Diplomacy
U.S. fails to meet its commitments to Africa
Washington, who convened the U.S.-Africa Leaders Summit after 8 years after the first one, prompted reactions when it warned African leaders against China and Russia.
Chinese experts said U.S. officials “seem to have forgotten how many African countries have been bombed by the U.S. and other Western countries, and how many times the U.S. has created chaos in the continent to plunder natural resources.”
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin told reporters in Beijing yesterday that Washington should respect the will of the African people and take concrete steps to help Africa’s development, rather than vilifying and attacking other countries.
25 percent of Obama-era pledges fulfilled
An article published on the Global Times, questioned the sincerity of U.S. commitments to help Africa and urged Washington to take action instead of making promises. It was reminded that similar aid projects were tailored for Africa (The Power Africa Initiative) during the Obama era, but only 25 percent of these commitments were fulfilled.
The article emphasizes that the African strategy has reached an ‘impasse’ due to the actions of the U.S., and Washington has set itself the goal of blocking China’s development on the African continent.
The article notes that Washington did not like the African continent in the past and considered it as a problem that needs to be solved, and now it deals with it as a pawn in the competition for great power, mentioning that this situation is clearly seen not only by African countries but also by the international community.
‘China has nothing to worry about’
China became Africa’s largest trading partner with four times the U.S.-Africa trade volume, reaching $254 billion in 2021. The article emphasizes that African countries see this difference.
In this context, Chinese analysts say that China does not need to worry about Washington’s calls because China has a “solid and mature friendship” with the continent.
‘Destabilization’ warning
At the invitation of U.S. President Joe Biden, 49 African leaders gathered in Washington to attend the three-day U.S.-Africa Leaders Summit.
The first U.S.-Africa Leaders Summit was held in 2014 under Barack Obama administration. Inviting African leaders to Washington after 8 years, the U.S. warned that China and Russia would destabilize Africa.
With this summit, the U.S. aims to win back its influence in Africa, where reactions towards the West have increased, European countries have started to withdraw their troops, and China, Russia and Turkey have improved their relations.
Africa, which is home to one of the largest regional voting blocs in the United Nations and is increasing its emphasis on sovereignty day by day, is one of the focal points of great powers.
“The summit is really rooted in the recognition that Africa is a key geopolitical player and one that is shaping our present and will shape our future,” a senior White House official said at a briefing last week.
Addressing African leaders and the African Union at the summit, Biden said: “The United States is all in on Africa’s future.”
U.S. strategy toward sub-Saharan Africa
The U.S. released the U.S. Strategy toward sub-Saharan Africa in August. While emphasizing that Sub-Saharan Africa was one of the largest regional voting groups in the United Nations, a new framework was drawn for Africa’s importance to the U.S. national security interests in line with the new strategy.
Stressing ‘equal partnership’ in explaining the new strategy, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said, the fact that African countries are a major geopolitical force is the basis for the new U.S. strategy for Africa.
Blinken, on the other hand, criticized China for saddling African countries with heavy debts, while accusing Russia of meddling in the internal affairs of continental countries through the Wagner group.
It seems that the Biden administration’s acts to balance Russia and China powers continue in Africa.
African leaders refuse to make a choice
African leaders, on the other hand, are aware of the Washington approach, which considers them as “pawns in the great power race.”
Many African leaders reject the idea that they should choose between the United States and China.
“The fact that both countries have different levels of relations with African countries makes them equally important for Africa’s development,” Ethiopia’s U.N. ambassador, Taye Atske Selassie Amde, told Reuters about the discussions at the summit. “However, it should be known each African country has the agency to determine their respective relationship and best interest.”
Diplomacy
Greece’s Marinakis says paying Hormuz transit fees beats enduring Red Sea shipping crisis detour
Evangelos Marinakis, one of Greece’s leading shipowners, has announced that he is prepared to pay up to $200,000 per transit to keep the Strait of Hormuz open to civilian maritime traffic.
Speaking to the Financial Times, Marinakis stated that paying a transit fee would be a far better option for him than having the strait closed to navigation.
As the chairman of Capital Maritime Group, which controls a fleet of 185 vessels including approximately 35 tankers, Marinakis emphasized that shipowners have been forced to use alternative routes around the Cape of Good Hope for years due to attacks launched by the Houthis in the Red Sea, a detour that has generated substantial additional costs.
The Greek shipowner indicated that paying a transit fee of $100,000 or $200,000, depending on the size of the cargo or the vessel, is far more reasonable than enduring the current logistical challenges. He added that such payments could offset all the losses experienced so far.
Following US strikes on Iran and the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, the Tehran administration had introduced transit fees of up to $2 million for certain vessels transiting the waterway.
In May, Iran announced the establishment of a state agency tasked with managing the Strait of Hormuz. It was stated that the institution in question would provide real-time updates regarding maritime activities in the waterway.
Ebrahim Azizi, the chairman of the Iranian Parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, had noted that only commercial vessels and countries cooperating with Iran would be able to benefit from the facilities provided under this “professional mechanism.”
US President Donald Trump has explicitly opposed the imposition of transit fees in the Strait of Hormuz. In a statement on the matter, Trump said, “We want the strait to be open. We do not want any transit fees to be charged. This is an international waterway.”
On the other hand, the draft text of a planned 60-day ceasefire extension agreement between the parties stipulates that the Strait of Hormuz will remain open without any transit fees being demanded.
According to the draft details reviewed by Axios, the US in return commits to lifting the blockade it has imposed on Iranian ports. The Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, however, announced that the management of the Strait of Hormuz has been excluded from the scope of the agreement with the US, asserting that the issue will be addressed solely by littoral states.
Diplomacy
Pashinyan promises aid to farmers hit by Russian import restrictions
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has pledged compensation for Armenian farmers affected by restrictions on exports to Russia.
According to Sputnik Armenia, Pashinyan made the announcement during an election campaign meeting in the Gegharkunik region.
Speaking at the event, Pashinyan said the subsidies would be designed to offset losses incurred by producers.
The prime minister also acknowledged that some Armenian products had failed to meet required quality standards, adding that such companies would receive support aimed at improving product quality.
Addressing alternative markets for Armenian exports, Pashinyan said several Armenian business delegations were already engaged in negotiations abroad.
He added that Armenia had received offers for the purchase of roses as well as fresh fruits and vegetables.
Pashinyan argued that Armenia’s agricultural output was not particularly large, describing this as an advantage under current circumstances. According to the prime minister, “a respected supermarket chain in Europe” would be capable of selling the entire volume of these products on its own.
Russia’s Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance (Rosselkhoznadzor) imposed temporary restrictions on imports of stone fruits and grapes from Armenia effective July 2.
The ban covers cherries, sour cherries, apricots, plums, peaches and nectarines, among other products.
On the same day, a temporary suspension was also introduced on certification procedures for live fish shipments from Armenia. Russian authorities had previously restricted the entry of flower products originating from Armenia into the Russian market.
In addition, Russia’s Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing (Rospotrebnadzor) halted the import of all consignments of Jermuk mineral water from Armenia.
In a statement, the agency said levels of bicarbonate, chloride and sulfate ions in the mineral water exceeded established limits and could mislead consumers regarding the product’s medicinal properties.
The Russian regulator argued that the growing number of violations stemmed from the abolition of Armenia’s Agriculture Ministry and the transfer of its responsibilities to the Economy Ministry.
Rosselkhoznadzor further stated that Armenia’s Economy Ministry was experiencing structural problems and was unable to adequately perform the supervisory functions assigned to it.
Diplomacy
Zelenskyy urges US to grant Ukraine license to produce Patriot missiles
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he has asked the United States to grant Ukraine a license to manufacture missiles for the Patriot air defence system.
In a post on social media platform X, Zelenskyy argued that current US production of missile defence interceptors is insufficient and could contribute to crises in different parts of the world.
“Producing 60-65 missiles a month is nothing compared with the challenges we face today. This is no secret, and Russia knows it as well,” Zelenskyy wrote. “We need to expand production. As I requested from the previous US administration, I am asking the current administration to grant Ukraine a license to produce Patriot missiles.”
Zelenskyy said US companies possess advanced technologies that are not available in Ukraine, while Kyiv could contribute its extensive battlefield experience in return.
He also argued that granting such a license would benefit not only Ukraine, but also the Middle East and any country Washington chooses to support.
Washington pledges to maintain defence support
Zelenskyy’s remarks came a day after US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on May 30 that Washington would continue supporting Ukraine’s defence capabilities and ensure military shipments to Kyiv continue.
“We want them to be able to defend themselves, and we will find a way to help them do that,” Hegseth said.
Several days earlier, Yuriy Ihnat, spokesperson for the Ukrainian Air Force, warned that the country’s air defence forces were experiencing a shortage of missiles.
“Due to certain supply problems, we are practically at starvation levels when it comes to missiles today,” Ihnat said.
Concerns persist over air defence missile stocks
In April, Zelenskyy warned that Ukraine’s stockpile of air defence missiles could be exhausted at any moment.
He said that under current conditions, air defence missiles were more critical for Ukraine than the air defence systems themselves.
Highlighting what he described as a critical shortage of Patriot missiles, Zelenskyy said: “We are facing a deficit now that could hardly be worse.”
Concerns that Ukraine could face a severe shortage of US-made air defence missiles had previously been reported by Reuters.
The situation was expected to worsen as the United States and its allies depleted significant portions of their arsenals during tensions with Iran, a point Zelenskyy also underscored.
In a separate statement in January, Zelenskyy said Ukraine lacked sufficient missiles for both US- and European-made air defence systems.
The Ukrainian leader said he had been forced to personally secure every package of missiles from European countries and the United States.
-
Asia2 weeks agoIran conflict accelerates yuan adoption and record CIPS volumes in global oil trade
-
Asia2 weeks agoXi and Putin deepen partnership with call for ‘multipolar world’
-
Europe2 weeks agoFive EU states push gradual single market access for Western Balkans
-
Middle East1 week agoLeaked documents show IRGC routed Chinese military equipment through UAE
-
Europe1 week agoFrench justice minister calls for three-year halt to legal immigration
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoNATO weighs Hormuz security mission if Iran blockade remains in place by July
-
Middle East1 week agoIran says Hormuz transit will remain free but ships must cover operational costs
-
Europe2 weeks agoGermany initiates diplomatic contact with France’s National Rally ahead of presidential election
