Fuel Enrichment Plant (PFEP) at Natanz.
— Behman Asgarpour: Operational Manager at Arak.
— Seyyed Hossein Hosseini: An official of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI) involved in the heavy water research reactor project at Arak.
— Jafar Mohammadi: Technical advisor to the AEOI and responsible for the production of valves for centrifuges.
— Seyyed Jaber Safdari: Manager of the Natanz Enrichment Facilities.
— Ghasem Soleimani: Director of Uranium Mining Operations at the Saghand Uranium Mine.
The list also includes other senior officials involved in areas such as centrifuge component manufacturing, uranium conversion, and nuclear fuel research.
What are the targeted institutions and organizations?
Under the decision, the assets of 15 institutions and companies that form the main backbone of Iran’s nuclear program have also been frozen.
These organizations include research centers, financial structures, and supplier companies.
— Atomic Energy Organization of Iran: The main governing body of the program.
— Bank Sepah and Bank Sepah International: Stated to provide financial support to Iran’s Aerospace Industries Organization.
— Isfahan Nuclear Fuel Research and Production Center (NFRPC): An AEOI unit involved in enrichment-related activities.
— Kavoshyar Company: An AEOI subsidiary said to have attempted to procure vacuum induction furnaces and laboratory equipment for the nuclear program.
— Novin Energy Company: A company operating within the AEOI, stated to have transferred funds to organizations linked to the nuclear program.
— Tamas Company: An umbrella organization responsible for uranium extraction, enrichment, and processing activities.
The list also includes other critically important companies, such as Mesbah Energy Company, a supplier for the heavy water reactor at Arak, and Pars Trash Company, which is stated to be involved in the centrifuge program.
What is the trigger mechanism? How did the process unfold?
The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), signed in 2015 between Iran and the P5+1 countries (US, Russia, China, France, the United Kingdom, and Germany), imposed limitations on Tehran’s nuclear program in exchange for the lifting of severe UN sanctions.
This agreement was established on an international legal footing with UNSC Resolution 2231, adopted the same year.
The resolution included not only the lifting of sanctions but also a special provision known as “snapback.” This provision, referred to as the “trigger mechanism,” served as a safeguard, allowing for the reinstatement of all lifted UN sanctions if Iran seriously violated its obligations under the deal.
The mechanism was designed to bypass the veto power of permanent members in the Security Council. Under normal circumstances, a new vote in the Council is required to pass a sanctions resolution, and it must not be vetoed by any permanent member.
However, the snapback provision reverses the process: when one of the parties notifies that Iran is not fulfilling its obligations, the sanctions automatically return within 30 days unless a resolution to the contrary is adopted. This means that a veto from any country cannot stop the process.
Additionally, Resolution 2231 had limited the timeframe for using this right. The deadline to trigger the mechanism was October 18, 2025. After this date, the snapback option would cease to exist.
The crisis, which began with the unilateral withdrawal of the US administration under President Donald Trump from the agreement in 2018, deepened in the following years. Citing Washington’s sanctions, Iran began to increase its enriched uranium stockpiles and use advanced centrifuges.
In the summer of this year, Israel’s attacks on Iran’s nuclear facilities were followed by Tehran’s announcements of retaliation. During the same period, allegations that Iran was limiting its cooperation with the IAEA raised concerns in Western capitals. In response to this situation, Europe’s three major powers—France, Germany, and the United Kingdom (E3)—decided to activate the snapback mechanism.
On August 28, 2025, the governments of London, Paris, and Berlin submitted an official notification to the UN Security Council, announcing that Iran was in “significant non-performance” of its commitments under the agreement. This notification was the step that activated the trigger mechanism.
The notification initiated a 30-day process. If the Council did not pass a resolution to prevent the re-imposition of sanctions within this period, the old sanctions would automatically come back into effect. However, the likelihood of such a resolution passing in the Council was slim from the outset. Since any permanent member could block the resolution by withholding its approval, the path was clear for an automatic snapback.
By mid-September, no resolution to block the snapback had emerged from the Security Council. Consequently, around September 17, all previously lifted UN sanctions were automatically reinstated. The arms embargo, the ban on nuclear technology transfers, and travel restrictions and asset freezes on specific individuals and entities were reactivated.
The European Union also supported this step with a decision on September 29, re-implementing additional sanctions at its own level. Thus, Iran entered a new era of intensified international isolation.
Reactions from Iran, Russia, and China
The Tehran administration declared the process “legally invalid.” The Iranian Foreign Ministry described the E3’s initiative as “political and arbitrary.”
Officials argued that the mechanism was being misused and that the parties failing to fulfill their primary obligations were the US and Europe. They also showed resistance to the pressure by implying that they might restrict cooperation on IAEA inspections.
The snapback process also sparked debate in the international arena. Russia and China reacted strongly to the E3’s move.
Both countries attempted to have the snapback postponed in the Security Council. However, due to the structure of the mechanism, these efforts were unsuccessful. When the deadline expired, the sanctions automatically came into effect. Nevertheless, Russia and China announced that they do not recognize these sanctions.
Diplomacy
South Korea pulls part of embassy staff from Ukraine amid POW dispute
The South Korean government has decided to withdraw part of its embassy staff from Ukraine.
According to the Yonhap news agency, Foreign Ministry spokesman Park Doo-sun cited the Kyiv administration’s failure to take “positive steps” in the dispute that began with the leak of information concerning the handover of North Korean prisoners of war as the justification for the move.
The spokesman also listed the ongoing threat of air strikes, which complicates the safety of diplomats, among the reasons.
Following the withdrawal of part of the personnel, essential diplomatic contacts will continue under the leadership of the charge d’affaires ad interim to Ukraine. All consular staff tasked with protecting South Korean citizens will remain in Ukraine.
Prior to this move, the Seoul administration decided on 8 October to withdraw its ambassador. The Foreign Ministry stated at the time that it was ready to continue consultations with Kyiv to resolve the emerging issues constructively.
Tensions between the two countries began with a speech delivered by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at the United Nations General Assembly in September.
Zelenskyy announced that two captured soldiers from the North Korean army had been handed over to South Korea.
South Korean President Lee Jae-myung, meanwhile, accused Kyiv of breaching a confidentiality agreement.
Lee said the disclosure of this information endangered the prisoners’ families and stability on the Korean Peninsula.
Seoul expects a public apology
Dmytro Lytvyn, an adviser to the Ukrainian president, denied the existence of a confidentiality agreement.
The South Korean Foreign Ministry summoned Ukrainian Charge d’Affaires Andriy Veshkin on 28 September and issued a note of protest against Lytvyn’s remarks.
President Lee Jae-myung warned in a statement on 2 October that they would take additional measures against Kyiv if Ukrainian authorities did not acknowledge the agreement and make a public apology. Lee stated that Ukraine itself had initially requested that the transfer of the prisoners be kept confidential.
Ukrainian Foreign Ministry spokesman Heorhii Tykhyi said the dispute stemmed from differing interpretations of the confidentiality regime.
Tykhyi noted that Seoul, based on its constitution which recognises the entire Korean Peninsula as its own territory, requested that the prisoners be handed over “like its own citizens”.
Describing the handover as a “gesture of goodwill”, Tykhyi stated that they were conducting closed-door negotiations to resolve differences of opinion.
Ambassador Park Ki-chang returned to Seoul on 10 October. According to a report by The Korea Times newspaper citing the ministry, recalling the ambassador served as a diplomatic protest against the leak of information regarding the prisoners.
The newspaper wrote that South Korea had last taken a similar step in 2008 by withdrawing its ambassador to Japan.
Moscow warned foreign diplomats
On 3 October, the Russian Foreign Ministry reiterated its warning to foreign nationals, including diplomatic mission staff, against remaining in Ukraine.
The ministry recalled its advice to leave Kyiv, citing ongoing strikes against military targets.
The ministry noted that those who failed to heed the warnings would bear responsibility for the potential consequences.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said in a statement on 24 September that they had no information regarding Kyiv handing over two North Korean prisoners of war to Seoul.
Peskov, noting that prisoner matters fall under the authority of the Defence Ministry and intelligence services, said, “Contacts through the special services are continuing.”
Diplomacy
Ex-BND head Hanning tied to former Mossad chief amid spy inquiry
August Hanning, who led Germany’s Federal Intelligence Service (BND) between 1998 and 2005, was arrested on 6 October on allegations that he obtained roughly 2,000 classified agency documents and used them during contacts with intelligence officers from a foreign state.
Accused of high treason and espionage on behalf of a foreign intelligence agency, the former spy chief is alleged to have procured the documents from former BND employee Manfred D.
Prosecutors stated that the leaked records included internal briefing notes presented to senior German officials, though the Berlin government has not yet publicly disclosed which country received the classified data.
According to an exclusive report by Jake Green for The Cradle, seized email exchanges revealed extensive ties between the arrested Hanning and former Mossad director Danny Yatom.
The correspondence shows that the two former intelligence directors built an ongoing network of contacts following their public service, combining commercial ventures, efforts to secure political influence, and intelligence links.
This dynamic has triggered debate that using personal connections and official access for private gain has left Germany’s intelligence apparatus vulnerable.
Intelligence notes for 10,000 euros and campaign proposals
According to the reviewed emails, Hanning told Yatom in a 2018 message that he could prepare an “overall assessment based on information obtained from senior German officials and intelligence agencies” concerning an unidentified candidate.
The former BND head committed to completing the report by 13 July in exchange for 10,000 euros.
Contacts between the two men subsequently expanded to cover domestic political processes in Germany. Ahead of the September 2021 federal election, Yatom asked Hanning to approach leading candidates.
Describing CIY Global as a “political campaign company”, the former Mossad chief noted that he aimed to introduce its capabilities to German politicians, and he mentioned his intention in the same exchange to transfer documents concerning a cybersecurity firm.
Cybersecurity partnership and surveillance operations across Europe
The partnership between Yatom and Hanning reached beyond political lobbying initiatives into the cybersecurity sector.
Hanning reportedly served as a consultant for World Health Energy Holdings, a cybersecurity company linked to Yatom.
Firms of this type, established or managed by former intelligence personnel, provide commercial platforms on the international market for Israeli-origin surveillance, cyber intelligence, and political influence capabilities.
The operational presence of private Israeli-based surveillance technologies across Europe has recently entered judicial records through scandals in Poland, Spain, and Greece.
Polish prosecutors announced on 12 October that data collected under the previous government via Pegasus spyware against political opponents had been transferred out of the country, adding that manufacturer NSO Group maintained access to the technical infrastructure.
In Spain, the 2022 CatalanGate investigation established that at least 65 people, including politicians, lawyers, and civil society representatives, were targeted using Pegasus or Candiru software, with Citizen Lab researchers publishing strong evidence linking the operation to Spanish authorities.
In Greece, the surveillance operation targeting journalist Thanasis Koukakis and Member of the European Parliament Nikos Androulakis was determined to have used Predator software, linked to Intellexa, a company founded by former Israeli intelligence officer Tal Dilian.
In the German espionage investigation, the traffic between Hanning and Yatom involving paid reporting, contacts with electoral candidates, and commercial partnerships does not yet provide conclusive legal evidence regarding the final destination of the roughly 2,000 classified documents.
Nevertheless, the disclosed correspondence gives German investigators a concrete line of inquiry to assess whether classified state secrets reached commercial networks tied to Israeli intelligence.
Diplomacy
Trump dismisses US envoy to Greece Kimberly Guilfoyle
US President Donald Trump has dismissed Kimberly Guilfoyle, the US ambassador in Athens, following serious press reports concerning her conduct.
White House Press Secretary Katie Zacharia told reporters during her first briefing that Guilfoyle had been asked to resign.
“She was doing a good job, but we didn’t like what we read in the press,” Trump said. “She was not a member of my family. I think she dated my son a long time ago.”
In a social media post, Guilfoyle stated: “These claims are unfounded, and I will resolutely defend my name, reputation, and integrity.” She added that she was particularly proud of the embassy’s work.
According to Kathimerini, her removal came as no surprise in Washington. Days of successive disclosures and vigorous exploitation of the matter by Democrats had been inflicting political damage on the White House ahead of the sensitive midterm elections.
The US State Department was instructed not to comment, with crisis management transferred entirely to the White House.
Reports indicate that most of the president’s team swiftly favoured Guilfoyle’s dismissal, while Secretary of State Marco Rubio was reportedly uneasy with the demonstratively warm public welcome she had staged for him.
Democrats on the House Foreign Affairs Committee have called for an investigation.
“Her resignation does not absolve her of responsibility,” the lawmakers wrote, adding: “While American families struggled to make ends meet, she used her position as a Trump administration official to enrich herself.”
Chargé d’Affaires Josh Huck will assume ambassadorial duties until a successor is chosen.
Meanwhile, Guilfoyle’s departure is expected to cause delays in agreements between Greece and the US.
These include the so-called “Rubio package”, comprising approximately $4 billion in arms deals finalised only days before the secretary of state’s arrival.
Several procedural steps still remain before the contracts can be signed.
In Athens, opposition parties are demanding answers. Dimitris Mantzos of PASOK called for a detailed briefing on the agreements reached during Rubio’s visit.
-
Europe2 weeks agoBerlin Left Party backs Israel’s right to exist for coalition pact
-
America2 weeks agoHow will Brazil’s presidential runoff work?
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoThe West is preparing for war not with Russia, but with its own people, French analyst Georges Kuzmanovic insists
-
Russia2 weeks ago71 EU lawmakers demand closure of Russian Houses in 15 member states
-
Europe2 weeks agoMI6 investigates potential leaks after former BND chief is detained
-
Russia2 weeks agoUS and Russian figures discuss American stake in Nord Stream lines
-
Russia2 weeks agoDrone strike shuts down Yandex data centre in Russia’s Ryazan region
-
America2 weeks agoTrump weighs presidential memorandum to cut surging US diesel prices
