Asia
Women’s rights situation in Afghanistan
All human beings are born free and equal in terms of dignity and basic rights, and they deserve these rights because they are humans. However, in Afghanistan, the people are going through hardship in its history of human rights, especially women rights since the return of the Taliban on August 15 2021.
Today, the Afghan people have been deprived of their most basic and fundamental human rights, and Afghan women, making half of the society, have been completely excluded from political, social and economic life.
While the world insists on the equality of men and women in all human rights, the women in Afghanistan have been deprived of their most natural and basic rights such as rights to education, work, political participation, freedom, organizing gatherings, and protests, and etc….
In return, the Taliban’s response to women’s protests and lawsuit against these deprivations was nothing but intimidation and threats, severe repression, arbitrary arrests and imprisonment, murder and torture.
Rights to education
The right to education is one of the fundamental human rights. These have been also mentioned in Article 26 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Articles 28 and 29 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, Article 13 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and Article 10 of the Convention on the Elimination of Any Discrimination Against Women and other general international human rights documents. Humanity and women’s rights have been emphasized in these articles repeatedly.
Based on these rights, all people across the globe must have equal access to education. But Afghanistan, the only country in the world, has denied women of their right to education. The Taliban has banned women from school, university and education.
Rights to freedom
The Taliban also restricted women’s right to freedom in every level of society. Based on orders, all the women are required to wear long black dresses. Putting any other color in official places is punishable. The women must also cover their faces with a black mask. With these restrictions, the Taliban, in addition to removing the identity of women, are seeking to remove their face from society.
Moreover, the Taliban also restricted one of the most basic and natural rights of women, the rights to freedom of movement in the society.
Through a series of restrictions, the Taliban prevented adult women without a male partner from traveling abroad or even within the country to other provinces.
Sadly, women cannot go to government offices and hospitals and health centers without a male partner even in emergency cases. The restrictions come despite the fact that many women have lost their husbands and fathers in wars and explosions and have no male partner in their families.
Women have been deprived of all social and health services in the wake of these restrictions.
These restrictions also deprive many women from the opportunity of scholarships abroad or necessary trips for treatment.
Following a sequence of restrictions, the Taliban also banned women from going to parks, recreation centers, restaurants and women public baths.
This open discrimination is actually a violation of Article 13 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which emphasizes freedom of movement. Such laws do not exist in the laws of any country, even in Islamic states.
The Taliban want to remove women from society and remove their identities and physical appearance through these discriminatory actions. With these decisions, the Taliban violated important principles of human dignity, freedom and equality, which are at the top of all human rights and freedoms.
Right to work
Men and women are born free and are equal in terms of dignity and social rights, according to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as the most important human rights document agreed and accepted by all governments.
Taking note of this, all women have the right to enjoy the desired economic life, and have a free hand to choose a job to elevate themselves from poverty.
Moreover, based on these human rights declaration, women should not be subjected to torture or cruel punishment, and contrary to humanity and human affairs. They should also not be forced to accept a job and rather they must choose any occupation on their own.
Meanwhile, according to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, member states must recognize the right of women to work and provide them the opportunity to freely choose any job that would help support the family.
The Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women also emphasized on the fact that equality between men and women in employment leads to the realization of their rights, and also declares: Discrimination in any way against women’s employment rights violates the principle of equality and respect. It is human character and must not be violated.
With the return of Taliban into power, the Afghan women have been widely deprived of the right to work and ordered to stay at home. The Taliban dismissed female employees working in ministries, government offices, judicial courts and those who were serving in police rank.
Businesswomen, artists, athletes, audio and visual media employees, female journalists and employees of private companies have already lost their jobs as per Taliban order.
The Taliban in a recent decree banned women from all jobs, including those working in foreign institutions and relief organizations. This comes despite the fact that many of these women are the breadwinners of their families, who are now unemployed and struggling with poverty.
In many cases, these women started to beg at the streets or sell their children due to extreme poverty and destitution.
Such exclusion and restriction on women’s jobs, in addition to paralyzing the country’s economic and development cycle, leads to the spread of poverty and misery in the society.
The Taliban have deprived women from working under the pretext that their works are against Islamic standards.
These restrictions come despite the fact that there is no prohibition on women’s work and economic activity in Islamic laws.
If you look at other Islamic countries, women are equal to men in various jobs and play an active role in the development and prosperity of their country’s economy.
By banning women from workplaces, the Taliban have clearly violated one of its most basic human rights, which is mentioned in the most important international documents above.
Right to the politics
The right of political participation of women, equal to men, is clearly stated in the most important international documents.
Among other things, Article 21 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights deals with the right of political participation of all members of the society, including women, on equal terms with men.
Moreover, Article 25 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights emphasized the right of women to political participation in a society without discrimination.
Also, the Convention on the Political Rights of Women approved in 1952 explicitly and specifically deals with the implementation of the principle of equal rights of women and men in the enjoyment and exercise of political rights in accordance with the Charter and Covenant.
In addition, articles seven and eight of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, had also referred to women’s political participation and the right to vote in all elections and referendums, and the right to be elected and participate in determining government policy. It also touched upon appointing women to government positions and conducting government affairs in all levels are emphasized in equal terms with men.
Afghanistan is a member of all these conventions and human rights documents, but however, women’s right to political participation was completely violated, and no women are seen in the cabinet and high government positions. It won’t be a lie to say that women have been completely excluded from the country’s political scene.
Right to hold peaceful protests
Freedom of assembly and protest is one of the fundamental human rights, which is emphasized in Article 20 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 21 of the Convention on Civil-Political Rights, Conventions No. 87 and 98 of the International Labor Organization and other international and regional human rights documents.
All citizens and socio-political forces in a society have the right to make their voices heard by those in power through peaceful civil gatherings and demonstrations. These marches or gatherings come to make these politicians accountable for their policies, plans, actions and behavior.
However, the Taliban has so far tried to suppress the voice of protesters and went to beat, arrest, imprison and torture them. The women, who protest to defend their rights, face severe repressions that even put their lives and their families in serious danger.
Translated from etilaatroz
Asia
Pentagon plans covert spy ring for economic war on China, report says
The US Department of War (Pentagon) is reportedly planning to establish an extensive network of deep-cover agents to wage economic warfare against China and other adversaries of the US.
According to a report by The Washington Post citing six sources familiar with the initiative, the plan has not yet been put into effect. The newspaper reported that the initiative remains at the planning stage. The Pentagon, however, denies that any such initiative exists.
The report said the operatives would pose as entrepreneurs or private sector employees while concealing their ties to the US government. The network’s mission would be to gather economic intelligence and counter China.
The programme is led by Tom Rakusa, who spent 39 years at the CIA. Rakusa serves as a senior adviser to Deputy Secretary of Defence Steve Feinberg.
The proposed spy network is seen as part of a broader policy by the Donald Trump administration to sharpen economic competition with other countries.
The US is already resorting to tariffs, export controls, and investment in strategic sectors, alongside expanding its economic intelligence gathering.
According to The Washington Post, the new initiative demonstrates the Pentagon’s growing influence under the Trump administration. The department is currently seeking a record budget of $1.5 trillion.
Trade war flares up again with Trump’s return to the White House
The trade friction between the US and China flared up again following Donald Trump’s return to the White House. In April 2025, Washington raised tariffs on Chinese goods to as much as 145%, and Beijing retaliated with tariffs of up to 125%.
In May, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio described China as the primary geopolitical challenge facing Washington. Rubio said that to avoid war, the two sides needed to manage their conflict of interests.
In July, Chinese expert Zheng Yongnian did not simply warn that underestimating the US could prove to be a “fatal mistake”; he stated it explicitly.
According to Zheng’s assessment, the US maintains its primacy through the role of the dollar, its military superiority, and its technological advantages.
Even so, the two sides agreed in June to declare a truce and lower tariffs. In autumn 2026, the US and China extended their trade truce until 10 January 2027.
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the extension would give the parties more time to discuss economic issues.
Trade deals do not eliminate the strategic contradictions between the two countries. Financial Times columnist Rana Foroohar likened the race between the two nations for commercial, technological, and geopolitical influence to the 19th-century “Great Game” between the Russian and British empires.
Foroohar cited China’s standing in shipbuilding and commercial maritime transport, as well as its expanding footprint in overseas ports, among its key advantages.
Asia
Japan plans curbs on short-term home sales to cool urban prices
Japan’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) plans to restrict short-term property trading to rein in surging home prices in major urban centres, particularly Tokyo.
Led by Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, the party aims to make support for working households a core priority ahead of local elections scheduled for April next year.
The LDP’s research commission on housing and land policy met on Wednesday to discuss the issue.
According to a report by the Nikkei Asia newspaper, Commission Chair and LDP lawmaker Midori Matsushima said at the opening of the meeting: “Prices of newly built condominiums across Tokyo’s 23 wards have doubled over the past decade. We must work on measures ensuring that people who wish to live in these homes can actually afford to buy them.”
Homeownership in the capital has become virtually unattainable for broad segments of the population. According to data from the Real Estate Economic Institute, the average sale price of a newly built condominium in Tokyo’s 23 wards rose %18.5 in fiscal 2025 compared with the previous year, reaching 137.84 million yen (around $872,000).
Meanwhile, statistics from the Ministry of Labour show that the average annual income of a full-time worker in the capital remained at 6.78 million yen in fiscal 2025. This widening gap between incomes and residential property prices is directly shaping political priorities.
During its campaign for the House of Representatives election in February, the LDP pledged to curb speculative transactions across metropolitan Tokyo and other regions. Earlier this month, a party project team focused on policies concerning foreign nationals also submitted a recommendation urging the government to introduce immediate tax measures against rising home prices.
Under current legislation, profits realized from properties sold within five years of acquisition are classified as “short-term capital gains”. These returns face a tax rate approaching %40, including income tax and local inhabitant tax.
Although this rate is twice the approximately %20 levied as “long-term capital gains” tax on properties held for more than five years, several party members argue it remains insufficient to deter speculation. Calls to tighten the framework may be considered as part of the annual tax reform package to be drafted in December alongside the LDP’s coalition partner, the Japan Innovation Party.
The ruling bloc wants to present concrete housing pledges to voters heading to the polls in April across numerous urban centres, including 22 of Tokyo’s wards where local assembly terms expire.
“We need to support families with children, who are typically at the stage of purchasing a home,” a senior LDP official said.
Opposition parties are also preparing alternative proposals that target not only prospective homebuyers, but also residents forced into the rental market by high property prices and now affected by escalating rents.
Tax steps take precedence over limits on foreign buyers
Several countries seeking answers to housing affordability pressures have imposed direct restrictions on foreign purchasers. In South Korea, real estate policies played a major part in the declining public approval ratings of President Lee Jae Myung.
In August 2025, authorities in Seoul introduced an approval requirement for foreign nationals buying homes in the capital and adjacent areas, while also mandating that buyers reside in the properties for at least two years.
Canada and Australia have enacted temporary bans on foreign residential purchases, while Singapore levies a %60 additional stamp duty on foreign buyers.
The role of overseas investors in Japan’s property market also drew debate during the February election. However, restrictions aimed directly at foreign nationals are viewed as potentially conflicting with international trade and services agreements.
Consequently, rather than imposing restrictions based on the nationality of buyers, the government is discussing tax measures aimed at speculative real estate deals, such as rapid resales.
Fears that sharp market measures could shake regional banks
Concerns have also surfaced that aggressive steps to force down prices could harm the wider national economy.
A senior LDP tax official cautioned that a steep drop in land prices could weaken local financial institutions, warning: “We must consider the impact on regional banks.”
The real estate sector accounts for roughly %18 of total lending by Japanese banks. This proportion sits well above the %10 level recorded during Japan’s bubble economy of the mid-to-late 1980s.
At certain regional banks, property lending accounts for nearly half of total loan portfolios.
According to March 2025 data from the Financial Services Agency, approximately one-quarter of all loans extended by regional banks to the real estate sector are concentrated directly in Tokyo’s five central wards.
Buoyant asset valuations, supported in part by rising stock indices, have underpinned strong public approval for the Takaichi administration. Observers note that property interventions designed to cool the market could drag down equity prices and weaken the government’s standing.
A senior official on the LDP research commission stressed that decision-makers must act with caution regarding the scope and timing of any measures intended to bring price increases under control.
Asia
South Korea plans $120B spend on eight US nuclear power plants
South Korea will spend $120 billion to construct eight nuclear power plants in the US under an agreement that provides for $350 billion in investments in exchange for lower tariffs.
The South Korean government also announced that Seoul and Washington will begin examining a liquefied natural gas (LNG) project in Alaska comprising a large-scale pipeline to transport natural gas from the north of the state to the south, alongside the construction of an LNG terminal for exports overseas.
Seoul stated that a decision regarding the LNG project will be made following a commercial feasibility study. However, US President Donald Trump said that South Korea would invest $54 billion in the project, pointing to an apparent lack of full coordination between the two sides on the matter.
Trade and Industry Minister Kim Jung-kwan said in a statement: “This announcement opens a new horizon of cooperation where the two countries join forces to develop joint commercial ventures in strategic areas directly linked to economic security and future sectors such as artificial intelligence, nuclear energy, and LNG.”
“We will adhere to the principle of prioritising national interests and investing solely in commercially viable projects,” Kim said.
Speaking at the White House, Trump characterised South Korea’s plans as “one of the largest energy infrastructure investments in American history”.
The announcement followed a meeting between Trump and South Korean President Lee Jae Myung roughly one year ago at the APEC Economic Leaders’ Meeting held in South Korea, where they agreed on the creation of a $350 billion investment fund.
Under that agreement, $150 billion was allocated to the shipbuilding sector and $200 billion to other sectors. In return, the US announced it would reduce tariffs imposed on goods imported from South Korea from 25% to 15%.
Under the nuclear power project, South Korea’s state-controlled utility will build two plants in the US, while Pennsylvania-based Westinghouse Electric will construct six plants.
According to the South Korean government, this will mark the first instance in which a foreign country builds its own nuclear power plants in the US.
South Korean firms are also evaluating the possibility of acquiring a stake in Westinghouse as part of negotiations over sharing profits generated by the project.
South Korea additionally announced that it will build a $22.3 billion natural gas-fired power plant in Texas with a capacity of 6,472 megawatts.
The facility will be designed to supply electricity directly to nearby data centres. The project’s first phase is targeted to begin commercial operations in 2029, with full-capacity operations slated for 2032.
Seoul also disclosed that it had agreed to allow the US to receive 50% of the profits generated by the projects until South Korea recoups all of its investments.
After South Korea fully recovers its total investment amount, 90% of the profits will go to the US.
-
Europe2 weeks agoBerlin Left Party backs Israel’s right to exist for coalition pact
-
America2 weeks agoHow will Brazil’s presidential runoff work?
-
Diplomacy2 weeks agoThe West is preparing for war not with Russia, but with its own people, French analyst Georges Kuzmanovic insists
-
Russia2 weeks ago71 EU lawmakers demand closure of Russian Houses in 15 member states
-
Europe2 weeks agoMI6 investigates potential leaks after former BND chief is detained
-
Russia2 weeks agoUS and Russian figures discuss American stake in Nord Stream lines
-
Russia2 weeks agoDrone strike shuts down Yandex data centre in Russia’s Ryazan region
-
America2 weeks agoTrump weighs presidential memorandum to cut surging US diesel prices
