Connect with us

Europe

UK eyes Kosovo for processing asylum seekers arriving by small boats

Published

on

According to The Times, the UK will ask Kosovo to accept asylum seekers arriving in the country on small boats.

Ministers and officials have shortlisted Kosovo, which Serbia does not recognize as independent, among nine countries identified as potential overseas centers for sending asylum seekers who have exhausted all appeal routes in the UK.

Kosovo’s President Vjosa Osmani also stated that her country was “open” to a potential agreement with the UK regarding the acceptance of rejected asylum seekers.

Kosovo has entered the list of countries London wants to discuss the issue with. These countries include Serbia, North Macedonia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, and several outside Europe.

No formal talks have started with any country yet, but it is understood the British government wants to make progress by the West Balkan leaders’ summit in London in the autumn, where illegal immigration will be at the top of the agenda.

The government had hoped Albania would also be open to hosting one of the return centers, but Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama rejected this last week.

Senior government sources indicated that Kosovo was a “reasonable” country in which to establish a return center, as it is situated on one of the primary routes used by “illegal immigrants” heading to the EU.

According to the Foreign Office, approximately 22,000 “illegal immigrants” entered the EU via the West Balkan route last year.

Evidence that migrants have passed through a country designated to host a return center is viewed as a significant factor in streamlining their deportation process. The UK would then be able to argue that these migrants had the opportunity to seek asylum in a “safe” country but chose not to.

According to Frontex, the EU’s border agency, over 3,000 migrants entered the EU via the West Balkans in the first four months of the year, with 804 of these entries recorded in April. The majority of these migrants originated from Afghanistan, Turkey, and Syria.

Keir Starmer is facing mounting pressure over his perceived inability to address the increasing number of migrants arriving in small boats. To date, 13,573 migrants have made the crossing this way, a figure 37% higher than during the corresponding period last year.

Kosovo’s President Osmani reiterated last week that her country remains open to the idea of hosting one of the UK’s proposed return centers.

Osmani had said, “There has been no formal discussion with the UK on this matter. It has not been brought up so far. We are open to discussing this issue, but I cannot say more as I do not know the details. I cannot respond to a request that has not yet been made.”

Several European countries, including Italy, Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, and Switzerland, are considering establishing offshore centers for illegal immigrants.

Any such agreement would necessitate the UK providing payment for each asylum seeker who cannot be successfully relocated or processed through these centers.

Kosovo has previously demonstrated its willingness to enter into international agreements to accept individuals not welcomed by other European nations. In 2021, for instance, it signed a €200 million deal with Denmark to house 300 foreign prisoners. These inmates are intended to serve the remainder of their sentences in Kosovo pending repatriation to their home countries, though this particular agreement has yet to be implemented.

Shadow Foreign Secretary David Lammy visited Kosovo last month, where he signed an agreement for the UK to potentially provide technology aimed at preventing the country from being exploited by organized crime groups for smuggling goods and migrants into the UK.

In March, the EU announced its approval for member states to establish return centers, and Keir Starmer is reportedly willing to cooperate with other European nations on this front. Currently, the Netherlands is in negotiations with the Ugandan government to open such a facility.

During a visit to Albania earlier this month, the UK Prime Minister confirmed that the government is actively pursuing the concept of establishing return centers, stating, “I see these as a really important innovation.”

Last month, The Times revealed that the concept of return centers has received endorsement from the UN’s refugee agency, UNHCR. This development was described by government officials as a “game-changer.”

Shadow Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has discussed with UN High Commissioner for Refugees Filippo Grandi the possibility of the UK compensating Balkan countries for accepting asylum seekers whose claims have been rejected by the UK.

The UNHCR’s backing for these centers is considered crucial for their viability, particularly since the agency’s intervention in the High Court case against the Conservative government’s Rwanda plan contributed to that plan being ruled illegal.

The Labour Party’s plans will be different from the Conservative government’s Rwanda deportation plan, which is designed to send illegal immigrants to the African country on one-way flights within days of their arrival in the UK without hearing their asylum claims.

Sources aligned with the Labour Party have dismissed the possibility of establishing a return center in Rwanda, as the party does not deem Rwanda a safe country. Furthermore, sources within the Labour Party have emphasized that any proposed return center plan must satisfy Keir Starmer’s criteria of being “cost-effective, workable, and legal.”

Europe

German importers await details as China signals easing of rare earth restrictions

Published

on

German importers of rare earth minerals and magnets are eagerly awaiting details after Beijing announced last week that it would expedite export approvals for European companies.

Two major importers told Nikkei Asia that China’s export controls on seven rare earth elements, implemented on April 4 in retaliation for Washington’s extensive trade tariffs, disrupted nearly all supplies to Germany for about two months. With China holding a near-monopoly on these commodities, some companies have depleted their inventories.

The US informed reporters on Tuesday that a dispute over China’s rare earth export restrictions had been resolved by both sides following two days of talks in London, though no specifics were provided.

Rare earths are crucial for electronics manufacturers and automakers, used in components such as electric seats, steering wheels, brakes, wipers, and even sound systems. They are also utilized in weapons manufacturing due to their ability to withstand high temperatures.

Since Beijing’s April 4 announcement, Chinese authorities have rarely granted export permits through processes that the Federation of German Industries described as lacking transparency and clarity. China is seeking to have Europe relax its technology export restrictions, particularly on semiconductor manufacturing equipment produced by the Dutch company ASML.

So far, German automakers have not been as severely affected as smaller manufacturers, such as those in the electronics sector. Companies like Volkswagen and Mercedes-Benz operate large production facilities in China and often source rare earth elements directly. Amid this turmoil, Volkswagen confirmed it had received a limited number of import permits.

The process has been much more challenging for Noble Elements, a Berlin-based importer and trader of physical raw materials.

“We ordered dysprosium, but it never left the port, so we changed the order to the light rare earth elements neodymium and praseodymium because we didn’t want to have the $100,000 we paid for it blocked there,” Managing Director Andreas Kroll told Nikkei Asia.

Dysprosium, which is almost entirely controlled by China, is one of the heavy rare earth elements subject to Beijing’s export controls. It is in high demand for permanent magnets used in electric vehicle motors and wind turbine generators. According to data from Noble Elements, its wholesale price surged by over 50% to €550 ($808) per kilogram in the two months leading up to June 4.

The prices of neodymium and praseodymium, also vital for permanent magnets, are now rising as Chinese producers increase the prices of these lighter rare earth elements to compensate for lost sales.

Kroll mentioned that Chinese officials demanded pictorial evidence of processing methods and the intended end-use to prevent the production of military equipment.

“Given [China’s recent assurances], the licensing process is now expected to become faster, but the main issue will be the proof of civilian use, which will depend on how extensively the checks are conducted,” Kroll said, adding that Beijing will consider Europe’s stance on chip technology exports.

Continue Reading

Europe

Blackstone plans a $500 billion investment push into Europe

Published

on

Investment firm Blackstone Inc. plans to invest up to $500 billion in Europe over the next decade.

Speaking to Bloomberg, CEO Stephen Schwarzman explained that these plans highlight the region’s growing appeal to investors amid geopolitical shifts.

“We see a great opportunity in this,” Schwarzman stated. “European countries are starting to change their approaches, and we believe this will lead to higher growth rates.”

Other investors also targeting Europe

Blackstone is not the one company viewing Europe as an attractive region for investment.

At an industry conference in Berlin last week, representatives from BC Partners, Permira, and Brookfield Asset Management expressed similar intentions.

A trillion-dollar giant

Founded in 1985, Blackstone entered the real estate investment market in 1991. The company is now the world’s largest alternative investment management firm, with over $1 trillion in assets under management.

Headquartered in New York, the company has 27 offices across the US, Europe, and Asia.

According to the company’s financial results, Blackstone’s net profit for the first quarter of 2025 was $614.9 million, a 27.1% decrease compared to the same period last year. The company’s revenue also fell by 11% to $3.29 billion.

Interest in the United Kingdom and the Middle East

CEO Schwarzman noted that Blackstone employs 650 people in its London office. He added that the firm has become one of the largest foreign investors in the United Kingdom, with approximately $100 billion invested in the country.

Schwarzman also expressed the company’s interest in the Middle East, stating that the rapid growth of cities like Riyadh and Dubai is creating “attractive opportunities.”

Continue Reading

Europe

Meloni government implicated in spyware scandal, claims victory in referendum failure

Published

on

Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni experienced a significant setback followed by a major victory within the span of a week.

The setback originated from a parliamentary inquiry into the Israeli spyware, Graphite. The parliamentary committee confirmed that the government had utilized this spyware, developed by the offensive cyber company Paragon, to hack the smartphones of several activists working with migrants.

The committee verified that Paragon supplied Graphite to two Italian institutions, including the country’s foreign intelligence service, starting in 2023. According to the report, the version of Graphite provided did not include the capability to activate a phone’s microphone or camera. Instead, it allowed operators to access encrypted communications on the hacked devices.

The report also confirmed that Graphite exploited a vulnerability in WhatsApp, which Meta detected and fixed in December 2024, just one month before the spyware’s activities were publicly disclosed. A recent report on Israeli television revealed that the discovery of this vulnerability caused panic within Unit 8200, Israel’s military intelligence unit.

Government’s use of Israeli spyware confirmed

The Italian committee also confirmed Meta’s claim that the phones of several activists involved in migrant rights in Italy had been hacked. These activists included Luca Casarini, Giuseppe Caccia, and David Yambio. However, in Yambio’s case, the hacking was carried out by another, unnamed spyware, not Graphite.

According to the committee’s final report, the phone of investigative journalist Francesco Cancellato, known for his criticism of the country’s ruling party, was not hacked by Italian intelligence agencies. The report stated that these activists were legally monitored and that the use of spyware against them was coordinated with the relevant legal authorities in Italy.

Nevertheless, the committee recommended improving the oversight mechanisms that regulate the use of spyware in the country. It also emphasized that Casarini and Caccia were targeted in operations initiated by previous governments before Giorgia Meloni came to power.

Israeli company halts Italian intelligence access

Paragon developed the Graphite spyware, which has been sold to intelligence and law enforcement agencies in Israel, Europe, the US, and Singapore. In January, WhatsApp announced it had detected that approximately 100 user accounts were hacked using Paragon’s spyware.

The list of potential targets included civil society activists and an Italian investigative journalist who had exposed links between Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s party and neo-fascist movements.

Unlike Israel’s more famous spyware manufacturer, NSO, Paragon promotes itself as a “clean and responsible” company committed to human rights. This was the first time it faced backlash over allegations of misuse of its spyware, which allows states to access encrypted devices.

After Meta announced the WhatsApp hack, Paragon cut off the Italian intelligence agency’s access to its systems until the results of the ongoing parliamentary commission inquiry in Rome were released. According to a recent report by the Israeli television program Zman Emet (Real Time), Italian officials were so angered by Paragon’s decision that the Italian prime minister reportedly called Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to demand an explanation.

Referendum boycott proves effective

Italy’s attempt to repeal significant labor and citizenship laws through five national referendums failed due to low turnout, which remained at 30%. This participation rate was well below the 50% required for the results to be valid.

According to the Italian Ministry of the Interior, approximately 30% of eligible voters participated in the two-day referendum, which aimed, among other things, to halve the time migrants must live in Italy before they can apply for citizenship.

Although polling was open on Sunday and Monday (June 8-9) until 3:00 PM, turnout never approached the constitutional threshold. The referendums—four concerning the protection of workers’ rights and one on reducing the residency requirement for non-EU citizens applying for Italian citizenship from 10 to 5 years—were declared invalid due to insufficient participation.

The referendum, supported by the left-wing opposition and activist groups, sought to repeal a 1992 law that had increased the residency requirement for non-EU foreigners from 5 to 10 years. Had the referendum succeeded, 2.5 million foreign migrants who have lived in Italy for five years or more would have been immediately eligible to apply for citizenship.

Among those who did vote, support for the “Yes” campaign was overwhelming: about 80% supported the changes to labor laws, while approximately 65% backed the citizenship proposal. However, because the quorum was not met, the results have no legal standing.

The referendum campaign began amid heated debates following Italy’s Olympic gold medal win last year with a women’s volleyball team composed of daughters of African immigrants.

Opposition blames government as ruling party declares victory

The opposition parties, which largely supported the referendums, accused the government of deliberately suppressing turnout by calling for a boycott, thereby discouraging voters from going to the polls. Forza Italia was particularly active in this tactic, drawing criticism for a social media post urging voters to “go to the beach” instead of the ballot box.

As soon as the failure was certain, Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s party, Fratelli d’Italia (Brothers of Italy), went on the offensive. The party shared an image of opposition leaders with the caption “You lost,” claiming the referendums were a veiled attempt to weaken the government.

Government officials framed the result as a broader endorsement of the status quo. Deputy Prime Minister Giovanbattista Fazzolari stated, “The opposition tried to turn the five referendums into a vote against the Meloni government. The result is clear: the government has emerged stronger, and the left weaker.”

Once it became clear the referendum would not reach a quorum, Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini announced that his Lega party would push for stricter laws to make naturalization even more difficult. “Citizenship is not a gift,” Salvini said in a statement. “We want stricter and tougher rules to become an Italian citizen. A few more years of residence is not enough.”

In response, Pina Picierno, a Democratic Party deputy and Vice President of the European Parliament, described the outcome as a “deep, serious, and avoidable defeat.” She warned her own side against “political myopia,” adding, “Outside our bubble, there is a country that wants a future, not a settling of old scores.”

Italy’s state broadcaster, Rai, and other mainstream media outlets and newspapers almost completely censored coverage of the referendum. On the Sunday of the vote, the national newspaper headlines barely mentioned it.

Calls for reform from both sides

While the vote exposed Italy’s deep-seated political divisions, it also revealed a rare point of consensus: the current referendum system is facing increasing criticism. Representatives from both the government and the opposition have openly called for its reform, albeit for very different reasons.

Antonio Tajani, leader of Forza Italia and Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs, argued that issues put to a referendum should require more signatures and questioned the cost of the current system. “Perhaps the time has come to revise the law,” Tajani said. “Considering the money spent, for example, on the hundreds of thousands, even millions, of ballots sent abroad and returned blank, the signature threshold may need to be raised.”

These remarks drew sharp criticism from referendum supporters. Riccardo Magi, leader of +Europa and chairman of the citizenship referendum committee, called Tajani’s comments “literally shameful,” noting that the government showed no concern for the “much more expensive and scandal-ridden detention centers in Albania.”

“It is dangerous to play with public disillusionment,” Magi warned, announcing he would propose a constitutional amendment to abolish the turnout requirement.

Continue Reading

MOST READ

Turkey