America
US mulls mandatory social media checks for all foreign student visa applicants
The US administration is evaluating a proposal to mandate social media reviews for all foreign students applying to study in the country.
In preparation for this potential requirement, a memorandum dated Tuesday and reportedly signed by Senator Marco Rubio, instructed US Embassies and consulates to suspend scheduling new interview appointments for student visa applicants.
A State Department directive mentioned in the memorandum states, “In preparation for the expansion of necessary social media screening and review processes, consular sections should not increase visa appointment capacity for student or exchange program participants (F, M, and J) until further instruction by septel, which we expect to be issued in the coming days.”
“Septel” is an abbreviation used by the State Department for “separate telegram.”
The administration had previously introduced some social media screening requirements, primarily targeting returning students who might have participated in protests against Israel’s actions in Gaza.
The document does not explicitly state what future social media audits will target but references presidential decrees aimed at “keeping out terrorists” and “combating antisemitism.”
According to POLITICO, many State Department officials have privately complained for months that past instructions on screening students—for example, those who might have participated in campus protests—were vague.
For instance, it remains unclear whether sharing a Palestinian flag on an X account would subject a student to additional review.
State Department: Every sovereign country’s right
State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce avoided direct comment on Rubio’s reported directive, stating that no public announcement had been made.
Bruce said, “Every sovereign country has the right to determine who is trying to enter the country, why they want to enter, who they are, what they have done, and at least within that framework, what they will do here. This is not new. And we will continue to use all the tools at our disposal to assess who is coming here, whether they are students or not.”
Halting or even slowing visa applications would affect hundreds of thousands of students globally and numerous educational institutions in the US, which increasingly rely on attracting international talent.
Speaking to Bloomberg, Cleveland-based immigration lawyer David Leopold suggested that such a move by the administration could be “devastating, even catastrophic” for both international students and the US universities dependent on them. Leopold emphasized that the economic and cultural impacts would be enormous.
International students: A vital financial resource for universities
International students constitute 5.9% of the approximately 19 million total US higher education population. In the 2023-2024 academic year, over 1.1 million foreign students came to the US, with India sending the largest number, followed by China.
Most international students in the US pursue studies in science, technology, engineering, or mathematics (STEM). Approximately 25% study mathematics and computer science, while one-fifth choose engineering.
Foreign students typically pay full tuition fees. According to the Open Doors Report, supported by the State Department, New York University, Northeastern University, and Columbia University host the largest numbers of foreign students, each with over 21,000.
The decision concerning student visa interviews on Tuesday followed by a few days an attempt by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to prevent Harvard University from enrolling international students. A federal judge quickly issued a temporary halt to this initiative.
White House reportedly aims to terminate federal contracts with Harvard
The administration is also reportedly moving to cancel all remaining federal contracts with Harvard, valued at approximately $100 million.
The Trump administration is allegedly pressuring federal agencies to terminate their contracts with Harvard.
The General Services Administration (GSA) asserted that Harvard engaged in racial discrimination in admissions and other aspects of campus life. In a letter sent Tuesday, the GSA requested assistance for agencies in “reviewing for termination or transition of federal government contracts” with Harvard.
Josh Gruenbaum, Commissioner of the GSA’s Federal Acquisition Service, wrote in the letter to federal procurement officials, obtained by POLITICO, “We recommend that your agency terminate, as appropriate, any contracts it has identified as not meeting its standards and transition contracts that could be better served by an alternative counterparty to a new vendor.”
The GSA has asked agencies to report their plans regarding contracts with Harvard by June 6.
University of California next in ‘antisemitism’ investigation sights
As the White House intensifies its scrutiny of higher education, the Trump administration has pledged to expand its investigations on university campuses beyond Ivy League institutions to other schools, including the University of California (UC) system.
Leo Terrell, identified as head of the Justice Department’s “combating antisemitism” task force, stated that the UC system should expect “large-scale lawsuits,” adding that universities on the “East Coast, West Coast, and Midwest” could also face legal action.
Rachel Zaentz, senior director of strategic and critical communications for the UC president’s office, contended that the University of California “condemns antisemitism” and is working to eliminate it system-wide.
Zaentz added that the institution is cooperating with the Trump administration, stating, “The University is fully focused on strengthening our programs and policies to eliminate antisemitism and all forms of discrimination.”
In an interview with Fox News on Tuesday, Terrell remarked, “We are pursuing all our activities in the courtroom. Trump will not back down.”
Terrell also warned that they would target universities in ways that “will hurt them very financially.”
The advisor specifically cited federal hate crime charges and Title VII lawsuits, which focus on discrimination in hiring, as potential tools the administration might use.
America
Unauthorised AI agents access customer accounts at major US banks
Incidents have been detected at the largest US banks in which unauthorised artificial intelligence agents gained access to customer accounts.
According to a report by Axios based on sources, some of these AI agents attempted to take actions that were not included in user instructions.
Institutions facing risks arising from such agents include leading lenders such as Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, JPMorgan, Wells Fargo, and Citi.
In some cases, AI software entered customer accounts using usernames and passwords directly with user consent.
In contrast, security rules at most banks require users to log in to their accounts personally.
According to Axios, in other instances, AI agents designed to carry out tasks on behalf of customers contacted bank call centres directly or tried to take independent steps without receiving any instruction from the user.
Bank executives worry that such software with access to credentials could make unauthorized purchases or transfer funds.
Following these risks, banks are moving to restrict third-party AI agents from accessing their platforms. While Morgan Stanley has begun blocking such software, JPMorgan, Bank of America, and Citi are also introducing similar restrictions.
Banks are also considering offering a financial access model that gives AI agents read-only permissions while completely cutting off transaction capabilities.
Sources speaking to Axios point out that it is extremely difficult for banks to determine whether an agent is acting on user instructions or accessing the account entirely on its own initiative.
Regulators hold emergency meeting with systemically risky banks
According to reports by Bloomberg and the Financial Times citing sources, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell held an extraordinary meeting in April with top executives of the country’s largest banks over concerns about cyber threats that could be posed by a new AI model developed by Anthropic.
Sources providing details on the talks stated that US officials wanted to gauge bank awareness regarding risks tied to the Claude Mythos model and inspect the measures they have taken to protect their systems.
Senior executives from Citigroup Inc., Bank of America Corp., Wells Fargo & Co., Goldman Sachs Group Inc., and Morgan Stanley attended the meeting.
Organised at short notice, the summit indicated that regulatory authorities view this new breed of cyber attack as one of the greatest threats to the financial sector.
All of the banks represented at the table are classified as systemically important institutions within the global financial architecture.
Axios reported that leading AI firms, including Anthropic and OpenAI, harbour concerns that an AI-driven “catastrophic event” could take place over the next 6 to 12 months.
America
US wealthy demolish multimillion-dollar mansions for land
Wealthy buyers in the US are tearing down multimillion-dollar homes shortly after purchasing them for hundreds of millions of dollars.
According to a report by The Wall Street Journal, the trend is driven by a shortage of land in prestigious locations, particularly along coastlines.
For ultra-wealthy buyers, the prime factor has become the land’s location rather than the structure standing on it. After the acquired properties are flattened, newer, more modern homes are built on the cleared lots.
Drawing attention to the shift in the luxury real estate market, the report noted:
“The home itself, formerly the primary driver of an expensive real estate purchase, is now almost beside the point. Buyers are competing first and foremost for well-located land, situated on the ocean or a mountaintop.”
The newspaper cited moves by US billionaire William Lauder as an example. Lauder purchased the oceanfront estate of radio host Rush Limbaugh, who died in March 2023, for $155 million and had it completely demolished in July.
Lauder had previously torn down two homes situated on roughly 1.2 hectares of land along the Palm Beach coast. Having initially planned to construct his own residence on the parcel, Lauder subsequently sold the cleared plot for approximately $200 million.
Jonathan Miller, a real estate appraiser, stated that such transactions are becoming increasingly common as land prices rise.
Amid this momentum, estate agents have also begun marketing luxury homes directly as teardown lots.
Listings use artificial intelligence-generated imagery to showcase how the land would look without the structures on it.
Marketers avoid using the word “demolition” directly, resorting instead to terms such as “adaptive reuse”.
Teardown listings rise across luxury housing market
The trend is not confined to the coast and is spreading to other regions across the US.
Data from property brokerage Redfin reveals that references to demolishing buildings are becoming more frequent in sales listings.
The share of such listings exceeds 15% in the Bunker Hill Village area of Houston, while standing at 6.67% in Pimmit Hills, Virginia.
Dina Goldenteyer, a real estate agent working in Miami, remarked that serial demolitions have become more frequent because buyers no longer appreciate homes older than a decade.
Former retail executives Jamie Dooley and Christine Scott spent $3.7 million in 2020 to demolish a seaside home near Destin, Florida.
Although the couple spent five years building a modern home on the cleared site, they listed the resulting new structure with a demolition condition, citing the fact that no one wanted to buy the property as it stood.
William Paddock, an employee at the environmental consultancy WAP Sustainability, pointed to the environmental damage caused by this construction cycle.
Paddock emphasized that tearing down a home of roughly 1,000 square metres and replacing it with a new building of approximately 2,700 square metres generates a carbon footprint equivalent to the annual emissions of an average 250 American households.
America
US inflation reaches 3.7% as midterm election campaign intensifies
An uptick in September inflation as the US midterm elections approach has pushed the cost-of-living debate back to the centre of the agenda for Democrats seeking to regain control of Congress from Republicans.
Annual inflation stood at 3.7% in September, according to the Consumer Price Index published by the Bureau of Labour Statistics, with energy, petrol, and electricity costs rising on a monthly basis.
Food prices remained flat from August to September, recording a 2.5% increase compared with the same period last year.
Democrats are anchoring their election campaigns to pledges of easing the cost of living, blaming the price increases on President Donald Trump’s tariffs and the war with Iran.
Trump and Republicans, pointing to the numerous left-wing candidates who won primary elections this year, contend that the opposition has become captive to “communists” within the party.
When annual inflation stood at 2.4% in February, the US and Israel launched the Iran war on the final day of that month, and prices continued to climb throughout the conflict.
The recent acceleration has not entirely reversed the retreat from the 40-year peak of 9.1% recorded in June 2022; however, the rate has remained above the Federal Reserve’s 2% target for over five years.
Fed policymakers raised the benchmark interest rate by a quarter of a percentage point last month, citing the battle against stubborn inflation. Officials will convene again next week to consider whether to raise rates or hold them within the 3.75% to 4% target range.
Energy and fuel record sharpest increase since first month of war
In September, energy prices posted their largest monthly jump since March, the first full month of the war with Iran, climbing 20.4% year-on-year. Energy costs had risen 2.1% from July to August, after falling 1.5% from June to July and 5.7% from May to June.
Recent escalations in Iranian attacks on oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz, alongside more frequent strikes by Ukrainian forces against Russian refineries, have strained global crude oil and refined product markets, driving up US petrol and diesel prices.
Petrol prices also recorded their sharpest monthly increase since the first month of the war, climbing 9.1% from August to September, bringing the annual increase to 35.3%.
American Automobile Association (AAA) data shows the average price of regular petrol across the US stands at $4.26 per gallon; while below the level of roughly $4.48 recorded a month ago, it remains more than $1.20 higher than a year earlier. Average gallon prices exceed $6 in California and $5 in both Washington state and Nevada.
Electricity prices rose 0.2% from August to September, offsetting the 0.2% decline between July and August, and were up 4.4% year-on-year.
Heavy power demand from new data centres is feeding through into local household electricity bills. Trump argued that companies must cover the cost of the electricity required by their data centres themselves.
In a post on Truth Social, Trump claimed that he was requiring large data centres to generate their own power and feed the surplus back into the local grid, suggesting this could bring about “a major drop” in electricity prices.
Used vehicle market posts monthly rise as food costs stabilise
The cost of food at home fell 0.1% month-on-month in September, while dining out increased 0.2%.
Egg prices dropped to $2.27 a dozen, falling roughly 35% compared with September 2025 and remaining well below the 20-year peak of $6.23 recorded in March 2025.
Ground beef prices rose roughly 2.4% compared with September 2025, but at $6.48 a pound, they remained below the 20-year high of $6.98 reached in June.
Chicken held steady at its year-earlier level of $2.06 per pound last month, having fluctuated between $2.01 and $2.09 since November 2024.
Used car and truck prices fell 1.5% compared with September 2025, but rose 0.7% month-on-month in September following 0.4% increases in both July and August.
Heather Long, chief economist at Navy Federal Credit Union, noted that the sector faces severe pressure stemming from a combination of expensive replacement parts and a shortage of skilled labour.
Speaking to The Hill, Long emphasised that every cost pressure across the market is being felt directly at local auto repair shops.
-
Europe2 weeks agoBerlin Left Party backs Israel’s right to exist for coalition pact
-
America2 weeks agoTrump weighs presidential memorandum to cut surging US diesel prices
-
Diplomacy1 week agoSWP urges backing for Gulf trade routes bypassing Strait of Hormuz
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoEU and China reach preliminary deal to curb hybrid car imports
-
Europe1 week agoLSE study finds post-bailout Greece turned into a cafe economy
-
America2 weeks agoThiel targets Pope and Obama over AI in new ‘Antichrist’ lectures
-
America2 weeks agoEnergy firms enlist ex-US officials to tap Venezuelan oil
-
Russia2 weeks agoRussia relaxes diesel export curbs after talks with Trump
