Asia
US forges ‘Pax Silica’ alliance to counter China in AI and semiconductor race
Australia, the United Kingdom, Israel, South Korea, Japan, and Singapore have accepted the “Pax Silica” strategic initiative proposed by the US. This initiative includes a commitment to “create a secure, prosperous, and innovation-focused silicon supply chain, from critical minerals and energy inputs to advanced manufacturing, semiconductors, artificial intelligence infrastructure, and logistics.”
According to an analysis in AsiaTimes, the Netherlands and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) also attended the Pax Silica Summit in Washington on December 12 but did not sign the Pax Silica Declaration.
Taiwan was invited as a special guest. Canada and the EU reportedly participated in discussions regarding supply chain issues. India was notably absent from the summit.
Pax Silica formalizes the semiconductor and artificial intelligence alliance established by the US under the Trump and Biden administrations. From Washington’s perspective, it also defines the “practical limits of self-sufficiency” that the initiative aims to achieve, serving as the first line of defense in the world’s new geostrategic competition.
The official website of the US Department of State states, “Pax Silica is the State Department’s flagship effort on AI and supply chain security, building a new economic security consensus among allies and trusted partners.”
According to Under Secretary for Economic Affairs Jacob Helberg, “If the 20th century ran on oil and steel, the 21st century runs on computers and the minerals that power them. This historic declaration heralds a new economic security consensus that enables like-minded partners to build tomorrow’s AI ecosystem.”
The Pax Silica Fact Sheet states the following:
“Pax Silica aims to reduce coercive dependencies, protect the materials and talent that form the foundation of AI, and ensure that like-minded countries can develop and deploy transformative technologies at scale.
Pax Silica is a positive-sum partnership. Its purpose is not to isolate others, but to coordinate with partners who want to remain competitive and prosperous.”
However, although the Pax Silica Declaration does not explicitly name China, it clearly targets the country.
The declaration points to the importance of addressing “non-market practices that undermine innovation and fair competition.” Emphasizing the significance of private investment, Pax Silica notes that coordination is necessary to “protect these investments from market distortions of overcapacity and unfair dumping practices and to preserve a level playing field for innovation and growth.”
The declaration states, “We understand the importance of cooperation in the implementation of our respective policies to protect sensitive technologies and critical infrastructure from undue access, influence, or control.”
In comments reported by Politico, Under Secretary Helberg explicitly targeted China and its Belt and Road Initiative, stating:
“This is an industrial policy for the economic security coalition, and it’s a game-changer because there is no group today where we can come together on the AI economy and how we’re going to compete with China in the AI space. By aligning our economic security approaches, we can begin to move in concert to basically block China’s Belt and Road Initiative, which is designed to grow its export-oriented model, by blocking China’s ability to buy up ports, major highways, transportation, and logistics corridors.”
Arguing that the Pax Silica group will assume a role for AI similar to the one the G7 played in the industrial age, the under secretary asserted, “This commits us to a process where we’re going to be cooperating on aligning our export controls, screening foreign investments, combating anti-damping, but with a very proactive agenda to secure the chokepoints in the global supply chain system.”
According to the Fact Sheet, the initiative responds to the “growing demand from partners to deepen economic and technological cooperation with the US.” This implies that the US is asking its partners not to engage in a similar relationship with China.
Referencing Pax Romana and Pax Americana, the declaration says, “Pax Silica is a new kind of international grouping and partnership, bringing together the countries that are home to the world’s most advanced technology companies to unlock the economic potential of the new AI age.”
Pax Silica does not say anything new about the Taiwan issue and offers no concrete proposals regarding the supply of rare earth elements, but it does offer some relief to partner countries uneasy about US protectionism:
“We believe that true economic security requires reducing over-dependencies and forging new connections with trusted partners and suppliers committed to fair market practices. At the same time, we will seek to ensure trusted partners have access to all the technological breakthroughs that are shaping the AI economy.”
For Japan and South Korea, key component suppliers, joining Pax Silica is both a way to please a potential Trump administration and a green light for their own national semiconductor projects.
On the day the Pax Silica Summit was held in Washington, the Japanese press reported that about 20 more companies were considering investing in Rapidus, a new chip foundry being built near Sapporo on the northern island of Hokkaido.
Rapidus is a Japanese venture established to catch up with TSMC, a cutting-edge semiconductor contract manufacturing company, aiming to begin mass production at the 2-nanometer node in 2027 and at 1.4 nm shortly thereafter.
Founded in 2022, Rapidus was initially backed by Sony, Toyota and its semiconductor manufacturer Denso, NAND flash memory producer Kioxia, national telecom operator NTT, telecom equipment manufacturer NEC, investment firm Softbank, Japan’s largest bank Mitsubishi UFJ, and the Japanese government. Rapidus is collaborating with IBM to commercialize IBM’s 2 nm process technology.
Since then, 22 new investors have emerged, including Honda, Fujitsu, Canon, Fujifilm, Seiko Epson, Ushio, Kyocera, JX Advanced Metals, Dai Nippon Printing, Hokkaido Electric Power, Nippon Express, Nohmi Bosai (fire prevention), Argo Graphics (digital design and manufacturing process technology), Nagase Sangyo (specialty chemicals and functional materials), seven commercial banks, and the Development Bank of Japan. Additionally, Organo is building and will own the water treatment facilities within the plant.
Rapidus has thus transformed into a comprehensive public-private national industry project.
In South Korea, the government has announced an “AI Age Semiconductor Development Strategy,” which includes plans to build 10 new semiconductor factories and increase the country’s fabless (design-only) semiconductor sector tenfold.
This strategy was publicly announced on December 10 by Minister of Trade, Industry, and Resources Kim Jung-kwan during the “Artificial Intelligence (AI) Age K-Semiconductor Vision and Development Strategy Briefing,” chaired by President Lee Jae Myung.
As reported by Business Korea, the strategy aims to “move beyond [South Korea’s] current semiconductor industry structure centered on memory semiconductors and develop system semiconductors, including fabless and foundry, while also enhancing competitiveness in materials, components, and equipment to leap forward as the world’s second-largest semiconductor powerhouse.”
While Pax Silica can be seen as an American strategy, it also provides a platform for the industrial policies of Japan and South Korea, which do not want to cede technological leadership to China and seek to maximize the benefits of their partnership with the US.
Asia
Chinese Politburo signals cautious confidence as Beijing pivots toward targeted tech support
The mid-year meeting of the Communist Party of China (CPC) Politburo has long served as a critical evaluation point for Beijing. The session provides the central government with an opportunity to review developments from the first half of the year and steer the country toward a more realistic economic course in the months ahead.
The latest statement from the top leadership signals cautious confidence. The release indicates that policymakers are favoring a stable, targeted approach over the broad-based stimulus measures that characterized previous years. As China manages its economic transition, the post-Covid era of aggressive spending has clearly drawn to a close. In its place, a strategic and structural approach has taken hold, prioritizing resilience and stability over short-term capital injections.
According to the outcomes of the Politburo meeting, the policy orientation will continue to target specific sectors. Financial support will be directed away from the property market and toward high-tech emerging industries such as artificial intelligence and semiconductors. In the real estate sector, the objective remains stabilizing market confidence and keeping debt risks under control.
Infrastructure investment is likewise being reshaped around the concept of “new infrastructure.” The focus is no longer solely on concrete and physical structures; smart power grids, information technology networks, and data infrastructure have taken precedence.
This approach signifies an investment in future competitiveness rather than simply pumping capital into the economy’s more stagnant sectors. Serving as a new driver of growth, digital infrastructure fulfills a dual purpose: supporting domestic demand in the short term while safeguarding technological competitiveness over the long term.
Finally, Beijing is signaling a more conciliatory posture in international trade. The Chinese leadership aims to establish a more balanced trade framework to mitigate concerns voiced by trade partners such as the European Union over what has been termed “China Shock 2.0.”
As the administration prepares for critical leadership changes next year, its primary focus will remain on stability across both economic and social spheres.
China continues to strike a balance between realistic growth targets and systemic restructuring, maintaining policy leeway to absorb potential external shocks. Beijing’s economic strategy reflects a pragmatic assessment of both domestic and international challenges.
Struggling with weak demand, the domestic economy is not yet in a position to anchor national growth independently. Expansion continues to rely heavily on a record trade surplus alongside the impressive export performance of high-tech and clean energy sectors. However, this reliance has drawn pushback from several trading partners.
To stimulate domestic economic activity and ease trade tensions, Beijing unveiled its first standalone five-year plan focused on consumption. Released in July by the National Development and Reform Commission and the Ministry of Commerce, the plan targets an increase in retail sales to 60 trillion yuan (approximately $8.9 trillion) by 2030. This represents an increase of roughly 20% compared to 2025 levels.
To improve profit margins for small businesses, regulatory authorities are tackling the issue of “involution”—described as excessive internal competition—by curbing platform monopolies and preventing destructive price wars. While these structural adjustments may take longer to yield results, they are viewed as a more sustainable and effective alternative to direct cash handouts.
Asia
Chinese chipmaker profits surge 2,500% on explosive AI computing demand
Major Chinese microchip manufacturers saw their profits surge by 2,579.5% in the first half of 2026, driven by unprecedented demand for artificial intelligence and computing capacity.
Data from China’s National Bureau of Statistics, cited by the South China Morning Post (SCMP), underscored the industry’s sharp upward trajectory.
Yu Weining, senior statistician at China’s National Bureau of Statistics, explained that this surge is directly connected to the accelerating integration of artificial intelligence across various sectors.
Yu noted that this process has increased the need for computing capacity. The demand for computational processes also lifted profits across the entire electronics industry by 97% year-on-year.
Profits of major Chinese industrial enterprises with an annual revenue exceeding 20 million yuan ($2.9 million) rose 18.7% in the first six months of the year, reaching 4 trillion yuan.
In the first half of 2025, before the global data center construction process had begun, industrial profits had dropped by 1.8% to 3.4 trillion yuan, while profit growth in the electronics sector remained at 3.5%.
The SCMP reported that the global AI boom has generated explosive demand for high-performance computing systems and memory chips, causing a structural pivot in China’s industrial landscape.
Data showed that integrated circuit production in the first half of the year grew by 23% year-on-year to reach approximately 280 billion units.
This figure means that the country produced an average of more than 1.5 billion chips per day.
The profit growth is also corroborated by forecasts from China’s leading chipmakers. Shenzhen Longsys Electronics, one of the largest memory module manufacturers, expects its profits to increase by more than 600-fold in the first half of the year.
Flash memory maker GigaDevice projects that its net profit will surge by approximately 1,099% year-on-year due to supply shortages and rising product prices.
Chinese companies in the AI chip segment are also demonstrating strong profit growth, albeit at a more moderate pace compared to the memory market.
Hygon Information Technology, which develops central processing units and computing units for artificial intelligence, projects that its profits will rise by up to 52.3%.
CXMT hits record high on Shanghai Stock Exchange
Shares of Chinese chipmaker CXMT gained more than 500% on their first day of trading on the Shanghai Stock Exchange on July 27, jumping from 8.66 yuan to 55 yuan.
As a result of this sharp surge in its shares, CXMT’s market valuation reached 3.65 trillion yuan ($539 billion), making the company China’s most valuable publicly traded firm.
At the peak of the rally—even though quoted prices underwent a slight correction toward the close of the trading day—CXMT surpassed Tencent, which was trading on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange with a market capitalization of $514 billion.
Asia
Massive student movement over exam leaks forces resignation of India’s education minister
Indian public examination reform proposals follow education minister’s resignation after nationwide youth protests
India’s federal government introduced legislation in parliament on Monday to amend the law governing public examinations, days after the “Cockroach” movement forced the resignation of Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan following nationwide youth protests.
The bill incorporates enhanced sanctions, including longer prison sentences and higher fines for those found responsible for exam leaks and irregularities.
The demonstrations are widely viewed as the most significant youth-led challenge faced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi since he took office in 2014.
What triggered the protests?
Nearly 2 million students took the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET), an undergraduate medical entrance examination, in May. The federal National Testing Agency cancelled the exam on May 12 following allegations that question papers had been leaked. The examination was re-administered on June 21.
Young people took to the streets to protest against examination fraud, youth unemployment, and a perceived lack of future prospects.
According to a BBC report, the unemployment rate among university and college graduates aged 15 to 25 in the country stands at a critically high level of 40%. The addition of corruption in public examinations to existing economic strain broke the patience of the youth.
Abhijeet Dipke, founder of the Cockroach Public Party (CJP) movement, led the protests.
The movement derived its name from remarks made in May by Supreme Court Judge Surya Kant, who used the terms “cockroach” and “parasite” in a derogatory reference to unemployed youth and protesters. Young demonstrators adopted the insult as a symbol and named their movement after it.
How the movement unfolded
Young protesters organized street demonstrations demanding the resignation of Education Minister Pradhan. Dipke, who initiated the movement in New Delhi, subsequently organized protests in other parts of the country.
Sonam Wangchuk, one of the protesters, began a hunger strike at the demonstration site in support of the movement. As his physical condition deteriorated, authorities forcibly transferred him to a hospital.
The reaction to Wangchuk’s forcible removal from the protest site caused crowds at the venue to expand rapidly.
Tens of thousands of protesters faced tear gas and baton charges by police while attempting to march on parliament. Some demonstrators engaged in clashes with law enforcement officers.
CJP leaders held talks with ministers from the Modi government, who requested time to evaluate the protesters’ demands internally.
Modi called for unity among lawmakers in the ruling coalition to implement strict measures against exam paper leaks, punish those responsible, and establish a secure, leak-proof system.
Opposition representatives led by Rahul Gandhi staged a sit-in at the entrance of Modi’s official residence demanding Pradhan’s resignation. They were briefly detained by police before being released.
Opposition lawmakers supporting the student protesters disrupted proceedings in parliament. Demonstrations expanded to other regions of the country, including the financial hub of Mumbai.
In his first direct statement regarding the protests, published in a post on X, Modi announced that special courts would be established to prosecute individuals involved in exam paper leaks. Protesters rejected the proposal.
Movement leaders held a second round of talks with the government after Wangchuk ended his 26-day hunger strike.
Following those discussions, the government requested time until the afternoon of the following day to respond to the demand for Pradhan’s resignation.
Education Minister Pradhan subsequently announced his resignation, stating that he was stepping down in light of the situation at the protest site and across the country, as well as to prevent “external forces” from exploiting the environment.
On July 26, Modi announced the creation of a task force headed by technology entrepreneur Nandan Nilekani to overhaul the country’s examination system.
On Monday, July 27, the government presented a bill to parliament proposing amendments to the law governing public examinations. The legislation introduces stiffer penalties for offenders, including extended prison terms and increased monetary fines.
-
America2 weeks agoUS agricultural superpower status at risk as trade wars shift global markets to Brazil
-
America2 weeks agoUS controls $13 billion in Venezuelan oil revenues with little transparency, raising congressional concerns
-
Europe2 weeks agoUS secures multi-billion-dollar energy and AI deals at Three Seas summit in Dubrovnik
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoPalantir CEO Alex Karp says he would not vote for ‘pro-Russian’ AfD in Germany
-
Middle East2 weeks agoPentagon faces severe budget crunch as Middle East operational costs drain key military funds
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoWorld Bank warns US-Iran conflict could slash global growth to 1.3% as inflation looms
-
Middle East2 weeks agoOil passes $90 as tanker attacks halt Hormuz shipping
-
Europe2 weeks agoGermany accelerates African energy diplomatic push to secure natural gas and green hydrogen
